Czy (centralne) katalogi biblioteczne są jeszcze potrzebne? OPAC w infotopii

Marek Nahotko

doi:10.18778/0860-7435.29.03

Authors

Marek Nahotko Jagiellonian University, Institute of Information Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-7435.29.03

Keywords:

metadata interoperability, union catalogues, OPAC, big data, Linked Open Data

Abstract

The article presents the basic function of union catalogues: ensuring interoperability of library metadata. The problem of metadata interoperability was defined as an element of cooperation of information systems, especially functioning in the network. The methods used to ensure interoperability were presented. Three technologies were described that should facilitate metadata interoperability in the future: NoSQL databases, cloud applications and Linked Open Data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bermes, Emmanuelle (2011). Convergence and interoperability: a Linked Data perspective. In: World Library and Information Congress: 77th IFLA General Conference and Assembly. Puerto Rico, 13–18 August 2011. Pobrane 28 maja 2019, z: https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2011/149-bermes-en.pdf
Google Scholar

Breeding, Marshall (2012). Current and future trends in information technologies for information units. El profesional de la información, 21, 9–15.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.ene.02

Carney, David J. & Smith, James & Place, Patrick R. (2005). Topics in interoperability: infrastructure replacement in a system of systems. Report nr CMU/SEI2005-TN-031. Pitsburgh: Carnegie Mellon Univ.
Google Scholar

Chan, Lois M. & Zeng, Marcia L. (2006). Metadata interoperability and standardization – a study of methodology part I. Achieving interoperability at the schema level.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/june2006-chan

D-Lib Magazine, 12 (6). Pobrane 25 maja 2019, z: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html
Google Scholar

Coyle, Karen (2017). Creating the catalog, before and after FRBR. Pobrane 15 czerwca 2019, z: http://kcolyle.net/mexico.html
Google Scholar

Dunsire, Gordon i in. (2012). Linked Data vocabulary management: infrastructure support, data integration, and interoperability. Information Standards Quarterly, 24, 4–13.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv24n2-3.2012.02

Heath, Tom & Bizer, Christian (2011). Linked Data. Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publ.
Google Scholar

IFLA (2005). Sharing of bibliographic information and resources. Pobrane 12 czerwca 2019, z: http://archive.ifla.org/VII/d4/pub/InteroperabilityStandards.pdf
Google Scholar

Katal, Avita & Wazid, Mohammad & Goudar, Rayan H. (2013). Big data: issues, challenges and good practices. In: M. Parashar (ed.), Sixth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), Noida, India 8–10 Aug. 2013 (p. 404–409). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Google Scholar

Kienzler, Iwona (2003). Słownik terminologii komputerowej angielsko-polski i polsko-angielski. Gdynia: IVAX.
Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus (2017). Tell data from meta: tracing the origins of big data, bibliometrics, and the OPAC. OSIRIS, 32 (1), 224–240.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/694228

Manso-Callejo, Miguel & Wachowicz, Monica & Bernabé-Poveda, Miguel-Angel (2009). Automatic metadata creation for supporting interoperability levels of spatial data infrastructure. Pobrane 12 maja 2019, z: http://www.gsdi.org/gsdiconf/gsdi11/papers/pdf/194.pdf
Google Scholar

Mitchell, Erik (2013). Programmatic tools and the implications of automation in the next generation of metadata. Technical Services Quarterly, 30, 296–310.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2013.785802

Nahotko, Marek (2013). Współdziałanie metadanych w systemach informacyjnych. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej, 1, 61–83.
Google Scholar

Nahotko, Marek (2014). Współdziałanie metadanych w chmurze. Przegląd Biblioteczny, 1, 3–24.
Google Scholar

Nilsson, Mikael (2010). From interoperability to harmonization in metadata standardization. Stockholm: KTH School of Computer Science and Communication.
Google Scholar

NISO (2004). Understanding metadata. Bethesda: NISO Press.
Google Scholar

Pacek, Jarosław (2010). Bibliografia w zmieniającym się środowisku informacyjnym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SBP.
Google Scholar

Radwański, Aleksander (2015). System biblioteczny jako powszechna usługa sieciowa i baza danych. W: M. Odlaniecka-Poczobutt (red.), Systemy biblioteczne nowej generacji. Platformy usług (s. 31–38). Gliwice: TYPO Usługi Wydawnicze.
Google Scholar

Sandy, Heather M. (2019). Explaining cataloging to a six year old? Technical Services Quarterly, 36, 379–390.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2019.1664092

Su, Shiao-Feng (1994). Dialogue with an OPAC: how visionary was Swanson in 1964? The Library Quarterly, 64, 130–161.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/602674

Subieta, Kazimierz (1999). Słownik terminów z zakresu obiektowości. Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza PLJ.
Google Scholar

Taylor, Arlene & Joudrey, Daniel (2008). The Organization of information. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
Google Scholar

Tennant, Roy (2002). MARC must die. Library Journal, October 15, 26–28.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Kristen (2012). Introducing the next generation of library management systems. Serials Review, 38, 110–123.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2012.10765438

Zeng, Marcia L. & Chan, Lois M. (2006). Metadata interoperability and standardization – a study of methodology part II. Achieving interoperability at the record and repository levels. D-Lib Magazine, 12. Pobrane 5 czerwca 2019, z: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/zeng/06zeng.html
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/june2006-zeng

Zeng, Marcia L. & Qin, Jian (2008). Metadata. New York: Neal-Schuman Publ.
Google Scholar