Integrated Management of Metropolitan Areas in Romania

Justyna Danielewicz

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.351.04

Autor

Justyna Danielewicz University of Łódź, Faculty of Management, Department of City and Regional Management Łódź, Poland http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-7054

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.351.04

Słowa kluczowe:

współrządzenie, obszary metropolitalne, zintegrowane planowanie i zarządzanie, Rumunia

Abstrakt

Zachodzące na świecie procesy gwałtownej urbanizacji prowadzą między innymi do dynamicznego rozwoju obszarów metropolitalnych. Powiązania funkcjonalne między jednostkami terytorialnymi wchodzącymi w skład obszaru metropolitalnego powodują, że w celu zapobiegania negatywnym skutkom metropolizacji i zapewnienia zrównoważonego rozwoju takiego obszaru należy koordynować na poziomie metropolitalnym przygotowanie spójnych gospodarczo, przestrzennie i środowiskowo strategii. To z kolei wymaga zmiany podejścia do zarządzania rozwojem w kierunku współrządzenia i zintegrowanego planowania rozwoju. Celem artykułu jest ocena, czy zintegrowane planowanie i zarządzanie jest stosowane w obszarach metropolitalnych Rumunii. W badaniach wykorzystano metodę desk research, w ramach której przeanalizowano rumuńskie ustawodawstwo dotyczące obszarów metropolitalnych, zintegrowane strategie rozwoju obszarów metropolitalnych oraz raporty z ich realizacji. Cennym uzupełnieniem informacji były wywiady z przedstawicielami wybranych stowarzyszeń obszarów metropolitalnych.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Ahrend R., Kim S. J., Lembcke A. C., Schumann A. (2017), Why Metropolitan Governance Matters and How to Achieve It, [in:] D. Gómez‑Álvarez, R. Rajack, E. López‑Moreno, G. Lanfranchi (eds.), Steering the metropolis: metropolitan governance for sustainable urban development, IDB, Washington, pp. 51–60.
Google Scholar

Albrechts L. (2006), Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects, “European Planning Studies”, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1487–1500.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600852464

Ambruosi C. S., Baldinelli G. M., Cappuccini E., Migliardi F. (2010), Metropolitan Governance: Which Policies for Globalizing Cities?, “Transition Studies Review”, no. 17, pp. 320–331.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-010-0145-3

Benedek J., Varvari Ş., Litan C. M. (2019), Urban Growth Pole Policy and Regional Development: Old Wine in New Bottles?, [in:] T. Lang, F. Görmar (eds.), Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation. New Geographies of Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp. 173–195.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1190-1_8

Blowers A., Pain K. (1999), The unsustainable city?, [in:] S. Pile, C. Brook, G. Mooney (eds.), Unruly Cities? Order/Disorder, Routledge, London, pp. 247–298.
Google Scholar

Brody S. D. (2003), Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management, “Journal of Planning Education and Research”, no. 22, pp. 407–419.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03022004007

Bulkeley H., Betsill M. (2005), Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the ‘Urban’ Politics of Climate Change, “Environmental Politics”, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 42–63.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178

Candel J. J.L. (2017), Holy Grail or inflated expectations? The success and failure of integrated policy strategies, “Policy Studies”, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 519–552.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1337090

Combes P. P., Duranton G., Gobillon L. (2011), The identification of agglomeration economies, OECD, Paris, pp. 253–266.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq038

Cook I. R., Swyngedouw E. (2012), Cities, social cohesion and the environment: towards a future research agenda, “Urban Studies”, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1959–1979.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012444887

Cristea M., Ionescu‑Heroiu M. (2017), Turning Romania’s secondary cities into engines of growth, https://blogs.worldbank.org/europeandcentralasia/turning-romania-s-secondary-cities-engines-growth [accessed: 14.09.2020].
Google Scholar

Danielewicz J. (2013), Zarządzanie obszarami metropolitalnymi wobec globalnych procesów urbanizacji, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-914-8

Enhanced Spatial Planning as a Precondition for Sustainable Urban Development (2013), http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/782491468296462975/pdf/Full‑report.pdf [accessed: 22.08.2020].
Google Scholar

European Committee of the Regions, Romania, https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/Romania.aspx [accessed: 15.08.2020].
Google Scholar

Feiock C. R. (ed.) (2004), Metropolitan Governance. Conflict, Competition and Cooperation, Georgetown University Press, Washington.
Google Scholar

Geerlings H., Stead D. (2003), The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research, “Transport Policy”, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 187–196.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00020-9

Grigorescu I., Mitrică B., Mocanu I., Ticană N. (2012), Urban Sprawl and Residential Development in the Romanian Metropolitan Areas, “Romanian Journal of Geography”, vol. 56, pp. 43–59.
Google Scholar

Growth Poles. The Next Phase (2013), http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/286101468105256650/pdf/Full‑report.pdf [accessed: 25.08.2020].
Google Scholar

Guvernul României (2019), Codul administrativ din 03 iulie 2019.
Google Scholar

Healey P. (2010), Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty‑First Century, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01379-8

Heinelt H., Kübler D. (2004), Metropolitan governance in the 21st century. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448083

Hințea C., Neamțu B. (2014), Strategic Planning in the Framework of Metropolitan Areas in Romania: Going beyond the Requirements of the Law and Transforming it into an Effective Planning Tool, “The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy”, vol. VII, no. 2, pp. 71–97, https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2014-0004
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2014-0004

Hotărârea nr. 1513/2008 privind completarea Hotărârii Guvernului nr. 998/2008 pentru desemnarea polilor de creștere și a polilor de dezvoltare urbană în care se realizează cu prioritate investiții din programele cu finanțare comunitară și națională, Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 813 din 04 decembrie 2008.
Google Scholar

Hull A. (2008), Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities?, “Transport Policy”, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 94–103.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004

Ionescu‑Heroiu M. (2016), Metropolitan development is central to Romania’s economic development, https://blogs.worldbank.org/europeandcentralasia/metropolitan-development-central-romania-s-economic-development [accessed: 15.08.2020].
Google Scholar

Karta Lipska na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju miast europejskich, 2007, Lipsk.
Google Scholar

Lege nr. 350 din 6 iunie 2001 privind amenajarea teritoriului și urbanismul, Monitorul Oficial nr. 373 din 10 iulie 2001.
Google Scholar

Lege nr. 351 din 6 iulie 2001 privind aprobarea Planului de amenajare a teritoriului național – Secțiunea a IV‑a Rețeaua de localități, Monitorul Oficial nr. 408 din 24 iulie 2001.
Google Scholar

Lege nr. 315 din 28 iunie 2004 privind dezvoltarea regionala în România, Monitorul Oficial nr. 577 din 29 iunie 2004.
Google Scholar

Lege nr. 100 din 19 aprilie 2007 pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii nr. 351/2001 privind aprobarea Planului de amenajare a teritoriului naţional – Secţiunea a IV‑a – Reţeaua de localităţi, Monitorul Oficial nr. 284 din 27 aprilie 2007.
Google Scholar

Lege nr. 215/2001, Monitorul Oficial, nr. 123 din 20 februarie 2007.
Google Scholar

Mantey D. (2013), Zintegrowane zarządzanie miastami i obszarami metropolitalnymi, “Infos”, no. 4(141), pp. 1–4.
Google Scholar

Markowski T. (2011), Funkcjonowanie gospodarki przestrzennej – założenia budowy modelu zintegrowanego planowania i zarządzania, “Studia KPZK PAN”, vol. CXXXIV, pp. 25–44.
Google Scholar

Miller D. Y., Lee J. H. (2009), Making sense of metropolitan regions: A dimensional approach to regional governance, “Publius: The Journal of Federalism”, vol. 41, pp. 126–145.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjp040

Morgan D. R., Mareschal P. (1999), Central‑city/suburban inequality and metropolitan political fragmentation, “Urban Affairs Review”, no. 34, pp. 578–595.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922184086

Newig J., Fritsch O. (2009), Environmental governance: Participatory, multi‑level – and effective, “Environmental Policy and Governance”, no. 19, pp. 197–214.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.509

Ordonanța nr. 53/2002 privind Statutul‑cadru al unității administrativ‑teritoriale, Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 633 din 27 august 2002.
Google Scholar

Paulsson A. (2020), The city that the metro system built: Urban transformations and modalities of integrated planning in Stockholm, “Urban Studies”, vol. 57, no. 14, pp. 2936–2955.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019895231

Portney K. E. (2009), Sustainability in American cities: A comprehensive look at what cities are doing and why?, [in:] D. A. Mazmanian, M. E. Kraft (eds.), Toward sustainable communities, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 227–254.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262134927.003.0009

Rotmans J., Asselt M. van, Vellinga P. (2000), An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities, “Environmental Impact Assessment Review”, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 265–276.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00039-1

Solecki W. D., Leichenko R. M. (2006), Urbanization and the Metropolitan Environment: Lessons from New York and Shanghai, “Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development”, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 8–23.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.48.4.8-23

Stead D., Meijers E. (2009), Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors, “Planning Theory & Practice”, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 317–332.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229752

Tosun J., Lang A. (2017), Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts, “Policy Studies”, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 553–570.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239

Urban Agenda for the EU. Pact of Amsterdam (2016), Amsterdam.
Google Scholar

Vigar G. (2009), Towards an integrated spatial planning?, “European Planning Studies”, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1571–1590.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903226499

World Bank (2013), Growth Poles. The Next Phase, Washington, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/24488 [accessed: 27.08.2020].
Google Scholar

World Bank Group (2020), International Practices of Metropolitan Governance A Compendium of Collaborative Arrangements in Metropolitan Areas, Washington.
Google Scholar