Czy inwestorzy na rynku surowców powinni być przesądni (na przykładzie 29 towarów)?

Autor

  • Krzysztof Borowski SGH, Instytut Bankowości i Ubezpieczeń Gospodarczych

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.337.05

Słowa kluczowe:

efektywność rynków, anomalie kalendarzowe, efekt pechowych dat

Abstrakt

Problem efektywności rynków finansowych zawsze stanowił przedmiot zainteresowania badaczy. Zagadnienie to jest niezwykle ważne z punktu widzenia oceny efektywności zarządzania portfelem aktywów, a także w ujęciu finansów behawioralnych. W artykule, na przykładzie stóp zwrotu 29 surowców, zweryfikowana została hipoteza dotycząca występowania tzw. dni pechowych. Badaniu poddane zostały stopy zwrotu obliczone w następujących ujęciach: cena zamknięcia – cena zamknięcia, overnight, cena otwarcia – cena otwarcia oraz cena otwarcia – cena zamknięcia dla sesji przypadających w następujących dniach: 13. i 4. dzień każdego miesiąca, 13. i piątek oraz 13. i wtorek każdego miesiąca. Badanie potwierdziło występowanie efektów sezonowych w tzw. dni pechowe.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Agrawal A., Tandon K. (1994), Anomalies or illusions? Evidence from stock markets in eighteen countries, “Journal of International Money and Finance”, vol. 13, pp. 83–106.
Google Scholar

Agarwal S., He J., Liu H., Png I., Sing T., Wong W. (2014), Superstition and assets markets: evidence from Singapore housing, SSRN Working Paper, 2416832.
Google Scholar

Aggarval R., Rivoli P. (1989), Seasonal and day‑of‑the week effects in four emerging stock markets, “Financial Review”, vol. 24, pp. 541–550.
Google Scholar

Auer B., Rottman H. (2013), Is there a Friday the 13theffect in emerging Asian stock markets?, OTH im Dialog: Weidener Discussionpapiere, no. 35.
Google Scholar

Barone E. (1990), The Italian stock market: Efficiency and calendar anomalies, “Journal of Banking and Finance”, vol. 14, pp. 493–510.
Google Scholar

Botha F. (2013), Stock returns and Friday the 13th effect in five African countries, “African Review of Economics and Finance”, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 247–253.
Google Scholar

Boudreaux D. (1995), The monthly effect in international stock markets: evidence and implications, “Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions”, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–20.
Google Scholar

Boyle G., Hagan A., O’Connor S., Whitwell N. (2014), Emotion, fear and superstition in the New Zealand stock market, Working Paper New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competitionand Regulation Inc.
Google Scholar

Chamberlain T., Cheung C., Kwan C. (1991), The Friday the Thirteenth effect: myth or reality, “Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics”, vol. 30, pp. 111–117.
Google Scholar

Chaundler C. (1970), Every man’s book of superstition, A.R. Mowbray and Co., London.
Google Scholar

Coutts J. (1999), Friday the thirteenth and the Financial Times industrial ordinary shares index 1935–94, “Applied Economics Letters”, vol. 6, pp. 35–37.
Google Scholar

Defusco R., McLeavey D., Pinto J., Runkle D. (2001), Quantitative methods for investment analysis, United Book Press, Baltimore.
Google Scholar

Dyl E., Maberly E. (1988), The anomaly that isn’t there: a comment on Friday the Thirteenth, “Journal of Finance”, vol. 43, pp. 1286–1295.
Google Scholar

Fama E. (1970), Efficient capital markets; a review of theory and empirical work, “Journal of Finance”, vol. 25, pp. 383–417.
Google Scholar

Feltovich N., Harbaugh R., To T. (2002), Too cool for school. Signaling and countersignalling, “RAND Journal of Economics”, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 630–649.
Google Scholar

Fortin N., Hill A., Huang J. (2013), Superstition in the housing market, Discussion Paper no. 7484, IZA, Bonn.
Google Scholar

Fudenberg D., Levine D. (2006), Superstition and rational learning, “American Economic Review”, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 630–651.
Google Scholar

Gu A. (2003), The declining January effect: Evidence from U.S. equity markets, “Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance”, vol. 43, pp. 395–404.
Google Scholar

Hirshleifer D., Ming J., Huai Z. (2012), Superstition and financial decision making, Working Paper, University of California, Irvine.
Google Scholar

Kalayaan C. (2016), Superstition in the Philippine stock market, “Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research”, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 84–96.
Google Scholar

Kato K., Schwarz S., Ziemba W. (1990), Day of the weekend effects in Japanese stocks, [in:] E. Elton, M. Gruber, Japanese Capital Markets, Ballinger, New York.
Google Scholar

Kolb E., Rodriguez R. (1987), Friday the thirteenth: part VII – a note, “Journal of Finance”, vol. 42, pp. 1385–1387.
Google Scholar

Kramer T., Block L. (2008), Conscious and non‑conscious components of superstitious beliefs in judgment and decision‑making, “Journal of Consumer Research”, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 783–793.
Google Scholar

Latif M., Arshad S., Fatima M., Rarooq S. (2011), Market efficiency, market anomalies, causes, Evidences and some behavioral aspects of market anomalies, “Research Journal of Financeand Accounting”, vol. 2, no. 9/10, pp. 1–14.
Google Scholar

Lepori G. (2009), Dark omens in the sky: do superstitious beliefs affect investment decisions?, SSRN Working Paper 1428792.
Google Scholar

Lucey B. (2000), Friday the 13th and the philosophical basis of financial economics, “Journal of Economics and Finance”, vol. 24, pp. 294–301.
Google Scholar

Ng T., Chong T., Du X. (2010), The value of superstitions, “Journal of Economic Psychology”, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 293–309.
Google Scholar

Patel J. (2009), Recent evidence on Friday the thirteenth effect in U.S. stock returns, “Journal of Business and Economics Research”, vol. 7, pp. 55–58.
Google Scholar

Scalon T., Luben R., Scalon F., Singleton N. (1993), Is Friday the 13th bad for your health?, “British Medical Journal”, vol. 307, pp. 1584–1587.
Google Scholar

Schwert W. (2002), Anomalies and market efficiency, Simon School of Business Working Paper, no. FR 02–13.
Google Scholar

Shum M., Sun W., Ye G. (2014), Superstition and ‘lucky’ apartments: evidence from transaction‑level data, “Journal of Comparative Economics”, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 109–117.
Google Scholar

Smirlock M., Starks M. (1986), Day‑of‑the‑week and intraday effects in stock returns, “Journal of Financial Economics”, vol. 17, pp. 197–210.
Google Scholar

Sutheebanjard P., Premchaiswadi W. (2010), Analysis of calendar effects: Day‑of‑the‑week effect on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), “International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance”, vol. 1, pp. 2010–2023.
Google Scholar

Tsang E. (2004), Toward a scientific inquiry into superstitious business decision‑making, “Organization Studies”, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 923–945.
Google Scholar

“USA Today” (2007), Some hotels don’t skip the 13thfloor anymore, August 3, pp. 12–13.
Google Scholar

Vargha A., Delaney H. (1998), Kruskal‑Wallis test and stochastic homogeneity, “Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics”, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 170–192.
Google Scholar

Zhang Y., Risen J., Hosey C. (2014), Reversing one’s fortune by pushing away bad luck, “Journal of Experimental Psychology”, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 1171–1184.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2018-09-20

Jak cytować

Borowski, K. (2018). Czy inwestorzy na rynku surowców powinni być przesądni (na przykładzie 29 towarów)?. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 4(337), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.337.05

Numer

Dział

Artykuł

Podobne artykuły

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.