East European countryside in transition - case study of Serbia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.16.15

Keywords:

rural development and landscape, restoration and revitalization of the village, cultural heritage, historical colonization of the landscape

Abstract

Modern Serbian village, in the form of bulk or dense settlements, its architecture, constructive materials, spatial layout, functions and ways of exploitation of the soil, vary to some extent in some parts of the country. Natural conditions, time of occurrence, type of farm (if still there), and social structure ‒ all these factors affect rural development and landscape change. All changes in the way of cultivation and function of villages affected the development of construction zones, which were redesigned and rebuilt over many years ‒ not always to the benefit of cultural heritage. The evidence that urbanization can be seen in the Serbian countryside (as in other European countries) are considered in this work, with necessary illustrations. In the process of continuous change, attention should focus on preserving the identity of places and forms of developmental events. Initiated projects are focused on development and reconstruction of infrastructure and preservation of cultural heritage. Awareness of cultural values of Serbian villages and landscapes as subjects of a kind of historical colonization has been shaped during long-term transformation.

References

Beyerlin U., 1997, Dezentrale grenzüberschreitente Zusamenarbeit als internationales Rechtsphenomen, „Archiv des Völkerrechts”, 27(3).
Google Scholar

Dorfenentwicklung. Das Luftbild als Planungshilfe, 1984, Ministry für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und Forsten Baden-Württemberg.
Google Scholar

Findrik R., 1994, Narodno neimarstvo ‒ Stanovanje, Sirogojno.
Google Scholar

Findrik R., 1998, Dinarska brvnara, Sirogojno.
Google Scholar

Findrik R., 1999, Vajat – znamenje mladosti, Sirogojno.
Google Scholar

Fürst D., Ritter E.H., 1993, Landesentwicklungsplanung und Regionalplanung. Ein Grundriss Verwaltungswissenschaftlicher, Düsseldorf.
Google Scholar

Goppel K., 1991, Raumordnung und Recht, „Raumforschung und Raumordnung”, 2‒3, Berlin.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.1807

Haindl E., Landzettel W., 1991, Heimat ‒ ein Ort irgendwo?, Mensch, Dorf, Landschaft.
Google Scholar

Hubler K.H., Kaether J., 1999, Nachhaltige Raum und Regisnalentwicklung ‒ bleibt wo sie?, Befunde, Perspektiven und Vorschläge, Wissenschaft und Forschung, Berlin.
Google Scholar

Malchus V. Frh., 1991, Perspektiven für die Regionen an den EG-Binnengrenzen, „Raumforschung und Raumordnung”, Berlin, Materialien zur Ländlichen Neuordnung ‒ Heft 28th Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, München.
Google Scholar

Shaping New Europe, 2000, Strategic Targets for 2000‒2005 ‒ European Commission Information for the European Parliament, Council UE, Economical and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2014-01-01

How to Cite

Milosevic, P. (2014). East European countryside in transition - case study of Serbia. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica, (16), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.16.15

Issue

Section

Articles