The spatial nature of matrimonial behaviours

Anna Janiszewska

doi:10.18778/1508-1117.23.08

Authors

Anna Janiszewska Katedra Geografii Regionalnej i Społecznej Wydział Nauk Geograficznych, Uniwersytet Łódzki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.23.08

Keywords:

matrimonial behaviours, marital selection, behavioural geography

Abstract

The work presents a research approach of behavioural geography to the analysis of man’s spatial behaviours. Matrimonial behaviours constitute those which are influenced to a greater degree by behavioural factors (social status, education, nationality, religion) than spatial factors. Although in the process of marital selection, the future spouse’s spatial features are important during selection, other features, such as demographic and social ones are also taken into consideration. This study presents selected theoretical approaches to marital selection. Yet another purpose thereof is to present and exemplify the spatial dimension of marital selection in Poland on different levels: of voivodeships, of city-village units and of cities (on the example of Łódź).

References

Clark W.A., 1976, Migration in Milwaukee, „Economic Geography”, 52.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/142791

Comptom P.A., 1991, Is fertility in Western industrial countries amenable to geographical study?, [w:] Bähr J., Gans P. (eds.), The geographical approach to fertility, Im Selbstverlag des Geographischen Instituts der Universität Kiel, Kiel, s. 73–93.
Google Scholar

Dzieciuchowicz J., 1995, Koncepcja poznawcza zachowań migracyjnych, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica”, 20.
Google Scholar

Giddens A., 2003, Stanowienie społeczeństwa: zarys teorii strukturacji, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Golledge R.G., Zannares G., 1973, Cognitive approaches to the analysis of human spatial behaviour, [w:] Ittelson W.H. (eds.), Environment and Cognition, Seminar Press, New York.
Google Scholar

Good W.J., 1964, The Family, New Jersey.
Google Scholar

Guelke L., 1981, Idealism, [w:] Harvey M.E., Holly B.P. (eds.), Themes in Geographic Thoughts, Croom Helm, London.
Google Scholar

Hägerstrand T., 1975, Time, space and human conditions, [w:] Dynamic Allcation of Urban Space, Saxon House, Farnboroug.
Google Scholar

Hollingshead A.B., 1950, Cultural Factors in the Selection of Marriage Mates, „American Sociological Review”, 15.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086915

Irwing H., 1975, Distance, intensity, kinship: key dimensions of social interaction, „Sociology and Social Research”, 60.
Google Scholar

Janiszewska A., 2007, Dobór przestrzenny i demograficzno-społeczny małżeństw zawieranych w Łodzi, Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź.
Google Scholar

Jędrzejczyk D., 2001, Wprowadzenie do geografii humanistycznej, Wydawnictwo UW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Jones R.C., 1980, The role of perception in urban in – migration: a path analytic model, „Geographical Analysis”, 12.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1980.tb00021.x

Jones C., 1981, Residential mobility: an economic model, „Scottish Journal of Political Economy”, 28.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1981.tb00074.x

Kałuża D., 2007, Otwartość doboru terytorialnego małżonków we współczesnej Polsce, „Roczniki Socjologii Rodziny”, 17, UAM.
Google Scholar

Kerckhoff A.C., 1971, Patterns of Homogamy in Mate Selection, [w:] Anderson M. (ed.), Sociology of the Family, London.
Google Scholar

Kuciarska-Ciesielska M., 1978, Ruchliwość przestrzenna nowożeńców, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, 1.
Google Scholar

Lewis G.J., 1982, Human migration: a geographical perspective, Croom Helm, London.
Google Scholar

Moore G.T., Golledge R.G., 1976, Environmental knowing: concepts and theories, [w:] Moore G.T., Golledge R.G. (eds.), Environmental knowing, Dowolen Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg.
Google Scholar

Mrzygłód H., 1996, Dobór małżeński w rodzinach marynarzy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin.
Google Scholar

Samuels M.S., 1981, An existential geography, [w:] Harvey M.E., Holly B.P. (eds.), Themes in Geographic Thought, Croom Helm, London.
Google Scholar

Shaw R.P., 1975, Migration Theory and Fact: a review and bibliography of current literature, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia „Studia Demograficzne”, 57/58.
Google Scholar

Smith C.J., 1978, Self-help and social networks in the urban community, „Ekistics”, 46.
Google Scholar

Strzelecki Z., 1976, Terytorialny i społeczny dobór nowożeńców w Polsce Ludowej, „Biuletyn IGS”, 2.
Google Scholar

Strzelecki Z., 1989, Cykl życia rodziny a migracje, „Monografie i Opracowania SGPiS”, 5.
Google Scholar

Szukalski P., 2012, Wpływ kryzysów na zachowania demograficzne, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, 4, s. 17–30.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.59139/ws.2012.04.2

Thorns D.C., 1980, The role of the family life cycle in residential mobility, „Centre for Urban and Regional Studies Workshop Paper”, 69, University of Birmingham.
Google Scholar

Walmsley D.J., Lewis G.J., 1997, Geografia człowieka. Podejście behawioralne, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Warzywoda-Kruszyńska W., 1974, Małżeństwa a struktura społeczna, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo PAN, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk.
Google Scholar

Weinberg D.H., 1979, The determinants of intra-urban household mobility, „Regional Science and Urban Economics”, 9.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(79)90014-0

Węcławowicz G., 2003, Geografia społeczna miast, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Wienold H., 1972, Kontakt, Einfűhlung und Attraktion, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar

Winch R.F., 1958, Mate Selection. A study of Complementary Needs, New York.
Google Scholar