The spatial nature of matrimonial behaviours
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.23.08Keywords:
matrimonial behaviours, marital selection, behavioural geographyAbstract
The work presents a research approach of behavioural geography to the analysis of man’s spatial behaviours. Matrimonial behaviours constitute those which are influenced to a greater degree by behavioural factors (social status, education, nationality, religion) than spatial factors. Although in the process of marital selection, the future spouse’s spatial features are important during selection, other features, such as demographic and social ones are also taken into consideration. This study presents selected theoretical approaches to marital selection. Yet another purpose thereof is to present and exemplify the spatial dimension of marital selection in Poland on different levels: of voivodeships, of city-village units and of cities (on the example of Łódź).
References
Clark W.A., 1976, Migration in Milwaukee, „Economic Geography”, 52.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/142791
Comptom P.A., 1991, Is fertility in Western industrial countries amenable to geographical study?, [w:] Bähr J., Gans P. (eds.), The geographical approach to fertility, Im Selbstverlag des Geographischen Instituts der Universität Kiel, Kiel, s. 73–93.
Google Scholar
Dzieciuchowicz J., 1995, Koncepcja poznawcza zachowań migracyjnych, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica”, 20.
Google Scholar
Giddens A., 2003, Stanowienie społeczeństwa: zarys teorii strukturacji, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Golledge R.G., Zannares G., 1973, Cognitive approaches to the analysis of human spatial behaviour, [w:] Ittelson W.H. (eds.), Environment and Cognition, Seminar Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Good W.J., 1964, The Family, New Jersey.
Google Scholar
Guelke L., 1981, Idealism, [w:] Harvey M.E., Holly B.P. (eds.), Themes in Geographic Thoughts, Croom Helm, London.
Google Scholar
Hägerstrand T., 1975, Time, space and human conditions, [w:] Dynamic Allcation of Urban Space, Saxon House, Farnboroug.
Google Scholar
Hollingshead A.B., 1950, Cultural Factors in the Selection of Marriage Mates, „American Sociological Review”, 15.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086915
Irwing H., 1975, Distance, intensity, kinship: key dimensions of social interaction, „Sociology and Social Research”, 60.
Google Scholar
Janiszewska A., 2007, Dobór przestrzenny i demograficzno-społeczny małżeństw zawieranych w Łodzi, Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź.
Google Scholar
Jędrzejczyk D., 2001, Wprowadzenie do geografii humanistycznej, Wydawnictwo UW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Jones R.C., 1980, The role of perception in urban in – migration: a path analytic model, „Geographical Analysis”, 12.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1980.tb00021.x
Jones C., 1981, Residential mobility: an economic model, „Scottish Journal of Political Economy”, 28.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1981.tb00074.x
Kałuża D., 2007, Otwartość doboru terytorialnego małżonków we współczesnej Polsce, „Roczniki Socjologii Rodziny”, 17, UAM.
Google Scholar
Kerckhoff A.C., 1971, Patterns of Homogamy in Mate Selection, [w:] Anderson M. (ed.), Sociology of the Family, London.
Google Scholar
Kuciarska-Ciesielska M., 1978, Ruchliwość przestrzenna nowożeńców, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, 1.
Google Scholar
Lewis G.J., 1982, Human migration: a geographical perspective, Croom Helm, London.
Google Scholar
Moore G.T., Golledge R.G., 1976, Environmental knowing: concepts and theories, [w:] Moore G.T., Golledge R.G. (eds.), Environmental knowing, Dowolen Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg.
Google Scholar
Mrzygłód H., 1996, Dobór małżeński w rodzinach marynarzy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin.
Google Scholar
Samuels M.S., 1981, An existential geography, [w:] Harvey M.E., Holly B.P. (eds.), Themes in Geographic Thought, Croom Helm, London.
Google Scholar
Shaw R.P., 1975, Migration Theory and Fact: a review and bibliography of current literature, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia „Studia Demograficzne”, 57/58.
Google Scholar
Smith C.J., 1978, Self-help and social networks in the urban community, „Ekistics”, 46.
Google Scholar
Strzelecki Z., 1976, Terytorialny i społeczny dobór nowożeńców w Polsce Ludowej, „Biuletyn IGS”, 2.
Google Scholar
Strzelecki Z., 1989, Cykl życia rodziny a migracje, „Monografie i Opracowania SGPiS”, 5.
Google Scholar
Szukalski P., 2012, Wpływ kryzysów na zachowania demograficzne, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, 4, s. 17–30.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59139/ws.2012.04.2
Thorns D.C., 1980, The role of the family life cycle in residential mobility, „Centre for Urban and Regional Studies Workshop Paper”, 69, University of Birmingham.
Google Scholar
Walmsley D.J., Lewis G.J., 1997, Geografia człowieka. Podejście behawioralne, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Warzywoda-Kruszyńska W., 1974, Małżeństwa a struktura społeczna, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo PAN, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk.
Google Scholar
Weinberg D.H., 1979, The determinants of intra-urban household mobility, „Regional Science and Urban Economics”, 9.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(79)90014-0
Węcławowicz G., 2003, Geografia społeczna miast, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Wienold H., 1972, Kontakt, Einfűhlung und Attraktion, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar
Winch R.F., 1958, Mate Selection. A study of Complementary Needs, New York.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.