The spatial nature of matrimonial behaviours
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.23.08Keywords:
matrimonial behaviours, marital selection, behavioural geographyAbstract
The work presents a research approach of behavioural geography to the analysis of man’s spatial behaviours. Matrimonial behaviours constitute those which are influenced to a greater degree by behavioural factors (social status, education, nationality, religion) than spatial factors. Although in the process of marital selection, the future spouse’s spatial features are important during selection, other features, such as demographic and social ones are also taken into consideration. This study presents selected theoretical approaches to marital selection. Yet another purpose thereof is to present and exemplify the spatial dimension of marital selection in Poland on different levels: of voivodeships, of city-village units and of cities (on the example of Łódź).
References
Clark W.A., 1976, Migration in Milwaukee, „Economic Geography”, 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/142791
Comptom P.A., 1991, Is fertility in Western industrial countries amenable to geographical study?, [w:] Bähr J., Gans P. (eds.), The geographical approach to fertility, Im Selbstverlag des Geographischen Instituts der Universität Kiel, Kiel, s. 73–93.
Dzieciuchowicz J., 1995, Koncepcja poznawcza zachowań migracyjnych, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica”, 20.
Giddens A., 2003, Stanowienie społeczeństwa: zarys teorii strukturacji, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
Golledge R.G., Zannares G., 1973, Cognitive approaches to the analysis of human spatial behaviour, [w:] Ittelson W.H. (eds.), Environment and Cognition, Seminar Press, New York.
Good W.J., 1964, The Family, New Jersey.
Guelke L., 1981, Idealism, [w:] Harvey M.E., Holly B.P. (eds.), Themes in Geographic Thoughts, Croom Helm, London.
Hägerstrand T., 1975, Time, space and human conditions, [w:] Dynamic Allcation of Urban Space, Saxon House, Farnboroug.
Hollingshead A.B., 1950, Cultural Factors in the Selection of Marriage Mates, „American Sociological Review”, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086915
Irwing H., 1975, Distance, intensity, kinship: key dimensions of social interaction, „Sociology and Social Research”, 60.
Janiszewska A., 2007, Dobór przestrzenny i demograficzno-społeczny małżeństw zawieranych w Łodzi, Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź.
Jędrzejczyk D., 2001, Wprowadzenie do geografii humanistycznej, Wydawnictwo UW, Warszawa.
Jones R.C., 1980, The role of perception in urban in – migration: a path analytic model, „Geographical Analysis”, 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1980.tb00021.x
Jones C., 1981, Residential mobility: an economic model, „Scottish Journal of Political Economy”, 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1981.tb00074.x
Kałuża D., 2007, Otwartość doboru terytorialnego małżonków we współczesnej Polsce, „Roczniki Socjologii Rodziny”, 17, UAM.
Kerckhoff A.C., 1971, Patterns of Homogamy in Mate Selection, [w:] Anderson M. (ed.), Sociology of the Family, London.
Kuciarska-Ciesielska M., 1978, Ruchliwość przestrzenna nowożeńców, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, 1.
Lewis G.J., 1982, Human migration: a geographical perspective, Croom Helm, London.
Moore G.T., Golledge R.G., 1976, Environmental knowing: concepts and theories, [w:] Moore G.T., Golledge R.G. (eds.), Environmental knowing, Dowolen Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg.
Mrzygłód H., 1996, Dobór małżeński w rodzinach marynarzy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin.
Samuels M.S., 1981, An existential geography, [w:] Harvey M.E., Holly B.P. (eds.), Themes in Geographic Thought, Croom Helm, London.
Shaw R.P., 1975, Migration Theory and Fact: a review and bibliography of current literature, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia „Studia Demograficzne”, 57/58.
Smith C.J., 1978, Self-help and social networks in the urban community, „Ekistics”, 46.
Strzelecki Z., 1976, Terytorialny i społeczny dobór nowożeńców w Polsce Ludowej, „Biuletyn IGS”, 2.
Strzelecki Z., 1989, Cykl życia rodziny a migracje, „Monografie i Opracowania SGPiS”, 5.
Szukalski P., 2012, Wpływ kryzysów na zachowania demograficzne, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, 4, s. 17–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59139/ws.2012.04.2
Thorns D.C., 1980, The role of the family life cycle in residential mobility, „Centre for Urban and Regional Studies Workshop Paper”, 69, University of Birmingham.
Walmsley D.J., Lewis G.J., 1997, Geografia człowieka. Podejście behawioralne, PWN, Warszawa.
Warzywoda-Kruszyńska W., 1974, Małżeństwa a struktura społeczna, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo PAN, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk.
Weinberg D.H., 1979, The determinants of intra-urban household mobility, „Regional Science and Urban Economics”, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(79)90014-0
Węcławowicz G., 2003, Geografia społeczna miast, PWN, Warszawa.
Wienold H., 1972, Kontakt, Einfűhlung und Attraktion, Stuttgart.
Winch R.F., 1958, Mate Selection. A study of Complementary Needs, New York.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
