Anthropometric characteristics of four groups of indigenous people of Wallacea in East Indonesia

Neni Trilusiana Rahmawati; Janatin Hastuti; Rusyad Adi Suriyanto

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.86.2.05

Authors

Neni Trilusiana Rahmawati Lab. Bio- & Paleoanthropology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-0907
Janatin Hastuti Lab. Bio- & Paleoanthropology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada, Medika Sekip, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Department of Health Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada, Medika Sekip, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8621-463X
Rusyad Adi Suriyanto Lab. Bio- & Paleoanthropology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada, Medika Sekip, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Department of Medical Forensics, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada, Medika Sekip, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-0759

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.86.2.05

Keywords:

anthropometry, ethnicity, Wallacea, body dimensions

Abstract

The human body size varies significantly around the world, both between and within populations. Likewise, ethnic diversity has a significant effect on anthropometric data differences for the Naulu, Tana Ai, Bugis and Rampasasa tribes, in Wallacea, East Indonesia. Six body dimensions were collected from 484 people, 219 males and 265 females in the age from 18 to 80 years. The statistical analysis included tabulating the means and standard deviations for the various body dimensions and proportions. A one-way ANOVA with post hoc LSD test was performed to determine significant differences between the means of anthropometric dimensions and proportions, as well as within the four ethnic groups. There are significant differences (p<0.01) among the four ethnic groups and two sexes in most measurements taken. The post-hoc LSD test indicated that the Naulu male has the largest body size compared to the Tana Ai, Bugis, and Rampasasa tribes. The Naulu have a large body size, a long trunk, broad shoulders, and long legs. Tana Ai and Bugis people have nearly identical characteristics, namely a medium body, long trunk, narrow shoulders and hips, whereas Rampasasa people have a small body size, with a long trunk, narrow shoulders and a wide pelvis. The Naulu and Bugis people have trapezoidal trunks, while the Tana Ai and Rampasasa people have rectangular trunks. In conclusion, the tribes in the Wallace area of East Indonesia have a wide variety of physical characteristics. Further research is needed to understand how changes in technology, development, transportation and large migration flows affect the demographic and physical characteristics of ethnic groups in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashizawa K, Rahmawati NT, Hastuti J. 2009. Body size and shape, and its secular change in Javanese-Indonesian adults. Anthropol Sci 117(3):165–70. https://doi.org/10.1537/ase.080826
View in Google Scholar

Central Statistics Agency. 2021. Statistics of Indonesia 2021. Jakarta: Indonesia Central Statistics Agency.
View in Google Scholar

Chuan TK, Hartono M, Kumar N. 2010. Anthropometry of the Singaporean and Indonesia populations. Int J Ind Ergon 40(6):757–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.05.001
View in Google Scholar

Froment A. 2014. Human biology and the health of African rainforest inhabitants. In: Hewlett B. editor. Hunter-gatherers of the Congo basin. Transaction Publishers New Brunswick, 117–64.
View in Google Scholar

Funk SM, Guerra BP, de Mena Martínez N, Ickowitz A, Fa JE. 2020. Divergent trajectories of BMI over age for adult Baka Pygmy people and their sympatric non-Pygmy populations. Hum Ecol 48:143–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00151-7
View in Google Scholar

Gesser T, Sheehy A, Molinar L, Largo RH. 2000. Sex dimorphism in growth. Ann Hum Biol 27(2):187–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/030144600282299
View in Google Scholar

Glinka J, Artaria MD, Koesbardiati T. 2010. The three human morphotypes in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences 2(2):70–76.
View in Google Scholar

Hidayah Z. 1996. Ensiklopedi suku bangsa di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Pustaka LP3ES.
View in Google Scholar

Iseri A, Arslan N. 2009. Estimated anthropometric measurements of Turkish adults and effects of age and geographical regions. Int J of Ind Ergon 39: 860e865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.02.007
View in Google Scholar

Ishida T, Suzuki J, Duangchan P, Settheetham-Ishida W. 1998. Preliminary report on the short stature of Southeast Asian Forest dwellers, the Manni, in southern Thailand: lack of an adolescent spurt in plasma IGF-I concentration. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 29(1):62–5.
View in Google Scholar

Jacob T. 1967. Some problems pertaining to the racial history of the Indonesian region. Utrecht: Drukkerij Neerlandia.
View in Google Scholar

Jacob T. 1974. Studies on human variation in Indonesia. J Natl Med Assoc 66(5):394–99.
View in Google Scholar

Jacob T. 2006. The problem of Austronesia origin. In: T Simanjuntak, IHE Pojoh and M Hisyam, editors. Austronesian diaspora and the ethnogeneses of people in Indonesian Archipelago. Jakarta: LIPI Press. 7–13.
View in Google Scholar

Jacob T, Indriati E, Soejono RP, Hsu K, Frayer DW, Eckhardt RB, Kuperavage AJ, Thorne A, Henneberg M. 2006. Pygmoid Australomelanesia Homo sapiens skeletal remains from Liang Bua, Flores: population affinities and pathological abnormalities. PNAS 103:13421–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605563103
View in Google Scholar

Jacob T, Suriyanto RA, Hastuti J, Rahmawati NT, Koeshardjono. 2008. Acromiocristalis Populasi Pygmy Rampasasa (Kabupaten Manggarai, Pulau Flores, Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 21:272–82.
View in Google Scholar

Kadhem MM, Islam MA. 2014. Development of anthropometric datafor Bangladeshi male population. Int J Ind Ergon 44:407–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.007
View in Google Scholar

Karmegam K, Sapuan SM, Ismail MY, Ismail N, Bahri MTS, Shuib S, Mohana GK, Seetha P, Moli PT, Hanapi MJ. 2011. Anthropometric study among adults of different ethnicity in Malaysia. Int J Phys Sci 6(4):777–88. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS10.310
View in Google Scholar

Lin YC, Wang MJJ, Wang EM. 2004. The comparisons of anthropometric characteristics among four peoples in East Asia. Appl Ergon 35:173–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.01.004
View in Google Scholar

Little MA. 2020. Evolutionary Strategies for Body Size. Front Endocrinol 11:107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00107
View in Google Scholar

Luo J, Hendryx M, Laddu D, Phillips LS, Cheblowski R, LeBlanc ES, Allison DB, Nelson DA, Li Y, Rosal MC, Stefanick ML, Manson JE. 2019. Racial and ethnic differences in anthropometric measures as risk factors for diabetes. Diabetes Care 42:126–33. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1413
View in Google Scholar

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. 2016. A century of trends in adult human height. eLife 5: e13410. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13410
View in Google Scholar

Norton K, Olds TS. 2004. Anthropometrica. Sydney: UNSW Press.
View in Google Scholar

Olivier G. 1969. Practical anthropology. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
View in Google Scholar

Pietrusewsky M. 2006. The initial settlement of remote Oceania: the evidence from physical anthropology. In: Simanjuntak T, Pojoh IHE, Hisyam M, editors. Austronesian diaspora and the ethnogeneses of people in Indonesian Archipelago. Jakarta: LIPI Press. 320–347.
View in Google Scholar

Ponzetta MT, Mona S, Calabrese FM, Konrad G, Vacca E, Attimonelli M. 2013. Mountain Pygmies of Western New Guinea: A morphological and molecular approach. Hum Biol 85(1):285–05. https://doi.org/10.3378/027.085.0314
View in Google Scholar

Sirajuddin SM, Duggirala R, Crawford MH. 1994. Population structure of the Chenchu and other south Indian tribal groups: relationships between genetic, anthropometric, dermatoglyphic, geographic, and linguistic distances. Hum Biol 66(5):865–84.
View in Google Scholar

Sysling F. 2019. The human Wallace line: racial science and political afterlife. Med Hist 63(3):314–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2019.29
View in Google Scholar

Wibowo KKR, Soni P, Salokhe VM. 2012. Anthropometry of Javanese and Madurese farmers in East Java, Indonesia. Int Agric Eng J 21:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.03.012
View in Google Scholar

Widyanti A, Susanti L, Sutalaksana IZ, Muslim K. 2015. Ethnic differences in Indonesian anthropometry data: evidence from three different largest ethnics. Int J Ind Ergon 47:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.02.008
View in Google Scholar

World Health Organization. 2007. Growth reference data for 5–91 years. Available at: http://www.who.int/tools/growth-reference-data-for-5to19-years [Accessed 26 June 2023].
View in Google Scholar

Yusof HM, Ching TS, Ibrahim R, Lola S. 2007. Anthropometric indices and life style practices of the indigenous orang asli adults in Lembah Belum, Grik of Peninsular Malaysia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 16(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.2007.16.1.07
View in Google Scholar