Two interpretations of human evolution: Essentialism and Darwinism

Maciej Henneberg

doi:10.2478/v10044-008-0016-2

Authors

Maciej Henneberg Biological Anthropology and Comparative Anatomy Research Unit, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, and Department of Archaeology, Flinders University Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10044-008-0016-2

Keywords:

hominin, hominid, Australopithecus, brain, stature

Abstract

Despite intensive studies of a large number of fossils discovered during the 20th century there is no consensus as to the interpretation of the process of hominin evolution. Some authors see as many as six genera and some 17 species, while others argue for a single lineage from Plio/Pleistocene until today. Such diversity of interpretations of the same facts indicates lack of a uniform theoretical basis underlying studies of human evolution. Debates can be resolved using basic principles of scientific inquiry - parsimony and falsification of null hypotheses. Hypothesis testing is now possible with respect to the evolution of basic hominin characteristics such as brain size, body size and the size of the dentition that have sample sizes of a few hundred individual data points each. These characters display a continuous change with time. Analyses of variance do not falsify the null hypothesis of the existence of only one species at any time - variances around regression lines on time do not differ from the variance observed in the single species of Homo sapiens - distributions of residuals are normal. Thus, splitting of the hominin lineage into coeval species can only be based on descriptive characteristics that are liable to errors of subjective judgment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackermann R. R., J. Rogers, J. M. Cheverud, 2006, Identifying the morphological signatures of hybridization in primate and human evolution, J. Hum. Evol., 51, 632-45
View in Google Scholar

Albrecht G. H., J. M. Miller, 1993, Geographic variation in Primates: A review with implications for interpreting fossils, [in:] Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, W. H. Kimbel & L. Martin (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 123-61
View in Google Scholar

Bielicki T., 1969, Niektóre związki zwrotne w procesie ewolucji Hominidae, Mat. i Prace Antrop., 77, 3-60
View in Google Scholar

Brace C. L., 1967, The Stages of Human Evolution, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
View in Google Scholar

Brace C. L., 1981, Tales of the phylogenetic woods: The evolution and significance of evolution trees, Am. J. of Phys. Anthropol., 56, 411-29
View in Google Scholar

Brace C. L., 1995, Trends in the evolution of human tooth size, [in:] Aspects of Dental Biology: Palaeontology, Anthropology, and Evolution, J. Moggi-Cecchi (ed.), Int. Inst. for the Study of Man, Florence, pp. 437-46
View in Google Scholar

Brace C. L., P. E. Mahler, 1971, Post-Pleistocene changes in the human dentition, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 34, 191-204
View in Google Scholar

Brace C. L., S. L. Smith, K. D. Hunt, 1991, What big teeth you had grandma! Human tooth size, past and present, [in:] Advances in Dental Anthropology, M. A. Kelley & C. S. Larsen (eds.), Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 33-57
View in Google Scholar

Brown P., T. Sutkina, M. J. Morwood, R. P. Soejono, E. Jatmiko, et al., 2004, A new smallbodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia, Nature, 431, 1055-61
View in Google Scholar

Brumm A., F. Aziz, G. D. van den Burgh, M. J. Morwood, M. W. Moore, et al., 2006, Early stone technology on Flores and its implications for Homo floresiensis, Nature, 441, 624-28
View in Google Scholar

Calcagno J., 1989, Mechanisms of Human Dental Reduction, A Case Study from Post- Pleistocene Nubia, Univ. of Kansas Publ. in Anthropology, 18, Lawrence, Kansas
View in Google Scholar

Conroy G. C., 2002, Speciosity in the early Homo lineage: Too many, too few, or just about right?J. Hum. Evol., 43, 759-66
View in Google Scholar

Carruthers P., A. Chamberlain (eds.), 2000, Evolution and the human mind, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

Cela-Conde C. J., F. J. Ayala, 2007, Human evolution. Trails from the past, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
View in Google Scholar

Cope D. A., M. G. Lacy, 1992, Falsification of a single species hypothesis using the coefficient of variation: A simulation approach, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 89, 359-78
View in Google Scholar

Cope, D. A., M. G. Lacy, 1996, The CV as a tool for assessing the taxonomic composition of fossil sample, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., Suppl. 22, 89
View in Google Scholar

Darwin C., 1859 [1952], The origin of species by means of natural selection, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago
View in Google Scholar

Delson E., I. Tattersall, J. A. van Couvering, A. S. Brooks, 2000, Brief introduction to human evolution and prehistory, [in:] Encyclopedia of Human Evolution and Prehistory, 2nd ed., E. Delson, I. Tattersall, J. A. Couvering, A. S. Brooks (eds.), Garland Publishing, New York, pp. xvii-xxii
View in Google Scholar

De Miguel C., M. Henneberg, 1999, Variation in hominid body size estimates: Do we know how big our ancestors were?, Persp. Hum. Biol., 4(1), 65-80
View in Google Scholar

De Miguel C., M. Henneberg, 2001, Variation in hominid brain size: How much is due to method?, Homo, 52, 2-56
View in Google Scholar

De Queiroz K., M. J. Donoghue, 1988, Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem, Cladistics, 6, 61-75
View in Google Scholar

Eckhardt R. B., 2000, Human paleobiology, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

Eldredge N., S. J. Gould, 1972, Speciation and punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism, [in:] Models in paleobiology, T. Schopf (ed.), Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp. 85-120
View in Google Scholar

Eldredge N., J. Cracraft, 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
View in Google Scholar

Frayer D., 1978, The Evolution of the Dentition in Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe, Univ. of Kansas Publ. in Anthropology, 10, Lawrence, Kansas
View in Google Scholar

Frisancho A. R., 1990, Anthropometric standards for the assessment of growth and nutritional status, Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
View in Google Scholar

Genesis, 1611, The Holy Bible, Robert Barker, London
View in Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Forero M., 2009, Removing ambiguity from the biological species concept, J. Theor. Biol., 256, 76-80
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 1988, Decrease of human skull size in the Holocene, Hum. Biol., 60, 395-405
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 1990, Brain size/body weight variability in Homo sapiens: Consequences for interpreting hominid evolution, Homo, 39, 121-30
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 1997, The problem of species in hominid evolution, Persp. Hum. Biol., 3, 21-31
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 1998, Evolution of the human brain: Is bigger better?, Experim. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol., 25, 745-49
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 2001, The gradual eurytopic evolution of humans: Not from Africa alone, [in:] Man: Past, present, and future, E. Indriati (ed.), Bigraf Publishing, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, pp. 42-52
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 2006, The rate of human morphological microevolution and taxonomic diversity of hominids, Studies in Historical Anthropology, 4 [2004], 49-59
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 2007, The mode and rate of human evolution and the recent Liang Bua finds, [in:] Recent advances of Southeast Asia paleoanthropology and archaeology, E. Indriati (ed.), Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, pp. 24-29
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., 2008, Darwinian interpretation of human evolution based on the evolution of body size and brain size, [in:] Ksiega jubileuszowa, stulecie Zakladu Antropologii Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego 1908-2008, K. Kaczanowski (ed.), Plus Publishers, Kraków, pp. 71-85
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., G. Brush, 1994, Similum, a concept of flexible synchronous classification replacing rigid species in evolutionary thinking, Evol. Theor., 10, 278
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., A. Budnik, M. Pezacka, A. E. Puch, 1985, Head size body size and intelligence intraspecific correlation in Homo sapiens species, Homo, 36, 207-18
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., C. de Miguel, 2004, Hominins are a single lineage: Brain and body size variability does not reflect postulated taxonomic diversity of hominins, Homo, 55, 21-37
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., J. Schofield, 2008, The Hobbit Trap, Wakefield Press, Adelaide
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., J. F. Thackeray, 1995, A singlelineage hypothesis of hominid evolution, Evol. Theor., 13, 31-38
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M., A. Thorne, 2004, Flores human may be pathological Homo sapiens, Before Farming, 4, 2-4
View in Google Scholar

Hennig W., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, Univ. of Illinois Press, Illinois
View in Google Scholar

Henry A. G., B. Wood, 2007, Whose diet? An introduction to the hominin fossil record, [in:] Evolution of the human diet, P. S. Ungar (ed.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 11-28
View in Google Scholar

Hershkovitz I., L. Kornreich, Z. Laron, 2007, Comparative skeletal features between Homo floresiensis and patients with primary growth hormone insensitivity (Laron Syndrome), Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 134, 198-208
View in Google Scholar

Holliday T. W., 2003, Species concepts, reticulation, and human evolution, Curr. Anthropol., 44, 653-60
View in Google Scholar

Hunt K. D., 2003, The single species hypothesis: Truly dead and pushing up bushes, or still twitching and ripe for resuscitation?, Hum. Biol., 75, 485-502
View in Google Scholar

Jacob T., E. Indriati, R. P. Soejono, K. Hsü, D. Frayer, et al., 2006, Pygmoid Australomelanesian Homo sapiens skeletal remains from Liang Bua, Flores: Population affinities and pathological abnormalities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 103, 13421-26
View in Google Scholar

Jolly C. J., 1993, Species, subspecies, and baboon systematics, [in:] W. H. Kimbel & L. Martin (eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 67-107
View in Google Scholar

Jolly C. J., 2001, A proper study for mankind analogies from the papionin monkeys and their implications for human evolution, Yearb. Phys. Anthropol., 44, 177-204
View in Google Scholar

Jolly C. J., T. Woolley-Barker, S. Beyene, T. Distotell, J. Phillips-Conroy, 1997, Intergeneric hybrid baboons, Int. J. Primatol., 18, 597-628
View in Google Scholar

Jones S., R. D. Martin, D. R. Pilbeam, 2000, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

Kelley J., 1993, Taxonomic implications of sexual dimorphism in Lufengpithecus, [in:] Species, species concepts, and primate evolution, W. H. Kimbel & L. B. Martin (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 429-58
View in Google Scholar

Kimbel W., Y. Rak, 1993, The importance of species taxa in paleoanthropology and an argument for the phylogenetic concept of the species category, [in:] Species, species concepts, and primate evolution, W. H. Kimbel & L. B. Martin (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 461-84
View in Google Scholar

Lacruz R. S., F. R. Rozzib, T. G. Bromage, 2005, Dental enamel hypoplasia, age at death, and weaning in the Taung child, S. Afr. J. Sci., 101, 567-69
View in Google Scholar

Larsen C. S., 2008, Our Origins: Discovering Physical Anthropology, W. W. Norton, New York
View in Google Scholar

Lee M. S. Y., 2003, Species concepts and species reality: Salvaging a Linnean rank, J. Evol. Biol., 16, 179-88
View in Google Scholar

Lieberman D. E., D. R. Pilbeam, B. A. Wood, 1996, Homoplasy and early Homo: An analysis of the evolutionary relationship of H. habilis sensu stricto and H. rudolfensis, J. Hum. Evol., 30, 97-120
View in Google Scholar

Linnaeus C., 1758, Systema Naturae, Editio decimal, Laur Salvius, Holmiae
View in Google Scholar

Manning A., M. S. Dawkins, 1998, An introduction to animal behaviour, 5th ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

Martin R. D., 2007, Problems with the tiny brain of the Flores hominid, [in:] Recent advances of Southeast Asia paleoanthropology and archaeology, E. Indriati (ed.), Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, pp. 9-23
View in Google Scholar

Martin R. D., A. M. MacLarnon, J. L. Phillips, L. Dussubieux, P. R. Williams, W. B. Dobyns, 2006a, Comment on "The brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis", Science, 312, 999
View in Google Scholar

Martin R. D., A. M. MacLarnon, J. L. Phillips, W. B. Dobyns, 2006b, Flores hominid: New species or microcephalic dwarf?, Anat. Rec., 288A, 1123-45
View in Google Scholar

Mayr E., 1969, Principles of systematic zoology, McGraw-Hill, New York
View in Google Scholar

Mayr E., 1995, Species, classification, and evolution, [in:] Biodiversity and Evolution. R. Arai, M. Kato, Y. Doi, (eds.), National Science Museum Foundation, Tokyo, pp. 3-12
View in Google Scholar

Mathers K., M. Henneberg, 1995, Were we ever that big? Gradual increase in hominid body size over time, Homo, 46, 141-73
View in Google Scholar

Mayden R. L., 1997, A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem, [in:] Species, the Units of Biodiversity, M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, M. R. Wilson (eds). Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 381-424
View in Google Scholar

Meikle W. E., S. T. Parker, 1994, Naming our ancestors. An anthology of hominid Taxonomy, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Ill.
View in Google Scholar

Mishler B. D., M. J. Donoghue, 1982, Species concepts: a case for pluralism, Syst. Zool., 31, 491-503
View in Google Scholar

Mishler B. D., R. N. Brandon, 1987, Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept, Biol. & Philos., 2, 397-414
View in Google Scholar

Mishler B. D., E. C. Theriot, 2000, The phylogenetic species (sensu Mishler and Theriot): Monophyly, apomorphy, and phylogenetic species concepts, [in:] Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: A debate, Q. D. Wheeler & R. Meier (eds.), Columbia Univ., pp. 44-54
View in Google Scholar

Morwood M. J., R. P. Soejono, R. G. Roberts, T. Sutikna, C. S. M. Turney, et al., 2004, Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia, Nature, 431, 1087-91
View in Google Scholar

Nelson G. J., N. I. Platnick, 1981, Systematics and biogeography: Cladistics and vicariance, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
View in Google Scholar

Nixon, K. C., Q. D. Wheeler, 1990, An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept, Cladistics, 6, 211-23
View in Google Scholar

Obendorf P., C. E. Oxnard, B. J. Kefford, 2008, Are the small human-like fossils found on Flores human endemic cretins?, Proc. R. Soc. B, 275, 1287-96
View in Google Scholar

Platnick N. I., 1977a, Cladogram, phylogenetic trees, and hypothesis testing, Syst. Zool., 26, 438-42
View in Google Scholar

Platnick N. I., 1977b, Monophyly and the origin of higher taxa: A reply to E. O. Wiley, Syst. Zool., 26, 355-57
View in Google Scholar

Plavcan J. M., 1993, Catarrhine dental variability and species recognition in the fossil record, [in:] Species, species concepts, and primate evolution, W. H. Kimbel & L. B. Martin (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 239-93
View in Google Scholar

Plavcan J. M., D. A. Cope, 2001, Metric variation and species recognition in the fossil record, Evol. Anthropol., 10, 204-22
View in Google Scholar

Quintyn C., 2009, The naming of new species in hominin evolution: A radical proposal - a temporary cessation in assigning new names, Homo, 60, 307-41
View in Google Scholar

Rose K. D., T. Bown, 1993, Species concepts and species recognition in Eocene primates, [in:] Species, species concepts, and primate evolution, W. H. Kimbel & L. B. Martin (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 299-330
View in Google Scholar

Samadi S., Barberouse A., 2009, Species: Towards new, well-grounded practices, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 97, 217-22
View in Google Scholar

Staley J. T., 2009, Universal species concept: Pipe dream or a step toward unifying biology?, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 36, 1331-36
View in Google Scholar

Stanford C., J. S. Allen, C. S. Antón, 2009, Biological Anthropology, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ
View in Google Scholar

Strzałko J., M. Henneberg, 1982, Hominization as a necessary effect of evolution of a nongenetic mode of hereditary transmission, [in:] Evolution and environment, V. Novak, J. Milkovsky (eds.), CSAV Press, Prague, pp. 367-76
View in Google Scholar

Tattersall I., E. Delson, J. A. van Couvering (eds.), 1988, Encyclopedia of Human Evolution and Prehistory, Garland Publishing, New York
View in Google Scholar

Tobias P. V., 1988, Tooth material in the hominidae, J. Dent. Assoc. S. Afr., 43, 557-60
View in Google Scholar

Velasco J. D. 2009, When monophyly is not enough: Exclusivity as the key to defining a phylogenetic species concept, Biol. Philos., 24, 473-86
View in Google Scholar

Walker A., R. E. Leakey, 1993, The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton, Springer, New York
View in Google Scholar

Weber J., A. Czarnetski, C. M. Pusch, 2005, Comment on "The brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis", Science, 310, 236
View in Google Scholar

White T. D., B. Asfaw, Y. Beyene, J. Haile- Selassie, C. O. Lovejoy, et al., 2009, Ardipithecus ramidus and the paleobiology of early hominins, Science, 326, 64
View in Google Scholar

Wolpoff M. H., 1968, "Telanthropus" and the single species hypothesis, Am. Anthrop., 72, 447-93
View in Google Scholar

Wolpoff M. H., 1971, Competitive exlusion among Lower Pleistocene hominids: The single species hypothesis, Man, 6, 601-14
View in Google Scholar

Wood B., B. G. Richmond, 2000, Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology, J. Anat., 197, 19-60
View in Google Scholar