Somatotype and body composition of volleyball players and untrained female students – reference group for comparison in sport
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/anre-2016-0033Keywords:
female students, reference group, somatotype, body composition, volleyballAbstract
There is substantial evidence that somatotype and success in sport and physical performance are positively related. Existing somatotype data on athletes are useful as guidelines for sport selection and choice of training appropriate to the enhancement of desired somatotype characteristics. Updated somatotype data from non-athlete reference groups complement comparative analysis applied in assessing the effects of the training process and selection. The aim of this study was to determine the somatotype of untrained girls studying at Warsaw University of Technology in 2011, in order to create a current reference group for comparison, and to investigate the difference in body build of female volleyball players compared with the non-athlete group. Twelve Second Division female volleyball players (age 21.6±1.5 years, body height 177.3±6.2 cm, body mass 71.0±6.5 kg, training experience 8.4±3.4 years) and 150 female untrained students of the University of Technology in Warsaw (age 20.0±6.4 years, body height 166.5±6.4 cm, body mass 59.7±8.4 kg) participated in a study carried out in 2011. Somatotype was determined using the Heath-Carter method. The volleyball players were a little older and were significantly taller and heavier than female students (p<0.05). Significant differences between the groups were found in breadth of the elbow, breadth of the wrist, biacromial diameter, arm circumference and crus circumference (p<0.05). The mean somatotype of the volleyball players was 4.5-3.4-2.8. (4.5±1.0-3.4±1.2-2.8±1.3), whilst that of the untrained students was 5.1-3.6-2.8. (5.1±1.4-3.6±1.1-2.8±1.3); the groups did not differ significantly in somatotype. The groups were significantly different in body composition (F [kg] and LBM [kg]), as estimated by BIA and anthropometric methods (p<0.05). No differences were observed between the groups in the skinfolds. Morphological characteristics of the female volleyball players depended on the competition level and performance. Somatic features of the bodies of the volleyball players were dominated by the height of the body and the associated magnitude of the constituent characteristics.
Downloads
References
Buśko K., Lipińska M. 2012. Comparative analysis of the anthropometric method and bioelectrical impedance analysis on changes in body composition of female volleyball players during the 2010/2011 season. Human Movement 13(2):127-31.
View in Google Scholar
Carter JEL 2002. Part 1: The Heath-Carter Anthropometric Somatotype-Instruction Manual. Available at: http://www.somatotype.org/Heath-CarterManual.pdf
View in Google Scholar
Carter JEL, Heath HB.1990. Somatotyping development and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 2013. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Academic Press.
View in Google Scholar
Gualdi-Russo E, Zaccagni L. 2001. Somatotype, role and performance in elite volleyball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 41(2):256-62.
View in Google Scholar
Jagiello M, Jagiello W. 2009. Internal proportions of the body composition in members of the female national tennis team of Poland. Education. Physical Training. Sport 73(2):28-34.
View in Google Scholar
Jagiello W, Kalina RM, Korobielnikow G. 2007. Morphological diversification of female judo athletes. Arch Budo 3(1):27-34.
View in Google Scholar
Jagiełło W, Kruszewski A. 2009. Morphological diversification of competitors training Greco-Roman style of wrestling. Arch Budo 5(1):147-53.
View in Google Scholar
Jagiełło W, Kalina R, Jagiełło M. 2011. Differentiation of the body composition in the Polish national team pentathletes. Balt J Health Phys Act 3(2):105-11.
View in Google Scholar
Krawczyk B, Skład M, Majle B. 1995. Body components of male and female athletes representing various sports. Biol Sport 12 (4):243-50.
View in Google Scholar
Nikolaidis P. T, Afonso J, Busko K. 2015. Differences in anthropometry, somatotype, body composition and physiological characteristics of female volleyball players by competition level. Sport Sci Health 11(1):29-35.
View in Google Scholar
Malousaris GG, Bergeles NK, Barzouka KG, Bayios IA, Nassis GP, Koskolou MD. 2008. Somatotype, size and body composition of competitive female volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport 11:337-44.
View in Google Scholar
Marchocka M, Smuk E. 1984. Analysis of body build of senior weightlifters with particular regard for proportions. Biol Sport 1(1):57-71.
View in Google Scholar
Martín-Matillas M, Valadés D, Hernández-Hernández E, Olea-Serrano F, Sjöström M, Delgado-Fernandez M, Ortega F. B. 2014. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype characteristics of elite female volleyball players from the highest Spanish league. J Sports Sci 32(2):137-48.
View in Google Scholar
Milicer H, Skibińska A, Skład M. 1976. The secular trend in size and proportions of the body in higher school students. Physical Education and Sport 20 (2):3-10.
View in Google Scholar
Piechaczek H.1976. Estimation of total body fat by densitometric and anthropometric methods. Studies in Physical Anthropology 2:33-45.
View in Google Scholar
Piechaczek H. 1990. Body structure of male and female basketball players. Biol Sport 7(4):273-84.
View in Google Scholar
Piechaczek H, Lewandowska J, Orlicz B. 1996. Zmiany w budowie ciała młodzieży akademickiej Politechniki Warszawskiej w okresie 35 lat. Physical Education and Sport 40(3):3-14.
View in Google Scholar
Pietraszewska J, Burdukiewicz A, Stachoń A, Andrzejewska J, Pietraszewski B. 2015. Anthropometric characteristics and lower limb power of professional female volleyball players. S Afr J Res Sport Ph 37(1):99-112.
View in Google Scholar
Pilicz S. 1963. Rozwój sprawności fizycznej studentów Politechniki Warszawskie. Physical Education and Sport 7 (1):107-22.
View in Google Scholar
Pilewska W, Pilewski R, Zukow W. 2013. Characteristics of body composition highly qualified dancers and dancers Latin American style of dance sports in light of Perkal method. Journal of Health Sciences 3(8):193-218.
View in Google Scholar
Siri WE. 1956, The gross composition of the body. In: J Lawrence and C Tobias, editors.
View in Google Scholar
Advanced in biological and medical physics. London: Academic Press. 239-80.
View in Google Scholar
Weiner JS, Lourie JA. 1969. Human Biology, a Gide to Field Methods. International Biological Programme. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
View in Google Scholar
Wit B., Piechaczek H., Błachnio D., Buśko K., 1998. Comparative assessment of selected body components from bioelectrical impedance or skinfold measurements.
View in Google Scholar
Biol Sport 15(4):205-10.
View in Google Scholar
Viviani F, Baldin F. 1993. The somatotype of “amateur” Italian female volleyball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 33(4):400-4.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.