Is digit ratio (2D:4D) associated with the choice for the uniformed versus a civil study course by the Polish youth?

Marek Kociuba; Raja Chakraborty; Zofia Ignasiak; Sławomir Kozieł

doi:10.2478/anre-2019-0013

Authors

Marek Kociuba General Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, Wrocław, Poland
Raja Chakraborty Department of Anthropology, Dinabandhu Mahavidyalaya, Bongaon, West Bengal, India
Zofia Ignasiak Department of Physical Education, University School of Physical Education, Wrocław, Poland
Sławomir Kozieł Department of Anthropology, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2019-0013

Keywords:

prenatal testosterone, foetal androgen, 2D:4D, digit ratio, behaviour, choice of a study course

Abstract

The 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) is a sexually dimorphic trait determined by the relative balance of prenatal testosterone (T) and oestrogen during the intrauterine development of foetus. Males on average have relatively lower 2D:4D than women in population. Lower 2D:4D is very often linked with greater physical ability, strength, superior sporting performance and many personality traits and behaviours which are seen more among the males. Recently, lower 2D:4D were associated with military and police services among the Polish women. The objectives of this study were to examine whether 2D:4D differed between the students of a study course for future military service and a civil study course and whether sex difference in this ratio is present in both these groups. The cross sectional study included 50 boys and 42 girls enrolled in the uniformed course and other 56 boys and 50 girls of a general course in an upper-secondary School. The lengths of the second (2D) and fourth fingers (4D) of each hand were measured to have the 2D:4D ratio. Height and weight were also recorded. Overall, as well as among the civil course students, males showed significantly lower mean 2D:4D compared to the females. But there was no significant sex difference in digit ratio among the uniformed course students. Besides, the females under uniformed course showed lower 2D:4D than the females in civil course, whereas, the male uniformed students had similar or almost same 2D:4D values with the male civil course students. Increased prenatal testosterone exposure might have a role in determining the choice towards a challenging future occupation and such effect is perhaps more pronounced in women than in males.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apicella CL, Dreber A, Campbell B, Gray PB, Hoffman M, Little AC. 2008.Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evol Hum Behav 29 (6):384–90.
View in Google Scholar

Apicella CL, Dreber A, Gray PB, Hoffman M, Little AC, Benjamin BC. 2011. Androgens and competitiveness in men. J Neurosci Psychol Econ 4(1):54–62.
View in Google Scholar

Auger J, Le Denmat D, Berges R, Doridot L, Salmon B, Canivenc-Lavier MC, Eustache F. 2013. Environmental levels of ooestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 280(1768):20131532.
View in Google Scholar

Austin EJ, Manning JT, McInroy K, Mathews E. 2012. A preliminary investigation of the association between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Pers Indiv Differ 33(7):1115–24.
View in Google Scholar

Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Knickmeyer R, Taylor K, Hackett G, Hines M. 2009. Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behaviour in girls and in boys. Psychol Sci 20(2):144–8.
View in Google Scholar

Auyeung B, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S. 2013.Prenatal and postnatal hormone effects on the human brain and cognition. Pflügers Archiv Eur J Physiol 465(5):557–71.
View in Google Scholar

Ball S, Eckel C, Heracleous M. 2010. Risk Aversion and Physical Prowess: Prediction, Choice and Bias. J Risk Uncertainty 41(3):167–93.
View in Google Scholar

Bönte W, Procher VD, Urbig D and Voracek M. 2017. Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts self-reported measures of general competitiveness, but not behavior in economic experiments. Front Behav Neurosci 11:238.
View in Google Scholar

Branas-Garza P, Rustichini A. 2011. Organising effects of testosterone and economic behaviour: Not just risk taking. PLoS One 6(12):e29842.
View in Google Scholar

Breedlove SM. 2010. Organizational hypothesis: Instances of the fingerpost. Endocrinol 151(9): 4116–22.
View in Google Scholar

Brosnan MJ. 2006. Digit ratio and faculty membership: Implications for the relationship between prenatal testosterone and academia. Br J Psychol 97(4):455–66.
View in Google Scholar

Brown WM, Finn CJ, Bradley MC, Breedlove SM. 2002 Differences in finger length ratios between self identifies ‘‘butch’’ and ‘‘femme’’ lesbians. Arch Sex Behav 31(1):123–7.
View in Google Scholar

Cohen-Bendahan CC, van de Beek C Berenbaum SA. 2005. Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behaviour: methods and findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29(2):353–384. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004
View in Google Scholar

Csatho A, Osvath A, Bicsak E, Karadi K, Manning J, Kallai J. 2003. Sex role identity related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women. Biol Psychol 62(2):147–56.
View in Google Scholar

Csatho A, Osvath A, Karadi K, Bicsak E, Manning J, Kallai J. 2003. Spatial navigation related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women. Learn Indiv Differences 13(3):239–49.
View in Google Scholar

Daruvala D. 2007.Gender, Risk and Stereotypes.J Risk Uncertainty 35(3):265–83.
View in Google Scholar

Dell Inc. (2016). Dell Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. software.dell.com
View in Google Scholar

Dworkin SL. 2001. “Holding back”: Negotiating a glass ceiling on women’s muscular strength. Sociol Perspective 44(3):333–50.
View in Google Scholar

Fink B, Neave N, Laughton K, Manning JT. 2006. Second to fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking. Pers Indiv Differ 41(7):1253–62.
View in Google Scholar

Galis F, Ten Broek CM, Van Dongen S, Wijnaendts LC. 2010. Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio. Arch Sex Behav 39(1):57–62.
View in Google Scholar

Garbarino E, Slonim R, Sydnor J. 2011. Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. J Risk Uncertainty 42(1):1–26.
View in Google Scholar

Goodyear MDE, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens, T. 2007. The Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 335:624–5.
View in Google Scholar

Govier E. 2003. Brainsex and occupation: the role of serendipity in the genesis of an idea. J Managerial Psychol 18(5):440–52.
View in Google Scholar

Gwunireama IU, Didia BC, Dapper DV. 2013. Hardcore Sciences and Biological Sciences: Digit ratio as an anthropometric differentiator. J Anat Sci 4(2):42–7.
View in Google Scholar

Hines M. 2000. Gonadal hormones and sexual differentiation of human behaviour: effects on psychosexual and cognitive development. In: A Matsumoto (Ed), Sexual Differentiation of the Brain (pp 257–278) CRC Press, Florida.
View in Google Scholar

Hines M. 2010. Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 14(10):448–56.
View in Google Scholar

Hines M, Constantinescu M, Spencer D. 2015. Early androgen exposure and human gender development. Biol Sex Differ 6:3.
View in Google Scholar

Hönekopp J. 2011. Relationships between digit ratio 2D:4D and self-reported aggression and risk taking in an online study. Pers Indiv Differ 51(1):77–80.
View in Google Scholar

Hönekopp J, Schuster M. (2010). A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other, Pers Indiv Differ 48:4–10.
View in Google Scholar

Huh HR. 2012. Born to be a marine: digit ratio and military service. Pers Indiv Differ 53(3):166–8.
View in Google Scholar

Kociuba M, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z, Kozieł S. 2019. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the changes in handgrip strength on an aggressive stimulus: A study among Polish young adults. Early Hum Dev 128:62–8.
View in Google Scholar

Kociuba M, Koziel S, Chakraborty R. 2016. Sex differences in digit ratio (2D:4D) among the students of military and civil courses at military academy in Wroclaw, Poland. J Biosoc Sci 48(5):658–71.
View in Google Scholar

Kociuba M, Koziel S, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z. 2017. Sport preference and digit ratio (2D:4D) among female students in Wroclaw, Poland. J Biosoc Sci 49(5):623–33.
View in Google Scholar

Kozieł S, Chakraborty R, Sitek A. 2013. Second to fourth digits ratio (2D:4D) and subjective pain experience in tattooing. Anthropol Rev 76(1):117–24.
View in Google Scholar

Kozieł S, Chakraborty R, Sitek A, Ignasiak Z. 2018. Further evidence of association of low second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) with selection in uniformed services – a study among police personnel from Wroclaw, Poland. J Biosoc Sci 50(4):527–39.
View in Google Scholar

Kozieł S, Kociuba M, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z. 2017. Physical fitness and digit ratio (2D:4D) in male student from Wroclaw, Poland. Coll Antropol 41(1):31–8.
View in Google Scholar

Kozieł S, Kociuba M, Ignasiak Z, Chakraborty R. 2016. Is sport choice and participation related to 2D:4D? A study among adult male student in Wroclaw, Poland. Coll Antropol 40(2):105–10.
View in Google Scholar

Krane V, Waldron J, Michalenok J, Stiles-Shipley J. 2001. Body image, and eating and exercise behaviours: A feminist cultural studies perspective. Women. Sport Phys Activity J 10(1):17–54.
View in Google Scholar

Lombardo MV, Ashwin E, Auyeung B, Chakrabarti B, Taylor K, Hackett G, Bullmore ET, Baron-Cohen S. 2012. Fetal testosterone influences sexually dimorphic gray matter in the
View in Google Scholar

human brain. J Neurosci 32(2):674–80.
View in Google Scholar

Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P, Knickmeyer R, Manning JT. 2004. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Hum Dev 77:23–8.
View in Google Scholar

Malas MA, Dogan S, Evcil EH, Desdicioglu K. 2006.Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Hum Dev 82(1–2):469–75.
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT. 2002. Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behaviour and Health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT. 2011. Resolving the role of prenatal sex steroids in the development of digit ratio. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108(39):16143–4.
View in Google Scholar

Manning J, Kilduff L, Cook C, Crewther B, Fink B. 2014. Digit ratio (2D:4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Front Endocrinol 5:9.
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT, Reimers S, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Fink B. 2010. Sexually dimorphic traits (digit ratio, height, systemizing-empathizing scores) and gender segregation between occupations. Evidence from the BBC internet study. PersIndiv Differ 49(5):511–5.
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT, Taylor RP. 2001. 2nd to 4th digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evol Hum Behav 22(1):61–9.
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT, Trivers R, Fink B. 2017. Is digit ratio (2D: 4D) related to masculinity and femininity? Evidence from the BBC internet study. Evol Psychol Sci 3(4):316–24.
View in Google Scholar

McFadden D, Bracht MS. 2003. The relative lengths and weights of metacarpals and metatarsals in baboons (papio hamadryas). Horm Behav 43(2):347–55.
View in Google Scholar

McIntyre MH, Cohn BA, Ellison PT. 2006. Sex dimorphism in the digital formulae of children. Am J Phys Anthropol 129(1):143–50.
View in Google Scholar

McIntyre MH, Ellison PT, Lieberman DE, Demerath E, Towne B. 2005. The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 272:1473–9.
View in Google Scholar

Nye JVC, Orel E. 2015. The influence of prenatal hormones on occupational choice: 2D:4D evidence from Moscow. Pers Indiv Differ 78:39–42.
View in Google Scholar

Sapienza P, Zingales L, Maestripieri D. 2009. Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15268–73.
View in Google Scholar

Stenstrom E, Saad G, Nepomuceno MV, Mendenhall Z. 2011. Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D:4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviours. Pers Indiv Differ 51(4): 412–6.
View in Google Scholar

Sudhakar HH, Veena UB, Nadig TR. 2013. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and performance in Indian Swimmers. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 57(1):72–6.
View in Google Scholar

Swed A, Kosinska M, Manning J. 2017. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and month of birth: A link to the solstitial-melatonin-testosterone effect. Early Hum Dev 104:23–6.
View in Google Scholar

Trivers R, Manning J, Jacobson A. 2006. A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Jamaican children. Horm Behav 49(2):150–6.
View in Google Scholar

van Honk EJ, Schutter DJLG, Hermans EJ, Putman PLJ, Tuiten A, Koppeschaar HPF. 2004. Testosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinol 29(7):937–43.
View in Google Scholar

Voracek M, Pum U, Dressler SG. 2010. Investigating digit ratio (2D:4D) in a highly male-oriented occupation: The case of firefighters. Scand J Psychol 51(2):146–56.
View in Google Scholar

Wang XT, Kruger DJ, Wilke A. 2009. Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evol Hum Behav 30:77–84.
View in Google Scholar

Weis SE, Firker, A, Hennig J. 2007.Associations between the second to fourth digit ratio and career interests. Pers Indiv Differ 43(3):485–93.
View in Google Scholar

Williams TJ, Pepitone ME, Christensen SE, Cooke BM, Huberman AD, Breedlove NJ, Breedlove TJ, Jordan C, Breedlove SM. 2000. Finger length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature 404(6777):455–6.
View in Google Scholar

Zhao D, Yu K, Zhang X, Zheng L. 2013. Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Handgrip Strength in Hani Ethnicity. PLoS One, 8(10), e77958.
View in Google Scholar

Zheng Z, Cohn MJ. 2011. Developmental Basis of Sexually Dimorphic digit ratios. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(39):16289–94.
View in Google Scholar