Researching eighteenth-century fraud in the Old Bailey: reflections on court records, archives, and digitisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.91.02Keywords:
Fraud, Old Bailey, Digitisation, Legal History, MethodologyAbstract
This article seeks to provide reflection and guidance to researchers of fraud in Britain during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This reflection explains two reasons why there is a dearth of historical research into fraud offences. These reasons are ontological and methodological. The definitions and laws of fraud are complex and difficult to identify, and one of the most accessible court archive, the Old Bailey Sessions Papers (the Proceedings), needs to be treated with caution by the researcher of fraud. This article uses the in-depth historiography surrounding the Proceedings and applies this to the research of fraud offences which, this article argues, require a particular methodological approach.
Downloads
References
Archer, Dawn. 2014. “Historical Pragmatics: Evidence from the Old Bailey”. Transactions of the Philological Society 112 (2): 259–277.
Google Scholar
Beale, Joseph H. 1892. “The Borderland of Larceny”. Harvard Law Review 6 (5): 244–256.
Google Scholar
Bradley, John. Harold Short. 2005. “Texts into databases: the evolving field of new-style prosopography”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 20 (1): 3–24.
Google Scholar
Devereaux, Simon. 1996. “The City and the Sessions Paper: “Public Justice” in London 1770–1800”. Journal of British Studies 35 (4): 466–503.
Google Scholar
Devereaux, Simon. 2007. “From Sessions to Newspaper? Criminal Trial Reporting, the Nature of Crime, and the London Press, 1770–1800”. The London Journal 32 (1): 1–27.
Google Scholar
Eiseman, Jason et al. 2016. “Litchfield Unbound: Unlocking Legal History with Metadata, Digitization, and Digital Tools”. Law and History Review 34 (4): 831–855.
Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, James. 1995. “Sleaze and the Victorian Businessman”. History Today 45 (8): 5–8.
Google Scholar
Gallanis, Thomas P. 2006. “The Mystery of Old Bailey Counsel”. Cambridge Law Journal 65 (1): 159–173.
Google Scholar
Griffiths, Cerian Charlotte. 2014. “The Prisoners’ Counsels Act 1836: Doctrine, Advocacy and the Criminal Trial”. Law, Crime and History 2: 28–47.
Google Scholar
Griffiths, Cerian Charlotte. 2017. Prosecuting Fraud in the Metropolis, 1760–1820. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas. 2006. “Writing about the Death Penalty”. Legal History 10: 35–51.
Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim. Robert Shoemaker. 2006. “Digitising History from Below: The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1834”. History Compass 4 (2): 193–202.
Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim. Robert Shoemaker. James Winters. 2011. “Connected histories: a new web search tool for British historian”. The Journal of the Historical Association 96: 354–356.
Google Scholar
Innes, Joanna. John Styles. 1986. “The Crime Wave: Recent Writing on Crime and Criminal Justice in Eighteenth-Century England”. Journal of British Studies 25 (4): 380–435.
Google Scholar
Ireland, Richard. 2015. “Why everything we know about criminal justice history is wrong”. Law, Crime and History 5 (1): 130–142.
Google Scholar
King, Peter. 2009. “Making Crime News: newspapers, violent crime and the selective reporting of the Old Bailey trials in the late eighteenth century”. Crime, History and Society 13 (1): 91–116.
Google Scholar
Langbein, John. 1978. “The Criminal Trial before the Lawyers”. The University of Chicago Law Review 45 (2): 263–316.
Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. 1999. “The prosecutorial origins of defence counsel in the eighteenth century: the appearance of solicitors”. Cambridge Law Journal 58 (2): 314–365.
Google Scholar
Levi, Michael. 1987. Regulating fraud: white-collar crime and the criminal process. London and New York: Tavistock Publications.
Google Scholar
McGowen, Randall. 2007. “Managing the Gallows: The Bank of England and the Death Penalty, 1797–1821”. Law and History Review 25 (2): 241–282.
Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2005. Graphs, Trees and Maps: Abstract Models for Literary History. London and New York: Verso.
Google Scholar
Proceedings of the Central Criminal Court 1834–1913. Welcome to the CC project Wiki! http: //crimpleb.group.shef.ac.uk/wiki/pmwiki.php.
Google Scholar
Robb, George. 1992. White-Collar Crime in Modern England. Financial Fraud and Business Morality, 1845–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Robertson, Stephen. 2016. “Searching for Anglo-American Digital Legal History”. Law and History Review 34 (4): 1047–1069.
Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Robert B. 1993. “Using Quarter Sessions Records as Evidence for the Study of Crime and Criminal Justice”. Archives 20 (90), 145–157.
Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Robert B. 2008. “The Old Bailey Proceedings and the Representation of Crime and Criminal Justice in Eighteenth-Century London”. Journal of British Studies 47: 559–580.
Google Scholar
Sindall, Rob. 1983. “Middle Class Crime in Nineteenth-Century England”. Criminal Justice History 4: 23–40.
Google Scholar
Taylor, James. 2006. “Creating Capitalism: Joint-stock enterprise in British politics and culture, 1800–1870”. The Royal Historical Society.
Google Scholar
Tomasic, Roman. 2011. “The financial crisis and the haphazard pursuit of financial crime”. Journal of Financial Crime 18 (1): 7–31.
Google Scholar
Wilson, Sarah. 2006. “Law, Morality and Regulation: Victorian Experience of Financial Crime”. British Journal of Criminology 46 (6): 1073–1090.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
