Bauhaus – multiple portrait with the Polish episodes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-851X.07.07Keywords:
Bauhaus, avant-garde art, designAbstract
Bauhaus was the only art school derived from the extensive achievements of the avant-garde of the first half of the twentieth century, which gained the status of an independent artistic movement. Cited in the text by Deyan Sudijc, the design historian points out that in the second half of the twentieth century, up to modern times, every new group of reformer artists is rediscovering Bauhaus. Thus, the German school, which had been active for barely thirteen years, created something more than just a style, because it showed what the philosophy of creating objects that are both artistic and useful is.
The article attempts to describe the phenomenon of the school by recalling Polish critics who, like Tadeusz Peiper, visited Walter Gropius and described both the principal and the proposed education system. The author also particularly focuses on discussing Bauhaus’s theatrical output in the context of Oskar Schlemmer. The German creator of the Triadic Ballet, after leaving the innovative university, came to Breslau, or today’s Wrocław, to lecture at the local school and to stage innovative theater performances. This is an interesting and somewhat forgotten episode in his work.
The Bauhaus story is not just a story about an avant-garde school, the author also touches on the somewhat embarrassing aspect of legacy. The college founded by Gropius unfortunately did not survive the Nazi dictatorship in Germany. It was dissolved practically at the beginning of Hitler’s rule. However, fascist propaganda used Bauhaus stylistics in some areas of its functioning. Thus, the school, which became a separate stream of avant-garde, was also difficult to get involved in the political history of the twentieth century, which is also a paradox and a warning for historians assessing the work of artists mostly in terms of their aesthetic values.
References
CARDULLO/KNOPF 2001 – Bert Cardullo i Robert Knopf, Theater of the Avant-Garde. 1890–1950, New Haven–London, 2001, s. 169–186.
Google Scholar
GROPIUS 1961 – Walter Gropius, Introduction, [w:] Oskar Schlemmer, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Farkas Molnar, The theater of the Bauhaus, red. Walter Gropius, Artur S. Wensinger, London 1961, s. 7–14.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3186802
JAEGGI 2009 – Annemarie Jaeggi, Bauhaus: a Conceptual Model, [w:] Bauhaus a conceptual model, Berlin 2009, s. 13–20.
Google Scholar
LEYKO 1995 – Małgorzata Leyko, Przestrzeń sceniczna jako funkcja formy, barwy i ruchu. „Balet triadyczny” na tle koncepcji teatru Oskara Schlemmera, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. W kręgu zagadnień awangardy”, red. G. Gazda i M. Leyko, Łódź 1995, s. 103–111.
Google Scholar
LEYKO 2012 – Małgorzata Leyko, Teatr w krainie utopii, Gdańsk 2012.
Google Scholar
ŁARIONOW 2015 – Dominika Łarionow, „Wystarczy tylko otworzyć drzwi…” Przedmioty w twórczości Tadeusza Kantora, Łódź 2015.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-507-2
MCKINNEY/BUTTERWORTH 2009 – Joslin McKinney i Philip Butterworth, The Cambridge Introduction to Scenography, Cambridge 2009.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816963
NAYOR 1977 – Gillian Nayor, Bauhaus, tłum. Ewa M. Biegańska, Warszawa 1977.
Google Scholar
NOWICKA 2007 – Anna Nowicka, Bauhausbüne eksperyment teatralny, „Didaskalia” 2007, nr 82, s. 44–54.
Google Scholar
PEIPER 1972 – Tadeusz Peiper, W Bauhausie, [w:] Tadeusz Peiper, Tędy. Nowe usta, Kraków 1972, s. 164–171.
Google Scholar
PLASSARD 1992 – Didier Plassard, L’Acteur en effigie. Figure de l’homme artificiel dans le théâter des avant-gardes historiques. Allemagne, France, Italie, Geneve 1992.
Google Scholar
PRZYBYSZ/ZAJDER-JANISZEWSKA/MORAWSKI 2007 – Piotr J. Przybysz, Anna Zajdler-Janiszewska, Stefan Morawski – wstępny szkic do portretu, [w:] Stefan Morawski, Wybór pism estetycznych, Universitas, Kraków 2007, s. 7–53.
Google Scholar
SCHLEMER 1996 – Oskar Schlemmer, Theater (Bühne), [w:] The theater of the Bauhaus, Baltimore– London 1996, s. 80–102.
Google Scholar
SCHLEMMER/MOHOLY-NAGY/MOLNAR 1961 – Oskar Schlemmer, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Farkas Molnar, The theater of the Bauhaus, red. Walter Gropius, Artur S. Wensinger, London 1961.
Google Scholar
SCHMID 2007 – Herta Schmid, Tadeusz Kantor i niemiecki Bauhaus. Od utopii technologicznej do metafizycznej, [w:] Sztuka jest przestępstwem. Tadeusz Kantor a Niemcy i Szwajcaria, red. Uta Schorlemmer, Nürnberg–Kraków, 2007, s. 99–119
Google Scholar
STRZEMIŃSKI 1975 – Władysław Strzemiński, Sztuka nowoczesna a szkoły artystyczne, [w:] Władysław Strzemiński, Pisma, Warszawa 1975, s. 147–164.
Google Scholar
SUDJIC 2014 – Deyan Sudjic, B jak Bauhaus, tłum. Anna Sak, Kraków 2014.
Google Scholar
TONECKI 1927 – Zygmunt Tonecki, Technika w nowoczesnej inscenizacji teatralnej, „Praesens” 1930, nr 2, s. 153–156.
Google Scholar
TONECKI 1930 – Zygmunt Tonecki, Aliterackie próby teatralne. Oskar Schlemmer i Enrico Prampolini, „Wiadomości Literackie” 1930, nr 31/344, s. 2.
Google Scholar
VON MAUR 2002 – Karin von Maur, Oskar Schlemmer – od Bauhausu do wrocławskiej Akademii, [w:] Od Otto Muellera do Oskara Schlemmera. Artyści wrocławskiej Akademii. Eksperyment. Praktyka. Przypomnienie, katalog wystawy, Muzeum Narodowe we Wrocławiu, 2002, s. 176–183.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.