The Interactive Dimension of Creating Cultural Artifacts Using Agile Methodologies

Rafał  Wiśniewski; Izabela Bukalska

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.16.4.12

Authors

Rafał Wiśniewski National Centre for Culture / Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-8021
Izabela Bukalska Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7930-1700

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.4.12

Keywords:

Symbolic Interactionism, Creative Sectors, Creativity, Agile Methodologies

Abstract

The authors consider symbolic interactionism to be a suitable theoretical framework to analyze projects in creative sectors because it affords ample space for individual and collective creativity. Furthermore, teams working on different cultural artifacts establish a negotiated order (interactionist term coined by A. L. Strauss) among artists, managers, the audience, and sponsors, et cetera, by discussing and translating various meanings and perspectives. This is especially noticeable when projects are managed using an agile methodology. The application of agile methodologies in creative sectors is a relatively new idea, although it seems to be in harmony with the nature of artistic work. For instance, it implies the acceptance of unpredictability and flexibility while also recognizing the ability and individuality of project participants. There are also specific problems related to the personalities of the artists and the irregularities and discontinuities inherent in the process of creation. The first part of the article raises the topic of creativity in symbolic interactionism. This perspective is subsequently extended to teamwork in creative sectors employing the description of collective work in Howard Becker’s book entitled Art Worlds as an example. The authors reflect on other contemporary works explaining the cultural shift transpiring during the move from the analog age to the current digital age and its influence on the process of creation in the world of artists. This leads to a discussion of distributed agility, a concept stemming from agile management. The various agile methods are mentioned and shortly characterized; we also present a succinct depiction of historical perspective. The literature on the use of agile methods in creative sectors is referred to along with some of the challenges they face. The need to develop an agile management methodology specifically for creative industries is emphasized. This article utilizes the literature on symbolic interactionism to explain group dynamics by drawing analogies with agile management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rafał Wiśniewski, National Centre for Culture / Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland

Rafał Wiśniewski is an Associate Professor at Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw. He specializes in the sociology of culture and intercultural communication. He is the director of the National Centre for Culture in Poland.

Izabela Bukalska, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland

Izabela Bukalska is an Assistant Professor at the Sociology of Culture Department at Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw. She is a secretary of the Section of Qualitative Sociology and Symbolic Interactionism of the Polish Sociological Association. She conducts research using grounded theory methodology.

References

Angeuelov, Kiril. 2019. “Research for Usefulness of Agile Methods in Creative Business.” Conference Paper 2019 published in: International Conference on Creative Business for Smart and Sustainable Growth (CREBUS). Sandanski, Bulgaria: IEEE.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CREBUS.2019.8840091

Ashmore, Sondra and Kristin Runyan. 2015. Introduction to Agile Methods. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison.
Google Scholar

Beck, Kent et al. 2001. “Manifesto for Agile Software Development.” Agile Alliance. Retrieved October 04, 2020 ( http://agilemanifesto.org/ ).
Google Scholar

Becker. Howard S. 1984. Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. and Robert A. Faulkner. 2009. “Do You Know...?”: The Jazz Repertoire in Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. et al. 2006. Shedding Culture. Art from Start to Finish. Jazz, Painting, Writing and Other Improvisations. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Carew, Peter J. and David Glynn. 2017 “Anti-Patterns in Agile Adoption: A Grounded Theory Case Study of One Irish IT Organisation.” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 18(4):275-289
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0162-8

Chapman, Judith G. and Maureen H. Carrigan. 1993. “Public Self-Attention and Personal Standards: The Impact of Group Composition.” Current Psychology 12:216-229.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686804

Convertino, Gregorio and Nancy Frishberg. 2017. “Why Agile Teams Fail without UX Research.” Communications of the ACM 60(9):35-37.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3126156

Cropley, Arthur J. 2011. “Definitions of Creativity.” Pp. 511-524 in Encyclopedia of Creativity, edited by M. A. Runco and S. R. Pritzker. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00066-2

Cyran, Kazimierz and Sławomir Dybka. 2019. “The Influence of Prosumers on the Creation and the Process of Intelligent Products Flow.” Pp. 241-257 in SMART Supply Network, edited by A. Kawa and A. Maryniak. Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91668-2_13

Dezutter, Stacey. 2011. “Professional Improvisation and Teacher Education.” Pp. 27-50 in Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching, edited by K. Sawyer. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.003

Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Gorzko, Marek. 2016. “Problem twórczości w generowaniu pojęć wprost z danych w świetle metodologii teorii ugruntowanej [The Issue of Creativity in Generating Concepts Directly from Data in the Light of the Grounded Theory Methodology].” Roczniki Nauk Społecznych 44(4):95-119.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rns.2016.44.4-5

Harris, Shanelle M. 2019. The Use of a Modified System Development Life Cycle (MSDLC) in a Sociological Environment to Improve Solution Validation. Retrieved October 04, 2020 ( https://mdsoar.org/handle/11603/17664 ).
Google Scholar

Highsmith, Jim. 2004. Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. Boston: Addison Wesley.
Google Scholar

Hodgson, Damian and Louise Briand. 2013. “Controlling the Uncontrollable: Agile Teams and Illusions of Autonomy in Creative Work.” Work, Employment and Society 27(2):308-325.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012460315

Hormuth, Stefan. 1983. “Self-Awareness and Drive Theory: Comparing Internal Standards and Dominant Responses.” European Journal of Social Psychology 12(1):31-45.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420120103

Hughes, Diane et al. 2016. The New Music Industries: Disruption and Discovery. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar

INTERREG IVC. 2014. Analysis Report. Creative Industries. Retrieved October 04, 2020 ( https://cercles.diba.cat/documents-digitals/pdf/E140303.pdf ).
Google Scholar

Jurney, Russell. 2014. Zwinna analiza danych. Apache Hadoop dla każdego [Agile Data Science: Building Data Analytics Applications with Hadoop]. Gliwice: Helion.
Google Scholar

Katz, Jack. 1994. “Jazz in Social Interaction: Personal Creativity, Collective Constraint, and Motivational Explanation in the Social Thought of Howard S. Becker.” Symbolic Interaction 17(3):253-279.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1994.17.3.253

Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2018. Advances in Contemplative Social Research. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego / Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press.
Google Scholar

Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2019. “Creative Thinking in Qualitative Research and Analysis.” Qualitative Sociology Review 15(3):6-25.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.3.01

Larman, Craig. 2004. Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager’s Guide. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar

McCall, George and J. L. Simmons. 1978. Identities and Interactions. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Mead, George H. 1926. “The Nature of Aesthetic Experience.” International Journal of Ethics 36:382-392.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/207570

Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Morrow, Guy. 2018. “Distributed Agility: Artist Co-Management in the Music Attention Economy.” International Journal of Arts Management 20(3):38-48.
Google Scholar

Papadakis, Emmanouil and Loukas Tsironis. 2018. “Hybrid Methods and Practices Associated with Agile Methods, Method Tailoring and Delivery of Projects in a Non-Software Context.” Procedia Computer Science 138:739-746.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.097

Paris, Thomas and Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini. 2019. “The Process of Creation in Creative Industries.” Creative Innovation Management 28(3):1-17.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12332

Paris, Thomas, Gerald Lang, and David Masse. 2020. “Polarized Worlds and Contextual Creativity in Creative Industries: The Case of Creation Processes in the Perfume Industry.” Retrieved October 04, 2020 ( https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02104669.html ).
Google Scholar

Petkus, Ed. 1996. “The Creative Identity: Creative Behavior from the Symbolic Interactionist Perspective.” Journal of Creative Behaviour 30(3):188-196.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00768.x

Ramesh, Balasubramaniam et al. 2017. “Conflicts and Complements between Eastern Cultures and Agile Methods: An Empirical Investigation.” European Journal of Information Systems 26(2):206-235.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-016-0023-0

Reckwitz, Andreas. 2012. Odkrycie kreatywności [The Invention of Creativity]. Warsaw: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. Keith. 2003. Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration. New York, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert. 1971. “Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World.” Pp. 38-72 in Computer, Communications, and the Public Interest, edited by M. Greenberger. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm L. 1963. “The Hospital and Its Negotiated Order.” Pp. 147-169 in The Hospital in Modern Society, edited by E. Freidson. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Google Scholar

Ślęzak, Izabela. 2009. “Stawanie się poetą. Analiza interakcjonistyczno–symboliczna [Becoming a Poet. Interactionist-Symbolic Analysis].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 5(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.5.1.02

Thibeault, Bernie. 2018. “A Complete Guide to Microsoft’s Digital Feedback Loop.” Retrieved October 04, 2020 ( https://www.aerieconsulting.com/blog/microsofts-digital-feedback-loop ).
Google Scholar

Turner, Ralph. 1990. “Role Change.” Annual Review of Sociology (16):87-110.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000511

Vannini, Philipp and Waskul Dennis. 2006. “Symbolic Interaction as Music: The Esthetic Constitution of Meaning, Self, and Society.” Symbolic Interaction 29(1):5-18.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2006.29.1.5

Wiśniewski, Rafał and Tomasz Kukołowicz. 2017. “Pięć kierunków poszerzania pola kultury, czyli uwagi o współczesnej polityce kulturalnej [Five Directions of Expanding the Field of Culture—Comments on Contemporary Cultural Policy].” In Pomorskie poszerzenie pola kultury: dylematy – konteksty – działania [Pomeranian Expansion of the Field of Culture: Dilemmas—Contexts—Actions], edited by C. Obracht-Prondzyński and P. Zbieranek. Gdansk: Nadbałtyckie Centrum Kultury, Pomorskie Centrum Badań nad Kulturą UG.
Google Scholar