Research into Transformations in Everyday Life: Three Methodological Notes

Authors

  • Helena Kubátová Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.14.3.01

Keywords:

Everyday Life, Narrative Interview, Understanding, Temporality, Historicity, Generation Gap, Life-World (Lebenswelt), Social Reality, Phenomenological Sociology

Abstract

The article focuses on the reflection of my research experience in obtaining qualitative data using narrative interviews. I confronted my own research experience with the phenomenological methodology of Alfred Schütz, dramaturgical sociology of Erving Goffman, and interpretative sociology of Max Weber. The article discusses three problems that emerged during a longitudinal study of everyday life transformation in the long-term horizon of sixty years: 1. How to create a concept of everyday life so it serves not only as a tool for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data, but also as a tool for understanding the meanings of the examined empirical world; 2. How to discursively create an image of everyday life transformations during an interview between a participant and a researcher and what it means in relation to the research subject; 3. How to reach understanding between the participant and the researcher during a face-to-face interview.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Helena Kubátová, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic

Helena Kubátová is an Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology, Andragogy, and Cultural Anthropology of Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. Her research interests lie in the sociology of everyday life and of the way of life in rural settings, in phenomenology and social stratification, and in transformations of the Czech society after 1989.

References

Anýžová, Petra, Helena Kubátová, and Petr Matějů. 2016. “Rodina a kariéra ve světle hodnot a víry.” Pp. 175-204 in Konfrontace hodnot v pozdní modernitě: Česko a Hlučínsko v evropském kontextu, edited by F. Zich et al. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
Google Scholar

Anýžová, Petra, Helena Kubátová, and František Znebejánek. 2016. “Proměny hlučínské religiozity a hodnotové struktury hlučínského katolíka.” Pp. 149-174 in Konfrontace hodnot v pozdní modernitě: Česko a Hlučínsko v evropském kontextu, edited by F. Zich et al. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
Google Scholar

Assmann, Aleida. 2006. “Memory, Individual and Collective.” Pp. 210-224 in The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by R. Goodin and Ch. Tilly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. The Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

Bertaux, Daniel and Martin Kohli. 1984. “The Life Story Approach: A Continental View.” Annual Review of Sociology 10:215-237.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.001243

Bertaux, Daniel, Paul Thompson, and Paul Richard Thompson. 1993. Between Generations: Family Models, Myths, and Memories. Oxford: University Press.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13(1):3-21.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593

Crystal, David. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bjerg. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219-245.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock Publications.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar

Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On Collective Memory. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Halfacree, Keith. 1993. “Locality and Social Representation: Space, Discourse and Alternative Definitions of the Rural.” Journal of Rural Studies 9(1):23-37.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3

Halfacree, Keith. 2006. “Rural Space: Constructing a Three-Fold Architecture.” Pp. 44-62 in Handbook of Rural Studies, edited by P. Cloke, T. Marsden, and P. Mooney. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n4

Hann, Chris. 2015. “Backwardness Revisited: Time, Space, and Civilization in Rural Eastern Europe.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 57(4):881-911.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417515000389

Hekman, Susan. 1983. Weber, the Ideal Type, and Contemporary Social Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Google Scholar

Kubátová, Helena. 2013. “Changing Life Situations of Silesians in Hlučín Region.” Pp. 195-216 in Changes in Social Awareness on Both Sides of a Border Poland-Czech Republic, edited by U. Swadźba and D. Topinka. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar

Kubátová, Helena. 2014. “Proměny způsobu života na Hlučínsku v mezigenerační perspektivě.” Český lid 101(2):209-231.
Google Scholar

Kubátová, Helena. 2016a. Proměny příměstského venkova a venkovské každodennosti. Olomouc: Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého.
Google Scholar

Kubátová, Helena. 2016b. “Collective Memory and Collective Identity of Hlučín Region Inhabitants in the 20th Century.” Historická sociologie 1:11-32.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2016.1

Kubátová, Helena et al. 2015. Mezigenerační proměny způsobu života na Hlučínsku. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
Google Scholar

Mannheim, Karl. 1954. Ideology and Utopia. An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred. 1944. “The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology.” American Journal of Sociology 49(6):499-507.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/219472

Schütz, Alfred. 1945. “The Homecomer.” American Journal of Sociology 50(5):269-376.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/219654

Schütz, Alfred. 1953. “Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14(1):1-38.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2104013

Schütz, Alfred. 1954. “Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Philosophy 51(9):257-273.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2021812

Schütz, Alfred. 1962. “On Multiple Realities.” Pp. 207-259 in Collected Papers I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_9

Schütz, Alfred. 1964. “The Social World and the Theory of Social Action.” Pp. 3-19 in Collected Papers II. Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6854-2_1

Schütz, Alfred. 1966. “Some Structure of Life-World.” Pp. 116- 132 in Collected Papers III. Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy. The Hague: Martinuis Nijhoff.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1700-8_6

Schütz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred. 1981. Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann. 1973. The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin, (eds.). 1997. Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Thompson, Paul. 2000. The Voice of the Past. Oral History. Oxford: University Press.
Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1949. “‘Objectivity’ of Social Science and Social Policy.” Pp. 50-112 in On the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-08-28

How to Cite

Kubátová, H. (2018). Research into Transformations in Everyday Life: Three Methodological Notes. Qualitative Sociology Review, 14(3), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.14.3.01

Issue

Section

Articles