Popular Stoicism in the Face of Social Uncertainty

Renata Dopierała

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.18.4.08

Authors

Renata Dopierała University of Lodz, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-258X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.4.08

Keywords:

Stoicism, Popular (Modernity) Stoicism, Good Life and Happiness, Therapeutic and Counseling Culture

Abstract

The article discusses popular Stoicism (a modern, simplified, and often commercialized version of ancient Stoicism), which is offered as an answer to the uncertainty of modernity. The financial, political, climate, and health crises have been detrimental to the sense of agency and control over one’s life, leading individuals to seek ways of (subjectively) regaining it. Popular Stoicism can be viewed as an expert system providing individuals with a specific vision of happiness and the good life, in addition to offering practical knowledge on how to define an area of individual agency by negotiating the boundaries between that which is within one’s power and that which is not. Reflections begin with a juxtaposition of ancient and contemporary Stoicism, focusing on their different socio-cultural origins, followed by a synthesis of the principles of ancient Stoicism on happiness and the good life and a detailed interpretation of the ‘offering’ of popular Stoicism in the relevant areas. In the latter context, two chosen Stoic exercises (necessary to achieve happiness and the good life) are discussed—the ability to recognize what things depend/do not depend on us and Stoic emotion work. The practices and techniques recommended as a part of constant work on oneself are also supposed to teach individuals to adapt to their unstable reality. As a result, the popular version of Stoicism perpetuates the mechanisms of the culture of individualism, which holds the individual fully responsible for their life, and the therapeutic and counseling culture (based on one’s readiness to constantly self-improve), which is a new form of disciplining in a neoliberal society. Both are important elements of the everyday life and lifestyle of the middle class. This class is interested in self-fulfillment and is the primary target audience of contemporary Stoic handbooks. The consideration is based on fragments of books on popular Stoicism, mainly written by Polish philosophers, subjected to qualitative content analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Renata Dopierała, University of Lodz, Poland

Renata Dopierała, Ph.D., works at the Department of Sociology of Culture, Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, Poland. Her research interest lies in the sociology of everyday life (with the main focus on the issue of privacy) and the sociology of things. Her interests also include the phenomenon of consumerism and anti-consumption lifestyles.

References

Anderson, Kare. 2012. “Five Reason Why Stoicism Matters Today.” Forbes, September 28. Retrieved July 05, 2022 https://www.forbes.com/sites/kareanderson/2012/09/28/five-reasons-why-stoicism-matters-today/
Google Scholar

Blokker, Paul and Ulrike Vieten. 2022. “Fear and Uncertainty in Late Modern Society.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 9/2022:1-6.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2022.2033461

Boltanski, Luc and Ève Chiapello. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London, New York: Verso.
Google Scholar

Czapiński, Janusz. 2004a. “Psychologiczne teorie szczęścia [Psychological Theories of Happiness].” Pp. 51-102 in Psychologia pozytywna. Nauka o szczęściu, zdrowiu, sile i cnotach człowieka [Positive Psychology. Learning about Happiness, Health, Strength, and Human Virtues], edited by J. Czapiński. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Czapiński, Janusz. 2004b. “Spotkanie dwóch tradycji: hedonizmu i eudajmonizmu [When Two Traditions Meet: Hedonism and Eudaimonism].” Pp. 13-17 in Psychologia pozytywna. Nauka o szczęściu, zdrowiu, sile i cnotach człowieka [Positive Psychology. Learning about Happiness, Health, Strength, and Human Virtues], edited by J. Czapiński. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Dembek, Agata. 2012. “Profesjonalizacja emocji w domu i w pracy – wybrane przejawy problematyzacji emocji w późnym kapitalizmie [Professionalization of Emotions at Home and at Work—Selected Symptoms of Problematization of Emotions in Late Capitalism].” Kultura Współczesna 3/2012:42-53.
Google Scholar

Diener, Ed. 1984. “Subjective Well-Being.” Psychological Bulletin 3/1984:542-575.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

Drozdowski, Rafał et al. 2020. Życie codzienne w czasach pandemii. Raport z pierwszego etapu badań [Everyday Life in the Times of Pandemic. Report from the First Stage of Research]. Poznan: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Google Scholar

Epiktet [Epictetus]. 1961. Diatryby. Encheiridion z dodaniem Fragmentów oraz Gnomologium Epiktetowego [Diatribes]. Warsaw: PWN.
Google Scholar

Evans, Jules. 2019. “Why Stoicism Has Become So Popular Over the Last Decade.” Retrieved July 07, 2022 https://www.stoicinsights.com/philosopher-jules-evans-on-why-stoicism-has-become-so-popular-over-the-last-decade/
Google Scholar

Fabjański, Marcin. 2020. “Medytacja w praktyce filozoficznej jako ‘żywa metafizyka’ (praktyki medytacyjne w szkole stoickiej) [Meditation in Philosophical Practice as ‘Living Metaphysics’ (Meditation Practices in the Stoic School)].” Folia Philosophica 44/2020:1-9.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31261/fp.10033

Fabjański, Marcin. 2021. Stoicyzm uliczny. Jak oswajać trudne sytuacje [Street Stoicism. How to Tame Difficult Situations]. Cracow: Znak.
Google Scholar

Flood, Alison. 2020. “Dress Rehearsal for Catastrophe: How Stoics Are Speaking to Locked-Down Readers.” The Guardian, April 16. Retrieved June 30, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2020/apr/16/how-stoics-are-speaking-to-locked-down-readers
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2000. “Techniki siebie [Technlogies of the Self].” Pp. 247-275 in Filozofia, historia, polityka. Wybór pism [Philosophy, History, Politics. Writings], edited by M. Foucault. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2018. Rządzenie sobą i innymi. Wykłady z Collège de France 1982–1983 [The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982-1983]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Hadot, Pierre. 2003. Filozofia jako ćwiczenie duchowe [Philosophy as a Spiritual Exercise]. Warsaw: Aletheia.
Google Scholar

Hadot, Pierre. 2004. Twierdza wewnętrzna. Wprowadzenie do ‘Rozmyślań’ Marka Aureliusza [The Inner Citadel: The ‘Meditations’ of Marcus Aurelius]. Kety: Wydawnictwo Antyk.
Google Scholar

Hayborn, Daniel. 2003. “What Do We Want from a Theory of Happiness?” Metaphilosophy 3/2003:305-329.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00275

Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” The American Journal of Sociology 3/1979:551-575.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049

Hochschild, Arlie R. 2003. The Managed Heart. Commercialisation of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520930414

Illouz, Eva. 2010. Uczucia w dobie kapitalizmu [Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism]. Warsaw: Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar

Illouz, Eva. 2012. “Praca ‘Ja’. Z Evą Illouz rozmawiają Agata Dembek i Mateusz Halawa [The Work of the ‘I.’ Agata Dembek and Mateusz Halawa Talk to Eva Illouz].” Kultura Współczesna 3/2012:11-17.
Google Scholar

Irvine, William B. 2009. A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Irvine, William B. 2020a. “Stoicyzm nie ma czynić naszego życia wygodnym. Ma nam pomóc, by było znośne [Stoicism Is Not Meant to Make Our Life Comfortable. It Is to Help Us Make It Bearable].” Wysokie Obcasy, August 08. Retrieved July 05, 2022 https://www.wysokieobcasy.pl/wysokie-obcasy/7,157211,26182685,william-b-irvine-stoicyzm-czyni-zycie-znacznie-znosniejszym.html
Google Scholar

Irvine, William B. 2020b. Wyzwanie stoika. Jak dzięki filozofii odnaleźć w sobie siłę, spokój i odporność psychiczną [The Stoic Challenge: A Philosopher’s Guide to Becoming Tougher, Calmer, and More Resilient]. Cracow: Insignis Media.
Google Scholar

Jacyno, Małgorzata. 2007. Kultura indywidualizmu [Culture of Individualism]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Krajewski, Marek and Małgorzata Kubacka. 2020. “Pandemiczne emocje i radzenie sobie z nimi [Pandemic Emotions and Dealing with Them].” Pp. 58-74 in Życie codzienne w czasach pandemii. Raport z trzeciego etapu badań [Everyday Life in the Times of Pandemic. Report from the Third Stage of Research], edited by R. Drozdowski et al. Poznan: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Google Scholar

Lasch, Christopher. 1979. Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Norton.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3817/0679040187

Lazari-Radek, Katarzyna, de. 2021. Godny pożądania stan świadomości. O przyjemności jako wartości ostatecznej [A Desirable State of Consciousness. Pleasure as the Ultimate Value]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

Mazur, Tomasz. 2010. “Współczesna praktyka stoicka [Contemporary Stoic Practice].” Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria 2/2010:235-250.
Google Scholar

Mazur, Tomasz. 2013. “‘Stoisz prosty albo cię prostują’. Psychosomatyczne podstawy racjonalistycznych praktyk stoickich [‘You Stand Straight or They Straighten You.’ Psychosomatic Foundations of Rationalist Stoic Practices].” Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna 1/2013:166-185.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2013.2.1.8

Mazur, Tomasz. 2014. O stawaniu się stoikiem. Czy jesteście gotowi na sukces? [Becoming a Stoic. Are You Ready for Success?]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Paczkowski, Przemysław. 2017. “Stoicka koncepcja ‘wewnętrznej warowni’ [Stoic Concept of ‘Inner Stronghold’].” Kultura i Wartości 23/2017:49-60.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/kw.2017.23.49

Rapior, Waldemar. 2017. Życie w projekcie. Projekt jako narzędzie przekształcania świata i rama instytucjonalna rzeczywistości społecznej [Living in the Project. Project as a Tool for Transforming the World and the Institutional Framework of Social Reality]. Poznan: UAM.
Google Scholar

Rieff, Philip. 1966. The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar

Rokicka, Ewa. 2013. “Jakość życia – konteksty, koncepcje, interpretacje [Quality of Life—Contexts, Concepts, Interpretations].” Pp. 159-177 in Nowy ład? Dynamika struktur społecznych we współczesnych społeczeństwach [New Order? Dynamics of Social Structures in Contemporary Societies], edited by J. Grotowska-Leder. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-967-4.10

Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834

Rosa, Hartmut. 2020. Przyspieszenie, wyobcowanie, rezonans. Projekt krytycznej teorii późnonowoczesnej czasowości [Alienation and Acceleration—Towards a Critical Theory of Late-Modern Temporality]. Gdansk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Google Scholar

Rydlewski, Michał. 2020. “Praktyki terapeutyczne jako kapitalistyczne techniki siebie. Psychologizacja jako prywatyzacja problemów psychicznych [Therapeutic Practices as Capitalist Techniques of Self. Psychologization as the Privatization of Mental Problems].” Dyskurs & Dialog 2/2020:121-142.
Google Scholar

Ryff, Carol D. 1989. “Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57/1989:1069-1081.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Seidler, Paulina F. 2022. Po prostu spokój. Jak dobrze żyć po stoicku [Plain Peace. How to Live in a Stoic Way]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Zwierciadło.
Google Scholar

Sellars, John. 2021. Lekcje stoicyzmu [Lessons in Stoicism]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Czarna Owca.
Google Scholar

Seneka [Seneca], Lucjusz Anneusz. 2017. Myśli [Reflections]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.
Google Scholar

Sherman, Nancy. 2021. “If You’re Reading Stoicism for Life Hacks, You’re Missing the Point.” The New York Times, May 14. Retrieved June 30, 2022 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/14/opinion/stoics-self-help.html
Google Scholar

Skarga, Barbara. 2009. Tercet metafizyczny [Metaphysical Trio]. Cracow: Znak.
Google Scholar

Stachowiak, Jerzy. 2014. “O koncepcji nowego ducha kapitalizmu w ujęciu Luca Boltanskiego i Ève Chiapello [On the New Spirit of Capitalism as Approached by Luc Boltanski and Ève Chiapello].” Przegląd Socjologiczny 4/2014:9-43.
Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, Piotr. 2012. “Stoicyzm i buddyzm zen. Sześć podobieństw i sześć różnic [Stoicism and Zen Buddhism. Six Similarities and Six Differences].” Edukacja Filozoficzna 54/2012:135-148.
Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, Piotr. 2014. Sztuka życia według stoików [The Art of Living according to the Stoics]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo WAB.
Google Scholar

Stefaniuk, Tomasz. 2017. “Popular Stoicism. A New Chance for Practical Philosophy or Mere Illusion?” Kultura i Wartości 24/2017:45-69.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/kw.2017.24.45

Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. 1962. O szczęściu [On Happiness]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. 1966. “Happiness and Time.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1/1966:1-10.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2106134

Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. 2002. Historia filozofii. Tom 1 [The History of Philosophy, vol. 1]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Zawadzka, Anna M. 2014. “Wartości, cele i dobrostan w kulturze konsumpcji [Values, Goals, and Well-Being in the Culture of Consumption].” Pp. 15-37 in Kultura konsumpcji – wartości, cele, dobrostan. Psychologiczne aspekty zjawiska [Culture of Consumption—Values, Goals, Well-Being. Psychological Aspects of the Phenomenon], edited by A. M. Zawadzka, M. Niesobędzka, and D. Godlewska-Werner. Warsaw: Liberi Libri.
Google Scholar

Zuboff, Shoshana. 2020. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Ingram Publisher Services.
Google Scholar