Animal archeology: Domestic pigeons and the nature-culture dialectic

Colin Jerolmack

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.3.1.06

Authors

Colin Jerolmack City University of New York, Graduate Center, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.1.06

Keywords:

Pigeon, Human-animal Relations, Domestication, Nature, History, Wildlife

Abstract

This paper historically traces the purposive domestication of pigeons in order to examine the dialectical relationship between nature and culture. It is demonstrated that each instance of the domestication of the pigeon for a new function (i.e., food, messenger) also entailed the construction of a role of the bird in human society, replete with symbolic representations and moral valuations. Yet it is also argued that, though animals are repositories for social meaning, and culture is literally inscribed into the physical structure of domesticated animals, such meanings are patterned and constrained according to the biological features of the animal itself. The ubiquitous and unwanted “street pigeon” now found around the globe is the descendent of escaped domestic pigeons, occupying the unique and ambiguous category of “feral”- neither truly wild nor domestic. Ironically, the very traits that were once so desirous and that were naturally selected for are now what make the feral pigeon so hard to get rid of and so loathsome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Colin Jerolmack, City University of New York, Graduate Center, USA

Colin Jerolmack is a PhD candidate in sociology at the Graduate Center, City University of New York. He has published in Sociological Theory, Sociological Forum, and Society and Animals; and his interests include qualitative methods, community and urban studies, social psychology, and human-animal relations. His dissertation (in progress) is a comparative ethnography that seeks to contribute to theorizing about the roles of animals in place, politics, problems, public health, community, and identity.

References

Alger, Janet M. and Steven F. Alger (2003) Cat Culture: The Social World of a Cat Shelter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Anderson, Kay (1998) “Animal Domestication in Geographic Perspective.” Society and Animals 6(2):119-135.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853098X00104

Arluke, Arnold and Clinton Sanders (1996) Regarding Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Audubon Society (no date) “The Passenger Pigeon.” Retrieved August, 2006 http://www.audubon.org/bird/BoA/F29_G3a.html
Google Scholar

Bell, Michael Mayerfeld (1994) Childerley: Nature and Morality in a Country Village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Berger, John (1980) “Why Look at Animals?” Pp. 3-30 in About Looking, edited by John Berger. New York: Vintage Books.
Google Scholar

Birke, Lynda (2003) “Who-or-What are the Rats (and Mice) in the Laboratory.” Society and Animals 11(3):207-224.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853003322773023

Bodio, Stephen (1990) Aloft: A Meditation on Pigeons and Pigeon-Flying. New York: Lyons and Burford Publishers.
Google Scholar

Bronner, Simon J. (2005) “Contesting Tradition: The Deep Play and Protest of Pigeon Shoots.” Journal of American Folklore 118(470):409-452.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jaf.2005.0041

Buller, Henry, and Carol Morris (2003) “Farm Animal Welfare: a New Repertoire of Nature-Society Relations or Modernism Re-embedded?” Sociologia Ruralis 43(3):216-237.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00242

Butz, Mark and Lyn Butz (2005) “Animal Symbols.” Thousand Cranes Peace Network. Retrieved October, 2005 http://rosella.apana.org.au/~mlb/cranes/symbols-.htm#Animal
Google Scholar

Bryant, Clifton D. (1979) “The Zoological Connection: Animal-related Human Behavior.” Social Forces 58:399-421.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2577598

Darwin, Charles (1883) Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.87899

Durkheim, Emile ([1912] 1995) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.
Google Scholar

Enticott, Gareth (2003) “Lay immunology, Local Foods and Rural Identity: Defending Unpasteurised Milk in England.” Sociologia Ruralis 43(3):258-270.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00244

Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs (1990) Deceptive Distinctions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Fine, Gary Alan (2003) Morel Tales: The Culture of Mushrooming. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar

Fine, Gary Alan and Lazaros Christophorides (1991) “Dirty Birds, Filthy Immigrants, and the English Sparrow War: Metaphorical Linkage in Constructing Social Problems.” Symbolic Interaction 14:375-391.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1991.14.4.375

Geertz, Clifford (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, Mitchell Duneier and Richard P. Applebaum (2003) Introduction to Sociology. 4th edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Google Scholar

Glover, David and Marie Beaumont (2004) Racing Pigeons. Ramsbury, Marlborough (Great Britain): Crowood Press Ltd.
Google Scholar

Goode, David (2006) Playing with My Dog, Katie: An Ethnomethodological Study of Canine-Human Interaction. Indiana: Purdue University Press.
Google Scholar

Green-Armytage, Stephen (2003) Extraordinary Pigeons. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
Google Scholar

Greider, Thomas and Lorraine Garkovich (1994) “Landscapes: The Social Construction of Nature and the Environment.” Rural Sociology 59(1):1-24.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00519.x

Herda-Rapp, Ann and Karen G. Marotz (2005) “Contested Meanings: The Social Construction of the Mourning Dove in Wisconsin.” Pp. 73-122 in Mad About Wildlife, edited by Ann Herda-Rapp and Theresa L. Goedeke. Boston: Brill.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047407447

Herda-Rapp, Ann and Theresa L. Goedeke, editors (2005) Mad About Wildlife. Boston: Brill.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047407447

Irvine, Leslie (2004) If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connection With Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Jerolmack, Colin (2005) “Our Animals, Ourselves? Chipping Away the Human-Animal Divide.” Sociological Forum 20(4):651-660.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-005-9063-2

Johnston, Richard F. & Marián Janiga (1995) Feral Pigeons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Kean, Hilda (2001) “Imagining Rabbits and Squirrels in the English Countryside.” Society and Animals 9(2):163-175.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853001753639260

Latour, Bruno (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Levi, Wendell Mitchell ([1941] 1963) The Pigeon. Sumter, S.C.: Levi Publishing Co., Inc.
Google Scholar

Levi, Wendell Mitchell ([1965] 1996) Encyclopedia of Pigeon Breeds. Sumter, SC: Levi Publishing Co., Inc.
Google Scholar

Levi-Strauss, Claude (1962) Totemism. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael E. (1988) “Sacrifice and the Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object: Laboratory Culture and the Ritual Practice in the Neurosciences.” Social Studies of Science 18(2):265-289.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631288018002004

May, Reuben A. Buford (2004) “Of Mice, Rats, and Men: Exploring the Role of Rodents in Constructing Masculinity Within a Group of Young African American Males.” Qualitative Sociology 27(2):159-177.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000020691.72140.4c

McCafferty, Garry (2002) They Had No Choice: Racing Pigeons at War. Charleston, SC: Tempus Publishing, Inc.
Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Merton, Robert (1936) “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Action.” American Sociological Review 1(6):894-904.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615

Milbourne, Paul. 2003. “Nature-Society-Rurality.” Sociologia Ruralis 43(3):193-195.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00240

Nash, Jeffrey E. 1989. “What’s in a Face? The Social Character of the English Bulldog.” Qualitative Sociology 12(4):357-370.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989397

Patent, Dorothy Hinshaw (1997) Pigeons. New York: Clarion Books.
Google Scholar

Peters, Wim (2005) The Pigeon Sport: A Dying Game? Unpublished Manuscript.
Google Scholar

Philo, Chris (1995) “Animals, Geography, and the City: Notes on Inclusions and Exclusions.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13:655-681.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d130655

Philo, Chris and Chris Wilbert, editors (2000) Animal Spaces, Beastly Places. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Racing Pigeon Digest [no author] (2005, spring). Lake Charles, LA.
Google Scholar

Sabloff, Annabelle (2001) Reordering the Natural World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442679221

Scarce, Rik (2005) “More Than Wolves at the Door: Reconstructing Community Amidst a Wildlife Controversy.” Pp. 123-146 in Mad About Wildlife, edited by Ann Herda-Rapp and Theresa L. Goedeke. Boston: Brill.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047407447_009

Schorger, Arile W. (1955) The Passenger Pigeon. Madison WI.: University of Wisconsin Press.
Google Scholar

Skinner, Burrhus F. (1959) Cumulative Record. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Google Scholar

Skogen, Ketil and Olve Krange (2003) “A Wolf at the Gate: The Anti-Carnivore Alliance and the Symbolic Construction of Community.” Sociologia Ruralis 43(3):309-325.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00247

Smith, Christian (2003) Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162028.001.0001

Specter, Malcolm and John Kitsuse (1977) Constructing Social Problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
Google Scholar

Tester, Keith (1991) Animals and Society: the Humanity of Animal Rights. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Tovey, Hilary (2003) “Theorising Nature and Society in Sociology: The Invisibility of Animals.” Sociologia Ruralis 43(3):196-215.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00241

Webster’s New World College Dictionary (1996). New York: Macmillan Company.
Google Scholar

Whatmore, Sarah and Lorraine Thorne (1998) “Wild(er)ness: Reconfiguring the Geographies of Wildlife.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23(4):435-454.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1998.00435.x

Wolch, Jennifer (2002) “Anima Urbis.” Progress in Human Geography 26(6):721-742.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph400oa

Wolch, Jennifer and Jody Emel, editors (1998) Animal Geographies. New York: Verso.
Google Scholar

Wolch, Jennifer, Kathleen West and Thomas E. Gaines (1995) “Transspecies Urban Theory.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13:735-760.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d130735