Creating the Client Who Can Create Himself and His Own Fate – the Tragedy of the Citizens’ Contract

Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.07

Authors

Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.07

Keywords:

Active citizenship, Contractualism, Luhmann, Koselleck, Semantics, Governmentality

Abstract

This article is about the emergence of new forms of active citizenry, empowerment, and self-help that meet in the so-called citizens’ contract. Based on Danish social policy, the article shows how the articulation of the citizen as ‘fellow citizen’ has led to the current contractualization of the relationship between the administration and the individual citizen. Citizens’ contracts are employed not only to commit clients to a specific behavior, but first and foremost to commit them to a particular inner dialogue about obligation and freedom. Economic assistance becomes dependent on this dialogue and they thus become contracts both between the administration and the citizens and between the citizens and their own selves. The article moves beyond the Foucault-inspired categorization by identifying the tragic consequences of these self-contracts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen (PhD) is a Professor at Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy at The Copenhagen Business School. There, he is also research manager of the Public and Political Management Group consisting of 20 researchers. He has worked with discourse analysis and systems theory for quite many years. His focus has been diagnoses of present within the empirical field of public administration in a very broad sense. He has published 9 books and more than 30 articles. In 2003 he published Discursive analytical strategies. Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann at Policy Press.

References

Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (1995) Selvskabt forvaltning. Copenhagen: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
Google Scholar

Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (1999) Diskursive analysestrategier – Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Copenhagen: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
Google Scholar

Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (2003) Discursive analytical strategies - understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t898nd

Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (2004)”The Contractualisation of the Citizen – on the transformation of obligation into freedom.” Social Systems 10(2):273-291.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2004-0207

Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (2006) “Diskursive analytische Strategien in der Verwaltungswissenschaft.” Pp. 97-120 in Politik und Verwaltung, PVS – Politische Vierteljahresschrift, edited by J. Bogumil, W. Jann und F. Nullmeier. Sonderheft 37.
Google Scholar

Berlingske Tidende (2002) ”Dårlige forældre frem i lyset.” Berlingske Tidende, May 20.
Google Scholar

Born, Asmund and Per H. Jensen (2001) “Aktivering og handleplaner som integrationsinstrumenter – hvor ligger mulighederne for kritik?” Pp. 199-214 in Marginalisering, integration, velfærd, edited by J.G. Andersen and P.H. Jensen. Ålborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Google Scholar

Cour, Anders la (2002) ”Frivillighedens pris – En undersøgelse af Niklas Luhmanns teori om sociale systemer og dens anvendelse på området for frivilligt socialt arbejde.” Ph.D dissertation. Sociologisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, Denmark.
Google Scholar

Cruikshank, Barbara (1999) The will to empower democratic citizens and the subjects. London: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501733918

Dean, Mitchell (1994) ”A social structure of many souls: moral regulation, government and self-formation.”The Canadian Journal of Sociology 19(2):145-168.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3341342

Dean, Mitchell (1998) “Administrative Ascetism.” Pp. 87-107 in Governing Australia, edited by M. Dean and B. Hindess. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques (1996) The gift of death. Translated by D. Willis. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel (1997a) ”Technologies of the self.” Pp. 223-251 in The essential works of Michel Foucault, volume one. New York: The New Press.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel (1997b) ”Subjectivity and truth.” Pp. 87-92 in The essential works of Michel Foucault, volume one. New York: The New Press.
Google Scholar

Gibson, Barry, Jane Gregory and Peter Robinson (2005) “The intersection between systems theory and grounded theory: the emergence of the grounded systems observer.” Qualitative Sociology Review 1(2). Retrieved May, 2007 http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume2/QSR_1_2_Gibson_Gregory_Robinson.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.1.2.02

Jayasuriya, Kaneshka (2001) “Autonomy, liberalism and the new contractualism.” Law in context 18(2):57-78.
Google Scholar

Jespersen, Karen (2000) ”Opgør med et opgør.” Social Politik 2:24-30.
Google Scholar

Jydske Vestkysten (2001) ”Familier på kontrakt.” Jydske Vestkysten, November 2.
Google Scholar

Jyllandsposten (2002) ”Kriminelle børn hærger Karlebo.” Jyllandsposten, September 9.
Google Scholar

Koch, Anna (1982) Socialt arbejde – helhedsprincip og behovsvurdering på fagligt grundlag. Copenhagen: AKF.
Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart (1985) Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Lister, Ruth (2001) “Towards a citizens’ welfare state.” Theory, Culture & Society 18(2/3):91-111.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051805

Luhmann, Niklas (1981) ”Communication about law in interaction systems.” Pp. 234-256 in Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1993a) “Observing Re-entries.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 16(2):485-498.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj199316227

Luhmann, Niklas (1993b) Gesellschaftsstruktur und semantik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1995) Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1999) ”The paradox of form.” Pp. 15- 26 in Problems of form, edited by D. Baecker. Stanford California: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503617698-003

Luhmann, Niklas (2002) ”Deconstruction as Second-order observing.” Pp. 94-112 in Luhmann: Theories of Distinction. Stanford California: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619340-006

Mahs, Bertil Michael, editor (2002) Jeg har planer, eller har jeg? – Sociale handleplaner og praksis, volume 2. Copenhagen: Fokus.
Google Scholar

Miller, Toby and Alec McHoul (1998) “Helping the self.” Social Text 57(4):127-155.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/466884

Moe, Sverre (1998) Den moderne hjelpens sosiologi. Velferd i systemteoretisk perspektiv. Stavanger: Apeiros Forlag.
Google Scholar

Nancy, Bratt (1963) Samtaleteknik og klientbehandling. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.
Google Scholar

Olesen, Søren Peter (2001) ”Handlingsplansamtaler – en hån mod de arbejdsløse eller konstruktivt samspil med systemet?” Tidsskrift for arbejdsliv 3(3):7-28.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/tfa.v3i3.108351

Politiken (2002) ”Menneskelighed på kontrakt.” Politiken, September 9.
Google Scholar

Ramian, Knud and Erik Adolph (2002) ”Handleplansprocessen.” Pp. 17-25 in Jeg har planer, eller har jeg? – Sociale handleplaner og praksis, edited by Bertil Michael Mahs. Copenhagen: Fokus.
Google Scholar

Rimke, Heidi Marie (2000) ”Governing citizens through self-help literature.” Cultural Studies 14(1):61-78.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095023800334986

Schmidt, Lars-Henrik (1990) Det sociale selv. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Google Scholar

Simonsen, Palle (1989) ”Hvilken omstillingsproces står den offentlige sektor overfor og hvad er de uddannelsesmæssige konsekvenser heraf?” Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift 3:254-258.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1982) ”Afprivatisering af problemer kan føre til aktiv handling.” Socialrådgiveren 16, pp. 8-10.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1983a) ”Privatisering af det sociale ansvar.” Socialrådgiveren 15, p. 2.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1983b) ”Privatisering og selvhjælp.” Socialrådgiveren 25, pp. 14-15.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1984) ”Brug pjecen – moderniserings- og omstillingsprocessen.” Socialrådgiveren 21.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1986) ”Fremtidens sociale arbejde skal starte i lokalmiljøet.” Socialrådgiveren 24, pp. 12-13.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1989a) ”Klientgørende processer.” Socialrådgiveren 15, pp. 4-5.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1989b) ”Social handleplan i København.” Socialrådgiveren 25, p. 6.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1989c) ”Socialrådgiver i det tværfaglige.” Socialrådgiveren 26, pp. 18-20.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1990) ”Lad os blive socialrådgivere igen.” Socialrådgiveren 1, pp. 11.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1991a) ”Thisted kommune overtræder Bistandsloven.” Socialrådgiveren 6, pp. 3-5.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1991b) ”Luft til forsvarligt socialt arbejde.” Socialrådgiveren 13, pp. 16-17.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1992a) ”Problemtyve ryster rollen af sig.” Socialrådgiveren 5, pp. 3-4.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1992b) ”Tak for selvtillid.” Socialrådgiveren 18, pp. 7-9.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1994) ”Beskyttelse af klientens integritet.” Socialrådgiveren 16, pp. 4-5.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (1996) ”Fra helhedssyn til medsyn.” Socialrådgiveren 16, pp. 12-13.
Google Scholar

Socialrådgiveren (2001) ”Vojens: Om prævention og partnere.” Socialrådgiveren 24, pp. 3-21.
Google Scholar

Spencer-Brown, George (1969) Laws of Form. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Google Scholar

Sullivan, Barbara (1997) “Mapping Contract.” Pp. 1-13 in The New Contractualism?, edited by G. Davis, B. Sullivan & A. Yeatman. South Melbourne: MacMillan Education Australia.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10349952.1997.11876665

Vincent-Jones, Peter (2006) The new public contracting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

White, Stuart (2000) ”Social rights and the social contract – Political theory and new welfare politics.” British Journal of Political Science 30:507-532.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400000211

Yeatman, Anna (1997) “Contract, Status and Personhood.” Pp. 39-56 in The New Contractualism?, edited by G. Davis, B. Sullivan & A. Yeatman. South Melbourne: MacMillan Education Australia.
Google Scholar

Yeatman, Anna (1998) ”Interpreting Contemporary Contractualism.” Pp. 227-241. in Governing Australia, edited by M. Dean and B. Hindess. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar