Morality on Trial: Structure and Intelligibility System of a Court Sentence Concerning Homosexuality

Authors

  • Baudouin Dupret Institut Français du Proche-Orient, Syria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.2.07

Keywords:

Law, ruling, praxiological study of texts, instructed action, intelligibility systems and ressources, institutional context, legal relevance, procedural correctness, legal characterization

Abstract

This article analyses the structural organization of a ruling issued by an Egyptian court in the trial known as the “Queen Boat case”, where several people were arrested on the ground of their alleged homosexuality. With the text, and only the text, as data, it aims at making explicit the possibilities open to potential readers of the ruling. The praxiological study of texts constitutes a relatively new domain of inquiry in which texts are considered as produced objects whose intelligibility is structured and organized in a way that provides instructions for the texts’ reading and accounts for their author’s worldview and purposes. The article briefly presents the Egyptian legal and judicial system. Then, through close observation of each of the constitutive elements and organizational features of the ruling, it shows how this text serves as a vehicle for a limited number of possible logical options. In other words, it describes aspects of the practical grammar of written legal adjudication. Finally, in conclusion, some remarks are formulated concerning rulings as instructed reading of cases submitted to judicial review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Baudouin Dupret, Institut Français du Proche-Orient, Syria

Baudouin Dupret is educated in Law, Arabic and Islamic Sciences, and Political Sciences. He is research fellow at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and was based for several years in Cairo, Egypt, at the French Institute (CEDEJ). He is now based in Damascus, Syria, at the Institut Français du Proche- Orient (IFPO). He has published extensively in the field of the sociology and anthropology of law in the Middle East. His current work involves a praxiological approach to the production of truth in Arab contexts, including courts and parliaments, scientific expertise, the media, and religious education. He (co-)edited several volumes, among which Standing Trial: Law and the Person in the Modern Middle East (Tauris, 2004). He is the author of Au nom de quel droit. Répertoires juridiques et référence religieuse dans la société égyptienne musulmane contemporaine (Paris, Maison des sciences de l’homme, 2000) and Le Jugement en action. Ethnométhodologie du droit, de la morale et de la justice en Egypte (Geneva, Librairie Droz, 2006).

References

Drew, Paul, and John Heritage (1992) “Analyzing talk at work: an introduction.” Pp. 3-65 in Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Dupret, Baudouin (2006) Le Jugement en action. Ethnométhodologie du droit, de la morale et de la justice en Egypte. Geneva: Librairie Droz.
Google Scholar

Emerson, Robert M. (1983) “Holistic Effects In Social Control Decision-Making.” Law and Society Review 17(3): 425-55.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053588

Goffman, Erving (1981) Forms of Talk Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Hester, Stephen and Peter Eglin (1992) A Sociology of Crime. London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Hester, Stephen and Peter Eglin (1997) “Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction.” Pp. 1-24 in Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, edited by S. Hester and P. Eglin, Washington: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
Google Scholar

Jackson, Bernard S. (1988) Law, Fact and Narrative Coherence. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
Google Scholar

Jalbert, Paul (1999) “Critique and Analysis in Media Studies: Media Criticism as Practical Action.” Pp. 31-52 in Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches, edited by P. Jalbert, Lanham: University Press of America.
Google Scholar

Jayyusi, Lena (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Lenoble, Jacques, and François Ost (1980) Droit, mythe et raison. Essai sur la dérive mytho-logique de la rationalité juridique Bruxelles: Publications des Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.8612

Livingston, Eric (1995) An Anthropology of Reading. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael, and David Bogen (1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-contra Hearings. Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11sn042

Macbeth, Douglas (1999) “Glances, Trances, and Their Relevance for a Visual Sociology.” Pp. 135-170 in Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches, edited by P. Jalbert. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America.
Google Scholar

Matoesian, Gregory (2001) Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Pollner, Melvin (1974) “Sociological and common-sense models of the labelling process.” Pp. 27-40 in Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, edited by R. Turner. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey (1972) “On the analyzability of stories by children.” Pp. 325-345 in Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, edited by J. J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
Google Scholar

Sudnow, David (1965) “Normal Crimes.” Social Problems 12: 251-276.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1965.12.3.03a00010

Downloads

Published

2006-08-17

How to Cite

Dupret, B. (2006). Morality on Trial: Structure and Intelligibility System of a Court Sentence Concerning Homosexuality. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(2), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.2.07

Issue

Section

Articles