An Interview with Kathy Charmaz: On Constructing Grounded Theory

Antony J. Puddephatt

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.2.3.02

Authors

Antony J. Puddephatt Cornell University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.3.02

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Antony J. Puddephatt, Cornell University, USA

Antony J. Puddephatt (PhD) is a postdoctoral fellow in the Science and Technology Studies Department at Cornell University. His interests include sociological theory, science and technology studies, and ethnographic research. He is currently conducting a grounded theory styled analysis of the social and organizational dynamics of multidisciplinary research collaborations in the natural sciences.

References

Bryant, Antony and Kathy Charmaz, editors (2007, forthcoming) Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941

Charmaz, Kathy (1980) The Social Reality of Death. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

Charmaz, Kathy (1991) Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Charmaz, Kathy (2000) “Grounded Theory Methodology: Objectivist and Constructivist Qualitative Methods.” Pp. 509-535 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Charmaz, Kathy (2005) “Grounded Theory in the 21st Century: Applications for Advanced Social Justice Studies.” Pp. 507-535 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd Edition, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Charmaz, Kathy (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.

Charmaz, Kathy, Glennys Howarth and Allan Kellehear, editors (1997) The Unknown Country: Death in Australia, Britain and the U.S.A. London: McMillan; New York: St. Martin’s. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25593-1

Charmaz, Kathy and Debora A. Paterniti, editors (1999) Health, Illness, and Healing: Society, Social Context, and Self. Los Angeles: Roxbury.

Denzin, Norman (1997) Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243672

Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Glaser, Barney (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.

Glaser, Barney (2002) “Constructivist Grounded Theory?” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3(3). Retrieved 15 October 2006 http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-02/3-02glaser-e.htm

Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

Goldthorpe, John (2000) On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Gubrium, Jaber and Kathy Charmaz, editors (1992) Aging, the Self, and Community. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Henwood, Karen and Nicholas Pidgeon (2003) “Grounded Theory in Psychological Research.” Pp. 131-155 in Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design, edited by P.M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes and L. Yardley. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10595-008

Huber, Joan (1973) “Symbolic Interaction as a Pragmatic Perspective: The Bias of Emergent Theory.” American Sociological Review 38:278-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094400

Kuhn, Thomas (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Maines, David (2001) The Faultline of Consciousness: A View of Interactionism in Sociology. New York, NY: Alan de Gruyter.

Mann, Thomas (1973) The Magic Mountain. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Mead, George Herbert (1932) Philosophy of the Present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press.

Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ulmer, Jeffrey and Mindy Wilson (2003) “The Potential Contributions of Quantitative Research to Symbolic Interactionism.” Symbolic Interaction 26(4):531-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.531