The Interactionist Self and Grounded Research: Reflexivity in a Study of Emergency Department Clinicians

Peter Nugus

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.10

Authors

Peter Nugus University of New South Wales. Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.10

Keywords:

Symbolic interactionism, Reflexivity, Self, Emergency Department, Grounded theory

Abstract

This paper shows how the theory of symbolic interactionism shaped a grounded investigation of the organizational labor of Australian Emergency Department (ED) clinicians. Further, it shows how symbolic interactionism supports reflexive criteria for validating grounded research. Using ethnographic methods across two metropolitan EDs, interactionism’s emphasis on roles applied equally to the relationship between researcher and participants as to the relationships among participants. Specifically, the researcher generated data by positioning interactionism as the mediator of the emergent relationship between researcher and participants. The results of this positioning were: a traceable path from understanding to interpretation and the search for consequentiality rather than truth. Interactionism facilitated the co-production by the researcher and participants of limits on the generalizability of the data. The paper is an argument for symbolic interactionism as a means not merely to generate sociological findings, but to conceptualize the impact of the researcher on the grounded research process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Peter Nugus, University of New South Wales. Australia

Peter Nugus (PhD) is a medical sociologist in the Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia. He researches on the sociology of health organizations, professional identity and integrated care. Peter is a Research Fellow on the Interprofessional Learning Project and is based in the ACT Department of Health, the Centre's industry partner, in Canberra.

References

Albas, Cheryl A. and Daniel C. Albas (2003) “Motives.” Pp. 349-66 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Alvesson, Martin (2002) Understanding organizational culture, Sage: London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280072

Anspach, Renee R. and Nissim Mizrachi (2006) “The Field Worker’s Ethics: Ethnography and Medical Sociology.” Sociology of Health & Illness 28(6): 713-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00538.x

Blumer, Herbert (1990) Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Blumer, Herbert (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Burke, Kenneth (1935) Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. Los Altos, CA: Hermes Publications.

Charmaz, Kathy and Virginia Olesen (2003) “Medical Institutions.” Pp. 637-56 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Counselman, Francis, Robert W. Schafermeyer, Rebecca Garcia and Debra G. Perina (2000) ”A survey of academic departments of emergency medicine regarding operation and clinical practice.” Annals of Emergency Medicine 36(5): 446-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(00)67313-4

Drucker, Peter (1989) The New Realities. NY: Harper & Row Publishers.

Forte, James A. (2002) “Mead. Metatheory and Twenty-first-century Interdisciplinary Team Work.” Sociological Practice 4(4): 315-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020851011396

Gibson, Barry, Jane Gregory and Peter Robinson (2005) “The intersection between systems theory and grounded theory: The emergence of the grounded systems observer.” Qualitative Sociology Review 1(2): 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.1.2.02

Glaser, Barney (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Goffman, Erving (1963) Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Goffman, Erving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

Halfpenny, Peter (2001) “Positivism in the Twentieth Century.” Pp. 371-85 in Handbook of Social Theory, edited by G. Ritzer and B. Smart. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608351.n28

Hall, Wendy A. and Peter Callery (2001) “Enhancing the Rigor of Grounded Theory: Incorporating Reflexivity and Relationality.” Qualitative Health Research 11(2): 257-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119082

Heckscher, Charles (1994) “Defining the Post-bureaucratic Type.” Pp. 14-62 in The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, edited by C. Heckscher and A. Donnellon. London: Sage.

Heckscher, Charles and Anne Donnellon, editors (1994) The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change. London: Sage.

Herman-Kinney, Nancy J. and Joseph M. Verschaeve (2003) “Methods of Symbolic Interactionism” pp. 213-252 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Hewitt, John P. (2003) “Symbols, Objects, and Meanings.” Pp. 307-26 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Joas, Hans (2001) “The Emergence of the New: Mead’s Theory and its Contemporary Potential.” Pp. 89-99 in Handbook of Social Theory, edited by G. Ritzer and B. Smart. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608351.n8

Katovich, Michael A. and David R. Maines (2003) “Society.” Pp. 289-306 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Konecki, Krzysztof, T. (2005) “The Problem of Symbolic Interaction and of Constructing Self.” Qualitative Sociology Review 1(1): 68-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.1.1.05

Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lofland, John (1995) “Analytic Ethnography: Features, Failings and Futures.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24(1): 30-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124195024001002

Lofland, John (1970) “Interactionist Imagery and Analytic Interruptus.” Pp. 35-45 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior: Papers in Honor of Herbert Blumer, edited by T. Shibutani. New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Books.

Manning, Philip (2005) “Reinvigorating the Tradition of Symbolic Interactionism.” Symbolic Interaction 28(2): 167-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.2.167

McCall, George J. (2003) “Interaction.” Pp. 327-48 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Mead, George H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society, edited by C. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mills, C. Wright (1940) “Situated Action and Vocabularies of Motive.” American Sociological Review 5: 904-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524

Neitz, Mary Jo (1999) “Prescriptions for Qualitative Research.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28(1): 100-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023389

Nugus, Peter (2007a) The Organisational World of Emergency Clinicians. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales.

Nugus, Peter (2007b) Jeffrey Braithwaite, Rick Iedema, Anna Holdgate, Joanne Travaglia, Sally McCarthy, Margaret Fry and Barbara Daly. “El Impacto del Conocimiento Clínico, su Estructura e Interacción en la Experiencia del Paciente: El Recorrido Organizacional del Clínico de Emergencias.” Academic Emergency Medicine 14(4): e97-e98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.10.064

Punch, Keith F. (1998) Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.

Schein, E. (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership,5th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford M. Lyman (1968) “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33(1): 46-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239

Snow, David A., Calvin Morrill, and Leon Anderson (2003) “Elaborating Analytic Ethnography: Linking Fieldwork and Theory.” Ethnography 4(2): 181-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042002

Stokes, Randall and John Hewitt (1976) “Aligning Actions.” American Sociological Review 41: 838-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094730

Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tedlock, Barbara (2000) “Ethnography and Ethnographic Representation.” Pp. 455-86 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Thomas, Jim (2003) “Resurrecting the ‘Science’ of Symbolic Interactionism.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32 (4): 475-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241603253839

Turner, Ralph H. (1962) “Role-taking: Process versus Conformity.” Pp. 20-40 in Human Behavior and Social Process, edited by A.M. Rose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Vryan, Kevin D., Patricia A. Adler and Peter Adler (2003) “Identity.” Pp. 367-90 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Weigert, Andrew J. and Victor Gecas (2003) “Self.” Pp. 267-88 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.

Wolf, Z.R. (1988). Nurses’ Work: The Sacred and the Profane. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.