The Interactionist Self and Grounded Research: Reflexivity in a Study of Emergency Department Clinicians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.10Keywords:
Symbolic interactionism, Reflexivity, Self, Emergency Department, Grounded theoryAbstract
This paper shows how the theory of symbolic interactionism shaped a grounded investigation of the organizational labor of Australian Emergency Department (ED) clinicians. Further, it shows how symbolic interactionism supports reflexive criteria for validating grounded research. Using ethnographic methods across two metropolitan EDs, interactionism’s emphasis on roles applied equally to the relationship between researcher and participants as to the relationships among participants. Specifically, the researcher generated data by positioning interactionism as the mediator of the emergent relationship between researcher and participants. The results of this positioning were: a traceable path from understanding to interpretation and the search for consequentiality rather than truth. Interactionism facilitated the co-production by the researcher and participants of limits on the generalizability of the data. The paper is an argument for symbolic interactionism as a means not merely to generate sociological findings, but to conceptualize the impact of the researcher on the grounded research process.
Downloads
References
Albas, Cheryl A. and Daniel C. Albas (2003) “Motives.” Pp. 349-66 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Alvesson, Martin (2002) Understanding organizational culture, Sage: London.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280072
Anspach, Renee R. and Nissim Mizrachi (2006) “The Field Worker’s Ethics: Ethnography and Medical Sociology.” Sociology of Health & Illness 28(6): 713-31.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00538.x
Blumer, Herbert (1990) Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth (1935) Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. Los Altos, CA: Hermes Publications.
Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy and Virginia Olesen (2003) “Medical Institutions.” Pp. 637-56 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Counselman, Francis, Robert W. Schafermeyer, Rebecca Garcia and Debra G. Perina (2000) ”A survey of academic departments of emergency medicine regarding operation and clinical practice.” Annals of Emergency Medicine 36(5): 446-50.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(00)67313-4
Drucker, Peter (1989) The New Realities. NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
Google Scholar
Forte, James A. (2002) “Mead. Metatheory and Twenty-first-century Interdisciplinary Team Work.” Sociological Practice 4(4): 315-34.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020851011396
Gibson, Barry, Jane Gregory and Peter Robinson (2005) “The intersection between systems theory and grounded theory: The emergence of the grounded systems observer.” Qualitative Sociology Review 1(2): 3-21.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.1.2.02
Glaser, Barney (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Goffman, Erving (1963) Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar
Halfpenny, Peter (2001) “Positivism in the Twentieth Century.” Pp. 371-85 in Handbook of Social Theory, edited by G. Ritzer and B. Smart. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608351.n28
Hall, Wendy A. and Peter Callery (2001) “Enhancing the Rigor of Grounded Theory: Incorporating Reflexivity and Relationality.” Qualitative Health Research 11(2): 257-72.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119082
Heckscher, Charles (1994) “Defining the Post-bureaucratic Type.” Pp. 14-62 in The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, edited by C. Heckscher and A. Donnellon. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Heckscher, Charles and Anne Donnellon, editors (1994) The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Herman-Kinney, Nancy J. and Joseph M. Verschaeve (2003) “Methods of Symbolic Interactionism” pp. 213-252 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Hewitt, John P. (2003) “Symbols, Objects, and Meanings.” Pp. 307-26 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (2001) “The Emergence of the New: Mead’s Theory and its Contemporary Potential.” Pp. 89-99 in Handbook of Social Theory, edited by G. Ritzer and B. Smart. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608351.n8
Katovich, Michael A. and David R. Maines (2003) “Society.” Pp. 289-306 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof, T. (2005) “The Problem of Symbolic Interaction and of Constructing Self.” Qualitative Sociology Review 1(1): 68-89.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.1.1.05
Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Lofland, John (1995) “Analytic Ethnography: Features, Failings and Futures.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24(1): 30-67.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124195024001002
Lofland, John (1970) “Interactionist Imagery and Analytic Interruptus.” Pp. 35-45 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior: Papers in Honor of Herbert Blumer, edited by T. Shibutani. New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Books.
Google Scholar
Manning, Philip (2005) “Reinvigorating the Tradition of Symbolic Interactionism.” Symbolic Interaction 28(2): 167-73.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.2.167
McCall, George J. (2003) “Interaction.” Pp. 327-48 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Mead, George H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society, edited by C. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright (1940) “Situated Action and Vocabularies of Motive.” American Sociological Review 5: 904-13.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524
Neitz, Mary Jo (1999) “Prescriptions for Qualitative Research.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28(1): 100-104.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023389
Nugus, Peter (2007a) The Organisational World of Emergency Clinicians. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales.
Google Scholar
Nugus, Peter (2007b) Jeffrey Braithwaite, Rick Iedema, Anna Holdgate, Joanne Travaglia, Sally McCarthy, Margaret Fry and Barbara Daly. “El Impacto del Conocimiento Clínico, su Estructura e Interacción en la Experiencia del Paciente: El Recorrido Organizacional del Clínico de Emergencias.” Academic Emergency Medicine 14(4): e97-e98.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.10.064
Punch, Keith F. (1998) Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Schein, E. (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership,5th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford M. Lyman (1968) “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33(1): 46-62.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
Snow, David A., Calvin Morrill, and Leon Anderson (2003) “Elaborating Analytic Ethnography: Linking Fieldwork and Theory.” Ethnography 4(2): 181-200.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042002
Stokes, Randall and John Hewitt (1976) “Aligning Actions.” American Sociological Review 41: 838-49.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094730
Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Tedlock, Barbara (2000) “Ethnography and Ethnographic Representation.” Pp. 455-86 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Thomas, Jim (2003) “Resurrecting the ‘Science’ of Symbolic Interactionism.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32 (4): 475-78.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241603253839
Turner, Ralph H. (1962) “Role-taking: Process versus Conformity.” Pp. 20-40 in Human Behavior and Social Process, edited by A.M. Rose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Vryan, Kevin D., Patricia A. Adler and Peter Adler (2003) “Identity.” Pp. 367-90 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Weigert, Andrew J. and Victor Gecas (2003) “Self.” Pp. 267-88 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by H.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: CA: AltaMira Press.
Google Scholar
Wolf, Z.R. (1988). Nurses’ Work: The Sacred and the Profane. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.