Teaching Visual Grounded Theory

Authors

  • Krzysztof T. Konecki University of Lodz, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.5.3.05

Keywords:

Visual grounded theory, Homelessness, Photography, Visual sociology, Qualitative data analysis, Visual processes, Teaching qualitative methods, Qualitative sociology

Abstract

The paper is based on personal 20-years experience of teaching methodology of grounded theory and qualitative methods. In the following paper I would like to show the usefulness of visual analysis in teaching methodology of grounded theory. A very important tool is to use pictures and a sequencing of pictures, which give a comparative insight into empirical data and teaches the comparative method that is so important to generate theory (Glaser 1965; Glaser, Strauss, 1967; Glaser 1978). Students can learn how to compare and find patterns in empirical instances, which have visual character. Some of the sequences show stages of action and the sequence that all together is a linear representation of activity. Sequence of pictures helps to build the pattern that is conceptual understanding of the phenomena being studied. In other case, the sequences of pictures given to students are not planned. They are almost accidentally created and force students to find patterns by means of the comparative analysis. We should always know what had happened before a picture was taken as well as afterwards, it is similar to sequences analysis in textual data (Silverman 2007). We should always be aware of the context of analyzed activity. Students are also encouraged to make a theoretical sampling and saturate categories using data from photos and other visual data. This helps them to proceed with the research from empirical incidents to conceptually elaborated properties of categories and finally to the definition of category and formulating the hypotheses. In this way they learn visual grounded theory that is using the visual images for generating categories, properties and hypotheses and also for presenting results of analysis in the final report.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Krzysztof T. Konecki, University of Lodz, Poland

Krzysztof T. Konecki is a Professor of Sociology, chair of Organizational and Management Sociology Department, Lodz University, Poland, President of the Qualitative Methods Research Network of the European Sociological Association. His major research areas are: qualitative sociology, grounded theory, symbolic interactionism, visual sociology, sociology of management and organization, sociology of work, organizational symbolism, Japanese culture and management, human-non-human-animals relationships.

References

Anderson, Nels (1923/1965) The Hobo. The Sociology of the Homeless Man. Chicago, London: Phoenix Books, The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Banks, Marcus (2007) Using Visual Qualitative Data. LA, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
Google Scholar

Bryant, Antony (2009). “Grounded Theory and Pragmatism: The Curious Case of Anselm Strauss” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(3).
Google Scholar

Bryant, Anthony and Charmaz, Kathy (2007) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941

Charmaz, Kathy (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Chenail, Ronald (2004) “When Disney meets the research park: Metaphors and models for engineering an online learning community of tomorrow”.Pp. 107-121 in Internet and Higher Education, 7(2). Retrieved November, 2009 http://www.nova.edu/~ron/Disney.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.03.001

Chenail, Ronald (2008) “YouTube as a qualitative research asset: Reviewing user generated videos as learning resources.” Pp 18-24 in The Weekly Qualitative Report, 1(4). Retrieved November, 2009 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/WQR/youtube.pdf
Google Scholar

Chenail, Ronald J.; Spong, Jennifer L.; Chenail, Jan; Liscio, Michele; McLean, Lenworth. G.; Cox, Holly G.; Shepherd, Brenda and Mowzoon, Nura C. (2006). “Creating and using learning objects in qualitative research education.” Pp. 450-573 in The Qualitative Report, 11(3). Retrieved February, 2009 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR11-3/chenail.pdf
Google Scholar

Chenail, Ronald. J.; St. George, Sally; Wulff, Dan; Duffy, Maureen; Laughlin, Martha; Warner, Kate and Sahni, Tarmeen (2007) “Mentoring qualitative research authors globally: The Qualitative Report experience.” Pp 67-81 in The Qualitative Report, 12(1). Retrieved February, 2009 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-1/chenail.pdf
Google Scholar

Clarke, Adele (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
Google Scholar

Corbin, Juliet and Strauss, Anselm L. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Corbin, Juliet and Strauss, Anselm L.(2007) Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd Edition. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

Glaser, Barney (1965) “The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis.” Pp. 436 – 445 in Social Problems, Vol.12, no 4.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1965.12.4.03a00070

Glaser, Barney (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. San Francisco: The Sociology Press.
Google Scholar

Glaser Barney and Strauss, Anselm L. (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago : Aldine.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Goode, David (2007) Playing With My Dog Katie. An Ethnomethodological Study of Canine – Human Interaction. Purdue University Press.
Google Scholar

Hesse – Biber, Sharlene N. (2007) “Teaching Grounded Theory” in: Bryant Anthony and Kathy Charmaz, The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
Google Scholar

Hurworth, Rosalind E. (2008) Teaching qualitative research: Cases and issues. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087902056

Iacocca, Lee and Novak, William (1984) Iaccoca – An Autobiography. The Bantam Dell Publishing Group.
Google Scholar

Johnsen, Sarah; May, John and Cloke, Paul (2008) “Imag(in)ing ‘homeless places’: using auto – photography to re-examine the geographies of homelessness.” Pp. 194 – 207 in Area, 40, No 2.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00801.x

Konecki, Krzysztof Tomasz (2008). “Touching and Gesture Exchange as an Element of Emotional Bond Construction. Application of Visual Sociology in the Research on Interaction between Humans and Animals ”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 33. Retrieved November, 2009 http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1154
Google Scholar

Liberman, Kenneth (2004) Dialectical Practice In Tibetan Philosophical Culture. An Ethnomethodological Inquiry Into Formal Reasoning. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlelfield Publishers.
Google Scholar

Mastenbroek, Willem (1996) “Organizational Innovation in Historical Perspective. Change as duality management.” Pp. 5-14 in Business Horizons, July-August.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(96)90045-2

Pink, Sarah (2007) Doing Visual Ethnography. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857025029

Prus, Robert (1996) Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Radley, Alan; Hodgetts, Darin and Cullen, Andrea (2005) “Vizualizing homlessness: a study in photography and estrangement.”Pp. 273 – 295 in Journal of Community and applied Social Psychology, 15.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.825

Schubert, Cornelius (2006) “Video Analysis of Practice and Practice of Video Analysis. Selecting field and focus in videography.” in: Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods edited by Knoblauch, Hubert; Schnettler, Bernt; Raab, Jurgen and Soeffner, Hans Georg. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Silverman, David (2007) A Very Short, Fairly Interesting And Reasonably Cheap Book About Qualitative Research. LA, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
Google Scholar

Strübing, Jörg (2004) Grounded Theory. Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundierung des Verfahrens der empirisch begründeten Theoriebildung (Reihe: Qualitative Sozialforschung Bd. 15). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Google Scholar

Strübing, Jörg (2007) Anselm Strauss. Konstanz: Uvk Verlags GmbH.
Google Scholar

Suchar, Charles (1997).”Grounding visual research in shooting scripts”.Pp. 33-55 in Qualitative Sociology, 20(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024712230783

Downloads

Published

2009-12-31

How to Cite

Konecki, K. T. (2009). Teaching Visual Grounded Theory. Qualitative Sociology Review, 5(3), 64–92. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.5.3.05

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>