Anti-establishment Armed Groups as Total Institutions: Exploring Transformations of the Self

Maritza Felices-Luna

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.07.1.04

Authors

Maritza Felices-Luna University of Ottawa, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.07.1.04

Keywords:

Total Institutions, Identity, Self, Armed Conflict, Terrorism

Abstract

Based on an empirical research on the Irish and Peruvian conflicts, this article uses Goffman’s concept of total institution to analyse women’s involvement in the armed struggle. It contends that organisations presenting themselves as the legitimate army of an embryonic state are in fact total institutions attempting to produce a particular self and identity on its members through the use of the physical environment and the framing of all social interactions that take place within their purview. However, members demonstrate agency and self efficacy by mobilizing the same physical space and framed interactions in order to either facilitate their own transformation or resist it, which results in the emergence of an alternative self and identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bertaux, Daniel (1997) Les Récits de Vie. Luçon: Nathan.
Google Scholar

Branaman, Ann (2010) “The Protean Goffman: Erving Goffman and the New Individualism.” Pp. 232-253 in The Contemporary Goffman, edited by M. Hviid Jacobsen. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Collins, Randall (1988) “Theoretical Continuities in Goffman’s Work.” Pp. 41-63 in Erving Goffman, edited by P. Drew and A. Wootton. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Coser, Lewis (1974) Greedy Institutions. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Gheorghiu, Mihaï, Dinu (2001) “Institutions totales ou institutions bâtardes?” Pp.175- 198 in Erving Goffman et les institutions totales, edited by C. Amours and A. Blanc. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony (1988) “Goffman as a Systematic Social Theorist.” Pp. 250-279 in Erving Goffman, edited by P. Drew and A. Wootton. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1959) Presentation of Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1961) Asylums. New York: Penguin.
Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam (1988) “Goffman’s Approach to Face to Face Interaction.” Pp. 14-40 in Erving Goffman, edited by P. Drew and A. Wootton. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Lemert, Charles (2010) “Goffman, Still: Spoiled Identities and Sociological Irony.” Pp. 147-161 in The Contemporary Goffman, edited by M. Hviid Jacobsen. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Manning, Peter K. (2010) “Continuities in Goffman: The Interaction Order.” Pp. 98- 118 in The Contemporary Goffman, edited by M. Hviid Jacobsen. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Puddephatt, Anthony (2008) “Incorporating Ritual into Greedy Institution Theory.” Sociological Quarterly 49: 155-180.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00110.x

Quéré, Louis (2001) “Goffman, un naturaliste manchot.” Pp. 223-259 in Erving Goffman et les institutions totales, edited by C. Amours and A. Blanc. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Google Scholar

Stake, Robert E. (2003) “Case Studies.” Pp. 134-164 in Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Treviño, Javier A., editor (2003) “Erving Goffman and the Interaction Order.” Pp. 1-49 in Goffman’s Legacy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar

Weil, Robert (2001) “Les institutions totales dans l’oeuvre de Goffman.” Pp. 25-41 in Erving Goffman et les institutions totales, edited by C. Amours and A. Blanc. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Google Scholar

Ytreberg, Espen (2010) “The Question of Calculation: Erving Goffman and the Pervasive Planning of Communication.” Pp. 293-312 in The Contemporary Goffman, edited by M. Hviid Jacobsen. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar