The Communicative Construction of Reality and Sequential Analysis. A personal reminiscence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.2.04Keywords:
Communicative Paradigm, Sociology, Linguistics, Social Realities, Sequential AnalysisAbstract
This paper presents a historical view of the emergence of what is known as the communicative paradigm. Through a personal reminiscence of his long career, Thomas Luckmann entangles the main sources of what was a radical shift of the role of language and communication in the humanities and social sciences. In doing so, Luckmann shows that the epistemological and ontological assumptions on which the contemporary study of social interaction and communicative processes rely were practically non-existent half a century ago.
While sociology and linguistics seemed to exist in separate universes during Luckmann’s student days, a dialogical approach to language and social life eventually appeared – for example, in ethnomethodology, conversational analysis and French structuralism – and laid the foundation to the (today taken for granted) idea that social realities are the result of human activities. Human social reality and the worldview that motivates and guides interaction are mainly constructed in communicative processes. If social reality is constructed in communicative interaction our most reliable knowledge of that reality comes from reconstructions of these processes. Such reconstructions have been greatly facilitated by technological innovation, such as tape- and video-recorder, which, alongside theoretical advancements, may explain the timing of the communicative turn. Finally, this paper marks the benefits of sequential analysis in enabling us to trace step-by-step the processes by which social reality is constructed and reconstructed.
Downloads
References
Bergmann, Jörg. 1985. “Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit. Aufzeichnungen als Daten der interpretativen Soziologie.” Pp. 299-320 in Entzauberte Wissenschaft. Zur Relativität und Geltung sozialer Forschung (Soziale Welt 3), edited by Wolfgang Bonß, Heinz Hartmann. Göttingen: Schwarz.
Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg and Thomas Luckmann. 1995. “Reconstructive Genres of Everyday Communication.” Pp. 289- 304 in Aspects of Oral Communication, edited by Uta M. Quasthoff. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Lachmann, Renate. 1997. Memory and Literature. Intertextuality in Russian Modernism. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar
Lord, Albert B. 1960. The Singer of Tales. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas. 1999. “Remarks on the Description and Interpretation of Dialogue.” International Sociology 14(4):387-402.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014004001
Parry, Milman. 1930. “Studies in the Epic Technique of Oral Verse-Making. I: Homer and Homeric Style.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 41:73-147.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/310626
Plessner, Helmuth. 1964. Conditio Humana. Pfullingen: Günther Neske.
Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth. 1975[1928]. Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch, Einführung in die philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110845341
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.