The Fourth Act in Socio-Legal Scholarship: Playing With Law on the Sociological Stage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.1.06Keywords:
Globalization, Post-Conflict, Social Phenomenon, Socio-Legal Scholarship, Transitional JusticeAbstract
The emerging narrative of law as a social phenomenon—as opposed to a legal phenomenon— presents pressing questions about what it means to take a sociological approach to law, why the discipline needs retelling from a sociological vantage point, and how this relatively new narrative can be told. I consider these “baseline” questions of socio-legal studies through a careful dissection of Roger Cotterrell’s assertion that a sociological understanding of legal ideas “consistently and permanently addresses the need to reinterpret law systematically and empirically as a social phenomenon.” By deconstructing Cotterrell’s statement, I will explain how a sociological approach provides a vital analytical lens through which to appreciate not only how law works (succeeds or fails) in different social contexts but also how law acts as a social phenomenon. Drawing upon historical and contemporary research examples, I argue that law must be studied as if on a sociological “stage” upon which different actors perform and experience social “acts” within the “theater” of the legal discipline. I will explain why a sociological approach to law is vital for understanding how each “act”—each social phenomenon of law—plays out in the context of other phenomena, including globalization, transitional justice, and the evolution of socio-legal scholarship itself.
Downloads
References
Abbott, Kenneth. 1999. “International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts.” The American Journal of Internal Law 93(2):361-379.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997995
Abel, Richard L. 1982. The Politics of Informal Justice. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 1996. “Interdisciplinarity as Colonization.” Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 226. Retrieved January 05, 2014 http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/266
Google Scholar
Cleary, Maryell and Peter Hughes. 2013. “Harriet Martineau.” Dictionary of Unitarian & Universalist Biography. Retrieved February 08, 2014 http://www25.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/harrietmartineau.html
Google Scholar
Cloatre, Emilie. 2008. “Trips and Pharmaceutical Patents in Djibouti: An ANT Analysis of Socio-Legal Objects.” Social & Legal Studies 17(2):263-281.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663908090882
Cloatre, Emilie. 2013. Pills for the Poorest: An Exploration of TRIPS and Access to Medication in Sub-Saharan Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies.
Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 1992. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. London: Butterworths.
Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 1997. Law’s Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264903.001.0001
Cotterrell, Roger. 1998. “Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?” Journal of Law and Society 25(2):171-192.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00086
Cotterrell, Roger. 2011. “Ant’s Eye-View of Law.” Journal of Classical Sociology 11(4):506-510.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X11415151
Dror, Yekzel. 1959. “Law and Social Change.” Tulane Law Review 33:787-802.
Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. 1921. “Objective Law. III.” Columbia Law Review 21:126-143.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1112412
Durkheim, Émile. 1895. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen. 1936. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Elliot, W. Y. 1922. “The Metaphysics of Duguit’s Pragmatic Conception of Law.” Political Science Quarterly 37:639-654.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2142460
Felstiner, William L. F., Richard Abel, and Austin Sarat. 1980/1981. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, and Claiming…” Law & Society Review 25(3/4):631-654.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505
Frerichs, Sabine. 2011. “Re-Embedding Neo-Liberal Constitutionalism: A Polanyian Case for the Economic Sociology of Law.” Pp. 65-84 in Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets, edited by C. Joerges and J. Falke. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine. 2012. “Studying Law, Economy, and Society: A Short History of Socio-Legal Thinking.” Helsinki Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19. University of Helsinki. Retrieved February 08, 2014 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2022891
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2022891
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1986. “The Law and Society Movement.” Stanford Law Review 38(3):763-780.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228563
Kagan, Robert A. 1995. “What Socio-Legal Scholars Should do When There Is Too Much Law to Study.” Journal of Law and Society 22(1):140-148.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1410711
Klein, Julie T. 1996. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
Google Scholar
Koh, Harold. 1997. “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?” Yale Law Journal 106:2599-2659.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/797228
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494222
Latour, Bruno. 2009. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Massell, Gregory J. 1968. “Law as an Instrument of Revolutionary Change in a Traditional Milieu: The Case of Soviet Central Asia.” Law & Society Review 2:179-228.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052781
McKnight, Janet. 2015. “Accountability in Northern Uganda: Understanding the Conflict, the Parties, and the False Dichotomies in International Criminal Law and Transitional Justice.” Journal of African Law 59(2).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185531500008X
Merry, Sally Engle. 2007. “International Law and Sociolegal Scholarship: Toward a Spatial Global Legal Pluralism.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 41:149-168.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-4337(07)00006-3
Moore, Sally Falk. 1973. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law & Society Review 7(4):719-746.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967
Nelken, David. 2001. “The Meaning of Success in Transnational Legal Transfers.” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 19:349-366.
Google Scholar
Perry-Kessaris, Amanda, (ed.). 2012. Socio-Legal Approaches to International Economic Law: Text, Context, Subtext. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075753
Perry-Kessaris, Amanda. 2013. “Anemos-ity, Apatheia, Enthousiasmos: An Economic Sociology of Law and Wind Farm Development in Cyprus.” Journal of Law and Society 40(1):68-91.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00613.x
Posner, Richard A. 1987. “The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline: 1962-1987.” Yale Law Review 100(4):761-780.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1341093
Riles, Annelise. 2010. “Is the Law Hopeful?” Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers. Paper 68. Retrieved February 07, 2014 http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clsops_papers/68
Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 2004. “Vitality Amidst Fragmentation: On the Emergence of Postrealist Law and Society Scholarship.” Pp. 1-11 in The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by A. Sarat. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631228967.2004.00003.x
Scheingold, Stuart A. 2004. The Politics of Rights. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 1991. “Loyalty and Betrayal: Cotterrell’s Discovery and Reproduction of Legal Ideology.” Law & Social Inquiry 16(4):809-833.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1991.tb00871.x
Silbey, Susan. 2010. “Legal Cultures and Cultures of Legality.” Pp. 470-479 in Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by J. R. Hall, L. Grindstaff, and M. Lo. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Slaughter Burley, Anne-Marie. 1993. “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Duel Agenda.” American Journal of International Law 87(2):205-239.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2203817
Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2006. “International Law, International Relations Theory, and Post-Atrocity Justice: Towards a Genuine Dialogue.” International Affairs 82(3):467-478.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00545.x
Sumner, William Graham. 1906. Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals. Boston: Gin & Company.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1412602
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2006. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511073
Thakur, Ramesh. 2001. “Global Norms and International Humanitarian Law: An Asian Perspective.” International Review of the Red Cross 8 41. R etrieved F ebruary 0 7, 2014 http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jqzd.htm
Google Scholar
von Benda-Beckmann, Franz. 1989. “Scape-Goat and Magic Charm: Law in Development Theory and Practice.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 28:129-148.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1989.10756410
Waldorf, Lars. 2006. “Mass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice.” Temple Law Review 79(1):1-88.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.