Social Workers and the Sociological Sense of Social Problems: Balancing Objectivism, Subjectivism, and Social Construction

Authors

  • Maria Appel Nissen Aalborg University, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.14

Keywords:

Social Problems, Social Work, Knowledge, Objectivism, Subjectivism, Constructionism

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore the intricate relations between objectivism, subjectivism, and constructionism. I explore the construction of social problems in everyday professional practice as a valuable source for addressing and reflecting on differences in perceptions of knowledge. Using data from a study of how Danish social workers perceive social problems, the article shows how social workers’ perceptions of social problems reveal a sociological sense of social problems that renders possible both ontological assumptions, as well as epistemological reflections on the objective, subjective, and social constructionist dimensions of social problems. The social workers are constructing a model of social problems and how they are reproduced, as well as epistemological reflections on the uncertainty of knowing the “reality” of social problems. Those constructions are not formulated strictly in line with scholarly approaches but rather stem from experiences of working with social problems. The article proposes that we can learn something from this in terms of reimagining social constructionism. I propose that social constructionists should cultivate a sociological sense of the practical perceptions and approaches to solve social problems in society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Appel Nissen, Aalborg University, Denmark

Maria Appel Nissen is a Ph.D. Sociology (2005), Associate Professor in Theories in Social Work at Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University, Denmark. Her research is characterized by an overall interest in the social construction of various forms of knowledge in social work practice—in particular, sociological knowledge, knowledge of social problems and of human beings. Currently, she is leading a research project on Views on Human Nature in Social Work (2014-2017, funded by the VELUX foundation), a Master in Knowledge Based Social Work, and is a member of the board of European Social Work Research Association (ESWRA).

References

Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens, and Scott Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Becker, Howard. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Google Scholar

Becker, Howard, (ed.). 1966. Social Problems. A Modern Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar

Best, Joel. 1995. Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Best, Joel, (ed.). 2001. How Claims Spread. Cross-National Diffusion of Social Problems. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Best, Joel. 2004. “Theoretical Issues in the Study of Social Problems and Deviance.” Pp. 14-30 in Handbook of Social Problems—A Comparative International Perspective, edited by G. Ritzer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973526.n2

Best, Joel. 2008. “Historical Development and Defining Issues of Constructionists Inquiry.” Pp. 41-64 in Handbook of Constructionist Research, edited by J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein. New York: New Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Dello Buono, Ricardo Alan. 2013. “Re-Imagining Social Problems: Moving Beyond Social Constructionism.” Call for Papers, The Society for the Study of Social Problems, Annual Meeting August 9-11, New York.
Google Scholar

Fuller, Richard C. 1938. “The Problem of Teaching Social Problems.” American Journal of Sociology 44(3):425-443.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/218031

Fuller, Richard C. and Richard R. Meyers. 1941a. “Some Aspects of a Theory of a Social Problems.” American Sociological Review 6(1):24-32.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086338

Fuller, Richard C. and Richard R. Meyers. 1941b. “The Natural History of a Social Problem.” American Sociological Review 6(3):320-328.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086189

Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Gubrium, Jaber F. and James A. Holstein, (eds.). 2008. Handbook of Constructionist Research. New York: New Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Hazelrigg, Lawrence E. 1986. “Is There a Choice Between ‘Constructionism’ and ‘Objectivism?’” Social Problems 33(6):1-13.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/800671

Kahn, Alfred J. 1957. “Sociology and Social Work: Challenge and Invitation.” Social Problems 4(3):220-228.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1957.4.3.03a00040

Kallen, David J., Dorothy Miller, and Arlene Daniels. 1968. “Sociology, Social Work, and Social Problems.” The American Sociologist 3(3):235-240.
Google Scholar

Kirk, Stuart A. and William J. Reid. 2002. Science and Social Work: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/kirk11824

Klein, Earl E. 1931. “The Relation of Sociology to Social Work—Historically Considered.” Social Forces 9(4):500-507.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/9.4.500

Lee, Alfred M. 1954. “Sociologists in an Integrating Society: Significance and Satisfaction in Sociological Work.” Social Problems 2(2):57-66.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1954.2.2.03a00010

Lee, Alfred M. 1986. “Feuds Between Sociologists and Social Workers.” Sociology for Whom? Syracuse: University Press.
Google Scholar

Lemert, Edwin M. 1951. “Is There a Natural History of Social Problems?” American Sociological Review 16(2):217-233.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2087697

Lindesmith, Alfred R. 1960. “Social Problems and Sociological Theory.” Social Problems 8(2):98-102.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/799266

Lorenz, Walter A. 2006. Perspectives on European Social Work. From the Birth of the Nation State to the impact of Globalization. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbkjtsm

Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1938. “Social Structure and Anomie.” American Sociological Review 3(5):672-682.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084686

Merton, Robert K. and Robert Nisbet, (eds.). 1976. Contemporary Social Problems. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Google Scholar

Mesny, Anne. 1998. “Sociology for Whom? The Role of Sociology in Reflexive Modernity.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 23(2/3):159-178.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3341962

Miller, Gale and James E. Holstein, (eds.). 1993. Constructionist Controversies: Issues in Social Problems Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Nissen, Maria A. 2005. In the Eye of the Treatment. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Department of Sociology and Social Work [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar

Nissen, Maria A. 2010. New Horizons in Social Work. A Reflection Theory. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar

Nissen, Maria A. 2013a. “In Search for a Sociology of Social Problems for Social Work.” Qualitative Social Work 13(4):546-561.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013506928

Nissen, Maria A. 2013b. “The Social Work Manager as an Explorer of Social Work—Forms of Knowledge and Competences.” Pp. 161-178 in Professional Management of Social Work in Child Welfare, edited by K. Kildedal, E. Laursen, and R. R. Michelsen. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar

Nissen, Maria A. 2013c. “Theories About Social Problems. Exploring the Practical Knowledge of Social Problems.” Pp. 254-271 in Sociology in Social Work, edited by S. Juul. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar

Nissen, Maria A. and Margit Harder. 2008. “Changes in Social Welfare Work—On the Experience of Governance and the Strategies of Social Workers.” Nordic Journal of Social Work 28(3-4):233-246.
Google Scholar

Nissen, Maria A., Margit Harder, and Majbritt B. Andersen. 2008. The Qualifications and Competences of Social Workers. Research report, Aalborg University, Department of Sociology and Social Work [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar

Parton, Nigel and Stuart Kirk. 2010. “The Nature and Purposes of Social Work.” Pp. 23-27 in The Sage Handbook of Social Work Research, edited by I. Shaw et al. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106.n2

Payne, Malcolm. 2005. Modern Social Work Theory. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar

Philp, Mark. 1979. “Notes on the Form of Knowledge in Social Work.” The Sociological Review 27(1):83-111.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00326.x

Schütz, Alfred. 1972. Collected Articles. New York: Springer.
Google Scholar

Shaw, Ian. 2009. “Re-Reading the Jack-Roller: Hidden Histories in Sociology and Social Work.” Qualitative Inquiry 15(7):1241-1264.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409334205

Spector, Malcolm and John I. Kitsuse. 1987. Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Sussman, Marvin B. 1964. “The Social Problems of the Sociologist.” Social Problems 11(3):215-225.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1964.11.3.03a00010

Sutherland, Edwin H. 1947. Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
Google Scholar

Von Oettingen, Alexander. 2007. “Pedagogical Theories of Action in the Difference Between Theory and Practice.” Pp. 17-52 in Between Theory and Practice. Contemporary Challenges for Professional Pedagogy and Professional Education, edited by A. Von Oettingen and F. Wiedemann. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar

Wardell, Mark and Anna M. Zajicek. 1995. “Social Problems: Pathways for Transcending Exclusive Sociology.” Social Problems 42(3):301-331.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1995.42.3.03x0100v

Woolgar, Steve and Dorothy Pawluch. 1985a. “Ontological Gerrymandering: The Autonomy of Social Problems Explanations.” Social Problems 32(3):214-227.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1985.32.3.03a00020

Woolgar, Steve and Dorothy Pawluch. 1985b. “How Shall We Move Beyond Constructionism?” Social Problems 33(2):159-162.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/800559

Downloads

Published

2015-04-30

How to Cite

Appel Nissen, M. (2015). Social Workers and the Sociological Sense of Social Problems: Balancing Objectivism, Subjectivism, and Social Construction. Qualitative Sociology Review, 11(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.14