Social Workers and the Sociological Sense of Social Problems: Balancing Objectivism, Subjectivism, and Social Construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.14Keywords:
Social Problems, Social Work, Knowledge, Objectivism, Subjectivism, ConstructionismAbstract
The aim of this article is to explore the intricate relations between objectivism, subjectivism, and constructionism. I explore the construction of social problems in everyday professional practice as a valuable source for addressing and reflecting on differences in perceptions of knowledge. Using data from a study of how Danish social workers perceive social problems, the article shows how social workers’ perceptions of social problems reveal a sociological sense of social problems that renders possible both ontological assumptions, as well as epistemological reflections on the objective, subjective, and social constructionist dimensions of social problems. The social workers are constructing a model of social problems and how they are reproduced, as well as epistemological reflections on the uncertainty of knowing the “reality” of social problems. Those constructions are not formulated strictly in line with scholarly approaches but rather stem from experiences of working with social problems. The article proposes that we can learn something from this in terms of reimagining social constructionism. I propose that social constructionists should cultivate a sociological sense of the practical perceptions and approaches to solve social problems in society.
Downloads
References
Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens, and Scott Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Becker, Howard. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Google Scholar
Becker, Howard, (ed.). 1966. Social Problems. A Modern Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar
Best, Joel. 1995. Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Best, Joel, (ed.). 2001. How Claims Spread. Cross-National Diffusion of Social Problems. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Best, Joel. 2004. “Theoretical Issues in the Study of Social Problems and Deviance.” Pp. 14-30 in Handbook of Social Problems—A Comparative International Perspective, edited by G. Ritzer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973526.n2
Best, Joel. 2008. “Historical Development and Defining Issues of Constructionists Inquiry.” Pp. 41-64 in Handbook of Constructionist Research, edited by J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein. New York: New Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Dello Buono, Ricardo Alan. 2013. “Re-Imagining Social Problems: Moving Beyond Social Constructionism.” Call for Papers, The Society for the Study of Social Problems, Annual Meeting August 9-11, New York.
Google Scholar
Fuller, Richard C. 1938. “The Problem of Teaching Social Problems.” American Journal of Sociology 44(3):425-443.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/218031
Fuller, Richard C. and Richard R. Meyers. 1941a. “Some Aspects of a Theory of a Social Problems.” American Sociological Review 6(1):24-32.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086338
Fuller, Richard C. and Richard R. Meyers. 1941b. “The Natural History of a Social Problem.” American Sociological Review 6(3):320-328.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086189
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Gubrium, Jaber F. and James A. Holstein, (eds.). 2008. Handbook of Constructionist Research. New York: New Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Hazelrigg, Lawrence E. 1986. “Is There a Choice Between ‘Constructionism’ and ‘Objectivism?’” Social Problems 33(6):1-13.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/800671
Kahn, Alfred J. 1957. “Sociology and Social Work: Challenge and Invitation.” Social Problems 4(3):220-228.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1957.4.3.03a00040
Kallen, David J., Dorothy Miller, and Arlene Daniels. 1968. “Sociology, Social Work, and Social Problems.” The American Sociologist 3(3):235-240.
Google Scholar
Kirk, Stuart A. and William J. Reid. 2002. Science and Social Work: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/kirk11824
Klein, Earl E. 1931. “The Relation of Sociology to Social Work—Historically Considered.” Social Forces 9(4):500-507.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/9.4.500
Lee, Alfred M. 1954. “Sociologists in an Integrating Society: Significance and Satisfaction in Sociological Work.” Social Problems 2(2):57-66.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1954.2.2.03a00010
Lee, Alfred M. 1986. “Feuds Between Sociologists and Social Workers.” Sociology for Whom? Syracuse: University Press.
Google Scholar
Lemert, Edwin M. 1951. “Is There a Natural History of Social Problems?” American Sociological Review 16(2):217-233.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2087697
Lindesmith, Alfred R. 1960. “Social Problems and Sociological Theory.” Social Problems 8(2):98-102.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/799266
Lorenz, Walter A. 2006. Perspectives on European Social Work. From the Birth of the Nation State to the impact of Globalization. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbkjtsm
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1938. “Social Structure and Anomie.” American Sociological Review 3(5):672-682.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084686
Merton, Robert K. and Robert Nisbet, (eds.). 1976. Contemporary Social Problems. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Google Scholar
Mesny, Anne. 1998. “Sociology for Whom? The Role of Sociology in Reflexive Modernity.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 23(2/3):159-178.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3341962
Miller, Gale and James E. Holstein, (eds.). 1993. Constructionist Controversies: Issues in Social Problems Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Nissen, Maria A. 2005. In the Eye of the Treatment. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Department of Sociology and Social Work [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar
Nissen, Maria A. 2010. New Horizons in Social Work. A Reflection Theory. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar
Nissen, Maria A. 2013a. “In Search for a Sociology of Social Problems for Social Work.” Qualitative Social Work 13(4):546-561.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013506928
Nissen, Maria A. 2013b. “The Social Work Manager as an Explorer of Social Work—Forms of Knowledge and Competences.” Pp. 161-178 in Professional Management of Social Work in Child Welfare, edited by K. Kildedal, E. Laursen, and R. R. Michelsen. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar
Nissen, Maria A. 2013c. “Theories About Social Problems. Exploring the Practical Knowledge of Social Problems.” Pp. 254-271 in Sociology in Social Work, edited by S. Juul. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar
Nissen, Maria A. and Margit Harder. 2008. “Changes in Social Welfare Work—On the Experience of Governance and the Strategies of Social Workers.” Nordic Journal of Social Work 28(3-4):233-246.
Google Scholar
Nissen, Maria A., Margit Harder, and Majbritt B. Andersen. 2008. The Qualifications and Competences of Social Workers. Research report, Aalborg University, Department of Sociology and Social Work [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar
Parton, Nigel and Stuart Kirk. 2010. “The Nature and Purposes of Social Work.” Pp. 23-27 in The Sage Handbook of Social Work Research, edited by I. Shaw et al. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106.n2
Payne, Malcolm. 2005. Modern Social Work Theory. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar
Philp, Mark. 1979. “Notes on the Form of Knowledge in Social Work.” The Sociological Review 27(1):83-111.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00326.x
Schütz, Alfred. 1972. Collected Articles. New York: Springer.
Google Scholar
Shaw, Ian. 2009. “Re-Reading the Jack-Roller: Hidden Histories in Sociology and Social Work.” Qualitative Inquiry 15(7):1241-1264.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409334205
Spector, Malcolm and John I. Kitsuse. 1987. Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Sussman, Marvin B. 1964. “The Social Problems of the Sociologist.” Social Problems 11(3):215-225.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1964.11.3.03a00010
Sutherland, Edwin H. 1947. Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
Google Scholar
Von Oettingen, Alexander. 2007. “Pedagogical Theories of Action in the Difference Between Theory and Practice.” Pp. 17-52 in Between Theory and Practice. Contemporary Challenges for Professional Pedagogy and Professional Education, edited by A. Von Oettingen and F. Wiedemann. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag [Published in Danish].
Google Scholar
Wardell, Mark and Anna M. Zajicek. 1995. “Social Problems: Pathways for Transcending Exclusive Sociology.” Social Problems 42(3):301-331.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1995.42.3.03x0100v
Woolgar, Steve and Dorothy Pawluch. 1985a. “Ontological Gerrymandering: The Autonomy of Social Problems Explanations.” Social Problems 32(3):214-227.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1985.32.3.03a00020
Woolgar, Steve and Dorothy Pawluch. 1985b. “How Shall We Move Beyond Constructionism?” Social Problems 33(2):159-162.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/800559
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.