Online Claims-Making: The NRA and Gun Advocacy in Cyberspace

Authors

  • R.J. Maratea New Mexico State University, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.10

Keywords:

Claims-Making, Activism, Internet, Online, Cyberspace, Gun Control

Abstract

This article examines the Internet’s emergent role in the claims-making process. My central premise is while Internet technology provides lay citizens with a mass mediated platform to distribute claims publically, power dynamics in the public sphere have remained relatively stable: Insiders and lobbyists continue to be powerful cultural voices; the press still functions as a cultural gatekeeper of newsworthiness; most people continue to have relatively little social authority; and the least powerful risk being completely left out of a digital society. Using the National Rifle Association (NRA) web presence as a case study, I describe the Internet as a vast collection of interconnected public cyber-arenas where problem claims are continuously disseminated, global communication is facilitated via online advocacy networks, and claimants utilize novel cyber-strategies to mobilize supporters. In doing so, I examine how cyber-arenas fundamentally differ from more static traditional claims-making arenas like television, radio, and print publication. I conclude by considering the extent to which historically powerful insider claims-making groups like the NRA are actually best positioned to succeed in a supposedly democratized new media world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

R.J. Maratea, New Mexico State University, U.S.A.

R.J. Maratea is an Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at New Mexico State University. His research focuses on capital punishment and the implications of mass communication as they pertain to deviant and criminal identities, social problem construction, cyber-protest, and the institutionalization of social control. He is the author of The Politics of the Internet: Political Claims-Making and Its Affect on Modern Political Activism (2014), as well several articles and book chapters.

References

Altheide, David L. 1996. Qualitative Media Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985536

Benford, Robert D. and Scott A. Hunt. 2003. “Interactional Dynamics in Public Problems Marketplaces: Movements and the Counterframing and Reframing of Public Problems.” Pp. 153-186 in Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems, edited by J. A. Holstein and G. Miller. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Berg, Bruce L. 2006. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar

Best, Joel. 2008. Social Problems. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1971. “Social Problems as Collective Behavior.” Social Problems 18:298.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1971.18.3.03a00020

Brubaker, Jennifer. 2008. “Best Supporting Actor: The Third-Person Effect of Celebrity Political Endorsements.” Ohio Communication Journal 46:1-13.
Google Scholar

Chadwick, Andrew. 2006. Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Cillizza, Chris. 2012. “The NRA’s Big Spending Edge—In 1 Chart.” Washington Post, December 18. Retrieved October 03, 2014 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/12/18/the-nras-big-spending-edge-in-1-chart/
Google Scholar

Cillizza, Chris. 2013. “How the NRA Spent $32 Million on Politics in 2012.” Washington Post, January 30. Retrieved October 03, 2014 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/30/how-the-nra-spent-32-million-in-2012/
Google Scholar

Clark, John D. and Nuno S. Themudo. 2006. “Linking the Web and the Street: Internet-Based ‘Dotcauses’ and the ‘Anti-Globalization’ Movement.” World Development 34:50-74.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.09.001

Diani, Mario. 2003. “Introduction: Social Movements, Contentious Actions, and Social Networks: ‘From Metaphor to Substance?’” Pp. 1-18 in Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by M. Diani and D. McAdam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0001

Fallows, Deborah and Lee Rainie. 2004. The Internet as a Unique News Source: Millions Go Online for News and Images Not Covered in the Mainstream Press. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Google Scholar

Friedman, Emily. 2010. “BP Buys ‘Oil’ Search Terms to Redirect Users to Official Company Website.” ABC News, June 05. Retrieved January 02, 2013 http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/bp-buys-search-engine-phrases-redirecting-users/story?id=10835618
Google Scholar

Friends of NRA. 2014. Friends of NRA Website. Retrieved October 22, 2014 http://www.friendsofnra.org
Google Scholar

Gold, Matea, Joseph Tanfani, and Lisa Mascaro. 2012. “NRA Clout Rooted More in Its Tactics Than Its Election Spending.” Los Angeles Times, July 29. Retrieved August 15, 2014 http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jul/29/nation/la-na-nraclout-20120729
Google Scholar

Grinberg, Emanuella. 2012. “Hasbro to Unveil Black and Silver Easy-Bake Oven After Teen’s Petition.” CNN, December 18. Retrieved April 03, 2013 http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/living/hasbro-easy-bake-oven
Google Scholar

Hilgartner, Stephen and Charles L. Bosk. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” The American Journal of Sociology 94:53-78.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228951

Hunt, Kasie. 2013. “NRA Threatens to Punish Lawmakers on Gun Control Vote Despite Deal.” NBC News, April 10. Retrieved April 12, 2013 http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/10/17694499-nra-threatens-to-punish-lawmakers-on-gun-control-vote-despite-deal
Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar

Maratea, R.J. 2014. The Politics of the Internet: Political Claims-Making in Cyberspace and Its Effect on Modern Political Activism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug. 2003. “Beyond Structural Analysis: Toward a More Dynamic Understanding of Social Movements.” Pp. 281-298 in Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by Mario Diani and Doug McAdam. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0012

McAdam, Doug and Ronnelle Paulsen. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism.” American Journal of Sociology 99:640-667.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/230319

McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212-1241.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226464

Meyer, David S. and Joshua Gamson. 1995. “The Challenge of Cultural Ethics: Celebrities and Social Movements.” Sociological Inquiry 65:181-206.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1995.tb00412.x

Mitchell, Amy, Tom Rosentiel, and Leah Christian. 2012. “Mobile Devices and News Consumption: Some Good Signs for Journalism.” In The State of the News Media 2012. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism, Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 13, 2013 http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/mobile-devices-and-news-consumption-some-good-signs-for-journalism/
Google Scholar

Mungin, Lateef. 2013. “NRA Chief: Obama Makes ‘Mockery’ of American Freedoms.” CNN, January 28. Retrieved March 22, 2013 http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/23/politics/nra-response
Google Scholar

NRA. 2014. “Welcome to the NRA Digital Network: Your State of-the-Art Gateway to Everything NRA.” Retrieved October 22, 2014 http://home.nra.org
Google Scholar

NRA Foundation, The. 2014. “Mission Statement.” Retrieved October 22, 2014 http://www.nrafoundation.org/mission-statement.aspx
Google Scholar

NRA Political Victory Fund. 2014. “Grades and Endorsements.” Retrieved October 22, 2014 https://www.nrapvf.org/grades/
Google Scholar

NRA Trigger the Vote. 2014. “Our Mission.” Retrieved October 22, 2014 http://www.triggerthevote.org
Google Scholar

Passy, Florence. 2003. “Social Networks Matter. But How?” Pp. 21-48 in Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by M. Diani and D. McAdam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Perez, Victor W. 2013. “The Movement Linking Vaccines to Autism: Parents and the Internet.” Pp. 71-89 in New Images, New Issues: Making Sense of Social Problems, edited by J. Best and S. R. Harris. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Google Scholar

Reuters. 2010. “BP Buys Google Ads for Search Term ‘Oil Spill.’” Reuters, June 09. Retrieved May 14, 2014 http://www. reuters.com/article/2010/06/09/us-oil-spill-google-idUSTRE65833720100609
Google Scholar

Spector, Malcolm and John I. Kitsuse. 1987. Constructing Social Problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Spitzer, Robert J. 2012. The Politics of Gun Control. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00277-5

Street, John. 2002. “Bob, Bono, and Tony B: The Popular Artist as Politician.” Media, Culture & Society 24:433-441.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400309

U.S. Senate. 2013. Testimony of Wayne LaPierre Executive Vice President, National Rifle Association of America Before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Hearing on “What Should America Do About Gun Violence?” Washington DC: Senate Judiciary Committee 113th Cong., 1st sess., U.S. Senate. Retrieved April 04, 2013 http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pdf/1-30-13LaPierreTestimony.pdf
Google Scholar

Vegh, Sandor. 2003. “Classifying Forms of Online Activism: The Case of Cyberprotests Against the World Bank.” Pp. 71-95 in Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice, edited by M. McCaughey and M. D. Ayers. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2015-04-30

How to Cite

Maratea, R. (2015). Online Claims-Making: The NRA and Gun Advocacy in Cyberspace. Qualitative Sociology Review, 11(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.10