On the Nature of an Integral Sociology: An Exploration in Theory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.13.1.14Keywords:
Phenomenology, Transcendental Subjectivity, Aperspectivism, Etiology, Ontology, Epistemology, Integral Sociology, Consciousness StructuresAbstract
This article is the first in a series of three installments representing a doctoral project carried out at the University of the Free State in South Africa. The aim of this article is to establish an apodictic ontic and epistemic foundation for the construction of an integral framework for sociological practice. To this end, manifest reality is meditated upon in a realist phenomenological manner, thus yielding an etiological framework aimed at reflecting reality in itself, and not as the object of a specific scientific paradigm. Situated against the backdrop of the ontological turn in the social sciences, the argument is developed that contemporary science represents an ill-founded attempt at empirically describing a reality that is fundamentally trans-empirical. It is posited that any scientific enterprise which is founded exclusively on an empirical analysis of “objective” reality can ultimately yield only partial truths. To remedy this situation, the role of intersubjectively constructed meaning-frameworks and subjectively constituted qualia of manifestation during the generation of reality are acknowledged, facilitating an account thereof that enlivens the positivistic “world-as-described” by integrating it with the hermeneutically navigable “world-as-agreed-upon” and the individually encountered/embodied “world-as-witnessed.” The resulting etiological framework facilitates a grasp of the higher order unity of these “worlds” by facilitating the emergence of an aperspectival mode of being that transcends the empirico-perspectival mental consciousness structure characteristic of modern and postmodern epistemologies. In so doing, a universally valid layer of knowledge is laid bare which can serve as a contextualizing point of reference for the continued perspectival exploration of particular conditioned aspects of reality.
Downloads
References
Ashok, H. S. and M. S. Thimmappa. 2006. “A Hindu Worldview of Adult Learning in the Workplace.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 8(3):329-336.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306288425
Atkinson, Michael J., (ed.). 1985. Plotinus: Ennead V. 1: On the Three Principal Hypostases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Barnosky, Anthony D. et al. 2011. “Has the Earth’s Sixth Mass Extinction Already Arrived?” Nature 471:51-57.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09678
Bateson, Gregory. 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Black, Antony. 2008. “The ‘Axial Period’: What Was It and What Does It Signify?” The Review of Politics 70(1):23-39.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670508000168
Böhme, Gernot. 2014. Bewusstseinsformen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749
Braaten, Jane. 1991. Habermas’s Critical Theory of Society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Cheng, François. 2008. Fünf Meditationen über die Schönheit. Munich: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar
Clay, Diskin. 2014. “Meditating on the Meditations.” Pp. xiiilxii in Meditations, Marcus Aurelius. London: Penguin Classics.
Google Scholar
Colledge, Edmund and Bernard McGinn, (eds.). 1981. Meister Eckhart: The Essential Sermons, Commentaries, Treatises and Defense. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
Google Scholar
Dillon, Martin C. 1997. Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar
Dolphijn, Rick and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.11515701.0001.001
Dreher, Jochen, (ed.). 2012a. Angewandte Phänomenologie: Zum Spannungsverhaltnis von Konstruktion und Konstitution. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Google Scholar
Dreher, Jochen. 2012b. “Zur Konzeption einer Angewandten Phänomenologie: Einleitung des Herausgebers.” Pp. 7-24 in Angewandte Phänomenologie: Zum Spannungsverhaltnis von Konstruktion und Konstitution, edited by J. Dreher. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18886-7_1
Easwaran, Eknath, (ed.). 2007. The Upanishads. Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press.
Google Scholar
Eberle, Thomas S. 2014. “Phenomenology as a Research Method.” Pp. 184-202 in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Charles. 2013. The Ascent of Humanity: Civilization and the Human Sense of Self. Berkeley, CA: Evolver Editions.
Google Scholar
Evola, Julius. 1996. The Doctrine of Awakening: The Attainment of Self-Mastery According to the Earliest Buddhist Texts. Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions International.
Google Scholar
Farber, Marvin. 1968. The Foundation of Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl and the Quest for a Rigorous Science of Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Gebser, Jean. 1985. The Ever-Present Origin. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 2011. “Structuration Theory: Past, Present and Future.” Pp. 201-221 in Giddens’ Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation, edited by C. G. A. Bryant and D. Jary. Oxon: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Guénon, René. 2004a. The Crisis of the Modern World. Hillsdale, NY: Sophia Perennis.
Google Scholar
Guénon, René. 2004b. The Multiple States of the Being. Hillsdale, NY: Sophia Perennis.
Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.
Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4952-7
Huxley, Aldous. 1947. The Perennial Philosophy. London: Chatto & Windus.
Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl T. 2014. The Origin and Goal of History. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315823683
Keat, Russel. 1982. Merleau-Ponty and the Phenomenology of the Body. Unpublished manuscript, University of Edinburgh. Retrieved February 10, 2015: http://www.russelkeat.net
Google Scholar
Kotze, P. Conrad et al. 2015. “Strangers But for Stories: The Role of Storytelling in the Construction of Contemporary White Afrikaans-Speaking Identity in Central South Africa.” Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 16(1), Art. 20.
Google Scholar
Lazslo, Ervin. 2007. Science and the Akashic Field: An Integral Theory of Everything. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.
Google Scholar
Lewis, Simon L. and Mark A. Maslin. 2015. “Defining the Anthropocene.” Nature 519:171-180.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Mohrhoff, Ulrich J. 2008. “Evolution of Consciousness According to Jean Gebser.” AntiMatters 2(3):51-78.
Google Scholar
Nagler, Michael N. 2007. “A Religion for Modern Times.” Pp. 295-336 in The Upanishads, edited by E. Easwaran. Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press.
Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich W. 2012a. Also sprach Zarathustra. Cologne: Anaconda.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050057385
Nietzsche, Friedrich W. 2012b. Menschliches, Allzumenschliches. Cologne: Anaconda.
Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich W. 2014. Beyond Good and Evil. London: Penguin Classics.
Google Scholar
Phillips, Steven H. 2009. Yoga, Karma and Rebirth: A Brief History and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
Phipps, Carter. 2012. Evolutionaries: Unlocking the Spiritual and Cultural Potential of Science’s Greatest Idea. New York: Harper-Collins.
Google Scholar
Quinn, William W. 1997. The Only Tradition. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Radin, Paul. 2002. Primitive Man as Philosopher. New York: Dover Publications.
Google Scholar
Rangaswami, Sudhakshina. 2012. The Roots of Vedānta: Selections from Śaṅkara’s Writings. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar
Rao, K. L. Seshagiri. 1970. “On Truth: A Hindu Perspective.” Philosophy East and West 20(4):377-382.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1397823
Rao, K. L. Seshagiri. 2009. “The Nature of Hinduism.” Interreligious Insight 7(1):16-25.
Google Scholar
Rock, Adam J. and Stanley Krippner. 2007. “Does the Concept ‘Altered States of Consciousness’ Rest on a Mistake?” International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 26:33-40.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2007.26.1.33
Salagame, Kiran K. K. 2013. “Well-Being from the Hindu/Sanātana Dharma Perspective.” Pp. 371-383 in The Oxford Handbook of Happiness, edited by S. David, I. Boniwell, and A. Conley Ayers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0029
Scholem, Gershom. 1969. On the Kabbalah and Its Symbolism. New York: Schocken Books.
Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann. 1974. The Structures of the Life-World: Volume I. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar
Sessa, Ben. 2005. “Can Psychedelics Have a Role in Psychiatry Once Again?” The British Journal of Psychiatry 186:457-458.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.6.457
Sheldrake, Rupert. 2013. The Science Delusion. London: Coronet.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5339/rels.2014.science.10
Stolaroff, Myron J. 1999. “Are Psychedelics Useful in the Practice of Buddhism?” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 39(1):60-80.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167899391009
Strassman, Rick J. 2001. DMT: The Spirit Molecule. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press.
Google Scholar
Taylor, Jared. 2011. White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century. Oakton, VA: New Century Books.
Google Scholar
Visser, Frank. 2003. Ken Wilber: Thought as Passion. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 1992. “Toward a Social Praxeology: The Structure and Logic of Bourdieu’s Sociology.” Pp. 1-59 in An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, edited by P. Bourdieu and L. J. D. Wacquant. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Waley, Arthur, (ed.). 1997. Tao Te Ching. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.
Google Scholar
Walsh, Roger. 2001. “Shamanic Experiences: A Developmental Analysis.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 41(3):31-52.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167801413004
Wilber, Ken. 2006. Excerpt G: Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Subtle Energies. Integral Institute. Retrieved April 13, 2015: http://www.kenwilber.com/Writings/PDF/ExcerptG_KOSMOS_2004.pdf
Google Scholar
Wilber, Ken. 2007. Integral Spirituality: A Startling New Role for Religion in the Modern and Postmodern World. Boston: Integral Books.
Google Scholar
Williams, Paul. 2007. Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428474
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge Classics.
Google Scholar
Zevallos, Zuleyka. 2009. What Is Applied Sociology? A Brief Introduction on Applied Sociology. Sociology at Work. Retrieved April 11, 2016: http://www.sociologyatwork.org/about/what-is-applied-sociology/
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.