Bringing Historical Dimensions Into the Study of Social Problems: The Social Construction of Authority

Frank Furedi

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.07

Authors

Frank Furedi University of Kent, England

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.07

Keywords:

Authority, Legitimacy, Social Problems, Claims, Tradition

Abstract

Appeals to authority have always played a key role in the construction of social problems. Authority legitimates claims, which is why claim-makers have always sought its validation. An exploration into the historical dimension of the social construction of authority provides insight into changing foundations on which claims about social problems are made. In contrast to the Middle Ages, the modern era has found it difficult to gain consensus on the meaning of authority. This historical shift in the status of authority provides the context for contemporary competitive claims-making about social problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Frank Furedi, University of Kent, England

Frank Furedi is a Professor of Sociology at the University of Kent in Canterbury, England. His studies have been devoted to exploring the cultural developments that influence the construction of contemporary risk consciousness. His research has been oriented towards the way that risk and uncertainty is managed by contemporary culture. He has published widely about the construction of social problems relating to issues such as health, parenting children, food, and new technology. In recent years, his research has focused on the historical sociology of cultural authority. Currently, he is working on a comparative study of the construction of the Reading Wars in the UK and the U.S.

References

Arendt, Hannah. 2006. “What is Authority.” Pp. 91-141 in Between Past And Future, edited by Hannah Arendt. London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

Beetham, David. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. Houndmills: Macmillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7

Benson, Robert. 1991. “Political Renovatio: Two Models From Roman Antiquity.” Pp. 339-386 in Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, edited by Robert Benson and Giles Constable. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Google Scholar

Berman, Harold. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Best, Joel. 1999. Random Violence: How We Talk About New Crimes and New Victims. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 2008. The Republic and The Laws. Translated by Niall Rudd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00136660

Coleman, Janet. 2000. A History of Political Thought: From the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Google Scholar

Damaska, Mirjan. 1985. “How Did It All Begin?” The Yale Law Journal 94:1807-1824.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796223

Driedger, S. Michelle and John Eyles. 2003. “Drawing the Battle Lines: Tracing the ‘Science War’ in the Construction of the Chloroform and Human Health Risks Debate.” Environmental Management 31(4):476-488.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2888-z

Durkheim, Emile. 1968. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar

Figgis, Neville. 1960. Political Thought From Gerson to Grotius, 1414-1625. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Google Scholar

Flower, Harriet. 2004. “Introduction.” Pp. XXI-XLI in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, edited by Harriet Flower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521807948

Friedman, Richard. 1990. “On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy.” Pp. 56-91 in Authority, edited by Jospeh Raz. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Furedi, Frank. 2011. On Tolerance: A Defence of Moral Independence. London: Continuum Press.
Google Scholar

Furedi, Frank. 2013. Authority: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026338

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Gray, Phillip. 2007. “Political Theology and the Theology of Politics: Carl Schmitt and Medieval Christian Political Thought.” Humanitas 20(1-2):175-200.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen. 1976. Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. Toward a Rational Society. London: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Hannigan, John. 2006. Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Hilgartner, Stephen. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503618220

Hill, Christopher. 1986. “The Problem of Authority.” Pp. 32-57 in The Collected Essays of Christopher Hill, edited by C. Hill. Brighton: The Harvester Press.
Google Scholar

Hopfl, Harro. 1999. “Power, Authority, and Legitimacy.” Human Resource Development International 2(3):217-234.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678869900000024

Hurstfield, Joel. 1965. “Introduction: The Framework of Crisis.” Pp. 1-16 in The Reformation Crisis, edited by Joel Hurstfield. London: Edward Arnold.
Google Scholar

Krieger, Lionel. 1968. “Authority.” Pp. 154-183 in Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas, edited by Phillip Wiener. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Google Scholar

Lackey, Robert. 2007. “Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy.” Conservation Biology 21(1):12-17.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.x

Liftin, Kenneth. 2000. “Environment, Wealth, and Authority: Global Climate Change and Emerging Modes of Legitimation.” International Studies Association 2(2):119-148.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00207

Lincoln, Bruce. 1994. Authority. Construction and Corrosion. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226682518.001.0001

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue: A Study on Moral Theory. London: Ducksworth.
Google Scholar

Marx. Karl. 1975. “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law.” Pp. 3-130 in Karl Marx, Frederick Engels Collected Works. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Google Scholar

McCready, William. 1975. “Papalist and Antipapalists: Aspects of the Church/State Controversy in the Later Middle Ages.” Viator 6:241-273.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.301610

Minogue, Kenneth. 1963. The Liberal Mind. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.
Google Scholar

Mooney, Chris. 2006. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1963. “Christianity and Modern Industrial Society.” Pp. 27-68 in Sociological Theory, Values, and Social-Cultural Change, edited by Edward Tiryakian. New York: The Free Press.
Google Scholar

Pennington, Kenneth. 1991. “Law, Legislative Authority, and Theories of Government, 1150-1300.” Pp. 424-453 in The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350-c. 1450, edited by James Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.017

Priest, Susanna. 2006. “Public Discourse and Scientific Controversy: A Spiral of Science Analysis of Biotechnology Opinion in the United States.” Science Communication 28(1):195-215.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547006293918

Rawson, Elizabeth. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Shotter, David. 2005. Augustus Caesar. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203022887

Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Turner, Bryan. 1992. Max Weber: From History to Modernity. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300060

Weber, Max. 1946. “Science as Vocation.” Pp. 129-156 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Hans Gerth and Charles Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 2008. “The Profession and Vocation of Politics.” Pp. 309-369 in Weber: Political Ideas, edited by Peter Lassman and Ronald Speirs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Yearley, Steve. 1992. “Green Ambivalence About Science Legal-Rational Authority and the Scientific Legitimation of a Social Movement.” British Journal of Sociology 43(4):511-532.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/591338

Ziolkowski, Jan. 2009. “Cultures of Authority in the Long Twelfth Century.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 108(4):412-448.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/egp.0.0071