Invoking the Specter of Racism: Category Membership as Speaker Topic and Resource

Authors

  • Kevin McKenzie Independent Researcher, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.3.03

Keywords:

Category Entitlement, Category Membership, Ethnomethodology, Identity, Membership Categorization Device, Racism, Reflexivity

Abstract

This paper explores how category membership features in talk where speakers address the issue of racial discrimination. In particular, it examines how category membership gets invoked to furnish speaker entitlement in the course of destabilizing and reworking the category-bound inferences that inform membership attribution. I begin with the analysis of two relatively short extracts of talk in which speakers invoke ethnic and racial group identity as a preliminary to an examination of the paradoxical uses for which category membership is made relevant, moving on to consider an extended episode of The 700 Club. In contrast to analytic approaches which seek to reveal the denial of racism in speaker claims that mitigate the pernicious implications of category attribution, I consider how category attribution serves as a speaker resource in efforts to identify and critique racism. This participant work is then considered in relation to ethnomethodology’s efforts to re-specify the foundational postulates that inform the investigation of social order production and the place that the examination of participant meaning-making has in the pursuit of that endeavor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kevin McKenzie, Independent Researcher, U.S.A.

Kevin McKenzie is an independent researcher. He holds both a B.A. and an M.A. in Linguistics from the University of Texas system, and a Ph.D. in Social Sciences (with a focus on Language and Social Interaction) from Loughborough University in the U.K. He has worked at various universities in countries throughout the Middle East, including Cyprus, Turkey, the UAE, and Qatar. His research interests include exploring the potential of conversation analysis and ethnomethodology for an analysis of cross-cultural contact, broadly conceived to include transnational relations, military intervention, and issues traditionally formulated within the remit of Foreign Policy and International Relations. Currently, he is carrying out research on the discursive construction of professional identity within humanitarian aid organizations, as well as exploring how the analysis of talk in these and other settings inform scholarly debates concerned with the everyday rhetoric of shared knowledge in institutional settings.

References

Antaki, Charles. 1998. “Identity Ascriptions in Their Time and Place: ‘Fagin’ and the Terminally Dim.” Pp. 71-85 in Identities in Talk, edited by C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216958.n5

Atkinson, John M. and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Augoustinos, Martha and Danielle Every. 2007. “The Language of ‘Race’ and Prejudice: A Discourse of Denial, Reason, and Liberal-Practical Politics.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(2):123-141.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07300075

Augoustinos, Martha and Danielle Every. 2010. “Accusations and Denials of Racism: Managing Moral Accountability in Public Discourse.” Discourse & Society 21(3):251-256.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509360650

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translated by C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1

Benwell, Bethan and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626533

Billig, Michael. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Buttny, Richard. 2004. Talking Problems: Studies of Discursive Construction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Clark, Katrina and Michael Holquist. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Clifford, James and George E. Marcus, (eds.). 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Condor, Susan et al. 2006. “‘They’re Not Racist…’ Prejudice Denial, Mitigation, and Suppression in Dialogue.” British Journal of Social Psychology 45:441-462.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X66817

Coulter, Jeff. 1999. “Discourse and Mind.” Human Studies 22:163-181.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005484316659

Coulter, Jeff. 2008. “Twenty-Five Theses Against Cognitivism.” Theory, Culture & Society 25(2):19-32.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407086789

Coulter, Jeff and Wes Sharrock. 2007. Brain, Mind, and Human Behavior in Contemporary Cognitive Science: Critical Assessments of the Philosophy of Psychology. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 1991. “Transcription Design Principles for Spoken Discourse Research.” Pragmatics 1:71-106.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.1.1.04boi

Du Bois, John W. et al. 1993. “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” Pp. 45-89 in Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, edited by J. A. Edwards and M. D. Lampert. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek. 1991. “Categories Are for Talking.” Theory & Psychology 1(4):515-542.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354391014007

Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Gardner, Philip. 2012. “Enriching CA Through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA Keys.” Discourse Studies 14(3):313-319.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612440772

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 1977. “When Is Phenomenology Sociological?” Annals of Phenomenological Sociology 2:1-40.
Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism, edited by A. W. Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey Sacks. 1970. “On the Formal Structure of Practical Actions.” Pp. 338-366 in Theoretical Sociology, edited by J. C. McKinney and E. A. Tiryakian. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip J. 1995. “Laughing At and Laughing With: Negotiation of Participant Alignments Through Conversational Laughter.” Pp. 43-56 in Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, edited by P. Ten Have and G. Psathas. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888

Heritage, John. 2012a. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1):1-29.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684

Heritage, John. 2012b. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1):30-52.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685

Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1):15-38.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103

Hilbert, Richard A. 1992. The Classical Roots of Ethnomethodology: Durkheim, Weber, and Garfinkel. Chapel Hill, London: University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar

Hilbert, Richard A. 1995 “Garfinkel’s Recovery of Themes in Classical Sociology.” Human Studies 18(2):157-175.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323208

Hilbert, Richard A. 2009. “Ethnomethodology and Social Theory.” Pp. 159-178 in The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by Bryan S. Turner. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304992.ch8

Holquist, Michael. 1990. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203330340

Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Phil, Rupert Read, and Wes Sharrock. 2008. There Is no Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defense of Peter Winch. Aldershot, Hampshire, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Google Scholar

Jayussi, Lena. 1984. Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Jayussi, Lena. 1991. “Values and Moral Judgment: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order.” Pp. 227-251 in Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, edited by G. Button. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611827.011

Jefferson, Gail. 1985. “An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter.” Pp. 25-34 in Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. III: Discourse and Dialogue, edited by T. A. van Dijk. London: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Johnson, Luke. 2011. “Pat Robertson on Mac and Cheese: ‘Is That a Black Thing?’” The Huffington Post. Retrieved May 28, 2016 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/23/patrobertson-mac-and-cheese-black-thing_n_1110659.html
Google Scholar

Komter, Martha L. 1995. “The Distribution of Knowledge in Courtroom Interaction.” Pp. 107-128 in Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, edited by P. Ten Have and G. Psathas. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
Google Scholar

Liberman, Kenneth B. 2007. Husserl’s Criticism of Reason: With Ethnomethodological Specifications. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar

Liberman, Kenneth B. 2011. “The Reflexive Intelligibility of Affairs: Ethnomethodological Perspectives.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure: Revue suisse de linguistique générale 64: 73-99.
Google Scholar

Liberman, Kenneth B. 2012. “Semantic Drift in Conversation.” Human Studies 35:263-277.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9225-1

Lipsitz, George. 1995. “The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: Racialized Social Democracy and the ‘White’ Problem in American Studies.” American Quarterly 47(3):369-387.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2713291

Lipsitz, George. 2006. The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit From Identity Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael. 1993. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and the Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625473

Lynch, Michael. 2006. “Cognitive Activities Without Cognition? Ethnomethodological Investigations of Selected ‘Cognitive’ Topics.” Discourse Studies 8(1):95-104.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059559

Lynch, Michael and David Bogen. 1996. The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11sn042

McKenzie, Kevin. 2003. “Discursive Psychology and the ‘New Racism.’” Human Studies 26:461-491.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000003669.38823.19

McKenzie, Kevin. 2005. “The Institutional Provision for Silence: On the Evasive Nature of Politicians’ Answers to Reporters’ Questions.” Journal of Language and Politics 4(3):443-463.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.3.06mck

McKenzie, Kevin. 2009. “The Humanitarian Imperative Under Fire.” Journal of Language and Politics 8(3):333-358.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.01mck

McKenzie, Kevin. 2011. “Structure and Agency in Scholarly Formulations of Racism.” Human Studies 34:67-92.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9176-y

McKenzie, Kevin. 2012. “Formulating Professional Identity: The Case of Humanitarian Aid.” Pragmatics and Society 3(1):31-60.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.1.02mck

McKenzie, Kevin. Forthcoming. “Gradations of Laughter: Managing Interlocutor Affiliation in Talk About Humanitarian Aid.” Pragmatics.
Google Scholar

McKenzie, Kevin and Toine van Teeffelen. 1993. “Taking the Higher Ground Between West and Middle East: The Discursive Achievement of Meta-Perspective in Representations of the Arab Other.” Pragmatics 3(3):305-330.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.3.3.04ken

Mehan, Hugh and Houston Wood. 1975. The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212750

Morson, Gary Saul and Caryl Emerson. 1990. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

“Niggas vs. Black People.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 28, 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niggas_vs._Black_People
Google Scholar

Pollner, Melvin. 1987. Mundane Reason. Cambridge: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar

Rawls, Anne Warfield. 1989. “Language, Self, and Social Order: A Reformulation of Goffman and Sacks.” Human Studies 12(1-2): 147-172.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142843

Rawls, Anne Warfield. 2005. “Garfinkel’s Conception of Time.” Time & Society 14(2-3):163-190.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X05055132

Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage. 2006. “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35(5):677-705.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325

Riggs, Damien W. and Clemence Due. 2010. “The Management of Accusations of Racism in Celebrity Big Brother.” Discourse & Society 21(3):257-271.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509360652

Rock, Chris. n.d. Chris Rock—Niggas vs. Black People. Retrieved May 28, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6fUwPHMUt0
Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” Pp. 280-293 in Studies in Social Interaction, edited by D. Sudnow. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1974. “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” Pp. 216-232 in Ethnomethodology, edited by R. Turner. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, vol. I: Fall 1964-Spring 1968, edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50(4):696-735.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-Taking Organization.” Pp. 70-85 in Talk in Social Interaction, edited by G. Button and J. R. E. Lee. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1991a. “Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition.” Pp. 150-171 in Perspectives in Socially Shared Cognition, edited by L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-007

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1991b. “Reflections on Talk and Social Ctructure.” Pp. 44-70 in Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, edited by D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman. Oxford: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. “On Talk and Its Institutional Occasions.” Pp. 101-134 in Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar

Sharrock, Wes. 1974. “On Owning Knowledge.” Pp. 45-53 in Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, edited by R. Turner. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
Google Scholar

Sharrock, Wes and Bob Anderson. 1986. The Ethnomethodologists. London: Tavistock Publications.
Google Scholar

Sharrock, Wes and Robert J. Anderson. 1987. “The Definition of Alternatives: Some Sources of Confusion in Interdisciplinary Discussion.” Pp. 290-321 in Talk and Social Organization, edited by G. Button and R. E. Lee. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2010. “‘I’m Not Gonna Hit a Lady’: Conversation Analysis, Membership Categorization, and Men’s Denials of Violence Towards Women.” Discourse & Society 21(1):59-82.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509345072

The 700 Club. November 23, 2011. CBN.com. Retrieved May 28, 2016 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiqzfmqxZc-M&feature=relmfu
Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1992. “Discourse and the Denial of Racism.” Discourse & Society 3(1):87-118.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005

Wetherell, Margaret. 2001. “Debates in Discourse Research.” Pp. 380-399 in Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Whitehead, Kevin A. 2009. “‘Categorizing the Categorizer’: The Management of Racial Common Sense in Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 72(4):325-342.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200406

Whitehead, Kevin A. and Gene H. Lerner. 2009. “When Are Persons ‘White?’: On Some Practical Asymmetries of Racial Reference in Talk-in-Interaction.” Discourse & Society 20(5):613-641.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509106413

Widdicombe, Sue. 1998. “‘But You Don’t Class Yourself’: The Interactional Management of Category Membership and Non-Membership.” Pp. 52-70 in Identities in Talk, edited by C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216958.n4

Woolgar, Steve and Dorothy Pawluch. 1985. “Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations.” Social Problems 32(3):214-227.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1985.32.3.03a00020

Wowk, Maria T. and Andrew P. Carlin. 2004. “Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, and Membership Categorization Analysis: The Work of Rod Watson.” Human Studies 27(1): 69-89.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012245.95451.4b

X, Malcolm and Alex Haley. 1999. The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told to Alex Haley. New York, Toronto: Ballantine Books.
Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. 1993. Tarrying With the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381822

Žižek, Slavoj. 2003. The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5706.001.0001

Žižek, Slavoj. 2009. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-07-31

How to Cite

McKenzie, K. (2016). Invoking the Specter of Racism: Category Membership as Speaker Topic and Resource. Qualitative Sociology Review, 12(3), 44–83. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.3.03

Issue

Section

Articles