Studying Corruption: Reflections on the Methodological, Practical, and Personal Challenges

Alexandru V. Roman

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.12.3.01

Authors

Alexandru V. Roman California State University, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.3.01

Keywords:

Public Corruption, Eastern Europe, Republic of Moldova, Methodology, Challenges of Field Work

Abstract

There is a growing recognition among scholars that those engaged in qualitative research often face a number of serious methodological and personal challenges. Rather surprisingly, these difficulties receive relatively limited attention within the academic literature. Given the rising role of qualitative methodologies within social science research, the benefits of and the need for honest and practical discussions regarding what researchers should expect when entering fieldwork become increasingly obvious. This article draws on my fieldwork experiences of studying public corruption in the Republic of Moldova, a former Soviet state. I provide reflections on the methodological, practical, and personal challenges of conducting qualitative research on a sensitive issue within a social setting that is not structurally inclined to support projects of such nature. The discussion is primarily focused on the research difficulties that are bound to arise with any attempt to confirm previously suggested propositions within the post-Soviet social matrices. This article and the suggestions made here fall in line with a number of other recent works which have been motivated by the call to share insights and guidance about the challenges, “tricks of the trade,” and dangers of fieldwork in remarkable settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alexandru V. Roman, California State University, U.S.A.

Alexandru V. Roman is an Associate Professor with the College of Business and Public Administration at California State University, San Bernardino. He is the Director of The Research Institute for Public Management and Governance. His main research interests are public procurement, management, and corruption.

References

Adams, Laura L. 1999. “The Mascot Researcher: Identity, Power, and Knowledge in Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28(4):331-363.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023479

Anechiarico, Frank and James B. Jacobs. 1996. The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. 2007. Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932

Becker, Howard S. 2008. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Belousov, Konstantin et al. 2007. “Any Port in a Storm: Fieldwork Difficulties in Dangerous and Crisis-Ridden Settings.” Qualitative Research 7(2):155-175.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107076019

Birch, Maxine and Tina Miller. 2000. “Inviting Intimacy: The Interview as Therapeutic Opportunity.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3(3):189-202.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570050083689

Brandes, Stanley. 2008. “The Things We Carry.” Men and Masculinities 11(2):145-153.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X08315099

Campbell, Rebecca. 2013. Emotionally Involved: The Impact of Researching Rape. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203613511

Cannon, Sue. 2005. “Reflections on Fieldwork in Stressful Situations.” Pp. 126-154 in Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods: Fieldwork, vol. III, edited by C. Pole. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Ceglowski, Deborah. 2000. “Research as Relationship.” Qualitative Inquiry 6(1):88-103.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600106

Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Cunliffe, Ann L. 2002. “Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning.” Management Learning 33(1):35-61.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602331002

Cunliffe, Ann L. 2003. “Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities.” Human Relations 56(8):983-1003.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267030568004

Cunliffe, Ann L. 2004. “On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner.” Journal of Management Education 28(4):407-426.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904264440

Cunliffe, Ann L. and Jong S. Jun. 2005. “The Need for Reflexivity in Public Administration.” Administration & Society 37(2):225-242.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704273209

Darlington, Yvonne and Dorothy Scott. 2002. Qualitative Research in Practice: Stories From the Field. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Google Scholar

de Graaf, Gjalt and L.W.J.C. Huberts. 2008. “Portraying the Nature of Corruption Using an Explorative Case Study Design.” Public Administration Review 68(4):640-653.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00904.x

Della Porta, Donatella and Alberto Vannucci. 1997. “The Resources of Corruption: Some Reflections From the Italian Case.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 27(3-4):231-254.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008215600420

Dickson-Swift, Virginia et al. 2006. “Blurring Boundaries in Qualitative Health Research on Sensitive Topics.” Qualitative Health Research 16(6):853-871.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287526

Dickson-Swift, Virginia et al. 2007. “Doing Sensitive Research: What Challenges Do Qualitative Researchers Face?” Qualitative Research 7(3):327-353.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078515

Doig, Alan. 2011. “Numbers, Words, and KYC: Knowing Your Country and Knowing Your Corruption.” Critical Perspectives on International Business 7(2):142-158.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17422041111128221

Enguix, Begonya. 2014. “Negotiating the Field: Rethinking Ethnographic Authority, Experience, and the Frontiers of Research.” Qualitative Research 14(1):79-94.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112465635

Etherington, Kim. 1996. “The Counsellor as Researcher: Boundary Issues and Critical Dilemmas.” British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 24(3):339-346.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889608253018

Gair, Susan. 2002. “In the Thick of It: A Reflective Tale From an Australian Social Worker/Qualitative Researcher.” Qualitative Health Research 12(1):130-139.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302012001010

Goffman, Erving. 1989. “On Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18(2):123-132.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124189018002001

Haller, Dieter and Cris Shore, (eds.). 2005. Corruption: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.
Google Scholar

Hardy, Catherine A. and Susan P. Williams. 2011. “Assembling E-Government Research Designs: A Transdisciplinary View and Interactive Approach.” Public Administration Review 71(3):405-413.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02361.x

Harris, Lloyd C. 2002. “The Emotional Labour of Barristers: An Exploration of Emotional Labour by Status Professionals.” Journal of Management Studies 39(4):553-584.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00303

Harris, Stanley G. and Robert I. Sutton. 1986. “Functions of Partying Ceremonies in Dying Organizations.” The Academy of Management Journal 29(1):5-30.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/255857

Hibbert, Paul, Christine Coupland, and Robert MacIntosh. 2010. “Reflexivity: Recursion and Relationality in Organizational Research Processes.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 5(1):47-62.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641011042026

Höffling, Christian. 2002. Korruption als soziale beziehung [Corruption as Social Ties]. Opladen: Lseke Budrich Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10540-4

Hummel, Ralph. 1991. “Stories Managers Tell: Why They Are as Valid as Science.” Public Administration Review 51(1):31-41.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976634

Jamieson, Janet. 2000. “Negotiating Danger in Fieldwork on Crime.” Pp. 61-71 in Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research, edited by G. Lee-Treweek and S. Linkogle. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Johnson, Barbara and Jill M. Clarke. 2003. “Collecting Sensitive Data: The Impact on Researchers.” Qualitative Health Research 13(3):421-434.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302250340

Johnston, Michael. 2001. “The Definitions Debate: Good Politics, Governance, and the Concept of Corruption.” Pp. 11-31 in Political Economy of Corruption, edited by A. K. Jain. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203468388.ch2

Karklins, Rasma. 2005. The System Made Me Do It: Corruption in Post-Communist Societies. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Google Scholar

Kinard, E. Milling. 1996. “Conducting Research on Child Maltreatment: Effects on Researchers.” Violence and Victims 11(1):65-69.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.11.1.65

Kovats‐Bernat, Christopher. 2002. “Negotiating Dangerous Fields: Pragmatic Strategies for Fieldwork Amid Violence and Terror.” American Anthropologist 104(1):208-222.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.1.208

Lather, Patti. 1986. “Research as Praxis.” Harvard Educational Review 56(3):257-277.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.3.bj2h231877069482

Lee-Treweek, Geraldine and Stephanie Linkogle, (eds.). 2000. Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Li, Jun. 2008. “Ethical Challenges in Participant Observation: A Reflection on Ethnographic Fieldwork.” Qualitative Report 13(1):100-115.
Google Scholar

Liamputtong, Pranee and Douglas Ezzy. 2006. Qualitative Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Liamputtong Rice, Pranee and Douglas Ezzy. 1999. Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lupton, Deborah. 1998. The Emotional Self: A Sociocultural Exploration. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Mazzei, Julie and Erin E. O’Brien. 2009. “You Got It, So When Do You Flaunt It? Building Rapport, Intersectionality, and the Strategic Deployment of Gender in the Field.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38(3):358-383.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241608330456

Melrose, Margaret. 2002. “Labour Pains: Some Considerations on the Difficulties of Researching Juvenile Prostitution.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5(4):333-351.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570110045963

Menzel, Donald. 2003. “State of the Art of Empirical Research on Ethics and Integrity in Governance.” Pp. 16-48 in Ethics in Public Management, edited by G. H. Frederickson and K. R. Ghere. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar

Minichiello, Victor, Rosalie Aroni, and Terrance N. Hays. 2008. In-Depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis. Frenchs Forest, N.S.W: Pearson Education Australia.
Google Scholar

Morgan, Jayne and Kathleen Krone. 2001. “Bending the Rules of ‘Professional’ Display: Emotional Improvisation in Caregiver Performances.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 29(4):317-340.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880128114

Morgan, Rod, Mike Maguire, and Robert Reiner, (eds.). 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Morse, Janice M. and Peggy A. Field. 1995. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Patton, Michael Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Philp, Mark. 1997. “Defining Political Corruption.” Political Studies 45(3):436-462.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00090

Rager, Kathleen B. 2005. “Self-Care and the Qualitative Researcher: When Collecting Data Can Break Your Heart.” Educational Researcher 34(4):23-27.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004023

Ribbens, Jane and Rosalind Edwards, (eds.). 1998. Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209137

Roman, Alexandru V. 2012. “ The Myths Within Anticorruption Policies.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 34(2):238-255.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806340204

Roman, Alexandru V. 2014a. “Refocusing Perspectives on Public Corruption Away From the Individual: Insights From the Moldovan Social Matrix.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 43:216-231.
Google Scholar

Roman, Alexandru V. 2014b. “The Multi-Shade Paradox of Public Corruption: The Moldovan Case of Dirty Hands and Collective Action.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 62(1):65-80.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9519-5

Roman, Alexandru V. and Hugh T. Miller. 2014. “Building Social Cohesion: Family, Friends, and Corruption.” Administration & Society 46(7):775-795.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712473987

Rosenblatt, Paul C. 2001. “Qualitative Research as a Spiritual Experience.” Pp. 111-128 in The Emotional Nature of Qualitative Research, edited by K. Gilbert. London: CRC Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039283.sec2

Rubin, Herbert J. and Irene S. Rubin. 2012. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Sluka, Jeffrey. 1995. “Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast.” Pp. 276-294 in Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival, edited by C. Nordstrom and A. Robben. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Stanley, Christine A. and Patrick Slattery. 2003. “Who Reveals What to Whom? Critical Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Inquiry as an Interdisciplinary, Biracial, Male/Female Research Team.” Qualitative Inquiry 9(5):705-728.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403253004

Stanley, Liz and Sue Wise. 2002. Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203201619

Von Alemann, Ulrich. 2004. “The Unknown Depths of Political Theory: The Case for a Multidimensional Concept of Corruption.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 42(1):25-34.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000041035.21045.1d

Warr, Deborah J. 2004. “Stories in the Flesh and Voices in the Head: Reflections on the Context and Impact of Research With Disadvantaged Populations.” Qualitative Health Research 14(4):578-587.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303260449

Yanow, Dvora and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, (eds.). 2006. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar

Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar