Warsztaty pisania – ich znaczenie dla uczących się języka angielskiego
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-7435.24.06Słowa kluczowe:
pisanie, rozwój zawodowy, edukacja nauczycieli, młodzież, nauka języka angielskiegoAbstrakt
Korzystając z naturalistycznej, jakościowej metodologii w artykule zaprezentowane zostaną działania dwóch nauczycieli języka angielskiego w szkole średniej, angażujących się w zaspokajanie potrzeb młodzieży w zakresie nauczania języka. Wnioski sugerują, że najbardziej efektywnymi metodami nauki i osiągania sukcesu przez uczniów są: znajomość źródeł, opieranie się na wiedzy językowej, poświęcenie czasu na wybór odpowiednich książek i aktywności, wyraźne formułowanie zasad rządzących warsztatem pisarskim, a także traktowanie pisania jako czynności nierozerwalnie połączonej z myśleniem.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Applebee, Arthur N. & Langer, Judith A. (2013). Writing instruction that works: Proven methods for middle and high school classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Araujo, Juan (2013). Expanding the learning zone: Decisions that transform the practices of two English language arts teachers. 35th Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers Yearbook, (pp. 87–107). Louisville, KY: Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.
Google Scholar
Atwell, Nancie (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents . Montclair, NJ: Boynton & Cook Publishers.
Google Scholar
Baker, Colin (2008). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar
Ball, Arnetha F. (2006). Teaching writing in culturally diverse classrooms. In: C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (pp. 293–310). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
Google Scholar
Brophy, Jere E. & Good, Thomas L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In: M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edition, (pp. 328–375). New York: McMillan.
Google Scholar
Burke, Carolyn & Harste, Jerome & Short, Kathy (1995). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Google Scholar
Ciardiello, Angelo V. (1998). Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 2, 210–219.
Google Scholar
Cisneros, Sandra (1984). The house on Mango Street. New York, NY: Arte Publico Press.
Google Scholar
Collins, Suzanne (2008). The hunger games. New York, NY: Scholastic Press.
Google Scholar
Common Core State Initiative Standards (2015). English language arts standards: Writing 9–10. Retrieved from: http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/W/9-10/
Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. New Berry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Delpit, Lisa (1987). Skills and other dilemmas of a progressive black educator. Equity and Choice, 3, 2, 9–14.
Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31, 121–127.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.31.787.121
Edelsky, Carole (1986). Writing in the bilingual program: Habia una vez. Norwood: NJ. Abex.
Google Scholar
Englert, Carol S. & Mariage, Troy V. & Dunsmore, Kailonnie (2010). Tenets of sociocultural theory in writing instruction. In: C. A. MacActhur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, (pp. 208–221). New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Fu, Danling (2009). Writing between languages: How English language learners make the trans ition to fluency. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Google Scholar
Gallagher, Kelly (2006). Teaching adolescent writers. NY: Stenhouse Publications.
Google Scholar
Gambrell, Linda B. & Malloy, Jacquelynn A. & Mazzoni, Suzan A. (2011). Evidenced based best practices for comprehensive literacy instruction. In: L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction, 4th edition, (pp. 11–36). New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Gonzales, Linda Northcutt & Watson, Daniel (1986). Sheltered English teaching handbook. Carlsbad, CA: Northcutt, Watson, and Gonzalez.
Google Scholar
Graham, Steve & Perin, Dolores (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Google Scholar
Holdaway, Don (1979). The foundations of literacy. New York, NY: Ashton Scholastic.
Google Scholar
Homer (1996) The Odyssey. (R. Fagles, Trans.). New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. (1987). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall International.
Google Scholar
Kwok, Michelle N. & Ganding, Exequiel & Hull, Glynda A. & Moje, Elizabeth B. (2016). Sociocultural approaches to high school instruction: Examining the roles of context, positionality, and power. In: C. A. MacActhur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, 2nd edition, (pp. 257–271). New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
McCarthey, Sarah & Mkhize, Dumisile (2013). Teachers' orientations towards writing instruction. Journal of Writing Research, 4, 4, 1–33.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.1
Merriam, Sharan B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Moll, Luis C. & Amanti, Cathy & Neff, Deborah & Gonzalez, Norma (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 2, 132–141.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Moll, Luis C. (1989). Teaching second language students: A Vygotskian perspective. In: D. Johnson & S. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing, (pp. 57–69). NY: Longman.
Google Scholar
National Assessment of Educational Progress (2011). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdf
Google Scholar
Patterson, Leslie & Wickstrom, Carol & Roberts, Jennifer & Araujo, Juan, & Hoki, Chieko (Winter 2010). Deciding when to step in and when to back off: Culturally mediated writing instruction for adolescent English language learners. The Tapestry Journal, 2, 2, p. 1–28.
Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Peregoy, Suzanne F. & Boyle, Owen F. (2012). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book (6th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson Publications.
Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Louise M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In: R. B. Rudell, N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5th edition, (pp. 1363–1398). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Google Scholar
Salinger, Jerome D. (1951). Catcher in the rye. New York, NY: Little Brown and Company.
Google Scholar
Shavelson, Richard J. (1973). The basic teaching skill: Decision-making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education Center for R & D Teaching.
Google Scholar
Texas Education Agency (2013). Writing scores for end of course exams for fall 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/rpt/sum/yr13/
Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Wickstrom, Carol & Araujo, Juan & Patterson, Leslie (with Hoki, Chieko, & Roberts, Jennifer) (2011). Teachers prepare students for careers and college: “I see you”, therefore I can teach you. In: P. Dunston, K. H. Gambrell, P. Stecker, S. Fullerton, V. Gillis, & C. C. Bates (Eds.), 60th Literacy Research Association Yearbook, (pp. 113–126). Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association.
Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Jeffrey D. (2007). Engaging readers and writers with inquiry: Promoting deep unde rstandings in language arts and content areas with guiding questions. New York: Scholastic.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.