Quo Vadis Banking Union? Discussions over the Resolution of Banks

Authors

  • Klaudia Alicja Zielińska University of Łódź, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, International Business and Trade Department

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.333.12

Keywords:

SRM, resolution, banking union, credit institutions

Abstract

Transferring the right to make the decision concerning a bank’s resolution onto the international level has long been the bone of contention between the European Union’s Member States. The aim of this article is to provide a review of the discussions on this topic, while attempting to evaluate whether the consensus reached allows the achievement of goals set for the resolution mechanism. The article is composed of five parts. The first part introduces the concept of single supervision over the banking sector and explains the importance of having harmonised resolution rules. The second part discusses the process of reaching a consensus towards the establishment of the Single Resolution Mechanism. That part is followed by a description of the final structure agreed for the mechanism back in 2014. The fourth part outlines the review procedure of the established regulations currently under way. The final part of the article summarises the contents and attempts to identify the core issues that still need to be resolved in order to guarantee reliability of the second pillar of the banking union.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chopin T. (2014), Reforming the European Union: Which methods? Which options?, European Issues and Interviews, http://www.robert‑schuman.eu/en/european‑issues/0320‑reforming‑the‑european‑union‑with‑which‑methods‑what‑are‑the‑options [accessed: 7.04.2017].
Google Scholar

Council of the European Union 17983/13, Press Release 3281st Council meeting. Economic and Financial Affairs, 18 December 2013, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Council of the European Union 2013/0253(COD), 14056/1/13, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund amending Regulation (EU) no. 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 27 September 2013, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Council of the European Union 2013/0253(COD), 14754/13, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund amending Regulation (EU) no. 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 15 October 2013, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Council of the European Union 2013/0253(COD), 17055/13, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund amending Regulation (EU) no. 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 28 November 2013, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Council of the European Union 2013/0253(COD), 17410/13, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund amending Regulation (EU) no. 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 6 December 2013, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) no. 1093/2010 and (EU) no. 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal L 173/190, 12 December 2014.
Google Scholar

European Commission (2012), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, COM/2012/0510, Brussels.
Google Scholar

European Commission (2013), Commission proposes Single Resolution Mechanism for the Banking Union, IP/13/674, Brussels.
Google Scholar

European Commission 2016/0362(COD), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/59/EU on loss absorbing and recapitalisation capacity of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Directive 98/26/EC, Directive 2002/47/EC, Directive 2012/30/EU, Directive 2011/35/EU, Directive 2005/56/EC, Directive 2004/25/EC and Directive 2007/36/EC, COM(2016) 852 final.
Google Scholar

Financial Stability Board (2015), Principles on Loss‑absorbing and Recapitalisation Capacity of G‑SIBs in Resolution. Total Loss‑absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Term Sheet, http://www.fsb.org/wp‑content/uploads/TLAC‑Principles‑and‑Term‑Sheet‑for‑publication‑final.pdf [accessed: 7.04. 2017].
Google Scholar

Gianviti F., Krueger A.O., Pisani‑ Ferry J., Sapri A., Von Hagen J. (2010), A European mechanism for sovereign debt crisis resolution: a proposal, “Bruegel Blueprint Series”, vol. 10, pp. 3–35, http://bruegel.org/wp‑content/uploads/imported/publications/101109_BP_as_jpf_jvh_A_European_mechanism_for_sovereign_debt_crisis_resolution_a_proposal.pdf [accessed: 0.05.2017].
Google Scholar

Groen W.P. de (2016), The different legal and operational structures of banking groups in the euro area, and their impact on banks’ resolvability, Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Gros D. (2013), The Bank Resolution Compromise: Incomplete, but Workable?, CEPS Commentary, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Kern A. (2016), The European Central Bank and Banking Supervision: The Regulatory Limits of the Single Supervisory Mechanism, “European Company and Financial Law Review”, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 467–494.
Google Scholar

Micossi S. (2013), The new Single Bank Resolution Mechanism of the European Union, VOX CEPR’s Policy Portal, http://voxeu.org/article/eu‑s‑new‑single‑bank‑resolution‑mechanism [accessed: 3.05.2017].
Google Scholar

Pozzolo A.F., Calolari G., Navaretti G.B. (2016), Bail‑in, up to a point, “European Economy. Banks, Regulation, and the Real Sector”, vol. 2, pp. 9–31, http://european‑economy.eu/2016–2/bail‑in‑up‑to‑a‑point/ [accessed: 7.04.2017].
Google Scholar

Purpose of the single supervisory mechanism (n.d.), https://ec.europa.eu/info/business‑economy‑euro/banking‑and‑finance/banking‑union/single‑supervisory‑mechanism_en [accessed: 6.04.2017].
Google Scholar

Regulation (EU) no. 1024/2013 specific tasks of the European Central Bank concerning policies on the prudential supervision of credit institutions.
Google Scholar

Regulation (EU) no. 610/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) no. 1093/2010, Official Journal of the European Union L225, 30 July 2014.
Google Scholar

Regulation (EU) no. 806/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) no. 1093/2010, L 225/1, Official Journal of the European Union.
Google Scholar

Veron N. (2015), Europe’s Radical Banking Union, Bruegel Essay and Lectures Series, Bruegel, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-02-27

How to Cite

Zielińska, K. A. (2018). Quo Vadis Banking Union? Discussions over the Resolution of Banks. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 1(333), [185]–194. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.333.12

Issue

Section

Articles