Multi-level regional development governance: A European typology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.1.11Keywords:
EU cohesion policy, multi-level governance, territorial governance, spatial planning systems, regional developmentAbstract
The European Union identifies the regional level as the ideal spatial scale for resources’ redistribution, in so doing turning European regions into key spatial development players. This raises challenges due to the heterogeneity of the EU in terms of administrative configurations, and spatial governance and planning systems. The contribution of this article draws on the results of three interlinked ESPON research projects to shed light on the matter. Building on an overview of the institutional variables that may influence successful regional development, it proposes a typology of multi-level regional development governance in the EU and reflects upon the potentials for delivering economic, social, and territorial cohesion.
Downloads
References
ADAMS, N., COTELLA, G. and NUNES, R. (2014), ‘The engagement of territorial knowledge communities with European spatial planning and the territorial cohesion debate: a Baltic Perspective’, European Planning Studies, 4 (22), pp. 712–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772735
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772735
ADAMS, N., COTELLA, G. and NUNES, R. J. (eds.) (2011), ‘Territorial knowledge channels in a multi-jurisdictional policy environment. A theoretical framework’, [in:] ADAMS, N., COTELLA, G. and NUNES, R. J. (eds.) (2011) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, London: Routledge, pp. 26–55. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842973
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842973
ARESTIS, P. and PELAGIDIS, T. (2010), ‘Absurd Austerity Policies in Europe’, Challenge, 53 (6), pp. 54–61. https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132530603
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132530603
ARMONDI, S. and De GREGORIO HURTADO, S. (eds.) (2020), Foregrounding Urban Agendas. The New Urban Issue in European Experiences of Policy-Making, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29073-3
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29073-3
BARON, M., GRASLAND, C., CUNNINGHAM-SABOT, E., RIVIÈRE, D. and VAN HAMME, G. (eds.) (2010), Villes et régions européennes en décroissance, Maintenir la cohésion territoriale, Paris: Lavoisier/ Hermès.
Google Scholar
BERISHA, E., COTELLA, G., JANIN RIVOLIN, U. and SOLLY, A. (2021), ‘Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: a European typology’, European planning studies, 29 (1), pp. 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295
CAMAGNI, R. and CAPELLO, R. (2014), Rationale and Design of EU Cohesion Policies in a Period of Crisis with special reference to CEECs, GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Policy Paper, 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12047
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12047
CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1997), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Regional Development Studies, Luxembourg: European Communities. http://www.espace-project.org/publications/EUcompendium.pdf
Google Scholar
CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2017), My region, my Europe, our future. Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion7/7cr.pdf
Google Scholar
COTELLA, G. (2007), ‘Central Eastern Europe in the global market scenario: Evolution of the system of governance in Poland from socialism to capitalism’, Journal fur Entwicklungspolitik, 23 (1), pp. 98–124. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-23-1-98
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-23-1-98
COTELLA, G. (2014), ‘Spatial Planning in Poland between European Influences and Dominant Market Forces’, [in:] REIMER, M., GETIMIS, P. and BLOTEVOGEL, H. (eds.) Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Change, London: Routledge, pp. 255–277.
Google Scholar
COTELLA, G. (2019), ‘The Urban Dimension of EU Cohesion Policy’, [in:] MEDEIROS, E. (ed.), Territorial Cohesion. The Urban Dimension, Springer, pp. 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_7
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_7
COTELLA, G., ADAMS, N. and NUNES, R., (2012), ‘Engaging in European Spatial Planning: A Central and Eastern European Perspective on the Territorial Cohesion Debate’, European Planning Studies, 7 (20), pp. 1197–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673567
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673567
COTELLA, G. and JANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2015), ‘Europeizzazione del governo del territorio: un modello analítico’, Territorio, 73, pp. 127–134. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2015-073019
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2015-073019
COTELLA, G., OTHENGRAFEN, F., PAPAIOANNOU, A. and TULUMELLO, S. (2015a), ‘Socio-spatial and socio-political implications of the economic crisis and austerity politics in Southern-European cities’, [in:] KNIELING, J. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (eds.) Cities in Crisis. Socio-spatial Impacts of the Economic Crisis in Southern European Cities, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 27–47.
Google Scholar
DĄBROWSKI, M. (2014), ‘Towards place-based regional and local development strategie in Central and Eastern Europe? EU cohesion policy and strategic planning capacity at the sub-national level’, Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29 (4–5), pp. 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214535715
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214535715
DAVIES, H. W. E., EDWARDS, D., HOOPER, A. J., and PUNTER, J. V. (1989), ‘Comparative study’, [in:] DAVIES, H. W. E. (ed.), Planning control in Western Europe, London: HMSO, pp. 409–442.
Google Scholar
DAVIES, S. (2017), Does Cohesion policy work? Meta-review of research on the effectiveness of cohesion policy, European Policy Research Paper, 99. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2a-hUKEwiIyoPumffdAhXQy6QKHYPYDvAQFjAAegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eprc-strath.eu%2Fpublic%2Fdam%2Fjcr%3A2059df3a-8ca9-47da-b0e0-786f31b52160%2FEPRP%252099.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1RDRjO9ONrq-WVbuqThwQL
Google Scholar
DE MELLO, L. and BARENSTEIN, M. (2001), Fiscal Decentralisation and Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis, IMF Working Paper 01/71, Fiscal Affairs Department. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451849240.001
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451849240.001
D’OTTAVIO, G., CONWAY, M., PATEL, K. K., KOTT, S., METZLER, G., FICKERS, A. and SIERP, A. (2020), ‘New Narratives of European Integration History’, Contemporanea, 23 (1), pp. 99–132.
Google Scholar
DOTTI, N. F. (ed.) (2016), Learning from implementation and evaluation of the EU Cohesion Policy: Lessons from a research-policy dialogue, Brussels: RSA Research Network on Cohesion Policy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308903187_Learning_from_implementation_and_evaluation_of_the_EU_Cohesion_Policy_Lessons_from_a_research-policy_dialogue
Google Scholar
DÜHR, S., COLOMB, C. and NADIN, V. (2010), European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290
ESPON (2007), ESPON 2.3.2 Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. Final Report, Luxembourg: ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/fr-2.3.2_final_feb2007.pdf
Google Scholar
ESPON (2013), ESPON TANGO. Territorial approaches for new governance. Final Report – Scientific Report, Luxembourg: ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ESPON_TANGO_Scientific_Report_Final.pdf
Google Scholar
ESPON (2017), ESPON ReSSI. Regional Strategies for sustainable and inclusive territorial development. Regional interplay and EU dialogue. Annex 2 – Governance regimes, opportunities and challenges for Europea regions and cities, Luxembourg, ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ReSSI_Delivery%204_Annex%202_Governance%20Opportunities%20Challenges_FINAL.pdf
Google Scholar
ESPON (2018), ESPON COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Applied Research 2016–2018. Final Report. Luxembourg, ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/planning-systems
Google Scholar
ESPON (2021), ESPON METRO – The role and future perspectives of Cohesion Policy in the planning of Metropolitan Areas and Cities, Luxembourg, ESPON. https://www.espon.eu/metro
Google Scholar
FALUDI, A. (2001). European Spatial Planning: A Contested Field. Built Environment (1978–), 27 (4), pp. 244–252, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23288462 [accessed on: 15.02.2021]
Google Scholar
FALUDI, A. (2008), ‘The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror’, Environment and Planning A, 40 (6), pp. 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39225
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a39225
FALUDI, A. (2010), Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age?, London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842324
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842324
FERLAINO, F. and MOLINARI, P. (2009), Neofederalismo, neoregionalismo e intercomunalità, geografia amministrativa dell’Italia e dell’Europa, Bologna: Il Mulino.
Google Scholar
FRATESI, U. and WISHLADE, F. G. (2017), ‘The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts’, Regional Studies, 51 (6), pp. 817–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673
GAGLIARDI, L. and PERCOCO, M. (2017), ‘The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions’, Regional Studies, 51 (6), pp. 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384
GOLDSMITH, M. (1992), ‘Local Government’, Urban Studies, 29 (3–4), pp. 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080501
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080501
HESSE, J. J. and SHARPE, L. J. (1991), ‘Conclusions’, [in:] HESSE, J. J. (ed.), Local government and urban affairs in international perspective: analyses of twenty Western industrialised countries, Schriften zur kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis, Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.
Google Scholar
HIX, S. (2005), The political system of the European Union, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar
HOOGHE, L. and MARKS, G. (2001), Multi-level governance and European integration, Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
HOOGHE, L. and MARKS, G. (2003), ‘Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance’, American Political Science Review, 97 (2), pp. 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649
JANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2008), ‘Conforming and Performing Planning Systems in Europe: An Unbearable Cohabitation’, Planning Practice and Research, 23 (2), pp. 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081
JANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2010), ‘EU territorial governance: learning from institutional progress’, European Journal of Spatial Development, (38), pp. 1–28, http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/refer-eed%2038.pdf
Google Scholar
JANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2012), ‘Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: a Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison’, Planning Practice and Research, 27 (1), pp. 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
JANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2017), ‘Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: a European comparison’, European Planning Studies 25 (6), pp. 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
KRAAY, A., KAUFMANN, D. and MASTRUZZI, M. (2010), The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues, Policy Research Working Papers, The World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-5430 https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430
MATSAGANIS, M. and LEVENTI, C. (2014), ‘The Distributional Impact of Austerity and the Recession in Southern Europe’, South European Society and Politics, 19 (3), pp. 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.94770
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.947700
MUÑOZ GIELEN, D. and TASAN-KOK, T. (2010), ‘Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands’, European Planning Studies, 18 (7), pp. 1097–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191
NADIN, V. and STEAD, D. (2008), ‘European spatial planning systems, social models and learning’, disP, 172 (1), pp. 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
NEWMAN, P. and THORNLEY, A. (1996), Urban planning in Europe: international competition, national systems, and planning projects, London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
NUGENT, N. (2006), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke and Durham NC: Palgrave and Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. and GILL, N. (2003), ‘The global trend towards devolution and its implications’, Environment and Planning C, 21 (3), pp. 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0235
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c0235
SCHAKEL, A. H., HOOGHE, L. and MARKS, G. (2015), ‘Multilevel governance and the state’, [in:] LEIBFRIED, S., HUBER, E., LANGE, M., LEVY, J. D., NULLMEIER, F. and STEPHENS, J. D. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state, Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 269–285.
Google Scholar
SCHARPF, F. W. (1994), ‘Community and autonomy: multi-level policy making in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1 (2), pp. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769408406956
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769408406956
SCHMITT, P. and VAN WELL, L. (2017), ‘Tracing the place-based coordinative frameworks of EU Territorial Cohesion Policy. From European spatial planning towards European territorial governance’, [in:] MEDEIROS, E. (ed.), Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169743-7
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169743-7
STEAD, D. and COTELLA, G. (2011), ‘Spatial planning and the influence of domestic actors. Some conclusions’, disP, 186 (3), pp. 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557146
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557146
SUTCLIFFE, J. B. (2000), ‘The 1999 reform of the structural fund regulations: multi-level governance or renationalization?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 7 (2), pp. 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017600343205
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135017600343205
TULUMELLO, S., COTELLA, G. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (2020), ‘Spatial planning and territorial governance in Southern Europe between economic crisis and austerity policies’, International Planning Studies, 25 (1), pp. 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1701422
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1701422
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.