Ten Countries – Twenty Years Administrative Reforms in Ten New Eu-Members. Two Decades After Revolution

BEKSTA, A. and PETKEVICIUS, A. (2000), ‘Local Government in Lithuania’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

BÍRÓ, A-M. and KOVÁCS, P. (eds), (2001), Diversity in Action - Local Public Management of Multi-ethnic Communities in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.
Google Scholar

BLÁZEK, J. (2001), ‘Regional Development and Regional Policy in the Czech Republic: An Outline of the EU Enlargement Impacts’, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 12, pp. 757-769.
Google Scholar

COMAN, P., CRAI, E., RADULESCU, M. and STANCIULESCU, G. (2001), ‘Local Government in Romania’, [in:] KANDEVA, E. (ed.), Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 2, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

Die Regionen der Tschechischen Republik stellen sich vor (2001), Praha: Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj a DaDa.
Google Scholar

DRUMEVA, E. (2001), ‘Local Government in Bulgaria’, [in:] KANDEVA, E. (ed.), Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 2, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

EMILEWICZ, J. and WOLEK, J. (2002), Reformers and Politicians, Białystok, Warszawa: SEAPELISPA.
Google Scholar

EU COMMISSION (2000), Spatial Perspectives for the Enlargement of the European Union, Bruxelles, Luxembourg: Commission of the European Union.
Google Scholar

GERRITSE, R. (2007), The Autonomy of Local Governments versus National Policy Objectives in the Czech Republic - Insights in the Use of Selected Quality Management Instruments in Local Governments, Praha, Groningen: MEPCO, University of Groningen.
Google Scholar

HALÁSZ, I. (2000), ‘Az új regionális önkormányzatok alkotmányos helye és szerkezete az egyes kelet-közép-európai országokban’, Állam és Jogtudomány, 41, pp. 97-142.
Google Scholar

HORVÁTH, M. T. (2000), ‘Directions and Differences of Local Changes’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

HORVÁTH, R. and VERESS, E. (2003), Regionális politika és területfejlesztés Romániában, Magyar Kisebbség, 1, pp. 30-32.
Google Scholar

KANDEVA, E. (ed.), (2001), Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 2, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

KEMKERS, R. H. C. (2005a), ‘Közigazgatás és igazgatásszervezés az EU15-ben - Centralizmus, regionalizmus, lokalizmus és glokalizmus’ [Public administration and administrative division in the EU15 - Centralism, regionalism, localism and ‘glocalism’], [in:] BUGYA, T. and WILHELM, Z., Tanulmányok Tóth Józsefnek, pp. 109-131. Pécs: Geographical Institute, University of Pécs.
Google Scholar

KEMKERS, R. H. C. (2005b), ‘Where Exactly is the European Union? Borders, Regions and Statistical Divisions of the New EU25’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 12 (2), pp. 131-144.
Google Scholar

KIERES, L. (1997), Development of Regionalisation in Europe, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Google Scholar

KOWALCZYK, A. (2000), ‘Local Government in Poland’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

LACINA, K. and VAJDOVA, Z. (2000), ‘Local Government in the Czech Republic’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

MÄELTSEMEES, S. (2000), ‘Local Government in Estonia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

MEZEI, I. and HARDI, T. (2003), ‘A szlovák közigazgatás és területfejlesztés asszimmetriái’, Tér és Társadalom, 4, pp. 127-156.
Google Scholar

NEMEC, J., BERCIK, P. and KUKLIS, P. (2000), ‘Local Government in Slovakia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.) Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

PÁLNÉ KOVÁCS, I. (2005), ‘Hungary of the Regions: Utopia or Ultimatum?’, [in:] BARTA, GY. et al. (eds), Hungarian Spaces and Places: Patterns of Transition, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.
Google Scholar

SETNIKAR-CANKAR, S., VLAJ, S. and KLUN, M. (2000), ‘Local Government in Slovenia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar

SZIGETI, E. (2002), Község, város, jogállás - A magyar településhálózat közigazgatási térszerkezetének néhány kérdése, Budapest: Magyar Közigazgatási Intézet.
Google Scholar

TÜSKE, T. (2003), ‘A szlovén regionális politika törvényi háttere’, [in:] MEZEI, C. (ed.), Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudománi Kara Regionális Politika és Gazdaságtan Doktori iskola Évkönyve 2002, Pécs: Faculty of Economics, University of Pecs.
Google Scholar

VANAGS, E. and VILKA, I. (2000), ‘Local Government in Latvia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.
Google Scholar