Development of long bones of human extremities in fetal period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.41.2.08Abstract
The author has examined 235 human fetuses (123 males and 112 females) in the age from 4 to 10 lunar months. Following long bones of extremities were dissected: femur, tibia, fibula, humerus radius and ulna, moreover the author examined scapula and clavicle. Measurements taken on the bones considered also their unossified parts. Arithmetic means and other statistical characteristics of measurements are tabulated with respect to age of fetuses.
Downloads
References
Balthazard V., et Dervieux, Ann. Med. leg., 1921, 1, 37-42.
Bauer O. H. K., Anthrop. Anz., 1940, 17, 77-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1940.10725455
Bochenek A., Reicher M., Anatomia człowieka, PZWL, Warszawa, 1954.
Bożiłow W., Sawicki K., Wich J., Mat. Prac. Antr., 1969, 77.
Bożiłow W., Sawicki K., Mat. Prac. Antr., 1970, 79.
Brookes M., J. Anat., 1958, 92, 261-276.
Burtscher H., Z. Anat., 1877, 2, 357-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.872.374
Dega W., Przegl. Antrop., 1933, t. VII.
Dega W., Chir. Narz. Ruchu i Ortop. Polska, 1932, z. 2, 161-296.
Dega W., Różnice płciowe w budowie miednicy, kości udowych i stawów biodrowych płodów ludzkich, Praca wydana z zasiłku Senatu Uniw. Pozn., Poznań, 1933.
Fazekas I. Gy., Kosa F., Dtsch. Z. ges. ger. Med., 1967, 60, 149-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341917
Fazekas I. Gy., Kosa F., Acta Med. leg. Soc., 1966, 19, 135.
Fazekas I. Gy., Kosa F., Dtsch. Z. ges. ger. Med., 1966, 58, 142-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00580420
Fehling H., Arch. f. Gynäkologie, 1876, t. 10, z. I, 1-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01795725
Friedländer F., Zeitschrift f. orth. Chir., 1901, t. 9.
Follak O., Gerstenberger J., Przegl. Antrop., 1928, t. III, 3-4.
Gardner E., Gray D. J., Am. J. Anat., 1970, vol. 129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001290202
Gardner E., Gray D. J., Am. J. Anat., 1950, 87, 163-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000870202
Gardner E., Osteogenesis in the human embryo and fetus, W: The Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone, Academic Press, New York, 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3286-7.50017-8
Gengenbach A., Zbl. Gynäk., 1932, 56, 972-975.
Giordano A., Virchow Arch. Path. Anat., 1938, 301, 380-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595090
Godycki M., Zarys antropometrii, PWN, Warszawa, 1956.
Graf P., Bruns Beitr. z. klin. Chir., 1909, t. 64.
Gray D. J., Gardner E., Am. J. Anat., 1950, 86, 235-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000860204
Gray D. J., Gardner E., Am. J. Anat., 1969, 124, 431-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001240403
Hueter C., Virchows Arch. Path. Anat., 1863, 26.
Jackson C. M., Am. J. Anat., 1909, 9, 119-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000090106
Karpf M., Zeitschrift f. Anat. u. Entwick., 1967, 126, 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00531073
Keith A., Human Embryology and Morphology, London, 1948.
Key-Alberg A., Vjschr. gerichtl. Med., 1917, III, 53, 206-211.
Kontsek B., Anthrop. Anz., 1940, 17, 103-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14753825012331361956
Kosa F., Fazekas I. Gy., Zacchia, 1972, 3, 445-456.
Krukierek S., Przegl. Antrop., 1955, 21, 1058-1068.
Kugler, Arch. Klaus-Stift. Vererb. Forsch., 1931, 6, z. 4.
Landois Le, Virchows Arch. Path. Anat., 1869, 45, 77.
Langer K., Denkschr. Ksl. Akad. Wiss., Wien. math. nat. KL, 1872, 31, 1.
Latimer H. B., Anat. Rec., 1965, 153, 421-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091530412
Latimer H. B., Growth, 1948, 12, 133-144.
Lippert H., Z. Morph. Anthrop., 1963, 53, 229-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00573391
Lippert H., Anat. Anz., 1961, 169, 117-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1961.tb07085.x
Malinowski A., Przegl. Antrop., 1971, t. 37, z. 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(71)90675-X
Mall F. P., Die Alterbestimmung von menschlichen Embryonen und Feten, Handbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen, Leipzig, 1910.
Maresh M. M., Am. J. Dis. Child, 1955, 89, 725-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1955.02050110865010
Martin R., Saller K., Lehrbuch der Anthropologie, Stuttgart, 1958.
Michaelis P., Arch. Gynäk., 1900, 78.
Nauck E. T., Morph. Jb., 1931, 66, 65-195.
Nishizuka T., Z. Morph. Anthrop., 1925, 25, 1-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1113499
Olivier G., Pineau H., Arch. Anat. (Sem. Hóp.), 1958, 6, 21-28.
Olivier G., Pineau H., Ann. Méd. leg., 1960, 40, 141-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/40.2.144
Pavlov S., Petrov I., Gegenbaurs morph. Jahrb., 1971, 117, 2, 145-161.
Petrov I., Pavlov S., Folia Medica, 1966, t. 8, fasc. 4.
Petrov I., Travaux scientifiques, 1972, vol. 10, fasc. 3.
Petrov I., Travaux scientifiques, 1972, vol. 10, fasc. 1.
Petrov I., Natura, 1972, t. 2, nr. 5.
Retzius G., Biol. Untersuch., 1904, 11, 33-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lipi.19040110207
Robb R., Clark J., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., 1934, 31, 634-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-31-7255C
Scammon R. E., Calkins L., Growth in the Fetal Period, Minneapolis, 1949.
Scammon R. E., Calkins L., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 1924, 22, 157-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-22-79
Scammon R. E., Calkins L., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 1924, 21, 549-551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-21-276
Scammon R. E., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 1926, 23, 809-811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-23-3179
Scammon R. E., Anat. Rec., 1937, 68, 221-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1090680207
Schultz H. A., Hum. Biol., 1930, 2, 303, 438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1436471
Schultz H. A., Quart. Rev. Biol., 1926, 1, 465-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/394257
Schulz D. M., Giordano D. A., Schulz D. H., Arch. Path., 1962, 74, 244-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.19620740725
Stachura D., Przegl. Antrop., 1974, t. 40, z. 2.
Thomson A., Journ. of. Anat. and Physiol., 1899, 33.
Toldt C., Prag. med. Wschr., 1879, 121.
Trolle D., Acta Obstet. Gynaec. Scan., 1948, 27, 327-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016344709156316
Trotter M. i wsp., Growth, 1970, 3, 34, 283-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400030018x
Wich J., Przegl. Antrop., 1969, t. 35, z. 2.
Zangenmeister W., Z. Geburtsch. Gynäk., 1911, 69, 127.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
