The biological meaning of preferences on the human mate market

Bogusław Pawłowski

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.63.04

Authors

Bogusław Pawłowski Department of Anthropology, University of Wrocław, Kuźnicza 35, 50-138 Wrocław, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.63.04

Keywords:

human mate preferences, reproductive potential, age preferences, physical attractiveness, resources, height, WHR

Abstract

Factors, which universally influence mate choice decisions, are: age, physical appearance, and resources. Different evidence of the biological relevance of these three factors on the human mate market is presented. The sexspecific preferences for partner.s age reflect such values as Fisherian reproductive potential and fecundity for females and life expectancy related to the length of further time of paternal investment for males. Physical attractiveness is analyzed as a marker of female.s age, and in the case of both sexes as a marker of hormone level, heterozygosity and therefore immunocompetence. Because attractiveness connotes genetic quality of a prospective partner and indicates higher fitness for offspring, it is not an arbitrary trait. Resources of males are discussed as being important for females because they assure good paternal investment and therefore higher reproductive success. Human flexibility in age and physical attractiveness preferences is also examined in relation to ecological conditions. The evidence presented here indicates that the factors influencing human mate choice decisions can be honest, biologically relevant cues of reproductive value of a prospective partner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABBOT R.D., L.R. WHITE, G. WEBSTER ROSS, et al., 1998, Height as a marker of childhood development and late-life cognitive function: The Honolulu-Asia aging study, Pediatrics, 102, 602-609
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.102.3.602

ALLBECK P., C. BERGH, 1992, Height, body mass and mortality; do social factors explain the association?, Public Health, 106, 375-82
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80186-6

ANDERSON J.L., C.B. CRAWFORD, J. NADEAN, T. LINDBERG, 1992, Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socio-biology of ideals of female body shape, Ethol. Sociobiol., 13, 197-227
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90033-Z

ANDERSON M., Y. IWASA, 1996, Sexual selection, TREE, 11, 53-58
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.1996.11.s1.53

BAILIT H.L., P.L. WORKMAN, J.D. NISWANDER, J.C. MACLEAN, 1970, Dental asymmetry as an indicator of genetic and environmental conditions in human populations, Hum. Biol., 42, 626-638
View in Google Scholar

BAIZE H.R., J.E. SCHROEDER, 1995, Personality and mate selection in personal ads: evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection process, J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 10, 517-536
View in Google Scholar

BAR-TALE D., L. SAXE, 1976, Perceptions of similarity and dissimilarity physically attractive couples and individuals, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 33, 722-781
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.772

BERECZKEI T., A. CSANAKY, 1996, Mate choice marital success, and reproduction in a modern society, Ethol. Sociobiol., 17, 23-35
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00104-2

BERECZKEI T., S. VOROS, A. GAL, L. BERNATH, 1997, Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice, Ethology, 103, 681-699
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00178.x

BERSHEID E., E. WALSTER, 1974, Physical Attractiveness, [in:] Advances in experimental social psychology, L. Berkewitz (ed.), Acad. Press, New York, pp. 157-215
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60037-4

BETZIG L.L., 1988, Mating and parenting in Darwinian perspective. [in:] Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder & P. Turke (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 3-20
View in Google Scholar

BIELICKI T., J. CHARZEWSKI, 1983, Body weight and upward social mobility, Ann. Hum. Biol., 10, 403-408
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014468300006591

BIELICKI T., A. WALISZKO, 1992, Stature, upward social mobility and the nature of statural differences between social classes, Ann. Hum. Biol., 19, 589-593
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014469200002402

BJoRNTORP P., 1988, The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease, Acta Medica Scandinavica, (Suppl.), 723, 121-134
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1987.tb05935.x

BORGERHOFF MULDER M., 1988, Kipsigis bridewealth payments, [in:] Human Reproductive Behaviour, L.Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder & P.Turke (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 65-82
View in Google Scholar

BUSS D., 1989, Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures, Behav. Brain Sci., 12, 1-49
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992

BUSS D., 1993, The evolution of desire, New York: Basic Books
View in Google Scholar

BUSS D., 1995, Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science, Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1-30
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1

CHAGNON N.A., 1988, Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population, Science, 239, 985-992
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4843.985

CHASE H.C., 1969, lnfant mortality and weight at birth: 1960 United States cohort, Am. J. Pub. Hlth, 59, 1618-1628
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.59.9.1618

CHOINIERE R, P. LAFONTAINE, A.C. EDWARDS, 2000, Distribution of cardiovascular disease risk factors by socioeconomic status among Canadian adults, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 162, Suppl., 13-24
View in Google Scholar

CRONIN H., 1991, The ant and the peacock, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

CUNNINGHAM A.S., D.B. JELLIFFE, E.F. JELLIFFE, 1991, Breast-feeding and health in the 1980s: a global epidemiological review, J. Pediatr., 118, 1-8
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80023-X

CUNNINGHAM M.R., 1986, Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female attractiveness, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 50, 925-935
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925

CUNNINGHAM M.R., A.P. BARBEE, C.L. PIKE, 1990, What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial attractiveness, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 59, 61-72
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61

CUNNINGHAM M.R., A.R. ROBERTS, C.H. WU, A.P. BARBEE, P.B. DRUEN, 1995, "Their ideas of beauty are, on whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 68, 261-279
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261

DEAUX K., R. HANNA, 1984, Courtship in the personals column: The influence of gender and sexual orientation, Sex Roles, 11, 363-375
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287465

DERIDDER C.M., P.F. BRUNING, M.L. ZON-DERLAND, et al., 1990, Body-fat mass, body-fat distribution, and plasma hormones in early puberty in females, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol., 70, 888-893
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-70-4-888

DESCRILLI A., A. BOSSI, E. MARUBINI, M. CACAMO, 1983, Neonatal morbidity risk: A study of the relationship to birthweight and gestational age in four ltalian centres, Ann. Hum. Biol., 10, 235-246
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014468300006401

ELLIS B.J., 1992, The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women, [in:] The adopted mind, J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 267-288
View in Google Scholar

FEINGOLD A., 1992, Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of parental investment model, Psychol. Bull., 112, 125-139
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125

FISHER R.A., 1930, The genetical theory of natural selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford (revised edition from 1958)
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.27468

FOLSOM A.R., S.A. KAYE, T.A. SELLER, et al., 1993, Body fat distribution and 5-year risk of death in older women, J. Am. Med. Ass., 269, 483-487
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.269.4.483

FOLSTAD I., A.J. KARTER, 1992, Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap, Am. Nat., 139, 603-622
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/285346

FORBES G.F., 1987, Human body composition. Growth, aging, nutrition and activity, Springer-Verlag, New York
View in Google Scholar

FORD C.S., F. BEACH, 1951, Patterns of sexual behavior, Harper, New York
View in Google Scholar

FURNHAM A., T. TAN, C. MCMANUS, 1997, Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension, Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 539-549
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00241-3

GALLUP G.G. JR., 1982, Permanent breast enlargement in human females: a sociobiological analysis, J. Hum. Evol., 11, 597-601
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(82)80007-9

GANGESTAD S.W., D.M. BUSS, 1993, Pathogen prevalence and human mate preference, Ethol. Sociobiol., 14, 89-96
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7

GANGESTAD S.W., R. THORNHILL, 1997, The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry, Evol. Hum. Behav., 18, 69-88
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00003-2

GOLDING J., I.S. ROGERS, P.M. EMMETT, 1997, Association between breast feeding, child development and behaviour, Early Human Development, 49 Suppl., 175-184
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(97)00062-5

GOLDMAN N., M. MONTGOMERY, 1989, Fecundability and husband's age, Social Biology, 36, 146-166
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1989.9988729

GRAZIANO W.G., T. BROTHEN, E. BESCHEID, 1978, Height and attraction" Do men and women see eye-to-eye?, Journal of Personality, 46, 128-145
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00606.x

GREENLEES I.A., W.C. MCGREW, 1994, Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: analysis of published advertisements, Ethol. Sociobiol., 15, 59-72
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90017-5

HACHISUGA T., A. KAETSU, H. SUGIMORI, T. KAMURA, M. TSUNEYOSHI, T. KAWARA-BAYASHI, 1998, Risk factors for endometrial cancer in Japanese women, Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 8, 292-297
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.1998.09786.x

HARRISON A.A., L. SAEED, 1977, Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 35, 257-264
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.257

HAMMERSTEIN P., (in press), Games and markets: economic behaviour in humans and other animals, [in:] ,,Economics in Nature. The evolutionary biology of economic behaviour", R. Noe, J. van Hoof & P. Hammerstein (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

HEWLETT B.S., 1988, Sexual selection and parental investment among Aka pygmies, [in:] Human Reproductive Behaviour, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder & P. Turke (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 263-276
View in Google Scholar

HILL J., 1984, Prestige and reproductive success in man, Ethol. Sociobiol., 5, 77-95
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(84)90011-6

HOLL R.W., H. SCHRODER, E. HEINZE, 1991, Are short boys disadvantaged as adults - a reevaluation of 77 men with constitutional growth delay and (or) familial short stature, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 116, 928-934
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063699

HOYT L.L., J.W. HUDSON, 1981, Personal characteristcs important in mate preference among college students, Soc. Behav. Pers., 9, 93-96
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1981.9.1.93

HUANG Z.P., W.C. WILLETT, J.E. MANSON, et al., 1998, Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in women, Ann. Intern. Med., 128, 81
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-128-2-199801150-00001

JAŁKIEWICZ M., 1997, Perception of fatness, Przegląd Antropol. - Anthropol. Rev., 60, 75-88
View in Google Scholar

JONES D., 1995, Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications, Curr. Anthropol., 36, 723-748
View in Google Scholar

KAPLAN H., K. HILL, 1985, Hunting ability and reproductive success among male Ache foragers: Preliminary results, Curr. Anthropol., 26, 131-133
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/203235

KAYE S.A., A.R. FOLSOM, R.J. PRINEAS, J.D. POTTER, S.M. GAPSTUR, 1990, The association of body fat distribution with lifestyle and reproductive factors in a population study of postmenopausal women, Int. J. Obesity, 14, 583-591
View in Google Scholar

KEE F., V. NICAUD, L. TIRET, A. EVANS, D. O'REILLY, 1997, Short stature and heart disease: nature or nurture?, Int. J. Epidemiol., 26, 748-756
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/26.4.748

KEENAN J.P., G.G. GALLUP JR., N. GOULET, M. KULKARNI, 1997, Attributions of deception in human mating strategies, J. Soc. Behav. Pers., 12, 45-52
View in Google Scholar

KENDRICK K.M., M.R. HINTON, K. ATKINS, 1998, Mothers determine sexual preferences, Nature, 395, 229-230
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/26129

KENRICK D., 1994, Evolutionary social psychology: From sexual selection to social cognition, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 31, 75-121
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60152-5

KENRICK D.T., R.C. KEEFE, 1992, Age preferences in mates reflects sex differences in human reproductive strategies, Behav. Brain Sci., 15, 75-133
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067595

KOOPS B.L., L.J. MORGAN, F.C. BATAGLIA, 1982, Neonatal mortality risk in relation to birth weight and gestational age: Update, Pediatrics, 101, 969-977
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80024-3

KUJAWA B., 1998, Atrakcyjność fizyczna. Biologiczne podstawy preferencji estetycznych, Monografie Instytutu Antropologii UAM, 2, Poznań
View in Google Scholar

KUJAWA B., J. STRZAŁKO, 1998, Standard of physical attractiveness, Przegląd Antropol. - Anthropol. Rev., 61, 31-48
View in Google Scholar

LAKE J.K., C. POWER, T.J. COLE, 1997, Child to adult body mass index in the 1958 British birth cohort: associations with parental obesity, Arch. Dis. Child., 77, 376-381
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.77.5.376

LANGLOIS J.H., L.A. ROGGMAN, R.J. CASEY, J.M. RITTER, 1987, lnfant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype?, Dev. Psychol., 23, 363-369
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.363

LANGLOIS J.H., L.A. ROGGMAN, 1990, Attractive faces are only average, Psychol. Sci., 1, 115-121
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x

LANGLOIS J.H., L.A. ROGGMAN, L. MUSSELMAN, 1994, What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?, Psychol. Sci., 5, 214-220
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00503.x

LEIBEL R.L., N.K. EDENS, S.K. FRIED, 1989, Physiologic basis for the control of body fat distribution in humans, Annu. Rev. Nutr., 9, 417-443
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.09.070189.002221

LIAO Y., D.L. MCGEE, G. CAO, R.S. COOPER, 1996, Short stature and risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease: negative findings from the NHANES l epidemiological follow-up study, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 27, 678-682
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00512-9

LICHTER D.T, R.N. ANDERSON, M.D. HAYWARD, 1995, Marriage markets and marital choice, J. Fam. Issues, 1995, 16, 412-431
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251395016004001

LIVSHITS G., E. KOBYLIANSKY, 1991, Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review, Hum. Biol., 63, 441-466
View in Google Scholar

LOW B.S., R.D. ALEXANDER, K.M. NOONAN, 1987, Human hips, breasts and buttocks: ls fat deceptive?, Ethol. Sociobiol., 8, 249-257
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(87)90027-6

LYNN M., B.A. SHURGOT, 1984, Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: Effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 10, 349-357
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167284103002

MANNING J.T. 1995, Fluctuating asymmetry and body weight in men and women: implications for sexual selection, Ethol. Sociobiol., 16, 145-153
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)00074-H

MANINNG J.T., R.L. TRIVERS, D. SINGH, R. THORNHILL, 1999, The mystery of female beauty, Nature, 399, 214-215
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/20341

MATHES E.W., S.M. BRENNAN, P.M. HAUGEN, H.B. RICE, 1985, Ratings of physical attractiveness as a function of age, J. Soc. Psychol., 125, 157-168
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1985.9922868

MAZUR A., C. HALPER, J.R. UDRY, 1994, Dominant-looking male teenagers copulate earlier, Ethol. Sociobiol., 15, 87-94
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90019-1

MCDADE T.W., C.M. WORTHMAN, 1999, Evolutionary process and the ecology of human immune function, Am. J. Hum. Biol., 11, 705-717
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(199911/12)11:6<705::AID-AJHB1>3.0.CO;2-G

MEYER H.E., R. SELMER, 1999, lncome, educational level and body height, Ann. Hum. Biol., 26, 219-227
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/030144699282723

MOLLER A.P., M. SOLER, R. THORNHILL, 1995, Breast asymmetry, sexual selection and human reproductive success, Ethol. Sociobiol., 16, 207-219
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00002-3

MUELLER U., A. MAZUR, 1997, Facial dominance in Homo sapiens as honest signaling of male quality, Behav. Ecol., 8, 569-579
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/8.5.569

NOE R., P. HAMMERSTEIN, 1995, Biological markets, TREE, 10, 336-339
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89123-5

NOE R., J. VAN HOOF, P. HAMMERSTEIN, 2001, Economics in Nature. The evolutionary biology of economic behaviour, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (in press)
View in Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI B., 1998, Why are human newborns so big and fat? Hum. Evol., 13, 65-72
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439370

PAWŁOWSKI B., R.I.M. DUNBAR, 1999a, Withholding age as putative deception in mate search tactics, Evol. Hum. Behav., 20, 53-69
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00038-5

PAWŁOWSKI B., R.I.M. DUNBAR, 1999b, lmpact of market value on human mate choice decisions, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 266, 281-285
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0634

PAWŁOWSKI B., R.I.M. DUNBAR, (in press), Human mate choice strategies, [in:] ,,Economics in Nature. The evolutionary biology of economic behaviour" R. Noe, J. van Hoof & P. Hammerstein (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI B., R.I.M. DUNBAR, A. LIPOWICZ, 2000, Tall men have more reproductive success, Nature, 403, 156
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35003107

PECK A.M., D.H. VAGERO, 1989, Adult body height, self perceived health and mortality in the Swedish population, J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 43, 380-384
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.43.4.380

PERRETT D.I., K.J. LEE, I. PENTON-VOAK, et al., 1998, Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness, Nature, 394, 884-887
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/29772

PERUSSE, D. 1993, Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels, Behav. Brain Sci., 16, 267-322
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029939

PERUSSE, D. 1994, Mate choice in modern societies: testing evolutionary hypotheses with behavioral data, Human Nature, 5, 255-278
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692154

PIERCE C.A., 1996, Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the maletaller norm, Soc. Behav. Pers., 24, 143-149
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1996.24.2.143

POTTS M., R. SHORT, 1999, Ever since Adam and Eve: The evolution of human sexuality, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

QVIST J., S.E. JOHANSSON, L.M. JOHANSSON, 1996, Multivariate analyses of mortality from coronary heart disease due to biological and behavioural factors, Scand. J. Soc. Med., 24, 67-76
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489602400111

RAJECKI D.W., S.B. BLEDSOE, J.L. RASMUSSEN, 1991, Successful personal ads - gender differences and similarities in offers, stipulations and outcomes, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 457-469
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1204_6

RIKOWSKI A., K. GRAMMER, 1999, Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 266, 869-874
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0717

ROLLAND-CACHERA M.F., T.J. COLE, M. SEMPE, J. TICHER, C. ROSSIGNOL, A. CHARRAUD, 1991, Body mass index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 45, 13-21
View in Google Scholar

SAPPENFIELD W.M., J.W. BUEHLER, N.J. BINKIN, L.T. STRAUSS, C.J.R. HOGUE, 1987, Differences in neonatal and postnatal mortality, by race, birth weight and gestational age, Pub. Hlth Rep., 102, 182-192
View in Google Scholar

SCHUMACHER A, R. KNUSSMAN, 1979, Are the differences in stature between social classes a modification or an assortment effect?, J. Hum. Evol., 8, 809-812
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(79)90013-7

SILVENTOINEN K., E. LAHELMA, O. RHKONEN, 1999, Social background, adult body-height and health, Int. J. Epidemiol., 28, 911-918
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/28.5.911

SINGH D., 1993a, Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 65, 293-307
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293

SINGH D., 1993b, Body shape and women's attractiveness. The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio, Human Nature, 4, 297-321
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692203

SMUTS R.W., 1992, Fat, sex, class, adaptive flexibility, and cultural change, Ethol. Sociobiol., 13, 523-542
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90015-V

STEYN N.P., M. SENEKAL, S. BRITS, M. ALBERTS, T. MASHEGO, J.H. NEL, 2000, Weight and health status of black female students, S. Afr. Med. J., 90, 146-152
View in Google Scholar

STRZAŁKO J., K.A. KASZYCKA, 1988, Atrakcyjność fizyczna - obiektywne i subiektywne składowe oceny, Przegląd Antropol., 54, 7-17
View in Google Scholar

STRZAŁKO J., K.A. KASZYCKA, 1992, Physical attractiveness: lnterpersonal and intrapersonal variability of assessments, Social Biology, 39, 170-176
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1992.9988813

SWADDLE J.P., I.C. CUTHILL, 1995, Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 261, 111-116
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0124

SYMONS D., 1979, The evolution of human sexuality, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
View in Google Scholar

SYMONS D., 1995a, Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness, [in:] Sexual Nature Sexual Culture, P.R Abramson & S.D. Pinkerton (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 80-118
View in Google Scholar

SYMONS D. 1995b, comment to Jones D., Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications, Curr. Anthropol., 36, 742
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204427

TASSINARY L.G., K.A. HANSEN, 1998, A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness, Psychol. Sci., 9, 150-155
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00029

TEASDALE T.W., D.R. OWEN, T.I.A. SoRENSEN, 1991, lntelligence and educational level in adult males at the extremes of stature, Hum. Biol., 63, 19-30
View in Google Scholar

THIESSEN D., R.K. YOUNG, R. BURROUGHS, 1993, Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies, Ethol. Sociobiol., 12, 209-229
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90007-5

THORNHILL R., S.W. GANGESTAD, 1993, Human facial beauty: averageness, symmetry and parasite resistance, Human Nature, 4, 237-269
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692201

THORNHILL R., K. GRAMMER, 1999, The body and face of woman: one ornament that signals quality?, Evol. Hum. Behav., 20, 105-120
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00044-0

THORNHILL R., A.P. MOLLER, 1997, Developmental stability, disease and medicine, Biol. Rev., 72, 497-548
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0006323197005082

TOOKE W., L. CAMIRE, 1991, Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies, Ethol. Sociobiol., 12, 345-364
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(91)90030-T

TOVEE M.J., P.L. CORNELISSEN, 1999, The mystery of female beauty, Nature, 399, 215-216.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/20345

TOWNSEND J.M., 1993, Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students, Ethol. Sociobiol., 14, 305-330
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90002-Y

TURKE P.W., L. BETZIG, 1985, Those who can do: Wealth, status, and reproductive success on lfaluk, Ethol. Sociobiol., 6, 79-87
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(85)90001-9

TUVEMO T., B. JONSSON, I. PERSSON, 1999, lntellectual and physical performance and morbidity in relation to height in a cohort of 18-year-old Swedish conscripts, Horm. Res., 52, 186-191
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000023459

UDRY J.R., B.K. ECKLAND, 1984, Benefits of being attractive: differential payoffs for men and women, Psychological Reports, 54, 47-56
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.54.1.47

VAN VALEN L., 1962, A study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection, Evolution, 16, 125-142
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1962.tb03206.x

VERMEULEN A., 2000, Andropause, Maturitas, 34, 5-15
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5122(99)00075-4

VERMEULEN A., J.M. KAUFMAN, 1995, Ageing of the hypothalamo-pituitary-testicular axis in men, Horm. Res., 43, 25-28
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000184233

VOLAND E., C. ENGEL, 1990, Female choice in humans: a conditional mate selection strategy of the Krumhorn women (Germany, 1720- 1874), Ethology, 84, 144-154.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1990.tb00791.x

WAALER H.T., 1984, Height, weight and mortality, Acta Med. Scand., 679 (suppl.), 1-56
View in Google Scholar

WALSTER E., V. ARONSON, D. ABRAHAMS, L. ROTTMAN, 1966, lmportance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 4, 508-516
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021188

WAYNFORTH D., R.I.M. DUNBAR, 1995, Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: evidence from "Lonely hearts' advertisements", Behaviour, 132, 755-779
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853995X00135

WEDEKIND C., I. FOLSTAD, 1994, Adaptive or nonadaptive immunosuppression by sex hormone, Am. Nat., 139, 603-622
View in Google Scholar

WEDEKIND C., S. FURI, 1997, Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply hetero- zygosity?, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B, 264, 1471-1479
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0204

WETSMAN A., F. MARLOWE, 1999, How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania, Evol. Hum. Behav., 20, 219-228
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00007-0

WIDEMO F., 1999, Beauty is in the eye of beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences, TREE, 14, 26-31
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01531-6

WIEDERMAN M.W., 1993, Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements, Ethol. Sociobiol., 14, 331-352
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90003-Z

YU D.W., G.H. SHEPARD JR., 1998, ls beauty in the eye of the beholder?, Nature, 396, 321-322
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/24512

ZAADSTRA B.M., J.C. SEIDELL, P.A.H. VAN-NOORD, et al., 1993, Fat and female fecundity - prospective-study of effect of body-fat distribution on conception rates, Br. Med. J., 306, 484-487
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6876.484

ZAHAVI A., A. ZAHAVI, 1997, The handicap principle, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
View in Google Scholar