Variation in biological status among Polish males and underlying socio-economic factors

Authors

  • Maria Kaczmarek Department of Human Biological Development, Institute of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, Poznań
  • Magdalena Skrzypczak Department of Human Biological Development, Institute of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, Poznań

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10044-008-0010-8

Keywords:

biological age, physiological reserve, biomarkers, socio-economic status, lifestyle

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the socio-economic and lifestyle factors associated with biological status of Polish men. Data were collected during a cross-sectional survey carried out in Poznań and several localities in Western Poland, between 2000 and 2002. The sample consisted of 2509 men ranging from 30 to 90 years of age. Biological status was expressed in terms of functional-biological age (BA) computed as a composite z-score of 11 biomarkers according to the method proposed by Borkan and Norris [1980a], and physiological reserve index (PR) developed by Goffaux et al. [2005]. The average biological age profiles (BAP) were compared in several subgroups of participants. The subgroups were categorized based on demographic, socio-economic and lifestyle characteristics. It was found that values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, physical and emotional aging indicators and perceived satisfaction with life were significantly associated with most of the study factors, except for smoking habit and education level. The multivariate logistic regression models revealed that two factors, financial situation and physical activity, were significantly associated with the physiological reserve index estimation. The study confirmed the role of the socio-economic and lifestyle factors likely to play in men's biological status and aging rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams J. M., M. White, 2004, Biological aging A fundamental, biological link between socioeconomic status and health?European Journal of Public Health, 14(3), 331-334
View in Google Scholar

Balczewska E., 2004, Smoking and tobacco control in Poland, European Journal of Dental Education, 8 (suppl. 4), 42-45
View in Google Scholar

Bates K. A., A. R. Harvey, M. Carruthers, R. N. Martins, 2005, Androgens, andropause and neurodegeneration: exploring the link between steroidogenesis, androgens and Alzheimer's disease, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 62, 281-292
View in Google Scholar

Ben-Shlomo Y., G. D. Smith, M. Shipley, M. G. Marmot, 1993, Magnitude and causes of mortality differences between married and unmarried men, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 47, 200-205
View in Google Scholar

Bond J., R. Briggs, P. Coleman, 1993, The study of aging [in:] Aging in society: an introduction to social gerontology Bond J., P. Coleman, S. Peace (eds) Wiltshire: Sage Publications
View in Google Scholar

Borkan G. A., A. H. Norris, 1980a, Assessment of Biological Age Using A Profile of Physical Parameters, Journal of Gerontology, 35(2), 177-184
View in Google Scholar

Borkan G. A., A. H. Norris, 1980b, Biological Age in Adulthood: Comparision of Active and Inactive U. S. Males, Human Biology, 52(4), 787-802
View in Google Scholar

Bribiescas R., 2001, Reproductive Ecology and Life History of the Human Male, Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol., 44, 148-176
View in Google Scholar

Bribiescas R., 2005, Age-Related Differences in Serum Gonadotropin (FSH and LH), Salivary Testosterone, and 17-β Estradiol Levels Among Ache Amerindian Males in Paraguay, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 127, 114-121
View in Google Scholar

Campbell A., 1976, Subjective Measures of Well-Being, American Psychologist, 2, 117-124
View in Google Scholar

Chen Y-T., V. Vaccarino, C. S. Williams, J. Butler, L. F. Berkman, H. M. Krumholz, 1999, Risk factors for heart failure in the elderly: a prospective community-based study, American Journal of Medicine, 106, 605-612
View in Google Scholar

Crawford M. H., 2005, Genetics of biological aging in Mennonotes of Midwestern United States, Prz. Antropol.-Anthropol Rev, 68, 3-18
View in Google Scholar

Cress M. E., D. M. Buchner, T. Prohaska, J. Rimmer, M. Brown, C. Macera, L. DePietro, W. Chodzko-Zajko, 2006, Best practices for physical activity programs and behavior counseling in older adult population, Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act., 3, 34-42
View in Google Scholar

Dergance J. M., W. L. Calmbach, R. Dhanda, T. P. Miles, H. P. Hazuda, C. P. Mouton, 2003, Barriers to and Benefits of Leisure Time Physical Activity in the Elderly: Differences Across Cultures, J. Am. Geriatr Soc., 51, 863-868
View in Google Scholar

Facchini F., P. Gueresi, D. Pettener, 1989, Biological Age in Adults Males in Relation to Environmental factors, Humanbiology Budapestensis, 19, 219-224
View in Google Scholar

Facchini F., P. Gueresi, D. Pettener, 1992, Biological Age in Italian adults: Influence of social and behavioural factors, Annals of Human Biology, 19(4), 403-420
View in Google Scholar

Gliksman M. D., R. Lazarus, A. Wilson, S. R. Leeder, 1995, Social support, marital status and living arrangement correlates of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the elderly, Social Science and Medicine, 40(6), 811-814
View in Google Scholar

Goffaux J. G., G. C. Friesinger, W. Lambert, L. W. Shroyer, T. Moritz, M. McCarthy, W. G. Henderson, K. E. Hammermeister, 2005, Biological Age - A Concept Whose Time Has Come: A Preliminary Study, Southern Medical Journal, 98(10), 985-993
View in Google Scholar

Goggins W. B., J. Woo, A. Sham, S. C. Ho, 2005, Frailty Index as a Measure of Biological Age in a Chinese Population, Journal of Gerontology-Medical Sciences, 60A(8), 1046-1051
View in Google Scholar

Heikkinen E., 2006, Disability and physical activity in late life - research models and approaches, Eur. Rev. Aging. Phys. Act., 3, 3-9
View in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek M., 2000, A Polish version of Andropause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQOL), Manuscript, Poznań
View in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek M., E. Lasik, 2006, Correlates of biological age in postmenopausal life, Prz. Antropol.- Anthropol. Rev., 69, 15-26
View in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek M., M. Skrzypczak, 2002, Do aging male symptoms affect subjective feeling of wellbeing?Variability and Evolution, 10, 39-53
View in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek M., M. Skrzypczak, K. Łącka, 2005, Differentiation of gonadotropin and sex hormone levels in 50, 60 and 70-year old men. An attempt to indicate a normal range, Prz. Antropol.- Anthropol. Rev., 68, 19-28
View in Google Scholar

Karasik D., S. Demissie, L. A. Cupples, D. P. Kiel, 2005, Disentangling the Genetic Determinants of Human Aging: Biological Age as an Alternative to the Use of Survival Measures, Journal of Gerontology: Biological Sciences, 60A(5), 574-587
View in Google Scholar

Karasik D., M. T. Hannan, L. A. Cupples, D. T. Felson, D. P. Kiel, 2004, Genetic Contribution to Biological Aging: The Framingham Study, Journal of Gerontology: Biological Science, 59A(3), 218-226
View in Google Scholar

Kirkwood T., S. Austad, 2000, Why do we age?Nature408, 233-238
View in Google Scholar

Klemera P., S. Doubal, 2006, A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age, Mech. Aging and Develop., 127, 240-248
View in Google Scholar

Lawlor D. A., A. R. Ness, A. M. Cope, A. Davis, P. Insall, C. Riddoch, 2003, The challenges of evaluating environmental interventions to increase population levels of physical activity: the case of the UK National Cycle Network, J. Epidemiol Community Health, 57, 96-101
View in Google Scholar

Nakamura E., 1982, The aged people and its physiological ages in relation to work capacity, Kyoiku Igaku, 28, 2-11
View in Google Scholar

Nilsson P. M., M. Engberg, J-A. Nilsson, B. Karlsmose, T. Lauritzen, 2003, Adverse social factors predict early aging in middle-aged men and women: the Ebeltoft Health Study, Denmark, Scand. J. Public Health, 31, 255-260
View in Google Scholar

Rautio N., E. Heikkinen, R. L. Heikkinen, 2001, The association of socio-economic factors with physical and mental capacity in elderly men and women, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 33, 163-178
View in Google Scholar

Reff M. E., E. L. Schneider, 1982, Biological Markers of Aging, NIH Publication No 82-2221
View in Google Scholar

Report of CBOS (Centre of Social Opinion Research), 2006, Available from: http://www.cbos.pl/PL/Opinia/r2006.shtml
View in Google Scholar

Report of National Census, 2002, Available from: http://www.stat.gov.pl/dane_spol-gosp/nsp/index.htm
View in Google Scholar

Shumway-Cook A., A. E. Patla, A. Stewart, L. Ferrucci, M. A. Ciol, J. M. Guralnik, 2002, Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities, Phys. Ther., 82, 670-681
View in Google Scholar

Szklarska A., E. Rogucka, 2001, An assessment of biological age of males in Poland, Annals of Human Biology, 28(1), 30-37
View in Google Scholar

Uttley M., M. Crawford, 1994, Efficacy of a composite biological age score to predict tenyears survival among Kansas and Nebraska Mennonites, Hum. Biol., 66, 121-144
View in Google Scholar

Welon Z., T. Bielicki, E. Rogucka, R. M. Malina, 1999, Effect of Education and Marital Status on Premature Mortality Among Urban Adults in Poland 1988-1989, American Journal of Human Biology, 11, 397-403
View in Google Scholar

Who, 2003a, WHO Global InfoBase Online (National/Subnational Country Profiles). Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/countryinformation/
View in Google Scholar

Who, 2003b, WHO European Country Profiles on Tobacco Control 2003. Available from: http://data.euro.who.int/tobacco/
View in Google Scholar

Źivićnjak M., L. Szirovicza, L. Pavićić, N. Smolej-Naranćić, B. Janićijević, J. Milićić, P. Rudan, 1997, The Aging Process - An Analysis of the Latent Structure of Body Morphology (in Males), Collegium Antropologicum, 21(1), 117-126
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2008-01-30

How to Cite

Kaczmarek, M., & Skrzypczak, M. (2008). Variation in biological status among Polish males and underlying socio-economic factors. Anthropological Review, 71, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10044-008-0010-8

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>