Measured versus self-reported body height and body mass in patients after an acute coronary syndrome

Authors

  • Zygmunt Domagała Department of Anatomy, Wrocław Medical Uniwersity, Poland
  • Dariusz Kałka Department of Patophysiology, Wrocław Medical University, Poland
  • Bożena Kurc-Darak Department of Anatomy, Wrocław Medical Uniwersity, Poland
  • Krzysztof Womperski Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Głuchołazy, Poland
  • Lesław Rusiecki Department of Patophysiology, Wrocław Medical University, Poland
  • Ewa S. Krauz Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, Medinet Ltd.,Wrocław, Poland
  • Bohdan Gworys Department of Anatomy, Wrocław Medical Uniwersity, Poland
  • Paweł Dąbrowski Department of Anatomy, Wrocław Medical Uniwersity, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/anre-2017-0029

Keywords:

basic anthropometric measurements, ischaemic heart disease, body mass, height awareness

Abstract

The basic anthropometric data describing a person in the broadest context are body weight and height, two of the most frequently analyzed somatometric parameters. The same is true I in relation to clinical patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the self-reported and actual body weight, height and BMI in patients suffering from coronary artery disease and undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. The study sample consisted of 100 patients treated for coronary artery disease. The patients were asked to state their body weight and height. At the same time a three-person study team took measurements, which were later the basis for verification and objective assessment of the data provided by the patients. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistics 11.0 PL software. The analysis of mean results for the assessed group of patients has shown the presence of statistically significant differences between declared and actual data. The differences were observed for both male and female study population. It has been proven that the subjects declare greater body height (mean value 1.697 m vs. 1.666 m) and lower body weight (80.643 kg vs. 82.051 kg). Based on the data from surveys and direct measurements, the body mass index for the self-reported and actual data was calculated. A comparison of these values has shown considerable statistically significant differences. The differences between declared and actual data point to highly subjective self-assessment, which disqualifies the declared data in the context of monitoring of treatment and rehabilitation processes. The authors believe that actual data should be used in direct trial examination of patients suffering from coronary artery disease who presented with acute coronary syndrome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asplund K, Karvanen J, Giampaoli S, Jousilahti P, Niemelä M, Broda G et al. 2009. MORGAM Project: Relative risks for stroke by age, sex, and population based on follow-up of 18 European populations in the MORGAM Project. Stroke 240: 2319-26.
View in Google Scholar

Bays HE, Toth PP, Kris-Etherton PM, Abate N, Aronne LJ, Brown WV et al. 2013. Obesity, adiposity, and dyslipidemia: a consensus statement from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol 7: 304-83.
View in Google Scholar

Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Morrison C. 2000. Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population. J Epidemiol Community Health 54: 143-8.
View in Google Scholar

Chiolero A, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Paccaud F. 2007. Associations between obesity and health conditions may be overestimated if self-reported body mass index is used. Obes Rev 8:373-4.
View in Google Scholar

Chrostowska M, Szyndler A, Paczwa P, Narkiewicz K. 2011. Impact of abdominal obesity on the frequency of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in Poland - results from the IDEA study (international day for the evaluation of abdominal obesity). Blood Press 20:145-52.
View in Google Scholar

Dores H, de Araújo Gonçalves P, Carvalho MS, Sousa PJ, Ferreira A, Cardim N et al. 2013. Body mass index as a predictor of the presence but not the severity of coronary artery disease evaluated by cardiac computed tomography. Eur J Prev Cardiol Jun 17 [Epub ahead of print].
View in Google Scholar

Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ. 2002. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 360:1347-60.
View in Google Scholar

Gajewska M, Gromulska L. 2009. Adolescents’ self-reported and measured weight. Pediatr Wspolcz Gastroenterol Hepatol Zywienie Dziecka 11:69-72.
View in Google Scholar

Gil J, Mora T. 2011. The determinants of misreporting weight and height: The role of social norms. Econ Hum Biol 9:78-91.
View in Google Scholar

Gorber CS, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B. 2007. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 8:307-26.
View in Google Scholar

Gruszka K, Kubicka K, Jonak W, Sobiech KA, Steciwko A. 2013. Preferred and Undesirable Products in the Dietary Habits of Women. Adv Clin Exp Med 23:111-6.
View in Google Scholar

Kałka D, Domagała Z, Kowalewski P, Rusiecki L, Wojcieszczyk J, Kolęda P et al. 2013. The influence of endurance training intensity on dynamics of post-exertional heart rate recovery adaptation in patients with ischemic heart disease. Adv Med Sci 58: 50-7.
View in Google Scholar

Krzyżanowska M, Umlawska W. 2002. Measured versus self-reported body height. Int J Anthropology 17:113-20.
View in Google Scholar

Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M. 2001. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. J Am Diet Assoc 101:28-34.
View in Google Scholar

Lin Jin-Mann S, Decker MJ, Brimmer DJ, Reeves WC. 2010. Validity of Self-Reported Body Mass Index and Sleeping Problems Among Adult Population of Georgia. Open Obesity 2:145-50.
View in Google Scholar

Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, Ezzati M, Woodward M, Rimm EB, Danaei G et al. 2014. Metabolic mediators of the effects of body-mass index, overweight, and obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke: a pooled analysis of 97 prospective cohorts with 1·8 million participants. Lancet 383:970-83.
View in Google Scholar

Lucca A, Moura EC. 2010. Validity and reliability of self-reported weight, height and body mass index from telephone interviews. Cad Saude Publica 26:110-22.
View in Google Scholar

McAdams MA, Van Dam RM, Hu FB. 2007. Comparison of self-reported and measured BMI as correlates of disease markers in US adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15:188-96.
View in Google Scholar

Midanik LT, Greenfield TK, Rogers JD. 2001. Reports of alcohol related harm: telephone versus face-to-face interviews. J Stud Alcohol 62:74-78.
View in Google Scholar

Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS et al. 2003. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity- related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 289:76-9.
View in Google Scholar

Oliveira A, Ramos E, Lopes C, Barros H. 2009. Self-reporting weight and height: misclassification effect on the risk estimates for acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Public Health 19:548-53.
View in Google Scholar

Pećin I, Samovojska R, Heinrich B, Zeljković-Vrkić T, Laganović M, Jelaković B. 2013. Hypertension, overweight and obesity in adolescents: the CRO-KOP study. Coll Antropol 37:761-4.
View in Google Scholar

Phillips CM, Dillon C, Harrington JM, McCarthy VJ, Kearney PM, Fitzgerald AP et al. 2013. Defining metabolically healthy obesity: role of dietary and lifestyle factors. PLoS One 17,8(10):e76188.
View in Google Scholar

Sarno G, Räber L, Onuma Y, Garg S, Brugaletta S, van Domburg RT. 2011. Impact of body mass index on the five-year outcome of patients having percutaneous coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 108:195-201.
View in Google Scholar

Targoński R, Buciński A, Romaszko J, Zakrzewski A, Romaszko E. 2007. Analysis of selected risk factors of coronary artery disease in a healthy population aged 35-55 years. Kardiol Pol 65:1216-22.
View in Google Scholar

Van Gaal LF, Mertens IL, De Block CE. 2006. Mechanisms linking obesity with cardiovascular disease. Nature 444:875-80.
View in Google Scholar

van Wier MF, Ariëns GA, Dekkers JC, Hendriksen IJ, Pronk NP, Smid T et al. 2006. ALIFE@Work: a randomised controlled trial of a distance counselling lifestyle programme for weight control among an overweight working population [ISRCTN04265725]. BMC Public Health 24:140.
View in Google Scholar

Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J and the Prospective Studies Collaboration. 2009. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet 373:1083-96.
View in Google Scholar

Wiener L, Riekert K, Ryder C, Wood LV. 2004. Assessing medication adherence in adolescents with HIV when electronic monitoring is not feasible. AIDS Patient Care Stds 18:527-38.
View in Google Scholar

World Health Organization. 1995. Physical status: use and interpretation of antropometry - report of a WHO expert committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 854:1-452.
View in Google Scholar

Younge JO, Damen NL, van Domburg RT, Pedersen SS. 2013. Obesity, health status, and 7-year mortality in percutaneous coronary intervention: in search of an explanation for the obesity paradox. Int J Cardiol 167:1154-8.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2017-12-21

How to Cite

Domagała, Z., Kałka, D., Kurc-Darak, B., Womperski, K., Rusiecki, L., Krauz, E. S., … Dąbrowski, P. (2017). Measured versus self-reported body height and body mass in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. Anthropological Review, 80(4), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1515/anre-2017-0029

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.