Bone mineral density in healthy Syrian women measured by dual energyX-ray absorptiometry

Authors

  • Mohamed Adel Bakir Radiation Medicine Department, AECS, Damascus, Syria
  • Kholoud B Hammad Radiation Medicine Department, AECS, Damascus, Syria
  • Khuzama M Habil Radiation Medicine Department, AECS, Damascus, Syria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0002

Keywords:

bone mineral density (BMD), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), osteoporosis, osteopenia, Syrian women

Abstract

Assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technique is considered as a standard technique for diagnosing osteopenia and osteoporosis and evaluating the severity of such diseases. Numerous studies have demonstrated the necessity to establish an ethnicspecific reference data for Bone mineral density measurements. Such data are lacking for the Syrian population. The objectives of this study are (1) to establish BMD reference values in a group of healthy Syrian women using DXA technique, (2) to compare with values from other populations, (3) to study the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Syrian women using the manufacturer reference values. A total of 951 healthy Syrian women aged 20-79 years participated in this study. Weight, height, and BMI have been determined. BMD measurements were performed using Lunar Prodigy Advance System (GE).

The data were compared with those from other populations. The results have demonstrated the expected decline in BMD with age after peaking at 30-39 years old group. The peak values of the lumbar spine and femur neck were 1.16 (0.12), and 0.95 (0.13) g/cm2, respectively. The results of the Syrian women were compared with those from other populations and the differences were presented. Osteopenia was diagnosed in 35.80% and 60.31% and osteoporosis in 6.23% and 2.72% in lumbar spine and femur neck, respectively, of women 50-59 years of age. These ratios increased to 36.84%, 68.42% and 23.68%, 13.10%, respectively, in the age group more than 59 years. BMD values of the Syrian women were determined for the first time. The results demonstrate the importance of establishing population-specific reference range for BMD values for an accurate assessment of Osteoporosis. High prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis was demonstrated in Syrian using the manufacturer reference values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhudhikanok GS, Wng MC, Ecket K, Matkin C, Marcus R, Bachrach LK. 1996. Differences in bonemineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size. J Bone Res 111545-56.
View in Google Scholar

Byers, RJ, Hoyland JA, Braidman IP. 2001. Osteoporosis in men: A cellular endocrine perspective of an increasingly common clinical problem. J Endocrinol 168:353-62.
View in Google Scholar

Chan WP, Liu JF, CHI WL. 2004. Evaluation of BoneMineral Density of the Spine and Proximal Femur in Population-based Routine Health Examinations of Healthy Asian. Acta Radiologica 45:59-64.
View in Google Scholar

Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. 1992. Hip fractures in the elderly: a worldwide projection. Osteoporosis Int 2:285-9.
View in Google Scholar

Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G, Link TM. 2010. Radiation expousure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol 20:2707-14.
View in Google Scholar

Delezé M1, Cons-Molina F, Villa AR, Morales-Torres J, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JG, Calva JJ, Murillo A, Briceño A, Orozco J, Morales-Franco G, Peña-Rios H, Guerrero-Yeo G, Aguirre E, Elizondo J. 2000. Geographic differences in bone density of Mexico Women. Osteoporosis Int 11:562-9.
View in Google Scholar

Dougherty G, Al-Marzouk N. 2001. Bone density measured by dual-energy X absorptiometry in healthy Kuwaity women. Calcif Tissue Int 68:225-9.
View in Google Scholar

El Maghraoui A, Guerboub AA, Achemlal L, Mounach A, Nouijai A, Ghazi M, Bezza A, Tazi MA. 2006. Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Moroccan women. J Clin Densitom 9(4):454-60.
View in Google Scholar

El-Desouki M. 1995. Bone mineral density of the spine and femure in normal Saudi population. Saudi Med J 16(1):30-5.
View in Google Scholar

El-Desouki MI. 2003. Osteoporosis in postmenopausal Saudi women using X-ray bone densitometry. Saudi Med J 24:935-6.
View in Google Scholar

El-Sunbaty MR, Abdul-Ghaffar NU. 1996. Vitamin D deficiency in veiled Kuwaiti women. Eur J Clin Nutr 50:315-8.
View in Google Scholar

Fan B, Lu Y, Genant H, Fuerst T, Shepherd J. 2010. Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art, DXA systems? Osteoporos Int 21:1227–36.
View in Google Scholar

Gannagé-Yared MH, Chemali R, Yaacoub N, Halaby G. 2000. Hypovitaminosis D in a sunny country: relation to life style and bone markers. J Bone Minor Res 15:1856-62.
View in Google Scholar

Genant HK, Grampp S, Glüer CC, Faulkner KG, Jergas M, Engelke K, Hagiwara S, Van Kuijk C. 1994. Universal standardrization for dual x-rayabsorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 9:1503-14.
View in Google Scholar

Hadjidakis D, Kokkinakis E, Giannopoulos G, Merakos G, Raptis SA. 1997. Bone mineral density of vertebrae, proximal femur and oscalcis in normal Greek subjects as assessed by dual-energy X-rayabsorptiometry: comparison with other populations. Eur J Clin Invest 27:219-27.
View in Google Scholar

Hammoudeh M, Al-Khayarin M, Bener A. 2005. Bone density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in Qatari women. Maturitas 52:319-27.
View in Google Scholar

Hui SL, Gao S, Zhou XH, Johnston CC Jr, Lu Y, Glüer CC, Grampp S, Genant H. 1997. Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments. J Bone Miner Res 12:1463-70.
View in Google Scholar

Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Matsuzaki T, Yoneshima H, Marumo F. 2001. Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese population Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. Osteoporosis Int 12:529-37.
View in Google Scholar

Kanis JA 1994. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporosis Int 4:368-81.
View in Google Scholar

Kanis JA. 1997. Diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 7:108-16.
View in Google Scholar

Kanis, JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. 1994. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Mineral Res 9:1137-41.
View in Google Scholar

Larijani B, Resch H, Bonjour JP, AghaiMeybodi HR, MohajeryTehrani MR. 2007. Osteoporosis in Iran, Overview and Management. Iranian J Publ Health A supplementary issue on Osteoporosis 1-13.
View in Google Scholar

Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay RL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP. 1997. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761-8.
View in Google Scholar

Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay RL. 1995. Proximal femur bone levels of US adults. Osteoporosis Int 5:389-409.
View in Google Scholar

Maalouf G, Gannage-Yared MH, Ezzedine J, Larijani B, Rached A, et al. 2007. Middle East and North Africa consensus on osteoporosis. J Musculoskeletel Neuronal Interact 7(2):131-43.
View in Google Scholar

Maalouf G, Salem S, Sandid M, Attallah P, Eid J, Saliba N, Nehmé I, Johnell O. 2000. Bone mineral density of the Lebanese reference population. Osteoporos Int 11:756-64.
View in Google Scholar

Mahussain S, Badr H, Al-Zaabi K, Mohammad M. 2006. Bone mineral density in healthy Kuwaiti women. Arch Osteoporosis 1:51-7.
View in Google Scholar

Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. 1999. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures BMJ 312:1254-9.
View in Google Scholar

Mazess RB, Barden H. 1999. Bone density of the spine and femur in adult white females. CalcifTissueInt 65:91-9.
View in Google Scholar

Mishal AA. 2001. Effects of different dressstyles on vitamin D levels in healthy young Jordanian women. Osteoporosis Int 12:931-5.
View in Google Scholar

ONeill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ. 1996. The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European vertebral osteoporosis study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1010-8.
View in Google Scholar

Paker N, Soy D, Erbil M, Otlu EZ. 2005. Bone mineral density in healthy Turkish woman. J Miner Stoffwechs 12:73-6.
View in Google Scholar

Park AJ, Choi JH, Kang H, Park KJ, Kim HY, Kim SH, Kim DY, Park SH, Ha YC. 2015. Result of proficiency test and comparison of accuracyusing a European Spine Phantom among the three bone densitometries. J Bone Metab 22:45-9.
View in Google Scholar

Patni R. 2010. Normal BMD values for Indian females aged 20-80 years. J Mid life Health 1(2): 70-3.
View in Google Scholar

Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Bertoldo F, Bianchi G, Cepollaro C, Del Puente A et al. 2003. Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS). Osteoporos Int 14(12):978-82.
View in Google Scholar

Reid DM, Mackay I, Wilkinson S, Miller C, Schuette DG, Compston J et al. 2006. Cross-calibration of dual-energy X-ray densitometers for a large, multi-center genetic study of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:125-32.
View in Google Scholar

Steel S, Peel N. 2011. Reporting dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in adults fracture risk assessment. National osteoporosis society. Practical guides for a break free future. Available at: https://nos.org.uk/media/2072/reporting-dxa-scans-at-hipand-spine-in-adults.pdf
View in Google Scholar

Tenenhouse A, Josegh L, Kreiger N, Poliquin S et al. 2001. Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporosis Int 11:897-904.
View in Google Scholar

Tobias JH, Cook DG, Chambers TJ, Dalzeil N. 1994. A comparison of bone mineral density between Caucasian, Asian and Afro-Caribbean women. Clin Sci 87:587-91.
View in Google Scholar

Wehbe J, Cortbaoui C, Chidiac RM, Nehme A, Melki R, Bedran F, Atallah P, Cooper C, Hadji P, Maalouf G. 2003. Age-associated changes in Quantitative Ultrasonometry (QUS) of the oscalcis in Lebanese women-assessment of a Lebanese reference population. J Muscoloskelet Neuronal Interact 3:232-9.
View in Google Scholar

World Health Organization 1994. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post-menopausal osteoporosis. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
View in Google Scholar

Wu XP, Liao EY, Huang G, Dai RC, Zhang H. 2003. A comparison study of reference curves of bone mineral density at different skeletalsites in native Chinese, Japanese and American Caucasian women. Calcif Tissue Int 73:122-32.
View in Google Scholar

Yu W, Qin M, Xu L, Tian J, Xing X, Meng Xet al. 1998. Bone mineral analysis of 445 normal subjects assessed by dual X-raya bsorptiometry. Chin J Radiol 30:625-9.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Bakir, M. A., Hammad, K. B., & Habil, K. M. (2018). Bone mineral density in healthy Syrian women measured by dual energyX-ray absorptiometry. Anthropological Review, 81(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0002

Issue

Section

Articles