Na dobre czy na złe? Wspólny kryzys a dobro wspólne
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.16.03Słowa kluczowe:
crisis, positive disintegration, common good, solidarity, scaleAbstrakt
Crisis, sometimes associated with historically distant times or centrally planned economies, has turned out to be one of the main contemporary issues. Hence different systems like socialism and capitalism become similar in their inability to reply to expectations for a safe, peaceful and abundant life. It means that economic problems are more complex in their nature. Thorough analysis of the roots of different crises should therefore reach deeper than just economic explanations. This is the point where ethical and cultural explanations may be useful because they strive to explore the socio-cultural fabric at its foundations in the hierarchy of values and vision of human beings and society. When it comes to contemporary crisis the problem is twofold: firstly, there is the threat that the crisis will be treated inadequately and not realistically in consequence. Secondly, the roots ofthe crisis may not be diagnosed properly, which may lead to false ‘treatment’. This article is an attempt to highlight the above issues and analyse them in the context ofthe common good approach, which seems to offer valuable potential to understand the difficulties properly and offer a reasonable plan for recovery.Bibliografia
Alford H.J., M.J. Naughton O.P., Managing as if Faith Mattered. Christian Social Principles in the Modern Organization, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 2006.
Google Scholar
Benedykt XVI, Caritas in veritate.
Google Scholar
Clark J., A. Wildavsky, Moral Collapse of Communism. Poland as a Cautionary Tale, ICS Press, San Francisco 1990.
Google Scholar
Dąbrowski K., Dezintegracja pozytywna, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa 1979.
Google Scholar
Godłów-Legiędź J., Współczesna ekonomia. Ku nowemu paradygmatowi?, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar
Hornsby-Smith M.P., An Introduction to Catholic Social Thought, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607455
Jan Paweł II, Centesimus annus.
Google Scholar
Jan Paweł II, Sollicitudo rei socialis
Google Scholar
Kennedy R.G., The Good That Business Does, „Christian Social Thought Series” 2006, No. 9.
Google Scholar
Kopaliński W., Słownik wyrazów obcych i zwrotów obcojęzycznych, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1968.
Google Scholar
Larrivee J., It’s Not the Markets, It’s the Morals: How Excessively Blaming Markets Undermines Civil Society [w:] Back on the Road to Serfdom. The Resurgence of Statism, red. T.E. Woods, ISI Books, Wilmington 2010.
Google Scholar
Mele D., The Firm as a “Community of Persons”: A Pillar of Humanistic Business Ethos, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2012, vol. 106, nr 1.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1051-2
Novak M., Wolne osoby i dobro wspólne, tłum. G. Łuczkiewicz, Znak, Kraków 1998.
Google Scholar
Röpke W., International Economic Disintegration, William Hodge and Company, LondonEdinburgh-Glasgow 1942.
Google Scholar
Rożek T., Fiesta na wulkanie, (wywiad z Zytą Gilowską), „Gość Niedzielny”, 17.05.2009.
Google Scholar
Sadowski A., „Nie” dla ratowania spekulantów, „Przewodnik Katolicki”, nr 3, 18.01.2009.
Google Scholar
Schumacher E.F., Małe jest piękne. Spojrzenie na gospodarkę świata z założeniem, że człowiek coś znaczy, tłum. E. Szymańska, J. Strzelecki, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa 1981.
Google Scholar
Sena B., How Can We Measure the Contribution of the Business to the Common Good?Operationalising the Theoretical Concept of the Common Good, http://www.stthomas.edu/cathstudies/cst/conferences/thegoodcompany/Finalpapers/Sena%20Final%20paper.pdf
Google Scholar
Umehara T., The Civilization of the Forest, „New Perspectives Quarterly”, vol. 16, Issue 2, Spring 1999.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0893-7850.00224
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.