Efficacy, impact and English legal history

Thomas Glyn  Watkin

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.91.07

Authors

Thomas Glyn Watkin Queen’s Counsel (honoris causa); Fellow of the Learned Society of Wales; Honorary Professor of Law, Bangor University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-5876

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.91.07

Keywords:

Legal history, legislation, efficacy, impact, judiciary, interpretation, purposive

Abstract

Theorists of law and of social policy distinguish between the efficacy and the impact of laws and legislation. Efficacy concerns the achievement of the effects intended by law-makers. Impact refers to the actual consequences. At times, the two diverge. Sometimes, it is only after a lengthy period that the impact is appreciated. The impact sometimes requires intervention by legislators or judges acting purposively in order to correct unforeseen or unfortunate consequences. The extent of judicial intervention is not always clear from the surviving records. This article argues that an awareness of the possibility of such occurrence is essential if legal history is to present the whole truth concerning legal developments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashburner, Walter. 1933. Principles of Equity. Edited by D. Browne. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths.

Baker, John H. 1977. The Reports of Sir John Spelman: Part I. Vol. 93 for 1976. London: Selden Society.

Baker, John H. 1978. The Reports of Sir John Spelman: Part II. Vol. 94 for 1977. London: Selden Society.

Bolland, William C. 1915. Year Books of 5 Edward II (1311–1312). Vol. 31. London: Selden Society.

Bolland, William C. 1916. Year Books of 5 Edward II (1312). Vol. 33. London: Selden Society.

Brand, Paul A. 1975. “Formedon in the Remainder before De Donis”. Irish Jurist 10: 318–323.

Brand, Paul A. 1992. The Making of the Common Law. London & Rio Grande: The Hambledon Press.

Douglas, David C. 1964. William the Conqueror. London: Eyre Methuen.

Kaye, John M. 1988. “A Note on the Statute of Enrolments 1536”. Law Quarterly Review 104: 617–634.

Maitland, Frederic William. 1909. The Forms of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martin, Jill E. 2001. Hanbury and Martin Modern Equity. 16th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Miers, David R. Alan C. Page. 1990. Legislation. 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Milsom, Stroud F.C. 1956. “Formedon before De Donis”. Law Quarterly Review 72: 391–397.

Milsom, Stroud F.C. 1985. Studies in the History of the Common Law. London & Ronceverte: The Hambledon Press.

Plucknett, Theodore F.T. 1949. Legislation of Edward I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Watkin, Thomas Glyn. 1977. “The Spirit of the Seventies”. Anglo-American Law Review 6: 119–127.

Watkin, Thomas Glyn. 1991. “Quia emptores and the Entail: Subinfeudation and the Family Settlement in Thirteenth-Century England”. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 59: 353–374.

Watkin, Thomas Glyn. 1997. “The Political Philosophy of the Lord King”. In Communities and Courts in Britain 1150–1900. Edited by Christopher W. Brooks, Michael Lobban. 1–12. London and Rio Grande: The Hambledon Press.