Activist Discourse and the Origins of Feminist Shakespeare Studies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.27.09
Crossmark check for up

Keywords:

Anna Murphy Jameson (1794-1860), Margaret Fuller (1810-1850), feminist literary criticism, Shakespeare’s Heroines (1832), Woman in the Nineteenth-Century (1845), Romantic literature, Romantic literary criticism, Romantic sociability, nineteenth century public sphere

Abstract

This essay reconsiders interpretations of Shakespeare by Irish writer Anna Murphy Jameson and the American Transcendentalist Margaret Fuller. Developing an informal method in which the voice of the female critic rallies in defence of Shakespeare’s heroines, they intervene in a male-dominated intellectual sphere to model alternative forms of women’s learning that take root outside of formalized institutional channels. Jameson, in Shakespeare’s Heroines, invokes the language of authentic Romantic selfhood and artistic freedom, recovering Shakespeare’s female characters from earlier critical aspersion as figures of exceptional female eloquence and resilience; she adopts a conversational critical voice to involve her female readers in the interpretative process itself. Fuller, in Woman in Nineteenth Century, speaks authoritatively as a kind of female prophet to argue that women’s creative reinterpretations of Shakespeare point the way to a revitalization of a sterile literary critical field. Both writers call for the reform of women’s education through revisionist interpretations of history attuned to the representation of female exceptionalism. In embryonic form, these nineteenth century feminist writings formulate a persistent strain of socially engaged, activist feminist criticism of Shakespeare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Magdalena Nerio, University of Texas at San Antonio, US

teaches a variety of undergraduate courses in nineteenth century British and American literature in the Department of English at the University of Texas at San Antonio. In addition, she has published articles on Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Jane Austen, Mary Wollstonecraft, George Eliot, and the American Transcendentalist Margaret Fuller. Broadly, her research explores epistolary form, the rhetoric of nineteenth-century social reform movements, and political engagement in women’s writing of the eighteenth- and nineteenth centuries.

References

Adams, Kimberly VanEsveld. Our Lady of Victorian Feminism: The Madonna in the Work of Anna Jameson, Margaret Fuller, and George Eliot. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2001.
Google Scholar

Addams, Jane. “A Modern Lear.” Shakespeare in America: An Anthology from the Revolution to Now. Ed. James Shapiro. New York: Library of America, 2013. 266-81.
Google Scholar

Booth, Alison. “The Lessons of the Medusa: Anna Jameson and Collective Biographies of Women.” Victorian Studies 42.2 (1999): 257-288.
Google Scholar

Browning, Elizabeth Barrett. Aurora Leigh. Ed. Margaret Reynolds. New York: Norton, 1996.
Google Scholar

Crunden, Robert M. Ministers of Reform: The Progressives’ Achievement in American Civilization, 1889-1920. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
Google Scholar

Ellison, Julie. Delicate Subjects: Romanticism, Gender, and the Ethics of Under-standing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Nature.” Emerson’s Prose and Poetry: Authoritative Texts, Contexts, Criticism. Eds. Joel Porte and Saundra Morris. New York: Norton, 2001: 27-55.
Google Scholar

Fuller, Margaret. Woman in the Nineteenth Century. Ed. Larry J. Reynolds. New York: Norton, 1998.
Google Scholar

Greene, Gayle and Coppélia Kahn. “Feminist Scholarship and the Social Construction of Woman.” Making a Difference: Feminist Literary Criticism. Eds. Gayle Greene and Coppélia Kahn. New York: Routledge, 1985: 1-36.
Google Scholar

Gustafson, Sandra. “Eloquent Shakespeare.” Shakespearean Educations: Power, Citizenship, and Performance. Eds. Coppélia Kahn, Heather S. Nathans, and Mimi Godfrey. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2011: 71-91.
Google Scholar

Hankey, Julie. “Victorian Portias: Shakespeare’s Borderline Heroine.” Shakespeare Quarterly 45.4 (1994): 426-448.
Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William. “Shakespeare.” Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991: 323-335.
Google Scholar

Hoeckley, Cheri L. Larsen. “Introduction.” Shakespeare’s Heroines: Characteristics of Women Moral, Poetical, and Historical. By Anna Jameson. Toronto: Broadview Press, 2005: 9-37.
Google Scholar

Jameson, Anna Murphy. Memoirs of Celebrated Female Sovereigns. 2nd ed. London: Saunders and Otley, 1834.
Google Scholar

Jameson, Anna Murphy. Shakespeare’s Heroines: Characteristics of Women Moral, Poetical, and Historical. Ed. Cheri L. Larsen Hoeckley. Toronto: Broadview Press, 2005.
Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. “Preface to the Plays of William Shakespeare.” Samuel Johnson: Selected Poetry and Prose. Eds. Frank Brady and W. K. Wimsatt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977:
Google Scholar

Kelley, Mary. Learning to Stand and Speak: Women, Education, and Public Life in America’s Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.
Google Scholar

Kemp, Susan P. and Ruth Brandwein. “Feminisms and Social Work in the United States: An Intertwined History.” Journal of Women and Social Work 25.4 (2010): 341-364. Knight, Louise W. “Biography's Window on Social Change: Benevolence and Justice in Jane Addams’s ‘A Modern Lear.’” Journal of Women’s History 9.1 (1997): 111-138.
Google Scholar

Malachuk, Daniel. Perfection, the State, and Victorian Liberalism. New York: Palgrave, 2005.
Google Scholar

Polwhele, Richard. “The Unsex’d Females.” 1798.
Google Scholar

Russell, Anne E. “‘History and Real Life:’ Anna Jameson, Shakespeare’s Heroines and Victorian Women.” Victorian Review 17.2 (1991): 35-49.
Google Scholar

St. Clair, William. “Shakespeare.” The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 140-57.
Google Scholar

Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.
Google Scholar

Wallace, Miriam L. “Women Write Back: Alternative Legal Rhetorics in Inchbald, Wollstonecraft and Opie.” Women’s Writing 23.1 (2016): 68-86.
Google Scholar

Wharton, Edith. The House of Mirth. London: Wordsworth Editions, 1998.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-11-23 — Updated on 2023-12-20

Versions

How to Cite

Nerio, M. (2023). Activist Discourse and the Origins of Feminist Shakespeare Studies. Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance, 27(42), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.27.09 (Original work published November 23, 2023)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.