Religion and Culture of Origin. Re-Shaping Identity in the Integration Process: A Case Study in Sicily
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.3.07Keywords:
Integration, Religion, Identity, Multiculturalism, Adaptation, AssimilationAbstract
What happens when people of different cultures, values, religion live together? Sociological studies on immigrative phenomenon often swing between immigration and integration policies. These policies actually reveal the difficulty of the host society to institutionalize new models of social differences accompanying multiculturalism. Immigrants who “arrive” continue their life in a place where they do not passively participate in the passing of time, but become actors. Pressed by the hegemonic culture of the host society to adapt, do not cease to practice their religious and origin cultural expressions, often in conditions of urban spatial and social marginalization, they resist assimilation with ethnic persistence strategies. Considering the impact of religion and origin cultural values on expression of differences, it is important to consider their role in the integration process. And, above all—facilitate or hinder integration? These dynamics have been analyzed in a research study on immigrants’ integration process in Palermo. The main results are presented in this paper. In this case study, the research’s data hypothesizes a theoretical model of integration in which immigrants, free to express their religious and cultural differences, tend to reduce their perception of minority
Downloads
References
Alba, Richard and Victor Nee. 1997. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration.” International Migration Review 31(4):826-874.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839703100403
Ambrosini, Maurizio. 2007. Isole: minoranze migranti, globalizzazione a cura di Mario G., vol 2. Palermo: Fondazione Ignazio Buttitta.
Google Scholar
Ambrosini, Maurizio. 2014. Non passa lo straniero? Le politiche migratorie tra sovranità nazionale e diritti umani. Assisi: Cittadella.
Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 2001. Modernità in polvere. Rome: Meltemi.
Google Scholar
Birt, Jonathan. 2009. “Islamophobia in the Construction of British Muslim Identity Politics.” Pp. 210-227 in Muslims in Britain. Race, Place, and Identities, edited by P. Hopkins and R. Gale. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748625871.003.0012
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. La distinzione. Critica sociale del gusto. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 1992. Religion and Modernisation: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularisation Thesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Christ, Stephen. 2016. “Matachines in the Midwest: Religion and Identity in the American Heartland.” Qualitative Sociology Review 12(2):44-59.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.03
Cochran, Clarke E. 1998. “Introduction.” Pp. ix-xix in A Wall of Separation? Debating the Public Role of Religion, edited by M Serges, Ted G. Jelene, and C. E. Cochran. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Cole, Jeffrey and Sally Booth. 2006. “Domestic Work, Family Life, and Immigration in Sicily.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 11(1):22-36.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545710500470090
De La Garza, Antonio T. and Kent Ono A. 2015. “Retheorizing Adaptation: Differential Adaptation and Critical Intercultural Communication.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 8(4):69-289.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2015.1087097
Ferrante, Lorenzo. 2011. “New Comers, Confidence and Social Fragmentation in Communities with Strong Cultural Differentiation in Sicily.” International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 2(9):199-203.
Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert J. 1992. “Comment: Ethnic Invention and Acculturation, a Bumpy-Line Approach.” Journal of American Ethnic History 11(1):42-52.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1971. Status Passage. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1974. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar
Gordis, David M. and Yoav Ben-Horin. 1991. Jewish Identity in America. Los Angeles, CA: Susan and David Wilstein Institute of Jewish Policy Studies.
Google Scholar
Gordon, Milton M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Hagan, Jacqueline and Helen Rose Ebaugh. 2003. “Calling Upon the Sacred: Migrants’ Use of Religion in the Migration Process.” International Migration Review 37(4):1145-1162.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00173.x
Hirschman, Charles. 2004. “The Role of Religion in the Origin and Adaptation of Immigrant Groups in the United States.” International Migration Review 38(3):1206-1233.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00233.x
Leege, David C. and Lyman A. Kellstedt, eds. 1993. Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy. 2003. “‘You Know, Abram Was Really the First Immigrant’: Religion and Transnational Migration.” International Migration Review 37(3):847-873.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00160.x
Loch, Dietmar. 2009. “Immigrant Youth and Urban Riots: A Comparison of France and Germany.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35:791-814.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830902826236
Maréchal, Brigitte. 2003. Muslims in Enlarged Europe, Religion and Society. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047402466
Penninx, Rinus and Marco Martiniello. 2007. “Processi di integrazione e politiche (locali): stato dell’arte e lezioni di policy.” Mondi Migranti 3:31-59.
Google Scholar
Pennix, Rinus, Nicholas Van Hear, and Dimitrina Spencer. 2008. “Migration and Integration in Europe: The State of Research.” Compas Report:1-18.
Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1985. The Economic Sociology of Immigration. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Josh DeWind. 2004. “A Cross‐Atlantic Dialogue: The Progress of Research and Theory in the Study of International Migration.” International Migration Review 38(3):828-1302.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00221.x
Portes, Alejandro and Ruben G. Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies. The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. New York: Russell Sage Foudation.
Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Ruben G. Rumbaut. 2014. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520959156
Portes, Alejandro and Min Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530:74-96.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293530001006
Seidler, John. 1986. “Contested Accomodation: The Catholic Church as a Special Case of Social Change.” Social Forces 64(4):847-874.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2578784
Smith, Anthony Douglas. 1998. Le origini etniche delle nazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Google Scholar
Vertovec, Steven and Susanne Wessendorf. 2010. The Multiculturalism Backlash. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867549
Yang, Fenggang and Helen Rose Ebaugh. 2001. “Transformations in New Immigrant Religions and Their Global Implications.” American Sociological Review 66:269-288.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657418
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.