Quali(a)tative Methods: Sense-Based Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities

David Howes

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.18.4.02

Authors

David Howes Concordia University, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6199-4358

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.4.02

Keywords:

Sensory Turn, Sense-Based Research, Participant Sensation, Quali(a)tative Inquiry

Abstract

This paper begins by tracing the sensory turn in the human sciences—most notably, history and anthropology—which, in turn, gave rise to the interdisciplinary field of sensory studies. The latter field is articulated around the concept of the sensorium (defined as the entire sensory apparatus, including the extension of the senses via diverse media, as an operational complex) and the notion of qualia (defined as those aspects of the material world, such as color and sound, that are contingent on the human perceptual apparatus—in contrast to the inherent or elementary properties of materials, such as number or form, which are not).

Sense-based research in the human sciences is tied to sensing and making sense together with others. Its methodology of choice is sensory ethnography, or “participant sensation.” This method departs from the emphasis on observation in conventional qualitative research, as well as the latter’s reliance on such verbocentric methods as the questionnaire or focus group. Sensory ethnography highlights the primacy of the quali(a)tative dimensions of our being together in society. It extrapolates on Georg Simmel’s point: “That we get involved in interactions at all depends on the fact that we have a sensory effect upon one another” (as cited in Howes 2013).

In part II of this paper, a critique is presented of the diminution of the quali(a)tative in the context of the Scientific Revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth century, the cognitive revolution of the mid-twentieth century, and the scientization of the senses in the Sensory Evaluation Research Laboratory. These revolutions are problematized for their lopsidedness: the privileging of the infrasensible over the sensible and elemental (or atomistic) over the phenomenal in the case of the Scientific Revolution; the neuronal over the sensual and social in the case of the cognitive revolution; and, the unimodal (or one-sensation- and one-sense-at-a-time) over the multimodal, as well as the reduction of “significance” to the statistical, in the case of the research protocols of the sensory science laboratory. The paper concludes by presenting the results of a series of case studies in sensory ethnography that push the bounds of sense by leading with the senses and bringing the quali(a)tative back in.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

David Howes, Concordia University, Canada

David Howes is a Professor of Anthropology and Co-Director of the Centre for Sensory Studies at Concordia University, Montreal. He has conducted field research on the social and cultural life of the senses in Papua New Guinea and Northwestern Argentina, the sensori-social life of things in the museum, and the growing sense appeal of commodities in late capitalist society. His latest book is The Sensory Studies Manifesto: Tracking the Sensorial Revolution in the Arts and Human Sciences (2022).

References

Bendix, Regina. 2005. “Time of the Senses?” Current Anthropology 46(4):688-689.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/432823

Bergson, Henri. 1991. Matter and Memory. New York: Zone.
Google Scholar

Betts, Eleanor, ed. 2017. Senses of the Empire: Multisensory Approaches to Roman Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315608358

Bille, Mikkel and Tim Sørensen. 2016. “Into the Fog of Architecture.” Pp. 1-29 in Elements of Architecture: Assembling Archaeology, Atmosphere and the Performance of Building Spaces, edited by M. Bille and T. F. Sørensen. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. 1889. “On Alternating Sounds.” American Anthropologist A2(1):47-54.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1889.2.1.02a00040

Boyle, Sheryl. 2020. “Fragrant Walls and the Table of Delight: Sensory (Re)Construction as a Way of Knowing, the Case of Thornbury Castle 1508-21.” Ph.D. dissertation, Concordia University.
Google Scholar

Böhme, Gernot. 2017. The Aesthetics of Atmospheres, edited by J.-P. Thibaud. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315538181

Bull, Michael et al. 2006. “Introducing Sensory Studies.” The Senses and Society 1(1):5-7.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/174589206778055655

Butler, Shane and Alex Purves, eds. 2013. Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729848

Classen, Constance. 1997. “Foundations for an Anthropology of the Senses.” International Social Science Journal 153:401-412.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00032.x

Classen, Constance. 1998. The Color of Angels: Cosmology, Gender and the Aesthetic Imagination. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Classen, Constance. 2001. “The Senses.” In Encyclopedia of European Social History, vol. IV, edited by P. Stearns. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Google Scholar

Classen, Constance. 2012. The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252034930.001.0001

Clifford, James and Georg Marcus, eds. 1986. Writing Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520946286

Collins, Samuel G., Matthew Durington, and Harjant Gill. 2017. “Multimodality: An Invitation.” American Anthropologist 119(1):142-153.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12826

Corbin, Alain. 1990. “Histoire et anthropologie sensorielle [History and Sensory Anthropology].” Anthropologie et Sociétés 14(2):13-24.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/015125ar

Corbin, Alain. 2005. “Charting the Cultural History of the Senses.” Pp. 128-142 in Empire of the Senses, edited by D. Howes. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003230700-12

Cox, Rupert, Andrew Irving, and Christopher Wright, eds. 2016. Beyond Text? Critical Practices and Sensory Anthropology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719085055.001.0001

Csordas, Thomas. 1990. “Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology.” Ethos 18(1):5-47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010

Csordas, Thomas. 1993. “Somatic Modes of Attention.” Cultural Anthropology 8(2):135-156.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1993.8.2.02a00010

Dant, Tim. 1999. Material Culture in the Social World. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Google Scholar

Dant, Tim. 2004. Materiality and Society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Google Scholar

Dant, Tim. 2009. “The Work of Repair: Gesture, Emotion and Sensual Knowledge.” Sociological Research Online 15(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2158
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2158

Dawkins, Ashley and Alex Loftus. 2013. “The Senses as Direct Theoreticians in Practice.” Institute of British Geographers. Transactions 38(4):665-677.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00551.x

Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Deutsch, Allison. 2021. Consuming Painting: Food and the Feminine in Impressionist Paris. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271089959

Doerksen, Mark. 2017. “Electromagnetism and the Nth Sense: Augmenting Senses in the Grinder Subculture.” The Senses and Society 12(3):344-349.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2017.1367487

Doerksen, Mark. 2018. “How to Make Sense: Sensory Modification in Grinder Subculture.” Ph.D. dissertation, Concordia University.
Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Dubois, Danièle et al. 2021. Sensory Experiences. Dordrecht: Brill.
Google Scholar

Elliott, Danielle and Dara Culhane, eds. 2017. A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar

Febvre, Lucien. 1982. The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century: The Religion of Rabelais. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Feld, Steven. 1996. “Waterfalls of Song.” Pp. 91-136 in Senses of Place, edited by S. Feld and K. Basso. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1986. “The Uses of Diversity.” Michigan Quarterly Review 25(1):105-123.
Google Scholar

Geurts, Kathryn L. 2003. Culture and the Senses: Bodily Ways of Knowing in an African Community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Yannis. 2014. Archaeology and the Senses: Human Experience, Memory and Affect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139024655

Howes, David. 1990. “Les techniques des sens [Techniques of the Senses].” Anthropologie et Sociétés 14(1):99-115.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/015115ar

Howes, David, ed. 1991. The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar

Howes, David. 2003. Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11852

Howes, David, ed. 2005. Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Howes, David. 2013. “The Expanding Field of Sensory Studies.” Sensory Studies. Retrieved September 05, 2022 https://www.sensorystudies.org/sensorial-investigations/the-expanding-field-of-sensory-studies/
Google Scholar

Howes, David. 2015. “The Science of Sensory Evaluation.” Pp. 81- 98 in The Social Life of Materials, edited by A. Drazin and S. Küchler. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Howes, David. 2019. “Multisensory Anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 48(1):17-28.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011324

Howes, David. 2020. “Digging Up the Sensorium: On the Sensory Revolution in Archaeology.” Pp. 21-34 in The Routledge Handbook of Sensory Archaeology, edited by R. Skeates and J. Day. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560175-2

Howes, David. 2022. The Sensory Studies Manifesto: Tracking the Sensorial Revolution in the Arts and Human Sciences. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487528638

Howes, David and Constance Classen. 1991. “Conclusion.” In The Varieties of Sensory Experience, edited by D. Howes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar

Howes, David and Constance Classen. 2014. Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856032

Howes, David, Clifford Geertz, and Roseline Lambert. 2018. “Boasian Soundings: An Interrupted History of the Senses (and Poetry) in Anthropology.” Amerikastudien/American Studies 63(4):473-488.
Google Scholar

Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Jackson, Michael. 1983a. “Thinking through the Body.” Social Analysis 14:127-148.
Google Scholar

Jackson, Michael. 1983b. “Knowledge of the Body.” Man 18:327-345.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2801438

Jones, Carline A., ed. 2006. Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology and Contemporary Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Karmon, David. 2021. Architecture and the Senses in the Italian Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108775465

Kirmayer, Laurence. 1992. “The Body’s Insistence on Meaning.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 6(4):323-346.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1992.6.4.02a00020

Lahne, Jacob and Christy Spackman, eds. 2018. “Accounting for Taste: Technologies for Capturing Food-Sensory Experience.” The Senses and Society 13(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2018.1427361

Lamrani, Myriam, ed. 2021. “Beyond Revolution: Reshaping Nationhood Through Senses and Affects.” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 39(2).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/cja.2021.390202

Laplantine, François. 2005. Le social et le sensible: introduction à une anthropologie modale [The Social and the Sensible: Introduction to a Modal Anthropology]. Paris: Téraèdre.
Google Scholar

Laplantine, François. 2015. The Life of the Senses: Introduction to a Modal Anthropology. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Le Breton, David. 1990. Anthropologie du corps et modernité [Anthropology of the Body and Modernity]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Google Scholar

Lynch, Erin, David Howes, and Martin French. 2020. “A Touch of Luck and a ‘Real Taste of Vegas’: A Sensory Ethnography of the Montreal Casino.” The Senses and Society 15(2):192-215.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2020.1773641

Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574

Mauss, Marcel. 1979. “Body Techniques.” In Sociology and Psychology Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3032558

McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar

Meilgaard, Morten B. Thomas Carr, and Gail V. Civille. 2010. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. 1994. “The Pictorial Turn.” In Picture Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Newhauser, Richard, ed. 2014. A Cultural History of the Senses in the Middle Ages, 500-1450. London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474233156

Northey, Margot, Lorne Tepperman, and Patrizia Albanese. 2018. Making Sense in the Social Sciences. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Nudds, Matthew. 2014. “The Senses in Philosophy and Science: From Sensation to Computation.” Pp. 125-148 in A Cultural History of the Senses in the Modern Age, 1920-2000, edited by D. Howes. London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474233187.ch-005

Ong, Walter J. 1967. The Presence of the Word. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Ong, Walter J. 1969. “World as View and World as Event.” American Anthropologist 71(4):634-647.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1969.71.4.02a00030

Ong, Walter J. 1991. “The Shifting Sensorium.” Pp. 25-30 in The Varieties of Sensory Experience, edited by D. Howes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar

Piccolino, Marco and Nicholas J. Wade. 2008. “Galileo’s Eye: A New Vision of the Senses in the Work of Galileo Galilei.” Perception 37:1312-1340.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/p6011

Pink, Sarah. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249383

Plessner, Helmuth. 2019. The Levels of Organic Life and the Human: Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology. New York: Fordham University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823283996.001.0001

Promey, Sally, ed. 2014. Sensational Religion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Rhys-Taylor, Alex. 2017. Food and Multiculture: A Sensory Ethnography of East London. London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474204347

Santos, Bonaventura de Sousa. 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002000

Shapin, Steven. 2012. “The Sciences of Subjectivity.” Social Studies of Science 42:170-184.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711435375

Simmel, Georg. 1997. “Sociology of the Senses.” In Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings, edited by D. Frisby and M. Featherstone. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Skeates, Robin and Jo Day, eds. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Sensory Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560175

Stewart, Kathleen. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar

Stewart, Kathleen. 2011. “Atmospheric Attunements.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/d9109
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d9109

Stoller, Paul. 1989. The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Senses in Anthropology. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812203141

Stoller, Paul. 1997. Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812203134

Surkis, Judith. 2012. “When Was the Linguistic Turn? A Genealogy.” American Historical Review 117(3):700-722.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.117.3.700

Synnott, Anthony. 1991. “Puzzling Over the Senses from Plato to Marx.” Pp. 61-78 in The Varieties of Sensory Experience, edited by D. Howes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar

Tallis, Raymond. 2011. Aping Mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the Misrepresentation of Humanity. Durham: Acumen
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844652747

Teil, Geneviève. 2019. “Learning to Smell: On the Shifting Modalities of Experience.” The Senses and Society 14(3):330-345.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2019.1665812

Vannini, Phillip, Dennis Waskul, and Simon Gottschalk. 2012. The Senses in Self, Society and Culture: A Sociology of the Senses. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805985

Wetherell, Margaret. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250945

Wetherell, Margaret and Jonathan Potter. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.
Google Scholar