The (Re)Construction of Human Conduct: “Vernacular Video Analysis”

Authors

  • René Tuma Berlin Institute of Technology, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.8.2.09

Keywords:

Vernacular Video Analysis, Ethnomethodology, Interpretation, Interaction, Video, Workplace Studies, Visual Knowledge, Reflective Methods, Scientific Practice, Experts

Abstract

Video technology became available in the 1960s and massively diffused into nearly all institutional spheres during the following decades (Zielinski 1986). It is not only used for provision of movies and entertainment (Greenberg 2008), documenting, and recording of events in the semi-professional and private domain (Raab 2008), but also for the analysis of human conduct in psychology and education (Mittenecker 1987) and in sociology (Knoblauch et al. 2006; Knoblauch et al. 2008; Kissmann 2009; Heath, Hindmarsh and Luff 2010). In this paper, I am going to argue that with the availability of video technology a form of discursive practice of interpretive (re)construction of knowledge has been established in a variety of vernacular fields of practice. Based on the available literature and an empirical example taken from a public demonstration of such a vernacular video analysis, I will show some elements of communicative practice that allow for detailed analysis of visual knowledge. Furthermore, I will discuss methodological issues, as to be approached, and which elements can be found that constitute the communicative (re)constructive processes of analysis. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

René Tuma, Berlin Institute of Technology, Germany

René Tuma, M.SC., is a researcher and lecturer at the Technische Universität Berlin and currently working on his PhD Thesis in the field of video-analysis.  

References

Antaki, Charles, Michaela Biazzi, Anette Nissen et al. 2008. “Accounting for moral judgments in academic talk: The case of a conversation analysis data session.” Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 28(1):1-30.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.001

Bateson, Gregory. 1958. “Language and Psychotherapy: Frieda Fromm-Reichmann’s last project.” Psychiatry 21(21):96-100.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1958.11023118

Bateson, Gregory and Margaret Mead. 1942. Balinese Character. A Photographic Analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, Ray L. 1952. Introduction to Kinesics. An Annotation System for the Analysis of Body Motion and Gesture. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
Google Scholar

Brookman, Philip. 2010. Eadweard Muybridge. London: Tate Publishing.
Google Scholar

Burri, Regula and Joseph Dumit. 2008. “Social Studies of Scientific Imaging and Visualization.” Pp. 297-317 in The Handbook of Science and Technolgy Studies, 3rd Edition, edited by E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, et al. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul and Wallace V. Friesen. 2003. Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Expressions. Cambridge: Malor Books.
Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick. 2011. “Uses of video in social research: a brief history.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14(3):179-189.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.563615

Fleck, Ludwik. 1981. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190341.001.0001

Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96(3):606-633.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach.” Pp. 157-182 in Handbook of Visual Analysis, edited by T. Van Leeuwen, C. Jewitt. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020062.n8

Greenberg, Joshua H. 2008. From Betamax to Blockbuster: Video Stores and the Invention of Movies on Video. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh and Paul Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Hietzge, Maud. 2008. “Videogestützte Selbstreflexion in der Sportlehrerausbildung – Reaktivität, Akzeptanz und «how to do».” Pp. 295-298 in Jahresband der Deutschen Vereinigung für Sportwissenschaft (DVS)-Sektion Sportpädagogik, edited by V. Oesterhelt. Hamburg: Czwalina.
Google Scholar

Kissmann, Ulrike T. 2009. Video Interaction Analysis: Methods and Methodology. Frankfurt: Lang.
Google Scholar

Knoblauch, Hubert. 2008. “The Performance of Knowledge: Pointing and Knowlegde in Powerpoint Presentations.” Cultural Sociology 2(1):75-97.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975507086275

Knoblauch, Hubert, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab et al., (eds.). 2006. Video Analysis – Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Google Scholar

Knoblauch, Hubert, Alejandro Baer, Eric Laurier et al. 2008. “Visual Analysis. New Developments in the Interpretative Analysis of Video and Photography.” Forum Qualitative Social Research 9(3), Art. 14. Retrieved July 26, 2012: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1170/2587
Google Scholar

Knoblauch, Hubert, Bernt Schnettler and René Tuma. 2010. “Interpretative Videoanalysen in der Sozialforschung.” Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft Online, edited by S. Maschke, L. Stecher [www.erzwissonline. de]. Weinheim: Juventa.
Google Scholar

Laurier, Eric, Ignaz Strebel and Barry Brown. 2008. “Video Analysis: Lessons from Professional Video Editing Practice.” Forum Qualitative Social Research 9(3). Retrieved July 14, 2012: http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1168
Google Scholar

Macbeth, Douglas. 1999. “Glances, trances, and their relevance for a visual sociology.” Pp. 135-170 in Media studies: Ethnomethodological approaches, edited by P. L. Jalbert. Lanham: University Presses of America.
Google Scholar

Mittenecker, Erich. 1987. Video in der Psychologie. Methoden und Anwendungsbeispiele in Forschung und Praxis. Bern: Huber.
Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2003. “Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions.” Visual Studies 18(1):58-72.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586032000100083

Mondada, Lorenza. 2005. “Video Recording as the Reflexive Preservation and Configuration of Phenomenal Features for Analysis.” Pp. 51-67 in Video- Analysis, edited by H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, et al. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “Video Recording Practices and the Reflexive Constitution of the Interactional Order: Some Systematic Uses of the Split-Screen Technique.” Human Studies 32(1):67-99.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9110-8

Raab, Jürgen. 2008. Visuelle Wissenssoziologie. Theoretische Konzeption und materiale Analysen. Konstanz: UVK.
Google Scholar

Reichert, Ramón. 2007. Im Kino der Humanwissenschaften: Studien zur Medialisierung wissenschaftlichen Wissens. Bielefeld: transcript.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839406472

Ruby, Jay. 2000. Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Schnettler, Bernt. 2006. “Orchestrating Bullet Lists and Commentaries. A Video Performance Analysis of Computer Supported Presentations.” Pp. 155-168 in Video Analysis – Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, edited by H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, et al. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Google Scholar

Schnettler, Bernt. 2007. “Auf dem Weg zu einer Soziologie visuellen Wissens.” Sozialer Sinn 8(2):189-210.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosi-2007-0203

Schnettler, Bernt and Hubert Knoblauch. 2007. Powerpoint- Präsentationen: Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen. Konstanz: UVK.
Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2006. “Coordinating Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 39(4):377-409.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2

Thiel, Thomas. 2003. “Film und Videotechnik in der Psychologie. Eine erkenntnistheoretische Analyse mit Jean Piaget, Anwendungsbeispiele aus der Kleinkindforschung und ein historischer Rückblick auf Kurt Lewin und Arnold Gsell.” Pp. 649-708 in Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung, edited by H. Keller. Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Hans Huber.
Google Scholar

Tutt, Dylan and Jon Hindmarsh. 2011. “Reenactments at Work: Demonstrating Conduct in Data Sessions.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 44(3):211-236.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.591765

Tutt, Dyan, Jon Hindmarsh, Muneeb Shaukat et al. 2007. “The distributed work of local action: Interaction amongst virtually collocated research teams.” Pp. 199-218 in ECSCW 2007, edited by L. J. Bannon, I. Wagner, C. Gutwin, et al. London: Springer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_11

Zielinski, Siegfried. 1986. Zur Geschichte des Videorecorders. Berlin: Wissenschaftsverlag Spiess.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2012-08-30

How to Cite

Tuma, R. (2012). The (Re)Construction of Human Conduct: “Vernacular Video Analysis”. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.8.2.09