Visualizing the Unseen: Depicting the Abstract in German Media

Jan Krasni

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.8.2.06

Authors

Jan Krasni University of Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.8.2.06

Keywords:

Social Semiotics, Collective Memory, Media Discourse Analysis, Multimodal Composition, Bonus Payments, Bank Managers

Abstract

In my paper, I will combine two methods of media discourse analysis in order to achieve new insights into not only power relations inherent in texts, but also into the manner in which collective memory is constituted. Firstly, I will critically examine the social semiotic method of qualitative multimodal discourse analysis developed by Theo Van Leeuwen and Gunther Kress as a resource for describing how verbal semiotic modes, together with mixed linguistic/nonlinguistic modes, are used to establish and confirm power relations within pluricoded texts. Secondly, I will investigate the practicability of applying the concept of Key Visuals/Key Invisibles, postulated by Peter Ludes and Stefan Kramer, to multimodal compositions in order to gain a sociological and cultural understanding of the means by which certain content becomes part of collective memory and how it is manipulated. In this way, I hope to determine if an operationalization of Key Visual/Key Invisible is possible in order to view its associative potential as a semiotic resource.

I will apply this methodological device to video sequences of German news releases reporting on bonus payments to top bank managers during the world economic crisis in 2008. Thereby, I will examine if the discourse generated by these reports is characterized by a highly negative representation of managers: the news releases seem to hold them responsible for the economic crisis instead of investigating its causes. I will analyze which devices are used in the accusation of the managers and will attempt to determine if there are Key Visuals/Key Invisibles used to this end. If this is the case, I will analyze their use within the context of the truth imperative of journalistic reporting. In this section, I will focus on the connection between mediated content and the possibilities of depicting or recording the unseen processes of bonus payment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jan Krasni, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Jan Krasni is an Assistant Professor at the University of Belgrade (Department of German Language, Literature and Culture) and a Research Assistant at the University of Leipzig (Department of East-Asia Studies). His main fields of interest are Visual Culture, Social Semiotics and Multimodal Discourse Analysis.

References

Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.
Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Power of Identity [vol. 2 of The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture]. Cambridge, Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2000. Economy, Society and Culture. Volume III: End of Millennium. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2004. The Network Society. A Crosscultural Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel and Gustavo Cardoso. 2006. The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. John Hopkins University: Centre for Transatlantic Relations.
Google Scholar

Fraas, Claudia. 2005. “Schlüssel-Konzepte als Zugang zum kollektiven Gedächtnis – Ein diskursund frameanalytisch basierter Ansatz.“ Deutsche Sprache 3:242-257.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1868-775X.2005.03.04

Friedrichsen, Heike. 2009. Spiegel, January 21. Retrieved August 29, 2010: http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/jobundberuf/0,1518,600473,00.html
Google Scholar

“Frontal 21.” 2010. ZDF, November 9. Retrieved November 10, 2010: http://www.zdf.de/ZDFmediathek/beitrag/video/1186270/HSH-Nordbank-in-Noeten
Google Scholar

Hess-Lüttich, Ernest. 2001. Medien, Texte und Maschinen. Angewandte Mediensemiotik. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Google Scholar

Holly, Werner. 2010. “Besprochene Bilder – bebildertes Sprechen. Audiovisuelle Transkriptivität in Nachrichtenfilmen und Polit-Talkshows.”Pp. 359-382 in Sprache intermedial. Stimme und Schrift, Bild und Ton, edited by A. Deppermann, A. Linke. Berlin, New York: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223613.359

Iedema, Roderick A. 2001. “Analysing film and television: a social semiotic account of «Hospital: an Unhealthy Business.»” Pp. 183-206 in Handbook of Visual Analysis, edited by T. Van Leeuwen, C. Jewitt. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020062.n9

Jewitt, Carey and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Kramer, Stefan. 2008. “Hypermediale Key Visuals.” Pp. 91-102 in Intermedialität analog/digital. Theorien, Modelle, Analysen, edited by J. Paech, J. Schröter. Munich: Fink.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846743744_008

Kramer, Stefan and Peter Ludes, (eds.). 2010. Networks of Culture. Berlin: LIT Verlag Dr. W. Hopf.
Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther and Theo Van Leeuwen. 1998. “Front Pages: (The Critical) Analysis of Newspaper Layout.” Pp. 186-219 in Approaches to Media Discourse, edited by A. Bell, A. Garrett. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Education.
Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images. Grammar of Visual Design. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

Kress, Gunther, Carey Jewitt, Jon Ogborn et al. 2007. Multimodal Teaching and learning. The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London, New York: Conitnuum.
Google Scholar

Kreutzfeldt, Malte. 2008. „Steinbrück allmächtig.” Retrieved June 21, 2010: http://www.taz.de/1/zukunft/wirtschaft/artikel/1/steinbrueck-allmaechtig/
Google Scholar

Kroeber-Riel, Werner. 1993. Bildkommunikation. Imagerystrategien für die Werbung. Munich: Vahlen.
Google Scholar

Kröger, Michael. 2008. “Die Zeit für fette Boni ist vorbei.” Spiegel Online, October 21. Retrieved August 30, 2010: http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,585346,00.html
Google Scholar

Krüger, Udo M. 1988. “Infos – Infotainment – Entertainment. Programmanalyse.” Media Perspektiven 10:637-663.
Google Scholar

Lamby, Stephan. 2009. „Der große Rausch – ein Investmentbanker packt aus.” Eco Media. Das Erste Deutsche Fernsehen, January 8, 2009.
Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. 2002. “Travels in Hypermodality.” Visual Communication 1(3):299-325.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100303

Ludes, Peter. 2001. Multimedia und Multi-Moderne: Schlüsselbilder. Fernsehnachrichten und World Wide Web – Medienzivilisierung in der europäischen Währungsunion. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83363-1

Ludes, Peter and Helmut Schanze. 1999. Media Studies and Media Evaluation. Medienwissenschaften und Medienwertung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83338-9

Meier, Stefan. 2008. (Bild-)Diskurs im Netz. Konzept und Methode für eine semiotische Diskursanalyse im World Wide Web. Cologne: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
Google Scholar

“Panorama.” 2009. Das Erste, July 16. Retrieved June 19, 2010: http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/media/panorama282.html
Google Scholar

Parr, Rolf. 2007. “Börse im Ersten: Kollektivsymbole im Schnittpunkt multimodaler und multikodaler Zeichenkomplexe.” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 54(1):54-70.
Google Scholar

Pörksen, Uwe. 1997. Weltmarkt der Bilder. Eine Philosophie der Visiotype. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Google Scholar

Rajewska, Irina. 2002. Intermedialität. Stuttgart: A. Francke Verlag UTB.
Google Scholar

“Report Mainz.” 2009. Das Erste, July 20. 2009. Retrieved August 20, 2010: http://www.ardmediathek.de/ard/servlet/content/3517136?documentId=2782392
Google Scholar

Schütte, Georg. 1998. “Die USA, Europa und der Markt: Kontexte der Entwicklung von Fernsehinformationssendungen.” Pp. 155-182 in Die Amerikanisierung des Medienalltags, edited by H. Wenzel. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Google Scholar

“Sprudelnde Banker-Boni frustrieren Obama.” 2010. Spiegel Online, February 24. Retrieved August 28, 2010: http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/0,1518,679916,00.html
Google Scholar

Stegu, Martin. 2000. “Text oder Kontext: Zur Rolle von Fotos in Tageszeitungen.” Pp. 307-323 in Bild im Text – Text und Bild, edited by U. Fix, H. Wellmann. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
Google Scholar

Stöckl, Hartmut. 2004. Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache. Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text: Konzepte, Theorien, Analysemethoden. Berlin, New York: Walter De Gruyter.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110201994

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2003. “A multimodal perspective on composition.” Pp. 23-61 in Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse, edited by T. Ensink, Ch. Sauer. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.111.03lee

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647028

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Praxis. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.148.27lee

Warburg, Aby. 2010. Werke. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Ziem, Alexander. 2008. “«Heuschrecken» in Wort und Bild. Zur Karriere einer Metapher.” Muttersprache 2:108-120.
Google Scholar