Bringing the Social Back in: Some Suggestions for the Qualitative Study of Emotions

Margarethe Kusenbach; Donileen R. Loseke

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.09.2.03

Authors

Margarethe Kusenbach University of South Florida, USA
Donileen R. Loseke University of South Florida, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.2.03

Keywords:

Emotions, Sociology, Social Constructionism, Culture, Interaction, Qualitative Research Methods

Abstract

As a relatively new area of inquiry, it is not surprising that the research agendas and methodological tools of the sociology of emotions are still evolving. Our goal in this article is to offer new ideas toward emphasizing the social, as opposed to individual, dimensions of emotions in sociological research. What are the historical, cultural, and biographical structures and contexts of individual emotional experiences? What are the social and political antecedents of individual experience? What are the origins of social and cultural frameworks shaping individual experience? What are the social and political consequences of individual experiences? Broadly speaking, these questions are about how people make meanings from cultural resources, and about how these meanings make culture. And because these are questions about meaning, they necessarily require qualitative data and analytic techniques.

The second section of the article, written by Loseke, conceptualizes and explores emotions as systems of meanings. Rather than focusing on unique individual experiences, Loseke’s starting point is the shared ideas and rules regarding emotions within a culture, and their manifestations in widely circulating narratives. The ensuing analysis focuses on the symbolic and emotion codes (e.g., victim) and structures of such stories, and on the work they do for individuals and for society as a whole.

The third part of the article, written by Kusenbach, begins with individual emotional experiences, yet seeks to account for the larger cultural patterns (life stories) that provide them with meaning. Kusenbach’s research shows that residents of mobile homes, a stigmatized type of housing, employ a range of cultural narratives that furnish both negative and positive emotional experiences surrounding their place of living.

In sum, it is argued that both approaches generate new questions and insights, new kinds of data, and new methodological tools for a more sociological study of emotions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Margarethe Kusenbach, University of South Florida, USA

Margarethe Kusenbach is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Graduate Director at the University of South Florida, Tampa, USA. Her research interests include the sociology of emotions, cities and communities, disasters and sustainability, as well as qualitative research methods. Her current work focuses on issues of home and belonging in Florida mobile home communities.

Donileen R. Loseke, University of South Florida, USA

Donileen R. Loseke is a Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida, Tampa, USA. Her research interests focus on how narratives work and the work narratives do in public life. Most recently she has been exploring relationships between emotion discourse in socially circulating narratives and public support for particular political positions, especially as those positions are reflected in social policy.

References

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1992. “Citizen and Enemy as Symbolic Classification: On the Polarizing Discourse of Civil Society.” Pp. 289-308 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by Michèle Lamont, Marcel Fournier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Altheide, David. 2002. Creating Fear. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Amsterdam, Anthony G. and Jerome Bruner. 2000. Minding the Law: How Courts Rely on Storytelling, and How Their Stories Change the Ways We Understand the Law—and Ourselves. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Asen, Robert. 2002. “Imagining in the Public Sphere.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 35(4):345-367.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/par.2003.0006

Bellah, Robert N. et al. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Berns, Nancy. 2011. Closure: The Rush to End Grief and What it Costs Us. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Best, Joel. 1997. “Victimization and the Victim Industry.” Society 34(4):9-17.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912204

Boiger, Michael and Batja Mesquita. 2012. “The Construction of Emotion in Interactions, Relationships, and Cultures.” Emotion Review 4(3):221-229.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912439765

Brown-Saracino, Japonica. 2009. A Neighborhood that Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation, and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226076645.001.0001

Cerulo, Karen A. 1998. Deciphering Violence: The Cognitive Structure of Right and Wrong. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Cerulo, Karen A. 2000. “The Rest of the Story: Sociocultural Patterns of Story Elaboration.” Poetics 28(1):21-45.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00011-5

Clark, Candace. 1997. Misery and Company: Sympathy in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226107585.001.0001

D’Andrade, Roy. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

D’Andrade, Roy. 2005. “Some Methods for Studying Cultural Cognitive Structures.” Pp. 83-104 in Finding Culture in Talk: A Collection of Methods, edited by Naomi Quinn. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05871-3_3

Davis, Joseph E. 2002. “Narrative and Social Movements: The Power of Stories.” Pp. 3-30 in Stories of Change: Narrative and Social Movements, edited by Joseph E. Davis. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Denzin, Norman K. 1984. On Understanding Emotion. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Google Scholar

DeVault, Marjory L. 1999. “Comfort and Struggle: Emotion Work in Family Life.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561(1):52-63.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716299561001004

Durkheim, Emile. 1961. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Collier MacMillan.
Google Scholar

Duyvendak, Jan W. 2011. The Politics of Home: Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek. 1999. “Emotion Discourse.” Culture & Psychology 5(3):271-291.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953001

Franks, David D. 2010. Neurosociology: The Nexus between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York: Springer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5531-9_7

Franks, David D. and E. Doyle McCarthy, (eds.). 1989. “Introduction.” Pp. xi-xx in The Sociology of Emotions: Original Essays and Research Papers. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar

Gazso, Amber. 2012. “Moral Codes of Mothering and the Introduction of Welfare-to-Work in Ontario.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de sociologie 49(1):26-49.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2011.01279.x

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Gordon, Steven L. 1990. “Social Structural Effects on Emotions.” Pp. 134-179 in Research Agendas in the Sociology of Emotions, edited by Theodore D. Kemper. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Gottschalk, Simon. 2003. “Reli(e)ving the Past: Emotion Work in the Holocaust’s Second Generation.” Symbolic Interaction 26(3):355-380.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.3.355

Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85(3):551-575.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049

Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium, (eds.). 2012. “Introduction: Establishing a Balance.” Pp. 1-11 in Varieties of Narrative Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335117.n1

Holstein, James A. and Gale Miller. 1990. “Rethinking Victimization: An Interactional Approach to Victimology.” Symbolic Interaction 13(1):102-122.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1990.13.1.103

Katz, Jack. 1999. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Kemper, Theodore D. 1978. A Social Interactional Theory of Emotions. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar

Kunda, Gideon and John Van Maanen. 1999. “Changing Scripts at Work: Managers and Professionals.” Annuals of the American Academy 561(1):64-80.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716299561001005

Kusenbach, Margarethe. 2003. “Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool.” Ethnography 4(3):449-479.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007

Kusenbach, Margarethe. 2006. “Patterns of Neighboring: Practicing Community in the Parochial Realm.” Symbolic Interaction 29(3):270-306.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2006.29.3.279

Kusenbach, Margarethe. 2008. “A Hierarchy of Urban Communities: Observations on the Nested Character of Place.” City & Community 7(3):225-249.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2008.00259.x

Kusenbach, Margarethe. 2009. “Salvaging Decency: Mobile Home Residents’ Strategies of Managing the Stigma of «Trailer Living».” Qualitative Sociology 32(4):399-428.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-009-9139-z

Kusenbach, Margarethe. 2012. “Mobile Methods.” Pp. 252-264 in Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, edited by Sara Delamont. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Google Scholar

Lamb, Sharon, (ed.). 1999. “Constructing the Victim: Popular Images and Lasting Labels.” pp. 108-138 in New Versions of Victims: Feminists Struggle with the Concept. New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar

Lerner, Jennifer S. and Dacher Keltner. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(1):144-150.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146

Linde, Charlotte. 1993. Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Loseke, Donileen R. 2007. “The Study of Identity as Cultural, Institutional, Organization, and Personal Narratives: Theoretical and Empirical Integrations.” The Sociological Quarterly 48(4):661-688.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00096.x

Loseke, Donileen R. 2009. “Examining Emotion as Discourse: Emotion Codes and Presidential Speeches Justifying War.” The Sociological Quarterly 50(3):497-524.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01150.x

Loseke, Donileen R. 2012. “The Empirical Analysis of Formula Stories.” Pp. 251-272 in Varieties of Narrative Analysis, edited by James A. Holstein, Jaber F. Gubrium. Los Angeles: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335117.n12

Mazzeo, Christopher, Sara Rab, and Susan Eachus. 2003. “Work-First or Work-Only: Welfare Reform, State Policy, and Access to Postsecondary Education.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 586(1):144-171.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399702250212

McCarthy, E. Doyle. 1989. “Emotions are Social Things: An Essay in the Sociology of Emotions.” Pp. 51-72 in The Sociology of Emotions: Original Essays and Research Papers, edited by David D. Franks, E. Doyle McCarthy. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar

Meanwell, Emily, Joseph D. Wolfe, and Tim Hallett. 2008. “Old Paths and New Directions: Studying Emotions in the Workplace.” Sociology Compass 2(2):537-559.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00077.x

Miller, Gale and James A. Holstein, (eds.). 1989. “On the Sociology of Social Problems.” Pp. 1-18 in Perspectives on Social Problems, vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar

Mohr, John W. 1994. “Soldiers, Mothers, Tramps and Others: Discourse Roles in the 1907 New York City Charity Directory.” Poetics 22:327-357.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)90013-2

Picart, Caroline Joan (Kay) S. 2003. “Rhetorically Reconfiguring Victimhood and Agency: The Violence Against Women Act’s Civil Rights Clause.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6(1):97-126.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2003.0035

Quinn, Naomi, (ed.). 2005. “How to Reconstruct Schemas People Share, From What they Say.” Pp. 35-82 in Finding Culture in Talk: A Collection of Methods. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05871-3_2

Rochefort, David and Roger Cobb, (eds.). 1994. “Problem Definition: An Emerging Perspective.” Pp. 1-31 in The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “An Initial Investigation into the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” Pp. 31-74 in Studies in Social Interaction, edited by David Sudnow. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Salcedo, Rodrigo and Alejandra Rasse. 2012. “The Heterogeneous Nature of Urban Poor Families.” City & Community 11(1):94-118.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01385.x

Schneider, Ann and Helen Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87(2):153-180.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044

Schütz, Alfred. 1970. Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Shilling, Chris. 2002. “The Two Traditions in the Sociology of Emotions.” Pp. 10-32 in Emotions and Sociology, edited by J. Barbalet. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2002.tb03589.x

Smith, Dorothy. 1999. Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442683747

Stearns, Peter N. and Carol Z. Stearns. 1985. “Emotionology: Clarifying the History of Emotions and Emotional Standards.” American Historical Review 90(4):813-836.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1858841

Stone, Deborah. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Google Scholar

Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51(2):273-286.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521

Swidler, Ann. 1995. “Cultural Power and Social Movements.” Pp. 25-40 in Social Movements and Culture, edited by Hank Johnston, Bert Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226230665.001.0001

Thoits, Peggy A. 1996. “Managing the Emotions of Others.” Symbolic Interaction 19(2):85-109.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1996.19.2.85

Turner, Jonathan H. and Jan E. Stets. 2006. “Sociological Theories of Human Emotions.” Annual Review of Sociology 32(1):25-52.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123130

Waddell, Craig. 1990. “The Role of Pathos in the Decision-Making Process: A Study of the Rhetoric of Science Policy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 76(1):381-400.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639009383932

Wallis, Allan D. 1991. Wheel Estate: The Rise and Decline of Mobile Homes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Wilkins, Amy C. 2008. “«Happier than Non-Christians»: Collective Emotions and Symbolic Boundaries among Evangelical Christians.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71(3):281–301.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250807100308

Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1996. “Lumping and Splitting: Notes on Social Classification.” Sociological Forum 11(3):421-433.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408386