A Dyadic View on the Post-separation Network of Single Mothers

Authors

  • Dimitri Mortelmans University of Antwerp, Belgium
  • Wendy Verheyen University of Antwerp, Belgium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.04

Keywords:

Divorce, Social Network, Social Support, Grounded Theory, Dyadic Analysis

Abstract

Many empirical studies have focused on the quantitative changes in the social networks of divorced and separated people. In this qualitative study, we use interviews with dyads to construct a two-sided view of the support network after separation. The aim of the study is to gain insight into the needs for support after a relational breakup. Including a network member in the analysis enables a more detailed view on the interaction at hand in the bond between these women and their supportive network members. The results show that personal coping resources are left untouched. Giving advice on ones daily activities is counter-productive. This is better understood by non family members compared to the women’s parents (especially the mother). With respect to the reciprocity in these relationships, network members do not expect a return in the period after the separation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Dimitri Mortelmans, University of Antwerp, Belgium

    Dimitri Mortelmans is an Associate Professor at the University of Antwerp (Belgium). He is the head of the Research Center for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies (CELLO). His principal research interests lie in the is sociology of family and labour. His main research topics cover divorce, work-life balance and career patterns.

  • Wendy Verheyen, University of Antwerp, Belgium

    Wendy Verheyen is a Research Assistant in the Research Center for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies (CELLO) at the University of Antwerp (Belgium). She works on gender issues and divorce.

References

Albeck, Shulamith and Dania Kaydar. 2002. “Divorced Mothers: Their Network of Friends Pre- and Post-Divorce.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 36(3/4):111-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v36n03_07

Bawin-Legros, Bernadette and Jean-Francois Stassen. 2002. “Intergenerational Solidarity: Between the Family and the State.” Current Sociology 50(2):243-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050002620

Blau, Peter. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Briggs, Xavier deSouza. 1998. “Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Many Faces of Social Capital.” Housing Policy Debate 9(1):177-221. Retrieved August 1, 2011 http://www.knowledgeplex.org/kp/text_document_summary/scholarly_article/relfiles/hpd_0901_briggs.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1998.9521290

Coates, Dan, Caroline B. Wortman and Antonia Abbey. 1979. “Reactions to Victims.” Pp. 21-52 in New Approaches to Social Problems, edited by Irene H. Friez, Daniel Bar-Tal, John S. Carroll. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cohen, Orna and Rachel Deken. 2000. “Sense of coherence, ways of coping, and wellbeing of married and divorced mothers.” Contemporary Family Therapy 22(4):467-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007853002549

Donati, Pierpaolo. 2003. “Giving and Social Relations: The Culture of Free Giving and its Differentiation Today.” International Review of Sociology 13(2):243-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0390670032000117263

Duffy, Manja. 1993. “Social Support: The Providers‟ Perspective.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 19(1/2):57-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v19n01_04

Duran-Aydintug, Candan. 1998. “Emotional Support During Separation: Its Sources and Determinants.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 39(3/4):121-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v29n03_08

Eisenberg, Nancy. 1993. “Does true altruism exists?” Contemporary Psychology 38(4):350-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/033200

Ekeh, Peter P. 1974. Social exchange theory: The two traditions. London: Heinemann Educational.

Fischer, Claude. 1982. To Dwell Among Friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Flowers, Anita. 1996. “Social Support and Adjustment in Mothers with Young Children.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 25(3/4):69-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v25n03_05

Ganong, Lawrence and Marilyn Coleman. 2006. “Patterns of Exchange and Intergenerational Responsibilities after Divorce and Remarriage.” Journal of Aging Studies 20(3):265-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2005.09.005

Gerstel, Naomi. 1988. “Divorce, Gender and Social Integration.” Gender and Society 2(3):343-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003007

Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of the Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

Gouldner, Alvin W. 1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.” American Sociological Review 25(2):161-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623

Gouldner, Alvin W. 1973. “The importance of something for nothing.” Pp. 260-299 in For sociology. Renewal and critique in sociology today, edited by Alvin W. Gouldner. London: Allen Lane.

Gregory, Christopher A. 1982. Gifts and commodities (Vol. 2). London: Academic Press.

Hetherington, E. Mavis. 1999. Coping with divorce, single parenting and remarriage: a risk and resiliency perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Hetherington, E. Mavis and John Kelly. 2003. For better or for worse: divorce reconsidered. New York: Norton.

Hughes, Robert, Jr., Elaine Good and Kristin Candell. 1993. “A longitudinal study of the effects of social support on the psychological adjustment of divorced mothers.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 19(1):37-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v19n01_03

Hurlbert, Jeanne. 1990. “The Effects of Marital Status on the Form and Composition of Social Networks.” Social Science Quarterly 71(1):163-174.

Kalmijn, Matthijs. 2003. “Shared Friendships Networks and the Life Course: an Analysis of Survey Data on Married and Cohabiting Couples.” Social Networks 25:231-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00010-8

Kalmijn, Matthijs. 2007. “Gender differences in the effects of divorce, widowhood and remarriage on intergenerational support: does marriage protect fathers?” Social Forces 85(3):1079-1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0043

Kalmijn, Matthijs and Wim Bernansco. 2001. “Separated Lifestyles in Married and Cohabiting Relationships.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:639-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00639.x

Kalmijn, Matthijs and Marjolein Broese van Groenou. 2005. “Differential effects of divorce on social integration.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22:455-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505054516

Kaydar, Dania. 2001. “The Humanities and Social Sciences Gender and Divorce: Changes and Oscillations in the Networks of Friends of Divorced Mothers and Fathers.” Dissertation Abstracts International 61(12):4978-A.

Kessler, Ronald C. et al. 1995. “Social Psychology and Health.” Pp. 548-570 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by Karen S. Cook, Gary A. Fine, James S. House. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Komter, Aafke. 1996. “Reciprocity as a principle of exclusion: Gift giving in the Netherlands.” Sociology 30(2):299-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038596030002006

Komter, Aafke and Wilma Vollebergh. 1997. “Gift giving and the emotional significance of family and friends.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59:747-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353958

Krumrei, Elizabeth et al. 2007. “Post‒Divorce Adjustment and Social Relationships: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 46(3/4):145-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v46n03_09

Kunz, Jenifer. 1995. “Social Support during the Process of Divorce: It Does Make a Difference.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 24(3/4):111-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v24n03_07

Leigh, Leslie and Katherine Grady. 1985. “Changes in Mothers‟ Social Networks and Social Support Following Diovrce.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 47(3):663-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/352267

Lu, Luo. 1997. “Social Support, Reciprocity, and Well-Being.” The Journal of Social Psychology 137(5):618-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595483

Marks, Stephen R. and Shelley MacDermid. 1996. “Multiple Roles and the Self.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:417-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353506

Marshall, Sheila and David Lambert. 2006. “Parental mattering.” Journal of Family Issues 27(1):1516-1582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06290039

Mauss, Marcel. 1970. The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Cohen and West.

McChesney, Kay Y. and Vern Bengston. 1988. “Solidarity, Integration and Cohesion in Families: Concepts and Theories.” Pp. 15-30 in Measurement of Intergenerational Relations, edited by David Mangen, Vern Bengston, Pierre Laudry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

McLeroy, Kenneth R. et al. 1984. “Social Support and Physical Recovery in a Stroke Population.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1:396-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407584014001

Mendelson, Morton J. and Aaraon C. Kay. 2003. “Positive Feelings in Friendship. Does Imbalance in the Relationship Matter?” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 20(1):101-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407503020001190

Milardo, Robert. 1987. “Changes in social networks of men and women following divorce.” Journal of Family Issues 8(1):87-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251387008001004

Miles, Matthew B. and Micheal Huberman. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis: a Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Miller, Nancy B. et al. 1998. “Stressful Life Events, Social Support, and the Distress of Widowed and Divorced Women: A Counteractive Model.” Journal of Family Issues 19(2):181-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251398019002004

Munch, Allison, J. Miller Mc Pherson and Lynn Smith-Loving. 1997. “Gender, Children and Social Contact: The Effect of Childrearing for Men and Women.” American Sociological Review 62:509-520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657423

O'Donnell, Lydia. 1985. The Unheralded Majority. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.

Parry, Jonathan. 1986. “The gift, the Indian gift and the «Indian gift».” Man 21(3):453-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2803096

Pearlin, Leonardo I. 1989. “The Sociological Study of Stress.” Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 30(3):241-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136956

Pearlin, Leonardo I. and Carmi Schooler. 1978. “The structure of coping.” Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 19:2-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136319

Poortman, Anne-Rigt. 2000. “Sex differences in the Economic consequences of Separation: a panel study of the Netherlands.” European Sociological Review 16(4):367-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/16.4.367

Poortman, Anne-Rigt and Tineke Fokkema. 2001. “Economische gevolgen van echtscheiding voor mannen en vrouwen in Nederland, 1949-1998” [Economic consequences of divorce for men and women in the Netherlands]. Sociale Wetenschappen 44:69-92.

Rands, Marylyn. 1988. “Changes in Social Networks following Marital Separation and Divorce.” Pp. 127-146 in Families and Social Networks, edited by R. Milardo. London: Sage.

Samson, Douglas. 1997. “Stress following Marriage Breakdown: Does Social Support Play a Role?” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 26(3/4):39-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v26n03_03

Schieman, Scott and John Taylor. 2001. “Statuses, Roles, and the Sense of Mattering.” Sociological Perspectives 44(4):469-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1389654

Schwartz, Barry. 1967. “The social psychology of the gift.” The American Journal of Sociology 73(1):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/224432

Schwartz, Barry. 1993. “Why altruism is impossible...And ubiquitous.” Social service review 67(3):314-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/603993

Simmel, Georg. 1987. La Philosophie de l’Argent. Paris: Presses Universitair de France.

Smerglia, Virginia. 1999. “The Impact of Social Support on Women‟s Adjustment to Divorce: A Literature Review and Analysis.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 32(1/2):63-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v32n01_05

Sprechter, Susan et al. 2006. “No Breakup Occors on an Island: Social Networks and Relationship Dissolution.” Pp. 457-478 in Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution, edited by M. A. Fine, J. Harvey. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Strauss, Anselm L. and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.” American Sociological Review 51(2):273-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521

Terhell, Elizabeth L., Marjolein I. Broese van Groenou and Theo van Tilburg. 2004. “Network Dynamics in the Long-Term Period after Divorce.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21(6):719-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047833

Thoits, Peggy A. 1995. “Stress, Coping, and Social Support Processes: Where are We? What Next?” Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 35 (extra issue: Forty Years of Medical Sociology):53-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2626957

Vaisey, Stephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology 114(6):1675-1715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/597179

Verheyen Wendy and Dimitri Mortelmans. 2008. “Hoe gaan vrouwen om met de financiële gevolgen van een echtscheiding? Een kwalitatieve kijk op copingstrategieën” [How do women cope with the financial consequences of divorce? A qualitative perspective on coping straties]. Pp. 69-98 in Echtscheiding: werkelijk win for life? De sociologische en juridische gevolgen van het echtscheidingsrecht voor risicogroepen, edited by D. Cuypers, D. Mortelmans, N. Torfs. Brugge: Die Keure.

Williams, Karen B. and Kilping D. Williams. 1983. “Social Inhibition and Asking for Help: the Effects of Number, Strength and immediacy of Potention Help Givers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44:67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.67

Zimmerman, Marc A. 2000. “Empowerment Theory: Psychological, Organizational and Community Levels of Analysis.” Pp. 43-63 in Handbook of Community Psychology, edited by J. Rappaport, E. Seidman. New York: Kluwer Academic/Lenum Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2

Downloads

Published

2021-12-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mortelmans, Dimitri, and Wendy Verheyen. 2021. “A Dyadic View on the Post-Separation Network of Single Mothers”. Qualitative Sociology Review 7 (3): 72-96. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.04.