“The Real Deal”: Managing Intimacy Within Friendship at a Distance

Authors

  • Verónica Policarpo Catholic University of Portugal, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.02

Keywords:

Intimacy, Friendship, Transnational Friendships, Long Distance Friendships, ICT

Abstract

How is intimacy constructed between friends who live apart, at a long distance? Family studies have paid considerable attention to the (re)negotiation processes of personal and intimate bonds within transnational families. However, less attention has been paid to the ways in which these structural constraints affect intimate relationships between friends. As significant members of the personal networks of individuals, friends have a supportive role that, in the continuum of other personal relationships (family, co-workers, neighbors, acquaintances), is challenged by the increasing mobility that characterizes contemporary global post-industrial societies. While a significant amount of literature has underlined the negative impact of geographical distance in friendships, other studies have suggested otherwise, stressing the renewed importance of friendship ties between geographically long-distant young adults. This paper explores long distance friendships (LDFs) focusing mainly on two dimensions: the meanings given to intimacy and the practices of friendship at a distance. The main hypothesis is that transformations of intimacy between long-distant friends are likely to be associated with reconfiguration of the meanings given to friendship, as well as to the norms that regulate them. On the one hand, the erosion of friendship is associated with the impossibility of keeping a face-to-face, co-present, accompanying contact, which is part of the expected normative role of friendship. On the other hand, its reconfiguration is mostly associated with those routines and rituals that keep friendship alive by permanently reenacting a sense of self identity and “ontological security” through the “work of memory.” The role of information and communication technologies (ICT) in fostering intimacy within an LDF is also explored, as these have considerably changed the ways we relate to geographical distance and, therefore, the norms that shape intimate relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Verónica Policarpo, Catholic University of Portugal, Portugal

Verónica Policarpo is the Director of the Research Center of Public Opinion of the Catholic University of Portugal (CESOP), a unit specialized in applied social research; an Assistant Professor at the School of Human Sciences of the Catholic University of Portugal; and a Visiting Professor at the University of Saint Joseph (Macau, China). Currently and since 2013, she is a post-doc research fellow from the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) at the Morgan Centre of the University of Manchester, with a project called Friends Will Be Friends? Personal Communities and the Role of Friendship in Times of Uncertainty. Her research interests are currently focused on understanding the contemporary manifestations of intimacy and personal life, including gender and sexuality; life-course and well-being; migration, transnational mobility, and ethnic minorities; and advanced research methodologies in social sciences, both qualitative and quantitative.

References

Adams, Rebecca. 1998. “The Demise of Territorial Determinism: Online Friendships.” Pp. 153-182 in Placing Friendship in Context, edited by R. Adams, G Allan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520747.009

Adams, Rebecca and Allan Graham. 1998. Placing Friendship in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520747

Allan, Graham. 2003. “Friendship.” Pp 513-518 in Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, edited by K. Christensen, D. Levinson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich and Elizabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2014. Distant Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Becker, Jennifer et al. 2009. “Friendships Are Flexible, Not Fragile: Turning Points in Geographically-Close and Long-Distance Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 26(4):347-369.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509344310

Boase, Jeffrey et al. 2006. The Strength of Internet Ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Google Scholar

Bryant, Erin M. and Jennifer Marmo. 2012. “The Rules of Facebook Friendship: A Two-Stage Examination of Interaction Rules in Close, Casual, and Acquaintance Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 29:1013-1035.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512443616

Chua, Vincent, Julia Madej, and Barry Wellman. 2011. “Personal Communities—The World According to Me.” Pp. 101-115 in Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by J. Carrington, P. Scott. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294413.n8

Clark, Andrew. 2007. “Understanding Community: A Review of Networks, Ties, and Contacts.” Retrieved August 28, 2013 http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/469/1/0907_understanding_community.pdf
Google Scholar

Elliot, Anthony and John Urry. 2010. Mobile Lives. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887042

Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends’: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.” Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 12:1143-1168.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

Fehr, Beverly. 1999. “Stability and Commitment in Friendships.” Pp. 239-256 in Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability, edited by J. M. Adams, W. H. Jones. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0_15

Fiese, Barbara H. 2006. Family Routines and Rituals. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Finch, Janet. 2007. “Displaying Families.” Sociology 41(1):65-81.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284

Jamieson, Lynn. 1998. Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Jamieson, Lynn. 2011. “Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalization or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?” Sociological Research Online 16(4).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497

Johnson, Amy J. et al. 2009. “Changes in Friendship Commitment: Comparing Geographically Close and Long-Distance Young- Adult Friendships.” Communication Quarterly 57(4):395-415.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370903313430

Mason, Jennifer. 2004. “Managing Kinship Over Long Distances: The Significance of ‘The Visit.’” Social Policy and Society 3:421-429.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746404002052

Monsour, Michael. 1992. “Meanings of Intimacy in Cross- and Same-Sex Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 9:277-295.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592092007

Pahl, Ray. 2000. On Friendship. London: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Pahl, Ray. 2011. “Friendship.” Pp. 621-623 in Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, edited by D. Southerton. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Pahl, Ray and Liz Spencer. 2004. “Personal Communities: Not Simply Families of ‘Fate’ or ‘Choice.’” Current Sociology 52(2):199-221.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104041808

Pahl, Ray and Liz Spencer. 2010. “Family, Friends, and Personal Communities: Changing Models-in-the-Mind.” Journal of Family Theory & Review 2(3):197-210.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00053.x

Parks, Malcolm R. and Kory Floyd. 1996. “Meanings for Closeness and Intimacy in Friendship.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13:85-107.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596131005

Pires, Álvaro. 1997. “Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative. Essai théorique et méthodologique.” Pp. 113-169 in La Recherche Qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques, edited by J. Poupart et al. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur.
Google Scholar

Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5(2):243-263.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432

Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996. Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470

Spencer, Liz and Ray Pahl. 2006. Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. London: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188201

Urry, John. 2002. “Mobility and Proximity.” Sociology 36:255-274.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036002002

Utz, Sonja. 2007. “Media Use in Long-Distance Friendships.” Information, Communication & Society 10(5):694-713.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658046

Wang, Hua and Barry Wellman. 2010. “Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007.” American Behavioral Scientist 53:1148-1169.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209356247

Weber, Max. 1949. On the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Weiner, Aaron S. B. and James W. Hannum. 2013. “Differences in the Quantity of Social Support Between Geographically Close and Long-Distance Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30:662-672.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512465997

Wellman, Barry. 1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84:1201-1231.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226906

Wilding, Raelene. 2006. “Virtual Intimacies? Families Communicating Across Transnational Contexts.” Global Networks 6(2):125-142.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x

Downloads

Published

2016-04-30

How to Cite

Policarpo, V. (2016). “The Real Deal”: Managing Intimacy Within Friendship at a Distance. Qualitative Sociology Review, 12(2), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.02

Issue

Section

Articles