“The Real Deal”: Managing Intimacy Within Friendship at a Distance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.02Keywords:
Intimacy, Friendship, Transnational Friendships, Long Distance Friendships, ICTAbstract
How is intimacy constructed between friends who live apart, at a long distance? Family studies have paid considerable attention to the (re)negotiation processes of personal and intimate bonds within transnational families. However, less attention has been paid to the ways in which these structural constraints affect intimate relationships between friends. As significant members of the personal networks of individuals, friends have a supportive role that, in the continuum of other personal relationships (family, co-workers, neighbors, acquaintances), is challenged by the increasing mobility that characterizes contemporary global post-industrial societies. While a significant amount of literature has underlined the negative impact of geographical distance in friendships, other studies have suggested otherwise, stressing the renewed importance of friendship ties between geographically long-distant young adults. This paper explores long distance friendships (LDFs) focusing mainly on two dimensions: the meanings given to intimacy and the practices of friendship at a distance. The main hypothesis is that transformations of intimacy between long-distant friends are likely to be associated with reconfiguration of the meanings given to friendship, as well as to the norms that regulate them. On the one hand, the erosion of friendship is associated with the impossibility of keeping a face-to-face, co-present, accompanying contact, which is part of the expected normative role of friendship. On the other hand, its reconfiguration is mostly associated with those routines and rituals that keep friendship alive by permanently reenacting a sense of self identity and “ontological security” through the “work of memory.” The role of information and communication technologies (ICT) in fostering intimacy within an LDF is also explored, as these have considerably changed the ways we relate to geographical distance and, therefore, the norms that shape intimate relationships.
Downloads
References
Adams, Rebecca. 1998. “The Demise of Territorial Determinism: Online Friendships.” Pp. 153-182 in Placing Friendship in Context, edited by R. Adams, G Allan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520747.009
Adams, Rebecca and Allan Graham. 1998. Placing Friendship in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520747
Allan, Graham. 2003. “Friendship.” Pp 513-518 in Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, edited by K. Christensen, D. Levinson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Elizabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2014. Distant Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Becker, Jennifer et al. 2009. “Friendships Are Flexible, Not Fragile: Turning Points in Geographically-Close and Long-Distance Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 26(4):347-369.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509344310
Boase, Jeffrey et al. 2006. The Strength of Internet Ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Google Scholar
Bryant, Erin M. and Jennifer Marmo. 2012. “The Rules of Facebook Friendship: A Two-Stage Examination of Interaction Rules in Close, Casual, and Acquaintance Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 29:1013-1035.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512443616
Chua, Vincent, Julia Madej, and Barry Wellman. 2011. “Personal Communities—The World According to Me.” Pp. 101-115 in Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by J. Carrington, P. Scott. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294413.n8
Clark, Andrew. 2007. “Understanding Community: A Review of Networks, Ties, and Contacts.” Retrieved August 28, 2013 http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/469/1/0907_understanding_community.pdf
Google Scholar
Elliot, Anthony and John Urry. 2010. Mobile Lives. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887042
Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends’: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.” Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 12:1143-1168.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Fehr, Beverly. 1999. “Stability and Commitment in Friendships.” Pp. 239-256 in Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability, edited by J. M. Adams, W. H. Jones. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0_15
Fiese, Barbara H. 2006. Family Routines and Rituals. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Finch, Janet. 2007. “Displaying Families.” Sociology 41(1):65-81.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
Jamieson, Lynn. 1998. Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Jamieson, Lynn. 2011. “Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalization or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?” Sociological Research Online 16(4).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497
Johnson, Amy J. et al. 2009. “Changes in Friendship Commitment: Comparing Geographically Close and Long-Distance Young- Adult Friendships.” Communication Quarterly 57(4):395-415.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370903313430
Mason, Jennifer. 2004. “Managing Kinship Over Long Distances: The Significance of ‘The Visit.’” Social Policy and Society 3:421-429.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746404002052
Monsour, Michael. 1992. “Meanings of Intimacy in Cross- and Same-Sex Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 9:277-295.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592092007
Pahl, Ray. 2000. On Friendship. London: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Pahl, Ray. 2011. “Friendship.” Pp. 621-623 in Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, edited by D. Southerton. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Pahl, Ray and Liz Spencer. 2004. “Personal Communities: Not Simply Families of ‘Fate’ or ‘Choice.’” Current Sociology 52(2):199-221.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104041808
Pahl, Ray and Liz Spencer. 2010. “Family, Friends, and Personal Communities: Changing Models-in-the-Mind.” Journal of Family Theory & Review 2(3):197-210.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00053.x
Parks, Malcolm R. and Kory Floyd. 1996. “Meanings for Closeness and Intimacy in Friendship.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13:85-107.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596131005
Pires, Álvaro. 1997. “Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative. Essai théorique et méthodologique.” Pp. 113-169 in La Recherche Qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques, edited by J. Poupart et al. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur.
Google Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5(2):243-263.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996. Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470
Spencer, Liz and Ray Pahl. 2006. Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. London: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188201
Urry, John. 2002. “Mobility and Proximity.” Sociology 36:255-274.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036002002
Utz, Sonja. 2007. “Media Use in Long-Distance Friendships.” Information, Communication & Society 10(5):694-713.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658046
Wang, Hua and Barry Wellman. 2010. “Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007.” American Behavioral Scientist 53:1148-1169.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209356247
Weber, Max. 1949. On the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Weiner, Aaron S. B. and James W. Hannum. 2013. “Differences in the Quantity of Social Support Between Geographically Close and Long-Distance Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30:662-672.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512465997
Wellman, Barry. 1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84:1201-1231.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226906
Wilding, Raelene. 2006. “Virtual Intimacies? Families Communicating Across Transnational Contexts.” Global Networks 6(2):125-142.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.