Reading in Public Libraries: Space, Reading Activities, and User Profiles

Authors

  • Paula Sequeiros University of Coimbra, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.9.3.12

Keywords:

User Profiles, Single Case Studies, Space Relations, Qualitative Methodology, Public Libraries, Library Buildings, Portugal

Abstract

This single case research was developed within a public library in Porto, Portugal, Biblioteca Municipal Almeida Garrett. Its main objective was to understand how public library readers interact with space, the Internet technology, and reading resources, and how these interactions shape the representations of what a public library is. This case was chosen because the library has a recent and renowned building, high reader use levels, and Internet access. The design of user profiles was an intermediate step, and then a partial result in the process of understanding provision and appropriation of technology, space, and reading resources (all media and supports) in a specific context. The construction of these profiles is presented and  discussed in this paper. A qualitative, single case study was designed according to Burawoy’s Extended Case Method, departing from the framework of several theories – Feenberg and Bakardjieva’s approach to  Internet uses, Lefèbvre and Certeau’s approach on space – and some library users and studies of  Internet user profiles – by Rodrigues, Bakardjieva, and by other authors. A theoretical, diversified sample was constructed. User profiles were designed as a way of depicting common reading practices by grouping readers’ characteristics according to Internet, space, and bibliographical resource usage. Along with this usage, social demographics, motivations, meanings, and feelings were enquired about to construct a thick narrative. Observation of all forms of reading practices, in-depth interviews, informal conversations, children’s drawings, photography, and an architectural and social analysis of the building were used. The library has diversified uses, tied to present-day everyday life conditions, and its space and management style are flexible enough to allow for different user appropriations. As to the general reading atmosphere, high satisfaction was reported, and the most appreciated features of social and architectural space were signaled by readers. User profiles reflect diversified usage modes, diverse relations to space, to Internet and bibliographic resources, and to other users. Both the theoretical framework and the selected methodology proved fruitful for the intended purpose. These readers’ profiles may provide a tool to understand and manage public library services, given the adequate fittingness. The same may be said about readers’ evaluation of space, in general, or, specifically, about space appropriations, and, above all, about the production of stimulating reading atmospheres

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aabø, Svanhild, Ragnar Audunson, and Andreas Vårheim. 2010. “How do public libraries function as meeting places?” Library & Information Science Research 32(1):16-26.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.008

Audunson, Ragnar. 2005. “The public library as a meeting-place in a multicultural and digital context: The necessity of low-intensive meeting-places.” Journal of Documentation 61(3):429-441.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510598562

Audunson, Ragnar et al. 2007. “Public libraries, social capital, and low intensive meeting places.” Information Research 12(4). Retrieved October 17, 2011 http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis20.html
Google Scholar

Bakardjieva, Maria. 2004. “Virtual Togetherness An Everyday Life Perspective.” Pp. 121-142 in Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice, edited by Darin David Barney and Andrew Feenberg. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Google Scholar

Bakardjieva, Maria. 2005. “Becoming an Internet User in Bulgaria: Notes on a Tangled Journey.” Media Studies/Studia Medioznawcze 3(22):103-117.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La distinction: critique sociale du jugement de goût. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre and Alain Darbel. 1966. L’amour de l’art: les musées et leur public. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Google Scholar

Bull, Michael. 2006. “Investigating the culture of mobile listening: from Walkman to iPod.” Pp. 131-149 in Consuming music together: Social and collaborative aspects of music consumption technologies, edited by Michael Bull, Kenton O’Hara, and Barry Brown. Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4097-0_7

Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The extended case method.” Sociological Theory 16(1):4-33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040

Buschman, John and Gloria J. Leckie, (eds.). 2007. The library as place: History, community, and culture. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.04.007

Certeau, Michel, de. 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Donmoyer, Robert. 2000. “Generalizability and the single case study.” Pp. 45-68 in Case study method: Key issues, key texts, edited by Roger Gomm, Martyn Hammersley, and Peter Foster. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024367.d7

Eder, Donna and Laura Fingerson. 2002. “Interviewing children and adolescents.” Pp. 181-201 in Handbook of interview research: Context and method, edited by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n13

Eigenbrodt, Olaf. 2008. “Designing Library Facilities for Everyone? Providing Space for Informational Participation.” Retrieved July 1, 2010 http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/conferences/bobcatsss2008/eigenbrodt-olaf-89/PDF/eigenbrodt.pdf
Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew. 2002. Transforming Technology : A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Fernandes, Luís. 2003. “A imagem predatória da cidade.” Pp. 53-62 in Etnografias urbanas, edited by Graça Índias Cordeiro, Luís Vicente Baptista, and António Firmino Da Costa. Oeiras: Celta.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.etnograficapress.367

Fisher, Karen E. et al. 2007. “Seattle Public Library as place: reconceptualizing space, community, and information at the Central Library.” Pp. 135-160 in The library as place, edited by John E. Buschman and Gloria J. Leckie. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Google Scholar

Fortuna, Carlos and Fernando Fontes. 2000. Bibliotecas públicas, utilizadores e comunidades: o caso da Biblioteca Municipal António Botto. Lisbona: Observatório Das Actividades Culturais.
Google Scholar

Freitas, Eduardo de, José Luís Casanova, and Nuno de Almeida Alves. 1997. Hábitos de leitura: um inquérito à população portuguesa. Lisbona: Dom Quixote.
Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. A interpretação das culturas. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Google Scholar

Given, Lisa M. and Gloria J. Leckie. 2003. “‘Sweeping’ the library: Mapping the social activity space of the public library.” Library & Information Science Research 25:365-385.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00049-5

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3):575-599.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Hart, Chris, Manmohan Bains, and Kathryn Jones. 1996. “The myth of material knowledge: Reading the image of library buildings.” New Library World 97(1127):23-31.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074809610115681

Hohmann, Tina. 2006. “New aspects of library design.” Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries 16(2). Retrieved January 07, 2010 http://webdoc.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/liber/lq-2-06/hohmann.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.7841

Kvale, Steinar. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Lefèbvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Nagata, Haruki, Kanako Sakai, and Tetsuya Kawai. 2007. “Public library and users’ lifestyle in a changing context.” Performance Measurement and Metrics 8(3): 197-210.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040710841072

Nunes, João Arriscado. 2001. “Teoria crítica, cultura e ciência: O(s) espaço(s) e o(s) conhecimento(s) da globalização.” Pp. 297-228 in Globalização: fatalidade ou utopia?, edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos. Porto: Afrontamento.
Google Scholar

Peterson, Christina A. 2005. “Space designed for lifelong learning: The Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. joint-use library.” Pp. 56-65 in Library as place: Rethinking roles, rethinking space. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
Google Scholar

Petit, Michèle. 2001. Lecturas : del espacio íntimo al espacio público. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Eduardo Alexandre. 2007. “A biblioteca e os seus públicos: uma proposta interpretativa.” Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas (53):135-157.
Google Scholar

Seale, Clive. 2004. Researching Society and Culture. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Sequeiros, Paula. 2010. “Ler uma biblioteca nas inscrições de leitores, espaço e Internet: usos e representações de biblioteca pública.” PhD dissertation, University of Porto, Portugal. Retrieved October 10, 2010 http://eprints.rclis.org/15815/
Google Scholar

Sequeiros, Paula. 2011. “The social weaving of a reading atmosphere.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 43(4):261-270.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611425823

Silva, Terezinha Elisabeth, da. 2006. “Bibliotecas: metáforas da memória.” Encontros Bibli 21(28):85-94.
Google Scholar

Tonkiss, Fran. 2005. Space, the City and Social Theory: Social Relations and Urban Forms. Oxford: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Wirth, Louis. 1964 [1938]. “Urbanism as a way of life.” Pp. 60-83 in On cities and social life, edited by Albert J. Reiss Jr.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2013-07-31

How to Cite

Sequeiros, P. (2013). Reading in Public Libraries: Space, Reading Activities, and User Profiles. Qualitative Sociology Review, 9(3), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.9.3.12